ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2018 Free Agents (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=313128)

Simply Red 03-11-2018 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 13460670)

What I'm getting at is I'm not sure KC really needs another bluechip WR...Wilson had 150 yards in Mahomes first start. Kelce, Conley, Hunt and Hill weren't even playing.

I agree

Pasta Little Brioni 03-11-2018 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460625)
They can draft their asses off and improve the defense.

The 2nd they got from the rams for peters would get Odell and you pay him a bit more than the dude from Tampa just got. That deal would essentially be paid up in 3 or 4 years when Mahomes is coming due.

They need to try and put as much around Mahomes as they can

Not happening lulz

-King- 03-11-2018 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13460249)
Reek hit 1100 plus in his first year as the 1, you dont think he can hit 15 with Mahomes?

Blowing daddies money like Paris Hilton is no way to get ahead in the NFL

I think he can, that doesn't mean adding another great WR will hurt. How can you stop an offense of Hill, OBJ, Kelce and Hunt? I don't think we can afford OBJ but if we could, we would have the potential to have the best offense ever.
Posted via Mobile Device

mcaj22 03-11-2018 05:58 AM

did the Chiefs get Suh, Odell, Allen Robinson and Sammy Watkins yet?????????????

Come on KC you're doing a terrible job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rausch 03-11-2018 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13460641)
Wonder who Veach could trade this upcoming week?

I wouldn’t be surprised if Tanoh, Nelson, Conley, Robinson or Bailey were traded.

We (were rumored) already tried to trade Nelson and there were no takers.

I don't know why Conley would be worth anything...

Couch-Potato 03-11-2018 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 13460630)
You pretty much don’t care who we get since this is basically the entire free agency list, you just want somebody at this point.

I jut want to see some action, would be great if we were able to make 1 or 2 splashy signings.

Couch-Potato 03-11-2018 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 13460647)
You think a second in 2019 gets him?

Better yet, he doesn't think someone would out bid that offer.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 07:43 AM

I don't understand the fascination with Paul Richardson. Last year was his first with any meaningful playing time, and even then only put up 700 yards. (which is about half his career total)

If we're going after a WR, I'd rather spend the money on a proven playmaker like Robinson or Watkins.

On another note - people want Suh here after we just traded Peters for being an asshole?

LMAO

O.city 03-11-2018 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 13460647)
You think a second in 2019 gets him?

Probably

It would be better than the conditional they could get especially if they sign any other free agents.

He’s in the last year of his rookie deal and is gonna set the market at wr.

O.city 03-11-2018 07:56 AM

You’d essentially have to make Odell the highest paid wr and give up a pick

Hell it may not even take a 2nd

mcaj22 03-11-2018 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460721)
I don't understand the fascination with Paul Richardson. Last year was his first with any meaningful playing time, and even then only put up 700 yards. (which is about half his career total)

If we're going after a WR, I'd rather spend the money on a proven playmaker like Robinson or Watkins.

On another note - people want Suh here after we just traded Peters for being an asshole?

LMAO

Someone in here wants Odell, an even bigger distraction and on top of that you'd have to pay him as the highest paid WR.

Entirely unrealistic pipe dream (as are most players people want the Chiefs to sign in this thread) as Clark would never sign off on that.

In58men 03-11-2018 08:30 AM

Much rather have Robinson than OBJ.

Too much bullshit comes with him. Give me Robinson all day.

Titty Meat 03-11-2018 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460721)
I don't understand the fascination with Paul Richardson. Last year was his first with any meaningful playing time, and even then only put up 700 yards. (which is about half his career total)

If we're going after a WR, I'd rather spend the money on a proven playmaker like Robinson or Watkins.

On another note - people want Suh here after we just traded Peters for being an asshole?

LMAO

Suh was never dismissed from his team in college or quit during a game then fought with a coach on the team bus.

