ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 11:04 AM

It's not KU's meal ticket. For what university is this true?

Bambi 06-08-2010 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806666)
Post 1880. Mr. Plow provided the evidence < 50 or so posts earlier.

And then we had this...

Kansas....... $17,676,175 (football)... .$70,614,953 (everything else)


That's 52 million $ difference. If KU pulled in only 15 mill then you're saying the rest of KU's athletic revenue made 37 million?

The numbers posted earlier were incorrect. Plain and simple.

Mr. Plow 06-08-2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806673)
It's not KU's meal ticket. For what university is this true?

Stop. Save yourself the frustration. I'm a KU fan and even I can admit you'll never get him to see it.

vailpass 06-08-2010 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806661)
Mr. Plow posted the numbers earlier in the thread. And Kansas basketball does NOT make more money than Kansas football.

Oh yeah, Plow posted it first, thanks.
Have you ever heard anyon say bball makes more $ than fball? It's bizzarro world.

vailpass 06-08-2010 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6806670)
Just because your team sucks at basketball doesn't mean it's not the meal ticket for many schools. Why can you not understand this?

And just because your school sucks at EVERYTHING ELSE doesn't mean bball makes more $ than fball.

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6806590)
You do realize that the 4-4 and 1-7 were with the hardest schedule in the big 12 don't you? And they lost several close games with the north teams. But yeah if you just look at the record then it doesn't look good.

What was the 7-1 schedule?

I could be being mislead by the fact that they went from first to worst in only two years or that they lost 7 conference games in a row and the coach was being replaced at midseason.... but I do not think any objective observer sees this program as on the rise.

They see a team that was well coached for the first time in a long while and found a good QB, and the schedule and momentum all created a perfect storm.

We will see what Gil can do, but really. That is not a program on the rise right now.
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6806688)
Oh yeah, Plow posted it first, thanks.
Have you ever heard anyon say bball makes more $ than fball? It's bizzarro world.

Possibly. But it takes true dedication to see the figures and then disregard them.

The only major university, I would have to think, that might have a chance of making more money in basketball than football might be Duke. But that's damn near an entirely different animal b/c this is more akin to an Ivy League school.

Coach 06-08-2010 11:23 AM

Oh for FFS. We have discussed about the Turner Gil hiring.

Last year's Buffalo team was pretty young team.

Also, his first year in Buffalo was 2-10.
After that, it was 5-7.
Then it was 8-6.

Sometimes W-L's can be a little skewed with the first year, when he didn't have much to work on. But he has shown some improvement.

It also helps KU to have a former Big XII guy who has some experience in the conference. I should also point out that Gill served as position coach for two first team All-Americans, Tommie Frazier and Eric Crouch, with Crouch also earning the Heisman Trophy under Gill's tutelage. The Cornhuskers earned three national championships in Gill's time as an assistant there.

It also helps that he has strong ties in Texas.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806697)
Possibly. But it takes true dedication to see the figures and then disregard them.

The only major university, I would have to think, that might have a chance of making more money in basketball than football might be Duke. But that's damn near an entirely different animal b/c this is more akin to an Ivy League school.

Yep. Duke is an example of basketball making more.

11.8 in basketball.
9 in football.

Check post 1869.

epitome1170 06-08-2010 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806704)
Yep. Duke is an example of basketball making more.

11.8 in basketball.
9 in football.

Check post 1869.

The fact that this number is so close for a school as dominant in basketball and absolutely pathetic in football (maybe 2 wins a year) should tell everyone something about the power of football.

vailpass 06-08-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806697)
Possibly. But it takes true dedication to see the figures and then disregard them.

The only major university, I would have to think, that might have a chance of making more money in basketball than football might be Duke. But that's damn near an entirely different animal b/c this is more akin to an Ivy League school.

Yeah , I'm sure you are right. I have no doubt there may be a small number of individual schools that make more $ on bball than fball but to say what numb nuts is saying, that overall bball makes more $ than fball, is downright amusing.

teedubya 06-08-2010 11:55 AM

When/If Missouri & Nebraska leave the conference, can those of you who are colossal douchebags, go elsewhere too?

Reaper16 06-08-2010 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6806796)
When/If Missouri & Nebraska leave the conference, can those of you who are colossal douchebags, go elsewhere too?

