ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs trade Tyreek Hill to the Dolphins (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343099)

Chris Meck 04-24-2022 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRU (Post 16259522)
I follow the same sentiment as others with love him, will miss him, but it had to be done given the circumstances.

That said, who's going to be our "gotta have it" guy now? How many times over the past 6 years have we had that moment and Reek was the guy who made it happen?

Off the top of my head, I'm thinking of the following:

- Very early in his career, I can't remember first year or second, but Smith was QB and we were at Denver I believe. Come back, final seconds to tie (or win I can't remember) and Reek made the plays. This was the first time I actually perked up and though to myself wow, big moment, big play...could he do that more?

- At Dallas end of 1st half - throw it to him short and let him work his way through the crowd (untouched) for a TD.

- 4th down gotta have it moment(s) against the Ravens.

- Super Bowl

- Bills - Both the long one with 1 min left and then the end 13 second play to start that series of events.

I know there are a bunch more I'm not thinking of right now. These are big time, pressure is on, everybody watching, gotta have it moments, and he made them happen on the regular.

I said it at the time and people told me I was wrong, but Hardman had his chance to raise himself to that level and become "one of the guys" in the Bills game last year had he really made a true effort to score and win the game instead of running out of bounds. He said himself after the game in an interview "I probably should have tried to score, but I knew the guys would get it done." That means he doesn't see himself as one of the guys, so do we want to count on him in these gotta have it scenarios?

We've got Kelce, of course, but he'll be keyed in on.

I know JuJu and MVS are good, but I really haven't watched much of them. Are they big moment kinda guys?

Is this what we'll be searching for in the draft? Talent is one thing, but taking on those moments is another.

As much as I'll miss the overall exciting nature of watching Hill play, these are the moments I'll be concerned about until I see somebody else take over that role.

It won't be just one guy.

The 'one guy is going to win this for us' has not proven sustainable.

It will be a group of playmakers, that can't be keyed on.

The only place where KC is reliant on ONE GUY is at QB, and that's just fine.

ThaVirus 04-24-2022 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRU (Post 16259522)
That said, who's going to be our "gotta have it" guy now? How many times over the past 6 years have we had that moment and Reek was the guy who made it happen?

Off the top of my head, I'm thinking of the following:

- Very early in his career, I can't remember first year or second, but Smith was QB and we were at Denver I believe. Come back, final seconds to tie (or win I can't remember) and Reek made the plays. This was the first time I actually perked up and though to myself wow, big moment, big play...could he do that more?

- At Dallas end of 1st half - throw it to him short and let him work his way through the crowd (untouched) for a TD.

- 4th down gotta have it moment(s) against the Ravens.

- Super Bowl

- Bills - Both the long one with 1 min left and then the end 13 second play to start that series of events..


4th and 9 bomb against the Ravens in 2018

4th and 1 conversion from Henne in the 2020 Divisional vs the Browns

We had a big 3rd down conversion to ice the game @ Tampa Bay in 2020 that went to Hill

His long TDs @ LAC early 2020 and vs the Browns in week 1 2021 really sparked the comebacks in those games

I'm sure there a ton more that are escaping me at the moment. Hill made a lot of plays for us, many of them in big moments.

stevieray 04-24-2022 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16259358)
He made Alex Smith a 4000 yard passing QB.

Alex. ****ing. Smith.

Made?

Alex Smith put him on the map.

-King- 04-24-2022 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 16259654)
Made?

Alex Smith put him on the map.

LMAO. How many 4000 yard seasons did Alex have before that? And after that?

Rainbarrel 04-24-2022 03:36 PM

**** it, Tua is back there, somewhere...

ThaVirus 04-24-2022 03:42 PM

Chiefs trade Tyreek Hill to the Dolphins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 16259654)
Made?

Alex Smith put him on the map.


Imagine logging in and posting this lol

CasselGotPeedOn 04-24-2022 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 16259654)
Made?

Alex Smith put him on the map.

https://i.giphy.com/media/O5NyCibf93upy/giphy.webp

ThyKingdomCome15 04-24-2022 04:04 PM

I'd say they wanted Hill to play out this year, franchise tag next year, then trade him potentially next offseason. He would have been pushing 30 by then. It came a year sooner than expected. I heard Hill threatened to hold out and that sealed his fate. It was an absolute shock at the time but Veach's draft last year was special, including the Zeus trade. It was the right move.

Rasputin 04-24-2022 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRU (Post 16259522)
I follow the same sentiment as others with love him, will miss him, but it had to be done given the circumstances.