O.city 03-11-2018 08:49 AM

When they sign obj, I’m owning everyone’s sig

TambaBerry 03-11-2018 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460773)
When they sign obj, I’m owning everyone’s sig

I'm down dude, our offense would be unstoppable

Mother****erJones 03-11-2018 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460773)
When they sign obj, I’m owning everyone’s sig

You’ll be like the dude wetbutt23 that broke the Jose Quintana Cubs trade :)

bricks 03-11-2018 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 13460753)
Much rather have Robinson than OBJ.

Too much bullshit comes with him. Give me Robinson all day.

No way. How could you say that dude? c’mon

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2018 09:10 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Giants informed CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie that he is being released, per <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanRaanan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JordanRaanan</a> and me. Giants will save $6.5 million by releasing him.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/972851799005847552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In58men 03-11-2018 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bricks (Post 13460781)
No way. How could you say that dude? c’mon

Robinson was a beast with Bortles and he’s going to cost us a lot less as well. Beckham, to me, is a drama queen. We don’t need that on our team.

RealSNR 03-11-2018 09:10 AM

God, you people are reeruned.

Stop dreaming about FA WRs. We don't ****ing need anybody.

"Our offense would be so much better!"

Fine. **** it. Go ahead and do it. Go back to the ****ing Vermeil years. See if I ****ing care.

Buckweath 03-11-2018 09:14 AM

I guess people like to dream but there is absolutely no chance that either Beckham or Robinson comes here.

O.city 03-11-2018 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 13460793)
God, you people are reeruned.

Stop dreaming about FA WRs. We don't ****ing need anybody.

"Our offense would be so much better!"

Fine. **** it. Go ahead and do it. Go back to the ****ing Vermeil years. See if I ****ing care.

The gm has basically said they’re gonna add an outside wr. Better get on board.

Plus with the salary cap and cheap qb, they can add to the defense at their own discretion.

mcaj22 03-11-2018 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460773)
When they sign obj, I’m owning everyone’s sig

I do think you are probably half right. OBJ may well get traded/cut cause Gettleman has a history of pulling random moves like that.

But there is no way the Chiefs are going to be the leading trade partner. Too many things working against you with the Chiefs pipe dream. Other teams have more cap space and more assets to give up. And also, the Hunts. That's your biggest roadblock to your Madden fantasy dream list.

O.city 03-11-2018 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 13460798)
I do think you are probably half right. OBJ may well get traded/cut cause Gettleman has a history of pulling random moves like that.

But there is no way the Chiefs are going to be the leading trade partner. Too many things working against you with the Chiefs pipe dream. Other teams have more cap space and more assets to give up. And also, the Hunts. That's your biggest roadblock to your Madden fantasy dream list.

The chiefs have the cap space and paired with him needing a new deal, a 2nd rounder would do it.

Dunno about the Hunts but we’ll see

The Franchise 03-11-2018 09:26 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">An example of how simple decisions this week affect players, teams and futures.<br><br>Aqib Talib rejected a trade that was agreed to between Denver and SF; wouldn’t report. He later is traded to LA.<br><br>So SF doesn’t get its CB, Richard Sherman is released and he winds up in SF.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/972832685038108672?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2018 09:27 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Interesting to see if Trumaine Johnson also joins Sherman in SF. Was a lot of talk about him to the 49ers last week. <a href="https://t.co/Fv6V4CDHDB">https://t.co/Fv6V4CDHDB</a></p>&mdash; Jordan Raanan (@JordanRaanan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanRaanan/status/972826835384983558?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Rausch 03-11-2018 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 13460796)
I guess people like to dream but there is absolutely no chance that either Beckham or Robinson comes here.

I'm ok with a "soft rebuild" this year.

And by that I mean perhaps a high round T/G and the rest spent on defense...

RealSNR 03-11-2018 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460797)
The gm has basically said they’re gonna add an outside wr. Better get on board.

Plus with the salary cap and cheap qb, they can add to the defense at their own discretion.

