GloryDayz |
12-05-2017 10:50 AM |
I'm not seeing the problem here, I think I'm probably the #1 Peters hater around here, and I don't really see too much wrong with what he did.
Was it right? No. Was it a ticky-tack call? Yes. Would a respected team get called for that? No.
So as wrong as it was, he did it at the right time. We were already going to suffer a penalty, so it's not like the officials hadn't made up their minds that the opposition was going to be allowed to score. Yeah, I do believe that! So maybe what he's trying to do, but failed, is to raise awareness of how ticky-tack that call was.
It's no different than my desire to have Alex (or Mahomes) get into official's faces, draw a 15 yarder when it's going to be 4th and 10 from the opposition's 45 (and we aren't going to even try for 3, and not only giving the punter some room to work, but letting the officials, the NFL, and the viewing audience that we're not going to take it anymore, and while the action costs us 15, the talk will show how the officials (again) missed something they wouldn't miss if we were the Pats.
Next up, if we didn't have a cuck owner, might be a compilation of arbitrary and unbalanced calls. From missed holds (think last year's Pittsburgh game), to ticky-tack calls against us juxtaposed to calls called on us.
At some point you have to confront the league and demand justice. You can do it in private at first, but let them know "private" will stay private only if what's presented starts to change.
And for anybody who disagrees, I'd suggest that as we approach 48 years of not attending a SB, what would it hurt to try standing up to the league that appears to have favorites?
|