That said, who's going to be our "gotta have it" guy now? How many times over the past 6 years have we had that moment and Reek was the guy who made it happen?


I said it at the time and people told me I was wrong, but Hardman had his chance to raise himself to that level and become "one of the guys" in the Bills game last year had he really made a true effort to score and win the game instead of running out of bounds. He said himself after the game in an interview "I probably should have tried to score, but I knew the guys would get it done." That means he doesn't see himself as one of the guys, so do we want to count on him in these gotta have it scenarios?

.


<iframe width="855" height="481" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S89ymhpoNAg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TEX 04-24-2022 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16259622)
4th and 9 bomb against the Ravens in 2018

4th and 1 conversion from Henne in the 2020 Divisional vs the Browns

We had a big 3rd down conversion to ice the game @ Tampa Bay in 2020 that went to Hill

His long TDs @ LAC early 2020 and vs the Browns in week 1 2021 really sparked the comebacks in those games

I'm sure there a ton more that are escaping me at the moment. Hill made a lot of plays for us, many of them in big moments.

Exactly. That's why I laugh when people present the argument that the Chiefs have a winning record without Hill, as their main thesis. What about all the times they won with Hill? Still not good with the trade.

Rasputin 04-24-2022 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16259772)
Exactly. That's why I laugh when people present the argument that the Chiefs have a winning record without Hill, as their main thesis. What about all the times they won with Hill? Still not good with the trade.

You are just underestimating Andy Reid and what he can do to compensate losing Hill. We won't miss a beat and we maybe better just because we won't be as predictable to tendencies of where the ball is going. Bengals knew we were going to throw to Tyreek they banked on it and sure enough that's what we did and they got the interception in overtime.

If we are unpredictable and spread the ball around and run the ball this is going be a much more balanced and potent offense than before. I think Patrick can get 60TD 5500 yards *17games*

You're clearly underestimating what Patrick Mahomes can do and he is now in his prime years and this year be more ready for what ever the defense throws at him. Go ahead doubt Andy Reid and doubt Patrick Mahomes. Last 5 years we have the most wins 60 of all NFL and you can't tell me credit Hill for all 60 of those wins. Yes a lot of them yes he gets credit but it's the mind of Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes will to win games.

BleedingRed 04-24-2022 05:01 PM

I didn’t want this trade but in the long run it’s about opening Mahomes 2nd Super Bowl window. Can’t delay it to long or it could be his last prime window.

With this idea of going through draft we are at least salted for 4 total SB windows in Mahomes career. (Window being 2-3 year windows were talent is high and cap hit isn’t)

TEX 04-24-2022 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 16259822)
I didn’t want this trade but in the long run it’s about opening Mahomes 2nd Super Bowl window. Can’t delay it to long or it could be his last prime window.

With this idea of going through draft we are at least salted for 4 total SB windows in Mahomes career. (Window being 2-3 year windows were talent is high and cap hit isn’t)

The Chiefs will likely never have a better window than what they just had with him on his rookie deal.

TEX 04-24-2022 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 16259820)
You are just underestimating Andy Reid and what he can do to compensate losing Hill. We won't miss a beat and we maybe better just because we won't be as predictable to tendencies of where the ball is going. Bengals knew we were going to throw to Tyreek they banked on it and sure enough that's what we did and they got the interception in overtime.

If we are unpredictable and spread the ball around and run the ball this is going be a much more balanced and potent offense than before. I think Patrick can get 60TD 5500 yards *17games*

You're clearly underestimating what Patrick Mahomes can do and he is now in his prime years and this year be more ready for what ever the defense throws at him. Go ahead doubt Andy Reid and doubt Patrick Mahomes. Last 5 years we have the most wins 60 of all NFL and you can't tell me credit Hill for all 60 of those wins. Yes a lot of them yes he gets credit but it's the mind of Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes will to win games.

I'm not underestimating anything. Not trying to credit Hill with 60 wins, it's a team sport. But just about every big win, Hill played a huge part in. If anyone is underestimating something, it's you and Hill's contributions.

Rainbarrel 04-24-2022 07:37 PM

Alexsexuals, Hunters, Hillites, still no Badgeretts

-King- 04-24-2022 07:40 PM

It's hilarious that people try to paint defenses choosing to change their entire defense and coverages specifically for Hill as not only a problem, but a Hill problem.

Guys if you have a guy that forces defense to play him differently, you have the opposite of a problem. Don't blame Hill for the rest of the offense not being able to figure out how to exploit a defense that was selling out to stop one player.