Sure, but it's not going to be any of this ridiculous lavish shit people are talking about.

Sure as **** won't be OBJ

O.city 03-11-2018 09:37 AM

It’s not time for a rebuild

Don’t waste the Mahomes cheap years rebuilding

O.city 03-11-2018 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 13460826)
Sure, but it's not going to be any of this ridiculous lavish shit people are talking about.

Sure as **** won't be OBJ

It’ll be Watkins

Or Odell

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 09:39 AM

Was tooling around with Spotrac this morning...

According to their metrics, Allen Robinson's market value AAV is $13M a season, Watkins is listed at $5.9M and Richardson at $6.3M.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13460836)
I don’t know if it’s been posted here or not, but some guy who lives near Allen Bailey said on Twitter that there are moving trucks at his house

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For those wondering about Allen Bailey’s future in KC, I live one street over. There is a moving pod and large trailer in his driveway. I’m assuming that means he will be a cap casualty in the coming days. <a href="https://twitter.com/ArrowheadPride?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ArrowheadPride</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ProFootballTalk</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BlakeNFLDraft?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BlakeNFLDraft</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TerezPaylor</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/mellinger?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mellinger</a></p>&mdash; Greg Hunsucker (@GregHunsucker) <a href="https://twitter.com/GregHunsucker/status/972714705377689600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460839)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For those wondering about Allen Bailey’s future in KC, I live one street over. There is a moving pod and large trailer in his driveway. I’m assuming that means he will be a cap casualty in the coming days. <a href="https://twitter.com/ArrowheadPride?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ArrowheadPride</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ProFootballTalk</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BlakeNFLDraft?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BlakeNFLDraft</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TerezPaylor</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/mellinger?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mellinger</a></p>&mdash; Greg Hunsucker (@GregHunsucker) <a href="https://twitter.com/GregHunsucker/status/972714705377689600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

NEVERMIND

Chiefs trainer Allen Wright responded and said that Bailey is just remodeling. False alarm.

O.city 03-11-2018 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460833)
Was tooling around with Spotrac this morning...

According to their metrics, Allen Robinson's market value AAV is $13M a season, Watkins is listed at $5.9M and Richardson at $6.3M.

If they could get Watkins at that, I’d be all for it

I’m skeptical

In58men 03-11-2018 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13460842)
NEVERMIND

Chiefs trainer Allen Wright responded and said that Bailey is just remodeling. False alarm.

ROFL

Hoover 03-11-2018 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460829)
It’s not time for a rebuild

Don’t waste the Mahomes cheap years rebuilding

While I agree with this, I don't think its wise to spend a bunch of FA money under the belief that we are contending for a championship with a 22 year old QB with one game under his belt.

bigjosh 03-11-2018 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13460842)
NEVERMIND

Chiefs trainer Allen Wright responded and said that Bailey is just remodeling. False alarm.

remodeling to up resale value?:hmmm::hmmm:

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh (Post 13460853)
remodeling to up resale value?:hmmm::hmmm:

Only thing that makes sense, honestly. No way Bailey thinks that he’s on this team long term.

RealSNR 03-11-2018 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13460832)
It’ll be Watkins

Or Odell

You better hope it's not Odell. If it is, I'm going to rape you.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 09:57 AM

I’ve always really liked Allen Bailey, but his cap hit has reached the point where it just simply won’t match his production. He’s had injury issues too.

That extra $6M in cap space this year could be used on a big time player or a couple of mid-tier guys, assuming the contract is backloaded.

Unless he will take a pay cut, I’d move on as soon as a replacement is found.

staylor26 03-11-2018 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460721)
I don't understand the fascination with Paul Richardson. Last year was his first with any meaningful playing time, and even then only put up 700 yards. (which is about half his career total)

If we're going after a WR, I'd rather spend the money on a proven playmaker like Robinson or Watkins.

