ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs *****The Bryan Cook Thread*****

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

*****The Bryan Cook Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343628)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 17213700)

Dats what speed do.

https://i.redd.it/3dd7gdhljsyb1.jpg

That is awesome. I was wondering if Next Gen Stats would report on that.

Cook opened up with full speed sprint.

The more you see Cook the more you can see why Juan Thornhill said that he knew he would get best offer from another team because he knew how good and ready Bryan Cook was.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16275015)

And if I felt this guy was a pure BPA pick I’d be fine with that. I don’t think that’s the case.

They DID pick based on need and, IMO, prioritized a position of marginal importance.

Moreover, nobody says you don’t consider need, they say don’t REACH based on need and that’s exactly what the Chiefs did here.

But enjoy your straw man.

Why would Cook be considered a "reach"?

He was rolling. Looked like Roger Craig running!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 17213819)

Why would Cook be considered a "reach"?

Do you even Chiefs Planet, brah? All of the draftabaters are geniouses. [CPS]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 17213819)

Why would Cook be considered a "reach"?

Impossible to know how teams saw it, but a lot of people had him below other safeties picked after him and a lot of other guys in other positions.

I was like DJ, I didn't think he was BPA or a huge positional need. I think he's been OK, definitely flashed a bit, but I still think we've a ways to go to start crowning him a major success.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 17214365)

I mean, I gave my EXACT rationale in this thread. Compared him to Taylor Rapp (who's had a really nice career) and even noted that I could be wrong.

And as the season progressed I posted that I saw areas of improvement that suggested what I saw as poor ball-tracking skills (that I never think improve much at the next level) were probably just inexperience.

I also said that I found it odd that he was our Thornhill replacement unless we were going to get away from some of our single-high looks. And by and large we have done so. But he and Reid as fairly similar players have been able to do some really interesting disguises and matchup flips. Put simply, Spags adjusted his coverage schemes to fit his personnel and its worked out nicely. Also, Edwards being a ball-hawk has allowed us to maintain some of those looks that will put more pressure on a coverage safety even with Cook being a bit more downhill in his approach.

But Pitt's gonna troll because that's all he really has to offer. He damn sure wasn't in here having any conversations in real time. Or, y'know, at any point PRIOR to Cook having the biggest play of his career.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17214674)

But he and Reid as fairly similar players have been able to do some really interesting disguises and matchup flips. Put simply, Spags adjusted his coverage schemes to fit his personnel and its worked out nicely.

Imagine that! It pisses me off when coaches are so stuck to a scheme that they try to offload/find new players and/or force players into roles that don't fit.

Looked left ankle. Hope he recovers

Just trying to put the pieces together, and it seems like we might have dodged a bullet. Sure sounds like a high ankle sprain

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 17258039)

Just trying to put the pieces together, and it seems like we might have dodged a bullet. Sure sounds like a high ankle sprain

Um... No.

There's a picture going around I'm not going to post.

It ain't a sprain...

Yep, they did xrays and he's on the sideline... That's at least good news. Maybe get him back for the playoffs.