![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rodgers is 104 and Russell's is 102. I'll let you mull it over big dog. Seems like quite a big difference there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Never mind that Rodgers is one of the greatest QBs all time and at no point has Wilson EVER been the best QB in the NFL. Nevermind that one guy is coming off back to back MVPs while the other has never even sniffed one. Nevermind that the Broncos don’t even believe this, hence why they waited until Rodgers’ announcement, even with him being significantly older. You’re beyond ****ing clueless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Age is literally the only reason Wilson would be considered a better option. And that’s assuming he doesn’t continue to decline like he has. Rodgers is a significantly better QB that won his SB on his own, not with an elite all-time defense. |
Quote:
I think it was a good signing. Sure, losing the picks hurt, but losing your fans is worse. |
Quote:
|
I hate Denver but this will make them relevant.
Good defense Good running game Good quarterback AFC west will be tough as hell. We need a great offseason to keep ahead of the curve. |
Quote:
|
Based on this thread, Russell Wilson may be the most underrated QB in history.
|
Rodgers is a statistical all time great but i don’t think he’s even the best QB in his own teams history. Hell Favre got his team to the SB more.
Mahomes has already done more and he’s only 26. The truth is there weren’t many QB’s like him back then. And one that was (Stafford) was in Detroit. Nowadays there are more like him, but better. I think Mahomes and Allen will both be better than Rodgers when it’s all said and done |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.