On another note - people want Suh here after we just traded Peters for being an asshole?

LMAO

Paul Richardson reminds me a lot of Emmanuel Sanders when he was a FA. Both had very similar #’s and somewhat of a “breakout” season, but just like Sanders then, it’s clear that Richardson is still ascending and his best days are ahead of him. Mahomes throwing to him and Hill would really have DC’s shitting their pants.

Out of all the FA WR’s he has the best chance to live up to the deal he gets.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13460851)
While I agree with this, I don't think its wise to spend a bunch of FA money under the belief that we are contending for a championship with a 22 year old QB with one game under his belt.

That’s how the Seahawks or Eagles approached it, and look what it got them...

RunKC 03-11-2018 10:08 AM

Bailey has value and anyone who watched the Eagles, Patriots, Texans and Chargers game could see it. Biggest problem for him was that he was usually on Zombo’s side which meant no 1X1’s bc Zombo sucks ass.

The Chiefs need to keep this guy for 1 more year bc he does have value. I was hoping he would restructure, but it’s not a major concern as we’ll have enough cash.

Dunerdr 03-11-2018 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13460877)
Paul Richardson reminds me a lot of Emmanuel Sanders when he was a FA. Both had very similar #’s and somewhat of a “breakout” season, but just like Sanders then, it’s clear that Richardson is still ascending and his best days are ahead of him. Mahomes throwing to him and Hill would really have DC’s shitting their pants.

Out of all the FA WR’s he has the best chance to live up to the deal he gets.

Have you considered selling used cars?

KChiefs1 03-11-2018 10:21 AM

Shaggy Shane:

https://youtu.be/JSLQopsq2-o

The Franchise 03-11-2018 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460833)
Was tooling around with Spotrac this morning...

According to their metrics, Allen Robinson's market value AAV is $13M a season, Watkins is listed at $5.9M and Richardson at $6.3M.

I’ll shit myself if Watkins only gets $5.9 million a season.

Rausch 03-11-2018 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 13460919)

That guy on the right looks like what might have happened if the govt. used genetic research on Rausch's goatee 20 years ago.

Trim it. Just - trim it.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 13460927)
That guy on the right looks like what might have happened if the govt. used genetic research on Rausch's goatee 20 years ago.

Trim it. Just - trim it.

That dude drives me nuts sometimes. His take on the Peters situation was hard to listen to.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13460877)
Paul Richardson reminds me a lot of Emmanuel Sanders when he was a FA. Both had very similar #’s and somewhat of a “breakout” season, but just like Sanders then, it’s clear that Richardson is still ascending and his best days are ahead of him. Mahomes throwing to him and Hill would really have DC’s shitting their pants.

Out of all the FA WR’s he has the best chance to live up to the deal he gets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 13460900)
Have you considered selling used cars?

No shit, Dunerdr.

If Paul Richardson was anything resembling Sanders, SEA wouldn't be letting him to the market.

Robinson and Watkins have both proven to be elite talents/gamebreakers when healthy. Robinson is in no way in that category.

In58men 03-11-2018 10:35 AM

I enjoy both of them, solid guys.

Bowser 03-11-2018 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460936)
No shit, Dunerdr.

If Paul Richardson was anything resembling Sanders, SEA wouldn't be letting him to the market.

Robinson and Watkins have both proven to be elite talents/gamebreakers when healthy. Robinson is in no way in that category.

Helps the Robinson's of the world to have a Doug Baldwin playing on the other side of the field, as well. We all know Tyreek is a true weapon, but he isn't a 90-100 catch guy just yet.

Plus, I really don't feel like WR is a priority on this team considering the holes we have elsewhere. I'm a Marcus Kemp fan and would love to see what he could do as our 3rd or 4th WR.