Rasputin 04-24-2022 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16260077)
I'm not underestimating anything. Not trying to credit Hill with 60 wins, it's a team sport. But just about every big win, Hill played a huge part in. If anyone is underestimating something, it's you and Hill's contributions.


I don't underestimate his contributions but in this league change is constant. He could get hurt again any player can get hurt and you have to adjust at a whims notice. Other players have to step it up in order for it to work. If they don't step it up then you are absolutely correct. Either way we needed to get the defense better or we will get clobbered because we can't stop Carr and Devante how embarrassing that would be. I agree with you giving up Hill sucks but it was the choice that was forced on Bleach . HILL wanted out and he wanted too much money that our cap space couldn't hold to sign other players positions than his. Hill isn't the entire team but if you pay him what he wanted we would have been ****ed for several years and on top of that next few years he will start to decline in his skills. He had the second most drops 13 in the NFL. He wasn't as consistent and some of his balls were tipped for interceptions.

Right now we got three pretty good WR and the best TE and this is going be a dominant offensive line and a couple backs that will split the load and surprise how good they are.

Last year we started out sucking but ended up winning the division and hosted the AFCCG for the 4th time. We may or maynot be so good this year but at least in this draft we can get guys that will help us dominate for the next 5 years and open up the window for us to win another Lombardi or two.

Will we miss Hill absolutely, can we adjust and win without him absolutely.

Can Vlearch get players too help us win championships well just got to see how it plays out. Having 8 picks in first 4 rounds is pretty good odds to come away with some nice talent.

suzzer99 04-24-2022 08:44 PM

Tyreek had some really bad drops last year on easy passes, at least one that cost us a game. Maybe that's just an aberration, and he's still an all-pro even with the drops. But if it becomes a trend that would be concerning.

Obviously this isn't enough to just decide to get rid of him. But it could be enough for Veech/Reid to ask if we really want to make this guy the highest paid player in the league.

His catching balls in traffic seemed to drop last year too. About once a day I fantasize about Tyreek timing his jump better on that last play vs. the Bengals and getting his body in front of Eli Apple to make the catch. It would have been a great play. But he's made those plenty of times in the past. Obviously most of that is still on Mahomes, he was really trying to thread the needle on that throw with no margin for error.

Rasputin 04-24-2022 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16260074)
The Chiefs will likely never have a better window than what they just had with him on his rookie deal.


JUST HOW THE **** DO YOU KNOW MAN? HE's ON A 10 YEAR DEAL and will likely still get extended beyond. Tyreek wasn't going be with us for all of Mahomes contract. You don't know who else we can get. You don't know how our defense is going to perform and you don't know how each year we will be. Our window of opportunity to win a Super Bowl is every GOD DAMN YEAR WE HAVE PATRICK MAHOMES.

Tyreek had 13 drops second most in the NFL and some tipped balls that went for interceptions. He wasn't isn't the greatest WR in the league. If he was he would have came away with the ball instead of the Bengals defender have it.

YOU simply just made me hate Tyreek.


Just how the **** do you know we won't have a better opportunity to win Super Bowls? The Chiefs did exactly what the Patriots do to players just before they decline and trade them for draft stock. We can get right back to the Super Bowl may not this year because I don't think our defense will be as good but it sure wouldn't be as good keeping Tyreek then teams would just drive down and keep our offense off the field so Tyreek would be defacto. We need to boost our DLine and Edge and a CB to keep our defense good enough so that our offense can score points and our defense keeps the other team from out scoring us. The winner of the game is the team with the most points if our defense allows the other team to out score us we lose. It's like Patrics rookie year when we played the rams sure we scored a lot of points but so did the rams and they beat us because they made a defensive play and we did not.


I don't know because I'm not Nostradamus but I bet odds of winning more Super Bowls with Patrick Mahomes than odds of winning Super Bowls for Miami with Tyreek Hill.

mkp785 04-24-2022 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16260074)
The Chiefs will likely never have a better window than what they just had with him on his rookie deal.

That's not true. This draft can set up the team for the next 10 years. Especially if they get some quality defenders and a WR here.

RealSNR 04-24-2022 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16260077)
I'm not underestimating anything. Not trying to credit Hill with 60 wins, it's a team sport. But just about every big win, Hill played a huge part in. If anyone is underestimating something, it's you and Hill's contributions.

It's possible to acknowledge how important Tyreek Hill was to winning while also being optimistic for the future as a result of this trade because it now means the Chiefs have way more flexibility to evolve and change from year to year instead of being locked into paying 3 stars and 48 shitbuckets.