What does this even mean?

DJ's left nut 06-08-2010 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806804)
What does this even mean?

It means the guy that thinks he's going to become an internet millionaire by selling "Big16.tv" thinks you're an asshole.

I'm pretty broken up about it.

DaKCMan AP 06-08-2010 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6806677)
And then we had this...

Kansas....... $17,676,175 (football)... .$70,614,953 (everything else)


That's 52 million $ difference. If KU pulled in only 15 mill then you're saying the rest of KU's athletic revenue made 37 million?

The numbers posted earlier were incorrect. Plain and simple.

ROFL

Declare something that is correct incorrect, then don't offer any proof towards your claim. Brilliant!

Reaper16 06-08-2010 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6806809)
It means the guy that thinks he's going to become an internet millionaire by selling "Big16.tv" thinks you're an asshole.

I'm pretty broken up about it.

That's fine. I am an asshole. I'm no douchebag, though.

I was more remarking on the nonsense that is asking Mizzou & Nebraska fans to leave a Chiefs message board because their colleges are changing conferences.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6806796)
When/If Missouri & Nebraska leave the conference, can those of you who are colossal douchebags, go elsewhere too?

You are much nicer on twitter and professional

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6806796)
When/If Missouri & Nebraska leave the conference, can those of you who are colossal douchebags, go elsewhere too?

List for the new "Pack of 10"?

DJ's left nut 06-08-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6806812)
ROFL

Declare something that is correct incorrect, then don't offer any proof towards your claim. Brilliant!

I'm upset that I didn't try it long ago.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806804)
What does this even mean?

I guess it means that the Mountain West will become the new "OFFICIAL" College Conference of ChiefsPlanet.

DJ's left nut 06-08-2010 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806827)
List for the new "Pack of 10"?

I already got boned out of the Horsemen and the Gang of 14. I'm gonna be ****ing irate if I don't get included among this particular list of douchebags.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6806833)
I already got boned out of the Horsemen and the Gang of 14. I'm gonna be ****ing irate if I don't get included among this particular list of douchebags.

LMAO. I'm hoping for the vaunted triple crown.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6806831)
I guess it means that the Mountain West will become the new "OFFICIAL" College Conference of ChiefsPlanet.

LMAO

ChiTown 06-08-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6806822)
You are much nicer on twitter and professional

Who is this smoke?

vailpass 06-08-2010 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6806796)
When/If Missouri & Nebraska leave the conference, can those of you who are colossal douchebags, go elsewhere too?

n00b is retarted.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6806845)
Who is this smoke?

It's just Aridouche i believe, his tweets are not douchetastic

vailpass 06-08-2010 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6806849)
It's just Aridouche i believe, his tweets are not douchetastic

Oh it's a mult not a n00b?

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806834)
LMAO. I'm hoping for the vaunted triple crown.

Sadly, I'd have to become a MU or NU fan PDQ for consideration. I'll take the 2/3.

Good luck, my friend.

LMAO

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6806852)
Oh it's a mult not a n00b?

He ditched "AriChiefs" at 25k posts and started over, so not really a mult.

Hell, he told us all. It's no secret.

Crush 06-08-2010 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6806852)
Oh it's a mult not a n00b?

Technically, it is mult, but I think he abandoned the original account.

Crush 06-08-2010 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6806833)
I already got boned out of the Horsemen and the Gang of 14. I'm gonna be ****ing irate if I don't get included among this particular list of douchebags.


I want in on this as well.


Dear Kansas,

Nobody loves you.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 12:23 PM

Thus far, the "Pack of 10":

DJ's Left Nut
Crush
DeezNutz

Sure Oz?
Reaper?
KcMizzou?

Reaper16 06-08-2010 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806888)
Thus far, the "Pack of 10":

DJ's Left Nut
Crush
DeezNutz

Sure Oz?
Reaper?
KcMizzou?

I'm not exclusively an MU guy but count me in, sure.

Make sure Bugeater and Billay get in on this; gotta' have some Husker representation. **** Sam Hall though.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806893)
I'm not exclusively an MU guy but count me in, sure.

Make sure Bugeater and Billay get in on this; gotta' have some Husker representation. **** Sam Hall though.