RunKC 03-11-2018 10:41 AM

I don’t want to spend on a Sammy Watkins or Allen Robinson. It would be like too many cooks in the kitchen. We’ve got an amazing 3 headed monster attack in Hill, Kelce and Hunt that hurt defenses badly with Alex ****ing Smith. Mahomes is just going to magnify that.

Just add a complimentary weapon through the draft or FA without spending much and utilize your money on LG and defense.

We saw Mahomes make Albert Wilson look like Julian Edelman. He’s gonna make a #2 and #3 receiver look way better than they are.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 10:42 AM

I wonder if there’s any chance that we after Norwell still. It’d be a surprising but great signing.

staylor26 03-11-2018 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460936)
No shit, Dunerdr.

If Paul Richardson was anything resembling Sanders, SEA wouldn't be letting him to the market.

Robinson and Watkins have both proven to be elite talents/gamebreakers when healthy. Robinson is in no way in that category.

You mean like the Steelers let Sanders hit the market?

Revisionist history at it’s finest.

Also, NOBODY is saying he’s in that category. He’s just a cheaper option.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:47 AM

This place cracks me up.

I've been here for 12 years now, and for every one of those years, people here have been pissed that we don't have enough weapons at WR - that our WR1 would be a good WR2/3, that we have no depth at the position, etc.

Now, we have a legit WR1 but nothing but question marks on the other side - with a (basically) rookie QB and plenty of cap space - and the ability to add a legit weapon...and people are saying we're fine?

Weren't we ranked like 27th in red zone scoring?

Mahomes has played one game against a Denver team who had mailed it in. I love the guy, and can't wait to see how his career plays out - but expecting him to turn slapdicks like Albert Wilson into studs because of one game is ridiculous.

There's no reason why we can't use FA and the draft to fill holes. Hell, NOW is exactly the time to do it, while we have 15 on a rookie deal.

BryanBusby 03-11-2018 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13460949)
I wonder if there’s any chance that we after Norwell still. It’d be a surprising but great signing.

Would say zero. They aren't paying LT cash for a Guard.

Chief Northman 03-11-2018 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460833)
Was tooling around with Spotrac this morning...

According to their metrics, Allen Robinson's market value AAV is $13M a season, Watkins is listed at $5.9M and Richardson at $6.3M.

This changed recently.

Not long ago, Watkins was pegged around $9 million, and Robinson was between $11-12 million. Richardson’s number has held pretty steady between $6-7 million.

I wonder what they factor in for these substantial changes to Watkins’ and Robinson’s numbers?

Rausch 03-11-2018 10:49 AM

So my dream back end was sealed up by the Rams?

Sounds like a KC offseason...

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13460953)
You mean like the Steelers let Sanders hit the market?

Revisionist history at it’s finest.

:facepalm:

Pittsburgh had just drafted Wheaton who they thought could replace Sanders, Seattle has NOTHING behind Baldwin.

I don't understand the logic of wanting to spend $7M per on a guy that isn't guaranteed to be any better option than what's on the roster currently. Spend on an elite player, or don't bother.

Chief Northman 03-11-2018 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460954)
This place cracks me up.

I've been here for 12 years now, and for every one of those years, people here have been pissed that we don't have enough weapons at WR - that our WR1 would be a good WR2/3, that we have no depth at the position, etc.

Now, we have a legit WR1 but nothing but question marks on the other side - with a (basically) rookie QB and plenty of cap space - and the ability to add a legit weapon...and people are saying we're fine?

Weren't we ranked like 27th in red zone scoring?

Mahomes has played one game against a Denver team who had mailed it in. I love the guy, and can't wait to see how his career plays out - but expecting him to turn slapdicks like Albert Wilson into studs because of one game is ridiculous.

There's no reason why we can't use FA and the draft to fill holes. Hell, NOW is exactly the time to do it, while we have 15 on a rookie deal.

Exactly.