You want to win Super Bowls with Mahomes? Build the team sustainably over the long-term and make every season a pretty good shot at breaking through.

The team's going to look and play different. It's going to be built different. You're acting like because Hill isn't around, there's no way important game-winning plays can get made by any other player at any other position.

RunKC 04-24-2022 09:45 PM

I’m interested in seeing what the offense will look like with an actual WR corps and not just one damn good one.

Demarcus Robinson and Byron Pringle really held this team back last year. They couldn’t consistently beat single coverage and that seemed to really slow us down .

I think Juju and MVS are much better talents that will help as long as we can get a viable WR this next week through the draft

emaw1979 04-24-2022 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16260222)
I’m interested in seeing what the offense will look like with an actual WR corps and not just one damn good one.

Demarcus Robinson and Byron Pringle really held this team back last year. They couldn’t consistently beat single coverage and that seemed to really slow us down .

I think Juju and MVS are much better talents that will help as long as we can get a viable WR this next week through the draft

I never got why the NFL media has pushed the narrative that Mahomes has been surrounded with the best weapons in the NFL. Beyond 18, the Mahomes has had Hill and Kelce and a bunch of scrubs. Hell, even the line was trash to below average until last year.

Collectively, this is the best offensive talent he's had since 2018 to play with.

Chris Meck 04-25-2022 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16260178)
It's possible to acknowledge how important Tyreek Hill was to winning while also being optimistic for the future as a result of this trade because it now means the Chiefs have way more flexibility to evolve and change from year to year instead of being locked into paying 3 stars and 48 shitbuckets.

You want to win Super Bowls with Mahomes? Build the team sustainably over the long-term and make every season a pretty good shot at breaking through.

The team's going to look and play different. It's going to be built different. You're acting like because Hill isn't around, there's no way important game-winning plays can get made by any other player at any other position.

I agree with this and will go even further.

There has been a tendency to feed Hill no matter what; now, is that Andy? Or is that Mahomes? My eyes tell me it's Mahomes. Some of that is likely because of the huge drop-off in ability with the lesser WR's.

In 2021, Hill averaged 11.2 yards per catch. That's not explosive. Is it due to his talent? No, it's the defenses being deployed to stop him.

Does it matter, though? No, not really. The results are the results.

Mahomes is otherwordly talented, but there are still some tendencies that need to be curbed. One of which is the desire to just feed Hill and land the kill shot every play. Too much hero ball. It's just not a sustainable offensive plan, we saw it a lot last season, and it destroyed the team in the AFCCG.

It's entirely possible that an offense that does NOT have Hill may be more efficient, spreading the ball around more, and breaking KC's own tendencies. An evolution, if you will. From 'hero ball' to 'The Terminator'. Relentless. Everywhere. Every blade of grass threatened from every angle.

Brooklyn 04-25-2022 07:28 AM

imagine if Hill doesn't drop the pass in OT vs the Bengals. What's the conversation we are having?

ThaVirus 04-25-2022 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emaw1979 (Post 16260270)
I never got why the NFL media has pushed the narrative that Mahomes has been surrounded with the best weapons in the NFL. Beyond 18, the Mahomes has had Hill and Kelce and a bunch of scrubs. Hell, even the line was trash to below average until last year.

Collectively, this is the best offensive talent he's had since 2018 to play with.

I would agree we've been a collection of stars and scrubs for a while now, but Mahomes has been pretty lucky. Hill and Kelce are HoF talents and Reid is a HoF coach.

AdolfOliverBush 04-25-2022 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16260178)
the Chiefs have way more flexibility to evolve and change from year to year instead of being locked into paying 3 stars and 48 shitbuckets.

LMAO :clap:

sedated 04-25-2022 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emaw1979 (Post 16260270)
I never got why the NFL media has pushed the narrative that Mahomes has been surrounded with the best weapons in the NFL. Beyond 18, the Mahomes has had Hill and Kelce and a bunch of scrubs. Hell, even the line was trash to below average until last year.

This isn't true and only a thought because of the Tampa Super Bowl. Fischer was above average (and on a hell of a team-friendly deal), and Schwartz was a multiple All-Pro and frequently considered the best RT in the game.

Skyy God 04-25-2022 01:04 PM

From today’s Ringer article.

“Now the Packers and Chiefs both have four picks within the first two rounds of the draft, and while they likely won’t find anyone who can match Adams’s or Hill’s production one-for-one, even replacing 80 percent of their production at 10 percent of the cost is a good return on investment. Plus, there’s always the outside chance they will hit on a massive talent, as the Vikings did with Justin Jefferson in 2020, a month after they traded Stefon Diggs to the Bills.”