LMAO

This is awesome

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806888)
Thus far, the "Pack of 10":

DJ's Left Nut
Crush
DeezNutz

Sure Oz?
Reaper?
KcMizzou?

:D

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806893)
I'm not exclusively an MU guy but count me in, sure.

Make sure Bugeater and Billay get in on this; gotta' have some Husker representation. **** Sam Hall though.

LMAO

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6806902)
LMAO

How valid is this emoticon? Has this been published in a scholarly journal?

Pants 06-08-2010 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806911)
How valid is this emoticon? Has this been published in a scholarly journal?

Yeah, give me a link, please. Blogs by professors don't count, BTW.

Reaper16 06-08-2010 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806911)
How valid is this emoticon? Has this been published in a scholarly journal?

If it hasn't I will make it so.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806911)
How valid is this emoticon? Has this been published in a scholarly journal?

All I know is:

ROFL - LMAO = Basketball Revenue.

It has to.

Pablo 06-08-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806893)
I'm not exclusively an MU guy but count me in, sure.

Make sure Bugeater and Billay get in on this; gotta' have some Husker representation. **** Sam Hall though.

Aligning yourself with billay is akin to adding CoMo to your group.

Find a better NU representative.

HemiEd 06-08-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 6806579)
What kind of Nebraska fan would write that about one of their former great players? Really...that is lame beyond lame. Billay...are you 14 years old or something?

You just now figuring that out?

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806888)
Thus far, the "Pack of 10":

DJ's Left Nut
Crush
DeezNutz

Sure Oz?
Reaper?
KcMizzou?

If you don't include Fraz, there might only end up being a "Pack of One" - you're all getting the Fridge Treatment.

HemiEd 06-08-2010 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6806620)
ROFL Just can't admit it can you? Do you see the conferences being realigned around the basketball programs?
Why do you think that is?
And yet there is something in you that wants to continue to make an ass out of yourself by insisting that bball generates more revenue than fball.

They are being realigned around academics! /Mizzoufan :rolleyes:

Bugeater 06-08-2010 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6806833)
I already got boned out of the Horsemen and the Gang of 14. I'm gonna be ****ing irate if I don't get included among this particular list of douchebags.

You think getting left out is bad, I was apparently a member of the Gang of 14 and I never even knew it. I let a lot of internet cred go to waste.

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6806933)
If you don't include Fraz, there might only end up being a "Pack of One" - you're all getting the Fridge Treatment.

Sometimes a good Whirlpool must be sacrificed for the betterment of the group. :evil:

vailpass 06-08-2010 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6806861)
He ditched "AriChiefs" at 25k posts and started over, so not really a mult.

Hell, he told us all. It's no secret.

I'm not good.

SPchief 06-08-2010 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 6806927)
Aligning yourself with billay is akin to adding CoMo to your group.

Find a better NU representative.

I can take the spot if you want

Bugeater 06-08-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6806960)
I can take the spot if you want

This is only your second post in this thread, you're really going to have to step up the douchiness if you want to make the cut.

SPchief 06-08-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6806966)
This is only your second post in this thread, you're really going to have to step up the douchiness if you want to make the cut.

k.


So this is still about basketball right?

Reaper16 06-08-2010 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6806975)
k.


So this is still about basketball right?

Basketball is the only thing that anything is ever about.

luv 06-08-2010 12:55 PM

Done deal yet? The call was supposed to be made today.

/sarcasm

Crush 06-08-2010 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806979)
Basketball is the only thing that anything is ever about.


If your school was actually good at basketball then you would understand. /Wickedfail

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6806979)
Basketball is the only thing that anything is ever about.

KU created John Wooden and the sport of basketball duh

DeezNutz 06-08-2010 01:00 PM

Every mention of KU basketball nets more revenue for the University of Kansas.

Sure-Oz 06-08-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806993)
Every mention of KU basketball nets more revenue for the University of Kansas.

ROFL

Mr. Plow 06-08-2010 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806993)
Every mention of KU basketball nets more revenue for the University of Kansas.


15 > 17

vailpass 06-08-2010 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 6806943)
They are being realigned around academics! /Mizzoufan :rolleyes:

If by 'academics' you mean football teams and cable subscribers then yes, academics it is. :D

vailpass 06-08-2010 01:03 PM

:D
Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6806993)
Every mention of KU basketball nets more revenue for the University of Kansas.


