ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Gunther planning to use 3-4 defense in likely passing downs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=118384)

Radar Chief 06-23-2005 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium
We also don't have the DE's to pull it off.

Browning can play DE and would probably fit this scheme, the ? would be at the other end position I’d think.

JimNasium 06-23-2005 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
I like this idea; if we have the personnel....I love the 3-4....this would be.....

Greatest HIts? WTF is The Sweet?

Radar Chief 06-23-2005 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
I think we might be able to put Bell in at a DE to do a DT immitation on 3rd down passing situations--with Savii at DT? .... :hmmm:

In a 3-4? Bad idea.
I like the idea of him play’n “Falcon” but he’s way to light for DE in that formation.

Mr. Kotter 06-23-2005 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium
Greatest HIts? WTF is The Sweet?

Sweet, dude....just "SWEET!" :p

Mr. Kotter 06-23-2005 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief
In a 3-4? Bad idea.
I like the idea of him play’n “Falcon” but he’s way to light for DE in that formation.

"Falcon" is just a bastardized 3-4. :shrug:

PastorMikH 06-23-2005 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium
We also don't have the DE's to pull it off.

That's crazy man. We have Hicks! Hicks I tell you. He could play both positions at the same time! Why, he's so good that he ought to be considered for the Hall of Fame as a player - it's a tragedy to wait until he's retired for 5 years. If you don't believe me about Hicks, just ask DV!



:)

htismaqe 06-23-2005 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimNasium
We also don't have the DE's to pull it off.

I've often thought that Hicks was better suited for a 3-4.

htismaqe 06-23-2005 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
I think we might be able to put Bell in at a DE to do a DT immitation on 3rd down passing situations--with Savii at DT? .... :hmmm:

The Front Seven would be:

Johnson - Mitchell -Fox/Fujita - Bell (in a three pt on the DL)

Browning/Hicks - Siavii - Allen


:)

Siavii is a 1-gap player. He's really not strong enough to play NT in a 3-4.

htismaqe 06-23-2005 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter
"Falcon" is just a bastardized 3-4. :shrug:

IIRC, the Falcon had 4 down linemen AND DT.

Mr. Kotter 06-23-2005 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Siavii is a 1-gap player. He's really not strong enough to play NT in a 3-4.

I know, but I'd give it a look....maybe Hicks at DE, with Browning in the middle would work better... :hmmm:

Mr. Kotter 06-23-2005 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
IIRC, the Falcon had 4 down linemen AND DT.

I don't recall, now that you say that.... :hmmm:

Radar Chief 06-23-2005 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
IIRC, the Falcon had 4 down linemen AND DT.

I thought it was from the 3-4 and DT roamed the line and rushed the QB from whereever he could get the best rush from.

Mr. Kotter,
As a full time DE, with his hand on the ground, I’d think that’d get Bell hurt in the 3-4 formation.

whoman69 06-23-2005 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swanman
I've got an idea that's a million times better than running the 3-4. When the opposing team has a 3rd and 5 or more, we'll line up in a 4-3 and at the snap both of our defensive ends will drop 30 yards back into pass coverage. That's gotta work, right?

Word is that Syracuse is going to use something like that.

I always thought a 4-2-5 would be the best scheme against the pass.

Radar Chief 06-23-2005 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69
Word is that Syracuse is going to use something like that.

I always thought a 4-2-5 would be the best scheme against the pass.

Considering that pretty much describes the Nickel, you’d be 'bout
right. ;)

TRing 06-23-2005 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69
I always thought a 4-2-5 would be the best scheme against the pass.

Wouldn't that be the Nickel??


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.