Eleazar 04-25-2022 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16261037)
From today’s Ringer article.

“Now the Packers and Chiefs both have four picks within the first two rounds of the draft, and while they likely won’t find anyone who can match Adams’s or Hill’s production one-for-one, even replacing 80 percent of their production at 10 percent of the cost is a good return on investment. Plus, there’s always the outside chance they will hit on a massive talent, as the Vikings did with Justin Jefferson in 2020, a month after they traded Stefon Diggs to the Bills.”

If production at WR1 drops by 25%, but we increase production at WR2, WR3, and another spot like DE (which we could increase even with league-average replacement players), the team is better.

The chances of us doing those things now, with almost 2 draft classes worth of picks and a lot of cap space: pretty good.

And we were only giving up 2 or so years of peak production from Hill. Speed players don't usually drop off gradually. He will probably be effective in the league for several more years, but elite production from Hill is predicated on elite speed which doesn't usually last beyond 30. The clock is ticking on that.

It was the right move.

Skyy God 04-25-2022 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele (Post 16261116)
If production at WR1 drops by 25%, but we increase production at WR2, WR3, and another spot like DE (which we could increase even with league-average replacement players), the team is better.

The chances of us doing those things now, with almost 2 draft classes worth of picks and a lot of cap space: pretty good.

And we were only giving up 2 or so years of peak production from Hill. Speed players don't usually drop off gradually. He will probably be effective in the league for several more years, but elite production from Hill is predicated on elite speed which doesn't usually last beyond 30. The clock is ticking on that.

It was the right move.

Exactly.

TY Hilton started declining severely in his age 29 season, similarly sized.

ptlyon 04-25-2022 02:27 PM

Was at a benefit concert for ALS yesterday and they had a signed Chiefs helmet of Tyreek. Oof talk about poor timing. It did take $500 though from a gal I know from KC.

Rasputin 04-25-2022 02:34 PM

Our rivals desperately traded away for high cost players and gave away draft picks and they are going have to pay the Piper.

We traded away a player that in a couple years won't be near as effective and we gained draft capital and saved a got the Patrick Mahomes State Farm discount on Cap space. Although i think we are contenders this year because we have the best quarterback our defense is going take more time to develop so I'm curbing my enthusiasm although next year and next 5 years we should have an open window to win the Super Bowl. Every year we have a chance with Patrick but that window opened for the next five seasons with this draft if we hit on some defensive guys mostly that can get after the quarterback.

saphojunkie 04-25-2022 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele (Post 16261116)
If production at WR1 drops by 25%, but we increase production at WR2, WR3, and another spot like DE (which we could increase even with league-average replacement players), the team is better.

The chances of us doing those things now, with almost 2 draft classes worth of picks and a lot of cap space: pretty good.

And we were only giving up 2 or so years of peak production from Hill. Speed players don't usually drop off gradually. He will probably be effective in the league for several more years, but elite production from Hill is predicated on elite speed which doesn't usually last beyond 30. The clock is ticking on that.

It was the right move.

The problem is people like King and Tex are either unwilling or unable to comprehend and accept this.

Bump 04-25-2022 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16261204)
Exactly.

TY Hilton started declining severely in his age 29 season, similarly sized.

similar height. Have you seen Tyreek's abs and biceps?

TEX 04-25-2022 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16261284)
The problem is people like King and Tex are either unwilling or unable to comprehend and accept this.

I can't speak for King, but for me It has nothing to do with comprehension. I get what you're saying, I just don't agree with it. You're forgetting we had JuJu signed. So factor him in WITH Hill. THAT was supposed to be the plan. What we're on now is plan B or C. I don't accept the fact that what we have now is better than the original plan. We'll have to see how it all plays out. Until then, the emperor has no clothes. Let's hope he gets some.

-King- 04-25-2022 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16261284)
The problem is people like King and Tex are either unwilling or unable to comprehend and accept this.

Unwilling to accept what? Pretty sure it's in this thread that I said that Veach could knock the draft out and we're back in business. We just disagree on whether that would have been the best course of action.

sedated 04-25-2022 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16261334)
You're forgetting we had JuJu signed. So factor him in WITH Hill. THAT was supposed to be the plan. What we're on now is plan B or C. I don't accept the fact that what we have now is better than the original plan. We'll have to see how it all plays out. Until then, the emperor has no clothes. Let's hope he gets some.

