There's a lot of intriguing options in this draft at WR. A first rounder is locked up for five years. I'd go that route.

Lockett for a late third sounds good though.

DK and Veach would want to add an extension to his Rookie deal...

What would you give him? $20M year? $25M year?

a first combined with any pick past the 4th round would be sweet for dk. odds are you'd have to package and trade up in the first anyways to get a guy like olave or even burks

20 mil? Lol in a second…

If Tyler Lockett wasn’t gonna be 30 in September, I’d LOVE to have him in KC.

Unfortunately, he is and his whole game is built on speed and burst/acceleration so when he loses a step he’s done.

After these recent WR contracts, I have no interest in DK Metcalf, either.

This draft is built for us.

Tons of really talented DL and WRs.

Depending on how they feel behind closed doors about Fortsons outlook and Greys upside…there are a few decent fits for us at TE, too…but I think they love both of their guys.

If Veach is patient early, he will come out of this draft ready to stay in the Championship window for the next 5 years. There are a couple scenarios I’d love to see us move up to get a total stud that drops, but my preference is to stay put in most scenarios and let the draft come to us.

I’d love to see us go out and draft 2 DEs, a DT, 2 WRs and a corner in the first 3 rounds.

I’d post a list but I’d get a little too excited.

So we won't pay Tyreek $24m, but we would pay DK $20m+? Makes no sense. Tyreek is twice as impactful as DK.

I don't see him signing for less than 23 after the stunt Tyreek just pulled. But he's only 24, that's the difference.

Who is that bundle of sticks?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m told the Chiefs have not inquired about Seahawks WRs Tyler Lockett and D.K. Metcalf.<br><br>Doesn’t mean it can’t happen, but hasn’t as of now</p>&mdash; Matt Verderame (@MattVerderame) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattVerderame/status/1506767435646517254?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

If they want to move him, I’d rather give them a conditional pick next year for him. That’s likely better for both teams.

sounds like the majority of us just two years ago talking about hill...

We would be in the same position next year with DK and contract money.

Lockett makes more sense

Unless you’re just trading out DK and Hill and keeping draft pick profits by getting more for Hill than we would give up for DK…it wouldn’t make sense to trade for him before a stacked and deep WR draft.

And Tyler is too old.

Those 4th round picks this year are like thirds.

Deep

Who the **** is the Matt guy? I find him extremely obnoxious