The playoff game should be proof enough of why another WR threat is needed. As exciting as Hill is as a playmaker, teams will begin to defend him better. He is no secret anymore and not a high volume player with regards to touches. When Kelce went down in the Wildcard, Hill was contained.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13460956)
Would say zero. They aren't paying LT cash for a Guard.

Probably right. Someone is though, probably with loads of cap space.

BryanBusby 03-11-2018 10:53 AM

The Chiefs will sign a couple mediocre players and the usual gang will be in here to explain why they don't suck, Veach is actually a super genius and John Dorsey is a horse ****er.

That will be this week on CP.

staylor26 03-11-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460960)
Pittsburgh had just drafted Wheaton who they thought could replace Sanders, Seattle has NOTHING behind Baldwin.

Tyler Lockett > Markus Wheaton

Try again.

Also, how do you know that they don’t plan on drafting one also?

Coogs 03-11-2018 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 13460968)
Exactly.

The playoff game should be proof enough of why another WR threat is needed. As exciting as Hill is as a playmaker, teams will begin to defend him better. He is no secret anymore and not a high volume player with regards to touches. When Kelce went down in the Wildcard, Hill was contained.

I would say Smith was contained when Kelce went down. Videos show open players.

TRR 03-11-2018 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13460946)
I don’t want to spend on a Sammy Watkins or Allen Robinson. It would be like too many cooks in the kitchen. We’ve got an amazing 3 headed monster attack in Hill, Kelce and Hunt that hurt defenses badly with Alex ****ing Smith. Mahomes is just going to magnify that.

Just add a complimentary weapon through the draft or FA without spending much and utilize your money on LG and defense.

We saw Mahomes make Albert Wilson look like Julian Edelman. He’s gonna make a #2 and #3 receiver look way better than they are.

Agreed if all three (Hunt, Hill, Kelce) can stay healthy for 16+ games. You lose one of the three though, and the KC offense goes from fairly explosive to fairly ordinary. Hopefully Mahomes, in time (yes it is going to take time) can take the Reid offense to a new level.

I’ve said it before. Look what Pederson did for his young 2nd year stud QB. Did he stand pat with Agholor and Green-Beckham and hope that Wentz could take them to the next level??? **** no! He went out added Alshon and Torrey Smith. There is no reason why the #2 WR spot shouldn’t be an area of focus for KC and Mahomes this offseason.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13460971)
Tyler Lockett > Markus Wheaton

Try gaine

Wheaton was a superior prospect to Lockett coming out of college.

You know NOW that Lockett turned out better, but at the TIME, Pittsburgh thought Wheaton could replace Sanders.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 13460973)
Agreed if all three (Hunt, Hill, Kelce) can stay healthy for 16+ games. You lose one of the three though, and the KC offense goes from fairly explosive to fairly ordinary. Hopefully Mahomes, in time (yes it is going to take time) can take the Reid offense to a new level.

I’ve said it before. Look what Pederson did for his young 2nd year stud QB. Did he stand pat with Agholor and Green-Beckham and hope that Wentz could take them to the next level??? **** no! He went out added Alshon and Torrey Smith. There is no reason why the #2 WR spot shouldn’t be an area of focus for KC and Mahomes this offseason.

This.

Bowser 03-11-2018 10:57 AM

I like Chris Connelly, but the more time goes by the more I think he's a combine warrior (even though he looked to be on pace for a solid season last year before that freak Achilles injury). I'm certainly not against a FA WR coming in here, I just think we should keep focusing on remaking the defense before we go chasing wide receivers.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 10:58 AM

Veach has said he's going to be aggressive.

I certainly hope that "aggressive" doesn't mean settling for the 4th/5th best option that really doesn't give us much over what's on the roster.

staylor26 03-11-2018 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460975)
Wheaton was a superior prospect to Lockett coming out of college.

You know NOW that Lockett turned out better, but at the TIME, Pittsburgh thought Wheaton could replace Sanders.

This is just flat out false and subjective. They were both 3rd round picks.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-11-2018 11:00 AM

We need to sign or draft a WR regardless of where one stands on the matter.

