Bambi |
08-20-2014 06:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch
(Post 10834843)
Kansas gets 6.1m vs Bammy at 3.5m. Direct cash is 1.5m vs 0.75m. Kansas' deal is superior to Bammy.
This is a stupid conversation anyway since as Bambi notes, these numbers aren't big anyway. Bammy still generates much more overall revenue via ticket sales (nearly all from football). All this says is what apparel companies think of the brands - and top hoops schools have huge deals. #basketballDoesntMatter
|
College Basketball advertising revenue dominates College Football so it would make sense that this principle extends to apparel branding.
Teams like Mizzou are very interchangeable with others in Football, they are the third most popular "Tigers" in their conference alone…that's actually seems quite difficult to achieve, but they do it.
Mizzou's value is in their tv sets, not accomplishments on the field.
Iowa State literally has no value at all being that they have a very low population, the 2nd most popular school in their state, and virtually nothing to note when it comes to athletic achievement.
|