Quote:
Originally Posted by Shields68
(Post 17033824)
In a salary cap league there is always going to be a trade off. Further any GM is going to have to be careful not to pay a guy based on what he has done but rather what you think he will do during the life of the contract. Paying jones big money for a couple years maybe worth it, but paying him for 4-5 years is a gamble.
|
Oh I completely agree, I just hate the false equivalencies being presented. He's NOT Mahomes, and no one is saying that he's not an important player. What is being suggested that if next year is a tag and trade of CJ95, that Veach probably has a plan in place to address this and come out looking decent. You don't build dynasties by overpaying players and creating a very Top heavy pay structure on your roster.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKchiefs
(Post 17033855)
Problem is, let’s say hypothetically they let Jones play out his contract and walk next year. You can tag and trade, but he’s taking up most of the salary cap until he is traded and it hurts your ability to sign other free agents.
You can let him walk but then the roster is almost completely void of talent at DT and you don’t have any additional picks to help address the position. Left tackle is very likely your top need (again) so can you really use your 1st at DT when QB1s blind spot protection is in question again? You’d have to hope 1-2 of Leonard Williams, Christian Wilkins, or DJ Reader are available as the top FA options on the market outside of Jones. Of course they’ll all likely command large contracts, so are they that much lower than Jones that it’s worth it to not just extend Jones?
|
That is part of the problem, however, you can extend Thuney possibly, drop MVS, restructure Mahomes, etc. It's difficult, but not completely handcuffing our ability to manuever. Also, in regards to contract size, barring they create what is in essence a dummy year on the contract, the amount is high enough that I think you can possibly make it up in the aggregate amongst defensive positions. Although we possibly disagree on this one, this is actually a really good argument that does hold some weight in thought, and is a very good point that not many people have brought up or think about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city
(Post 17033903)
If we're a worse team, we aren't going to be able to compete in the current AFC field with what we have to offer on the DL. There's alot of talent there sure, but you take away the cornerstone of the defense and they can't get the stops they need.
|
I don't think anyone is advocating trading him at this exact moment, I think people are suggesting a tag and trade next year instead, which would give Veach time to address the position group.
If Veach can completely overhaul our OLine in 1 offseason, I have every confidence that he would have a plan to address the defensive line.
Losing a player like him would be unfortunate obviously, however, losing one player will not drop our defense from 16th in points and 11th in Yards to 28th in both, especially with the recovered assets (cap and picks) that will probably be used on defensive players.
They all help each other, but there are 10 more players out there defending every play, and some of them are pretty damn talented.