DeezNutz 06-08-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 6806996)
15 > 17

:clap:

Bugeater 06-08-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 6806975)
k.


So this is still about basketball right?

Just bring your douche game and it can be about whatever you want.

|Zach| 06-08-2010 01:05 PM

Anyways....

Always reliable Mizzou beat write Dave Matter via Twitter.

"Spoke to an attorney who specializes in sports law/contracts. Mizzou's best move might be to ignore ultimatum. More on blog later today"

http://twitter.com/Dave_Matter/statuses/15723992901

|Zach| 06-08-2010 01:07 PM

Even if you are not a Mizzou fan...RockMNation.com is a really good resource on keeping up with all of this shit...there link dump today is actually kind of hilairious.

RockMNation.com

http://www.rockmnation.com/2010/6/8/...u-links-6-8-10

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 01:07 PM

I just heard a news bulletin... Beebe wants us all to collect as many Campbell's soup labels as we can to keep the current Big 12 roster in major conferences! Only we can keep Baylor/ISU/KU's BCS hopes alive :-)
Posted via Mobile Device

luv 06-08-2010 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6807011)
Just bring your douche game and it can be about whatever you want.

I'm not sure how to reply to this. It can be taken in so many wrong directions.

Bugeater 06-08-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6807017)
Anyways....

Always reliable Mizzou beat write Dave Matter via Twitter.

"Spoke to an attorney who specializes in sports law/contracts. Mizzou's best move might be to ignore ultimatum. More on blog later today"

http://twitter.com/Dave_Matter/statuses/15723992901

Someone on our local station here said the same thing yesterday. After all, what the hell is the Big XII going to do if they just say "uhhh...we haven't decided anything yet"?

SPchief 06-08-2010 01:10 PM

Sweet, does everyone know that a former KU basketball player is playing tonight?

SPchief 06-08-2010 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6807026)
Someone on our local station here said the same thing yesterday. After all, what the hell is the Big XII going to do if they just say "uhhh...we haven't decided anything yet"?

Maybe make them play a basketball game against KU with the winner making the decision on what to do with the league

KChiefs1 06-08-2010 01:12 PM

http://campuscorner.kansascity.com/node/914

Quote:

Jon Sundvold - former Missouri basketball star and NBA player, uber-respected TV commentator and financial wizard - got my vote as a stand-up guy Tuesday morning when he became one of the few folk in Columbia, Mo., to return a telephone call.

Sundvold knew the subject was college athletic expansion and that I wanted his thoughts on Missouri's role in all of that. And he gave them. As an interested bystander, for sure, and not one of the decision makers.

But on that level I considered them worth sharing here:

"I don't know what's going to happen," Sundvold said. "Most of the people in Columbia have no idea. But it is the only thing they are talking about.

"If it blows up - if the Big 12 blows up - it should go on all their resumes.

The presidents and the chancellors, if it doesn't survive.

"It will be a phenominal failure on the parts of chancellors and presidents."

Sundvold contends the Big 12 should be in expansion mode rather than in the reactionary mode of giving Missouri and Nebraska ultimatums over those schools not giving the Big 12 their pledge of undying allegiance.

In that, he has a lot of agreement. While the Big Ten is talking about expansion, and the Pac 10 is talking about expansion, the Big 12 is trying to save itself by guilting Nebraska and Missouri into preserving the "Big Texas" Conference.

Will it work?

Not if Nebraska and Missouri maintain what for Missouri is an unusual and total silence and for Nebraska a general no-comment one.

Neither has to pledge anything. If the Big 12 votes to boot Nebraska and Missouri to the sidelines, it accomplishes the same thing as Nebraska and Missouri joining the Big Ten anyway.

One strategy for saving the Big 12 seems to be to drive a wedge between Nebraska and Missouri by repeated media statements quoting some poorly-cloaked sources that Missouri doesn't matter, that the Tigers have always been a bunch of whiners, and that Nebraska holds the key to everything.

See how important you are to "us," oh, mighty Nebraska?

Stay with us. We love you. We respect you.

Tom Osborne has more brains than to fall for a butter-up job. Osborne has been fighting the longest of anybody in the old Big Eight against the Big Texas.