Huh? How do you know what KC's ultimate plans were at any point in this offseason?

You don't think they contemplate a few moves ahead before acting? I sincerely hope the front office isn't taking every decision one at a time.

Sassy Squatch 04-25-2022 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 16261402)
Huh? How do you know what KC's ultimate plans were at any point in this offseason?

You don't think they contemplate a few moves ahead before acting? I sincerely hope the front office isn't taking every decision one at a time.

LMAO Yeah, think it's pretty safe to say trading Hill was not the original plan.

Skyy God 04-25-2022 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 16261327)
similar height. Have you seen Tyreek's abs and biceps?

They’re listed at similar weights. Reek is thicker, tho.

Bl00dyBizkitz 04-25-2022 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16260074)
The Chiefs will likely never have a better window than what they just had with him on his rookie deal.

Damn, may as well just give up then, huh?

Sell the farm. Its over.

-King- 04-25-2022 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16261459)
They’re listed at similar weights. Reek is thicker, tho.

Yeah no matter what the numbers say, they're nowhere near the same size or build.

Coochie liquor 04-25-2022 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16261334)
I can't speak for King, but for me It has nothing to do with comprehension. I get what you're saying, I just don't agree with it. You're forgetting we had JuJu signed. So factor him in WITH Hill. THAT was supposed to be the plan. What we're on now is plan B or C. I don't accept the fact that what we have now is better than the original plan. We'll have to see how it all plays out. Until then, the emperor has no clothes. Let's hope he gets some.

None of us know what Veach’s plan is. Let’s let it come to fruition before we burn dowm the kingdom. He had a beautiful plan, and draft last year. Let’s see what has changed come Saturday.

DRU 04-25-2022 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 16259760)
<iframe width="855" height="481" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S89ymhpoNAg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This was a great play and I was happy to see it, but this is not the type of moment I was talking about.

The one I'm talking about was very similar, but in overtime, and it would have won the game. Instead, he ran out of bounds and let "one of the guys" finish it.

It's just a mindset thing. When it was early, he went for it. When it was all on the line, he bowed out. I hope to see more of the former this year, but in those big moments.

RunKC 05-02-2022 06:43 AM

So far this is what we’ve got from the trade so far:

Trent McDuffie
Skyy Moore
Darian Kinnard
2023 4th and 2023 6th-TBD
Cash for a big signing-TBD

Well so far a starting corner, WR and potentially RT

Red Dawg 05-02-2022 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16277989)
So far this is what we’ve got from the trade so far:

Trent McDuffie
Skyy Moore
Darian Kinnard
2023 4th and 2023 6th-TBD
Cash for a big signing-TBD

Well so far a starting corner, WR and potentially RT

We won this trade. If you don't think so then you are just a Hill homer.

ThaVirus 05-02-2022 07:06 AM

Does anyone else think RedDawg is a huge ****ing dipshit?

Imagine declaring we "won" this trade before any of the rookies we took with the picks even played a down..

Sofa King 05-02-2022 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16278009)
Does anyone else think RedDawg is a huge ****ing dipshit?

Imagine declaring we "won" this trade before any of the rookies we took with the picks even played a down..

And what the **** is a Hill homer? He's one of the greatest Chiefs of all time. I guess sign me up for being a Hill Homer, he's incredible and a blast to watch. Wish we still had him.

2bikemike 05-02-2022 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 16278012)
And what the **** is a Hill homer? He's one of the greatest Chiefs of all time. I guess sign me up for being a Hill Homer, he's incredible and a blast to watch. Wish we still had him.

I liked Hill as well, but now that he is in Miami, I hope his stats are cut in half catching passes from Tua!

kccrow 05-02-2022 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16277994)
We won this trade. If you don't think so then you are just a Hill homer.

I mean, those guys have to play well and stay healthy. I'm not going to proclaim we won it yet. It does look extremely positive though.

kccrow 05-02-2022 07:45 AM

Would like to add, that I think we should not get comfortable with thoughts that good receivers will be around for more than a rookie deal for a while.

Hammock Parties 05-02-2022 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 16278057)
Would like to add, that I think we should not get comfortable with thoughts that good receivers will be around for more than a rookie deal for a while.

they're going to be more apt to give money to OL

Dunerdr 05-02-2022 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16278009)
Does anyone else think RedDawg is a huge ****ing dipshit?

Imagine declaring we "won" this trade before any of the rookies we took with the picks even played a down..

I think its become accepted at this point like Mahomo. No one even bitches about it any more.

