ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs BURROWHEAD: Bengals talking a lot of sh1ttttt (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=347151)

rfaulk34 07-13-2024 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17582490)
....and there's no ****ing way "jump ball Joe" is the most accurate by ANY measure. The bullshit completions his cyborg WRs came down with against us alone should dock him 50 points

You should learn to football...

before talking about football.

wazu 07-13-2024 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chargem (Post 17582440)
Per PFR, 192 of those 360 yards were after the catch, the average air yards per completion was only 4.3, and he had a fumble.

Why would this matter at all? Is it better to try and throw hero balls into coverage, or spot receivers who will have room to run after the catch and hit them in stride?

At some point the raw offensive numbers just are what they are, and you don't need a lot of nuance and play-by-play breakdowns to acknowledge it was an outstanding day for Mahomes. Especially when you consider that there is a ton of guesswork for PFF as to what players are supposed to be doing each play.

I'm not a PFF hater. I do place some value in their metrics, particularly around o-linemen and defensive players. Their metrics can be good for trying to provide some objective measurement for areas that otherwise can't be measured. Don't need to do that as much with the QB position.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-13-2024 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17582607)
You should learn to football...

before talking about football.

50 50 junk Hero balls don't ****ing count in my book

rfaulk34 07-13-2024 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17582888)
50 50 junk Hero balls don't ****ing count in my book

Is your book titled 'I'm a big fat dummy' ?

Chargem 07-14-2024 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 17582625)
Why would this matter at all? Is it better to try and throw hero balls into coverage, or spot receivers who will have room to run after the catch and hit them in stride?

At some point the raw offensive numbers just are what they are, and you don't need a lot of nuance and play-by-play breakdowns to acknowledge it was an outstanding day for Mahomes. Especially when you consider that there is a ton of guesswork for PFF as to what players are supposed to be doing each play.

I'm not a PFF hater. I do place some value in their metrics, particularly around o-linemen and defensive players. Their metrics can be good for trying to provide some objective measurement for areas that otherwise can't be measured. Don't need to do that as much with the QB position.

I can't believe you don't get this. PFF is just trying to separate out Mahomes impact on a play vs the Olines impact, the receivers impact, the coaches impact.

If Mahomes throws a screen pass to a running back, and then that running back takes the ball 50 yards down the field because of excellent blocking and the RB breaking tackles, was this a good play by Mahomes? Is it a play that any other of 50 QBs in the league could not make? Would it have been a worse play by Mahomes if the OL missed a block after 10 yards and it was only a 10 yard gain?

When Andy draws up a great pop pass play design, Mahomes pitches a ball 1 yard forward and Tyreek takes the ball 74 more yards for a touchdown, would you grade Mahomes the same for that as if he threw the ball 50 yards in the air, hitting Tyreek perfectly in stride for a 75 yard touchdown? The box score says these are the same.

I am sure PFF will try to give credit for a throw being placed in the right position for a receiver to get YAC, rather than a throw which is not placed accurately enough for the receiver to get YAC, but the majority of YAC will be down to the receiver who has the ball in their hands. It's almost like you have to watch the plays to decide if Mahomes played well, rather than just look at the end stats.

We both agree there is a ton guesswork by PFF, that is why I don't think its particularly good.

The idea that PFF should agree with the box score is inherently bizarre.. why would they exist as a business if you could tell all you need to by looking at a stat line? Why would any team bother with any analytics or grading, if the box score is so great?

Pasta Little Brioni 07-14-2024 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17582902)
Is your book titled 'I'm a big fat dummy' ?

No..."Ringless Brothers and Burrow and Zachey Circus"

RealSNR 07-14-2024 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chargem (Post 17583777)
why would they exist as a business

An excellent question

BlackOp 07-14-2024 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfaulk34 (Post 17582607)
You should learn to football...

before talking about football.

I do respect the Bengals strategy...have a season-ending injury to Burrow every other year...then restock the roster with cheap talent.

The Bills could learn a thing or two from them...

dirk digler 07-23-2024 10:20 AM

Cody Burrow Rhodes

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Guess who’s back �� <a href="https://t.co/dwHy2zymH2">pic.twitter.com/dwHy2zymH2</a></p>&mdash; Cincinnati Bengals (@Bengals) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bengals/status/1815775822784946661?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 23, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

KCUnited 07-23-2024 10:25 AM

https://i.imgur.com/1JDkWCc.jpg

raybec 4 07-23-2024 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 17597455)
Cody Burrow Rhodes

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Guess who’s back �� <a href="https://t.co/dwHy2zymH2">pic.twitter.com/dwHy2zymH2</a></p>&mdash; Cincinnati Bengals (@Bengals) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bengals/status/1815775822784946661?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 23, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I feel bad for rfaulk in a way. He's in here advocating for his guy and then he has to defend against this type of shit.

RealSNR 07-23-2024 10:36 AM

Looks like Burrow is copying a page from the Mahomes playbook and adopting the Coors Light diet

Hammock Parties 07-23-2024 10:40 AM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTL6IR4X...pg&name=medium

KC_Connection 07-23-2024 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 17597455)
Cody Burrow Rhodes

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Guess who’s back �� <a href="https://t.co/dwHy2zymH2">pic.twitter.com/dwHy2zymH2</a></p>&mdash; Cincinnati Bengals (@Bengals) <a href="https://twitter.com/Bengals/status/1815775822784946661?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 23, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

LMAO

Sassy Squatch 07-23-2024 11:27 AM

Supposed to be some weird homage to Eminem or something?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.