Missouri, meanwhile, is making my job a lot tougher but finally doing the right thing. Following advice of consultants hired to help guide them through the shoals of expansion, MU officials are maintaining a silence they have been unable to pull off for the last 25 years.

Missouri has always been surrounded by "sources" more than willing to tell the media exactly what is going down.

Now the powers that be at Mizzou are remaining mum in the face of rampant speculation and quite obviously have not shared details of what is or is not going on with a circle of people large enough to spring leaks.

Stay tuned.

Pants 06-08-2010 01:12 PM

What's with the circle jerk making fun of KU bball? How do you think MU fans would act if they were a perennial power in basketball and KU wasn't good at anything?

chiefsnorth 06-08-2010 01:17 PM

Should KSU be upset here? After all if KU had a credible football program, the two for one might make sense to some major conference


:-)
Posted via Mobile Device

Pants 06-08-2010 01:20 PM

How can the B12 be talking about expansion when the pasture is so much greener in B10 and two school who want to go there badly are waiting for the invitation? B12 has no trump cards in this, they don't have a choice in the matter, they have to react. Besides, Texas has too much pull and that's another thing causing dissension among other, less fortunate schools.

DJ's left nut 06-08-2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6807026)
Someone on our local station here said the same thing yesterday. After all, what the hell is the Big XII going to do if they just say "uhhh...we haven't decided anything yet"?

I said that 2 days ago in this very thread, dammit!

If MU has the invite, of course it's in their best interest to ignore the ultimatum, provided their damn sure they have a soft landing lined up. Make the Big 12 throw them out of the conference, avoid the buyout penalty in their Big 12 contract and then accept the Big-10 offer.

It'd save them millions.

kepp 06-08-2010 01:22 PM

Keitzman is on right now saying that switching conferences for academic reasons is extremely risky because all that Big10 grant/research money is going to suddenly "go away". Uh, yeah.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6807037)
What's with the circle jerk making fun of KU bball? How do you think MU fans would act if they were a perennial power in basketball and KU wasn't good at anything?

As an unbiased outsider, it appears to me that no one is making fun of KU Basketball, only the douchebags that think winning a Championship once every 25 years makes KU CBB royalty - and that a move to the Mountain West couldn't possibly hurt the program - you're Kansas, for Christ sake. Top recruits will want to play for us no matter what.

From my view, I see a lot of KU fans, both good (Guru, Lzen, etc) and douchbags alike scared shitless that they are about to be left out in the cold, and the douchebags will say just about anything to rationalize it.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6807054)
How can the B12 be talking about expansion when the pasture is so much greener in B10 and two school who want to go there badly are waiting for the invitation? B12 has no trump cards in this, they don't have a choice in the matter, they have to react. Besides, Texas has too much pull and that's another thing causing dissension among other, less fortunate schools.

Exactly.

On the surface, it would probably sound great to 2 undetermined schools to come to the B12 - until they realize that their only role in the whole thing is to make Texas richer.

Pants 06-08-2010 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6807059)
I said that 2 days ago in this very thread, dammit!

If MU has the invite, of course it's in their best interest to ignore the ultimatum, provided their damn sure they have a soft landing lined up. Make the Big 12 throw them out of the conference, avoid the buyout penalty in their Big 12 contract and then accept the Big-10 offer.

It'd save them millions.

I think the point they're trying to make is that even if MU gets no invite, it's unlikely the B12 will kick them out because the effect on the B12 is going to be the same as losing the schools to B10, which is what the ultimatum is trying to prevent to begin with.

Pitt Gorilla 06-08-2010 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6807020)
Even if you are not a Mizzou fan...RockMNation.com is a really good resource on keeping up with all of this shit...there link dump today is actually kind of hilairious.

RockMNation.com

http://www.rockmnation.com/2010/6/8/...u-links-6-8-10

I know this has been posted, but it absolutely owns:

http://www.bringonthecats.com/2010/6...-big-12-twelve

|Zach| 06-08-2010 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6807070)
I know this has been posted, but it absolutely owns:

http://www.bringonthecats.com/2010/6...-big-12-twelve

Yes. ****ing hilarious.

OnTheWarpath15 06-08-2010 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6807062)
Keitzman is on right now saying that switching conferences for academic reasons is extremely risky because all that Big10 grant/research money is going to suddenly "go away". Uh, yeah.

What an idiot.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.