TEX 05-02-2022 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 16278012)
And what the **** is a Hill homer? He's one of the greatest Chiefs of all time. I guess sign me up for being a Hill Homer, he's incredible and a blast to watch. Wish we still had him.

Exactly! Anyone declaring that "we won the trade" at this point, before any of the draft picks have even taken the field, can't be taken seriously. Time will tell.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 08:07 AM

Of course we won the trade.

So did Miami.

So did Tyreek.

It made sense for all parties to do what they did. It's a trade, not a zero-sum game.

-King- 05-02-2022 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 16278012)
And what the **** is a Hill homer? He's one of the greatest Chiefs of all time. I guess sign me up for being a Hill Homer, he's incredible and a blast to watch. Wish we still had him.

Oh you haven't heard? Hill is a selfish player who cares more about money than winning and who got figured out and held down by defenses last year.

Buehler445 05-02-2022 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278087)
Of course we won the trade.

So did Miami.

So did Tyreek.

It made sense for all parties to do what they did. It's a trade, not a zero-sum game.

Agreed. However, the book isn't written.

Reek won, and that part is over.

MIA may yet lose. That part we can reasonably surmise over time.

As far as us. If we win going away, it will be easy to surmise. If we lose, it becomes murky because we'll never know what we could have been with Reek.

BryanBusby 05-02-2022 09:32 AM

Too early to be declaring any winners.

0 games have happened since the trade and while Tyreek got more money it could cost him a gold jacket in the end.

saphojunkie 05-02-2022 09:53 AM

The trade is over. The trade was over BEFORE the draft.

"It's too early" is about judging what the parties do with the opportunity in front of them. They are separate things.

If I sell my 1994 honda civic for $200,000, I won that deal, right?

If I then spend that $200,000 losing lottery tickets, did I somehow NOT win the deal for my Honda Civic? Of course not. I just wasted my resources.

If the person who bought my honda civic sells it for $199,500, did they retroactively make a good deal when they bought it from me? No. They just managed to recover from their mistake. Yay.

You have to separate the deal from the management of acquired resources after.

jd1020 05-02-2022 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278087)
Of course we won the trade.

So did Miami.

So did Tyreek.

It made sense for all parties to do what they did. It's a trade, not a zero-sum game.

I dunno about it making sense for Miami. It made sense for the Chiefs and Tyreek for sure though.

5 picks for a WR is insane, especially when your QB is Tua.

TomBarndtsTwin 05-02-2022 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16278215)
Oh you haven't heard? Hill is a selfish player who cares more about money than winning and who got figured out and held down by defenses last year.

ONE of these things you posted is true.

Hill even admitted as much in his press conference . . . . . .

UK_Chief 05-02-2022 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278313)
The trade is over. The trade was over BEFORE the draft.

"It's too early" is about judging what the parties do with the opportunity in front of them. They are separate things.

If I sell my 1994 honda civic for $200,000, I won that deal, right?

If I then spend that $200,000 losing lottery tickets, did I somehow NOT win the deal for my Honda Civic? Of course not. I just wasted my resources.

If the person who bought my honda civic sells it for $199,500, did they retroactively make a good deal when they bought it from me? No. They just managed to recover from their mistake. Yay.

You have to separate the deal from the management of acquired resources after.

I’ll give you 100 bucks

-King- 05-02-2022 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 16278484)
ONE of these things you posted is true.

Hill even admitted as much in his press conference . . . . . .

What was the quote?

TomBarndtsTwin 05-02-2022 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16279182)
What was the quote?

Feel free to watch his introductory press conference after the trade if you like, but he was asked (and yes, I’m paraphrasing) ‘how tough was it to leave the Chiefs?’ His response: ‘It was tough, real tough, but when somebody comes to you with a lot of money, feelings change. Those guys are Hall of Famers and they’re going to continue to do their thing, Coach Reid is gonna do his thibg. They’ll be alright’

Again, I’m paraphrasing, but that’s the gist of it. I interpret that as he knew he was leaving a Super Bowl team to go to another team, not because they offered him a lot of money, but because they offered him a shitload of money. Not really sure what other way you could interpret that.

I love Tyreek and appreciate everything he did for KC and wish him luck. No ill will here. But make no mistake, he absolutely chose money over winning by leaving KC to go to Miami. Doesn’t make him a bad person, but that’s the reality.

RaidersOftheCellar 05-02-2022 07:11 PM

Hill didn’t win. He may think he did now, but he’ll remember what the good ol’ days were like as he’s watching KC win multiple Super Bowls from his couch.

