mnchiefsguy |
10-11-2011 12:52 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson
(Post 7985525)
I agree.
The conference is getting stronger with the addition of a BCS winner in TCU.
Tough to really worry about a program that doesn't bring much as far as athletic accomplishment goes.
All the schools moving (Nebraska, Syracuse, Pitt, TCU).... less to do with tv sets than everyone originally thought. Which is MU's only strong point.
It's about strong programs and MU simply doesn't have much as far as that goes.
|
This is wrong on so many levels. Time and time again it has been proven to mainly be about TV sets. Syracuse and Pittsburgh give the ACC the entire East Coast from Miami clear up to New York City.
Even TCU's move is about TV sets..as in Texas was willing to let them in because having TCU in the Big XII with the LHN is better than having to go to the Pac12 with no LHN.
Nebraska's move was about their brand....a NATIONAL brand that brings TV sets to the Big 10 network across the country.
Saying MU is not a strong program is just stupid. 40 wins in 4 years in football, 2 elite eights since 2000, and success in the lesser non-revenue sports as well.
Of course, one would not expect you to see any of that, with your face firmly planted in Texas' crotch.
|