And whoever that player is, they need to be capable of starting as we are losing Wilson.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 13460978)
I like Chris Connelly, but the more time goes by the more I think he's a combine warrior (even though he looked to be on pace for a solid season last year before that freak Achilles injury). I'm certainly not against a FA WR coming in here, I just think we should keep focusing on remaking the defense before we go chasing wide receivers.

I could be wrong, but I thought I read that if the Chiefs cut Hali and Bailey as expected, they'll have between $30-35M in cap space, plus their draft picks.


No reason why they can't use both to improve both sides of the ball.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13460982)
This is just flat out false and subjective. They were both 3rd round picks.

Speaking of subjective, aren't you the guy saying Richardson is Emmanuel Sanders?

staylor26 03-11-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460986)
Speaking of subjective, aren't you the guy saying Richardson is Emmanuel Sanders?

I didn’t say he is Emmanuel Sanders.

I was simply saying he reminds me of him. Your initial argument as to why he’s not is just bad because you could’ve said the same exact thing about Sanders, hence my comparison.

Bowser 03-11-2018 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 13460984)
I could be wrong, but I thought I read that if the Chiefs cut Hali and Bailey as expected, they'll have between $30-35M in cap space, plus their draft picks.


No reason why they can't use both to improve both sides of the ball.

Agreed. Maybe I'm focusing too much on what the defense needs and/or giving Kemp and Dieter too much credit (possibly Mahomes, as well). I absolutely would not be upset if they did bring in a Watkins or Robinson. Hopefully they will be able to fill as many holes as they can if your scenario happens.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13460983)
We need to sign or draft a WR regardless of where one stands on the matter.

And whoever that player is, they need to be capable of starting as we are losing Wilson.

This.

So, should we be targeting the elite option who has started 40 games in 3 seasons, the gamebreaker who has started 51 games in 4 seasons, or the lesser option who has started 13 games in the last 3 years?

PS: The two elite options are a year younger than the lesser option.

RunKC 03-11-2018 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 13460973)
Agreed if all three (Hunt, Hill, Kelce) can stay healthy for 16+ games. You lose one of the three though, and the KC offense goes from fairly explosive to fairly ordinary. Hopefully Mahomes, in time (yes it is going to take time) can take the Reid offense to a new level.

I’ve said it before. Look what Pederson did for his young 2nd year stud QB. Did he stand pat with Agholor and Green-Beckham and hope that Wentz could take them to the next level??? **** no! He went out added Alshon and Torrey Smith. There is no reason why the #2 WR spot shouldn’t be an area of focus for KC and Mahomes this offseason.

They didn’t have jack shit for Wentz in 2016.

I wouldn’t be pissed about spending $5-6 million on a receiver like Paul Richardson or Albert Wilson. That’s what the Eagles did bringing in Torrey Smith. I really don’t want to spend twice that much or more on a receiver like Watkins or Robinson.

Chiefs don’t need more star power on offense. They need it on defense.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13460998)
They didn’t have jack shit for Wentz in 2016.

I wouldn’t be pissed about spending $5-6 million on a receiver like Paul Richardson or Albert Wilson. That’s what the Eagles did bringing in Torrey Smith. I really don’t want to spend twice that much or more on a receiver like Watkins or Robinson.

Chiefs don’t need more star power on offense. They need it on defense.

Torrey Smith
Albert Wilson
Paul Richardson

One of these things is not like the others.

AND they went out and got Alshon.

staylor26 03-11-2018 11:14 AM

Yea, Torrey Smith was clearly on the decline while the other 2 guys aren’t.

OnTheWarpath15 03-11-2018 11:14 AM

The Chiefs lost 4 games (of 7 total) where the defense gave up an average of 17.25 points.

But sure, the offense is fine and we need all that star power on defense.

They have the money and draft capital to do both.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.