TribalElder 05-02-2022 07:25 PM

It’s crazy to think about but after we see this years offense it could prove that Tyreek was holding us back from what we could be

TomBarndtsTwin 05-02-2022 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16279324)
It’s crazy to think about but after we see this years offense it could prove that Tyreek was holding us back from what we could be

Yup.

1) Tyreek was our best skill position player on offense while he was here.

2) The Chiefs can be a better more balanced offense without Tyreek.


Both of these things can be true.

TEX 05-02-2022 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16279324)
It’s crazy to think about but after we see this years offense it could prove that Tyreek was holding us back from what we could be

Naw, Tyreek was not holding us back. All we needed was a more consistent running game. A legit #2 WR would have helped also.

TEX 05-02-2022 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 16279338)
Yup.

1) Tyreek was our best skill position player on offense while he was here.

2) The Chiefs can be a better more balanced offense without Tyreek.


Both of these things can be true.

Could have been better and more balanced with Tyreek also. Like they were in 2018 and 2019. That's on the Chiefs, not Tyreek.

RedinTexas 05-02-2022 07:57 PM

I'm ok with Hill moving on. I wish he could/would have stayed, but he wasn't going to fit here any more with the amount of money he wanted. It's a business and that's just how it goes. He did great things with the Chiefs and I wish him continued success except against the Chiefs or at the Chiefs' expense.

-King- 05-02-2022 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16279324)
It’s crazy to think about but after we see this years offense it could prove that Tyreek was holding us back from what we could be

A player that forces teama to entirely change their whole defense is not holding the team back.


Holy shit LMAO

TEX 05-02-2022 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedinTexas (Post 16279375)
I'm ok with Hill moving on. I wish he could/would have stayed, but he wasn't going to fit here any more with the amount of money he wanted. It's a business and that's just how it goes. He did great things with the Chiefs and I wish him continued success except against the Chiefs or at the Chiefs' expense.

That's a good way of looking at it.

TwistedChief 05-02-2022 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 16278009)
Does anyone else think RedDawg is a huge ****ing dipshit?

Imagine declaring we "won" this trade before any of the rookies we took with the picks even played a down..

I'll be honest: I think he's typically a total dipshit, but I'm pretty excited about optimistic RedDawg and I absolutely want to encourage his more recent attitude. So if the guy is overcorrecting a bit, let's just roll with it.

ThaVirus 05-03-2022 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16278087)
Of course we won the trade.

This is impossible to say at this point. If we struggle on offense next year, go 8-9 and the picks we made with this trade are all out of the league in 5 years while Hill goes on to continue his HoF career for another 8 years in Miami, we will have gotten the shit end of this trade.

Best you can do is say it made sense for all parties, which appears to be somewhat true.

Rainbarrel 05-03-2022 07:21 AM

People who smeared his name comes to the press conferences in KC. A SB ring(s) won't wipe away that reminder. I'd want out too

RunKC 08-10-2022 06:20 PM

Good luck Tyreek. You’re gonna need it

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">With no pressure somebody tell Tyreek stop lying on the net lmaoooo <a href="https://t.co/mLlCIW1VEi">pic.twitter.com/mLlCIW1VEi</a></p>&mdash; Yellow Boiii (@yellow815) <a href="https://twitter.com/yellow815/status/1557506597332701184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 10, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

R8RFAN 08-10-2022 06:33 PM

<a href='https://postimages.org/' target='_blank'><img src='https://i.postimg.cc/BbK4TB47/weiss.png' border='0' alt='weiss'/></a>

BryanBusby 08-10-2022 06:35 PM

hm a patriots dick sucker is going to suck patriot dick wow news at 11

Wallcrawler 08-10-2022 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16279402)
A player that forces teama to entirely change their whole defense is not holding the team back.


Holy shit LMAO

He did make defenses play differently. However, he is on record, with his agent bitching that he didn't get the ball.

Can I see the pill please?

The dude had career highs in targets receptions, and also interceptions caused and it still wasn't enough?

Without this dude in Pat's ear, causing him to hold out for the Tyreek Hill highlight, instead of taking a wide open 10-15 to Kelce, or just move through the progression, we should see a drastically more decisive and efficient Patrick Mahomes.

I said it when it happened, and I still believe that the exit of Tyreek Hill was addition by subtraction.

DrunkBassGuitar 08-10-2022 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8RFAN (Post 16404377)
<a href='https://postimages.org/' target='_blank'><img src='https://i.postimg.cc/BbK4TB47/weiss.png' border='0' alt='weiss'/></a>

lmao he got fired from KU


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.