![]() |
Quote:
Moore's out there running pro-forma routes. Pat doesn't even look his way. He'll hit his 2nd read then scramble before he gets to Moore. He just has zero interest in using the guy. No, this is not the time to be messing with the receiver rotations. He should be a gameday inactive and I suspect he probably will be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://i.postimg.cc/L88nkfvY/Screen...208-215020.png bUt We PlAy SkYy MoOrE aS a BlOcKeR aNd He IsNt SuPpOsEd To CaTcH tHe BaLl BeCaUsE hEs BaD aT iT. |
I like how some people on CP have invented a position for a shit player to justify his snaps. A blocking WR who is instructed not to ever get in positions to catch the ball is ****ing hilarious. All the while he's taking snaps off players from a position who's primary role is to do exactly that if they're not the TE #1.
But I guess you know your football LMAO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
I'll say it again. Why would they bother to take Moore off IR just to have him inactive on game day? He might not see the field and be a backup PR if there's an injury but he'll be active.
|
Quote:
You have 8 gameday inactives. Whoever he's replaced on the roster with his activation was GOING to be one of those gameday inactives. So to this point nothing has changed on the 45. Heck, did they just IR Omenihu to make the room for Moore? Seems like the most likely scenario in which case the 53 hasn't even changed in a meaningful way by activating Moore. You activate him because there's no reason NOT to. Now - why should we put him on the 45 and who are you going to bump to do so? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.