![]() |
Quote:
Shit, he was the only reason we had a chance today. |
Quote:
<iframe style="display: none;" allowtransparency="true" id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe> |
Here is the post that should end this stupid debate.
Raise your hand if when Jamal Charles laid on that turf, and Andy Reid walked out, if you said, pfff, no big deal. We got this. There are no hands raised, and if it is, you are full of shit. I am the biggest PRO ALEX SMITH GUY on the planet. For those who don't know, when I started here, my user name was ALEX SMITH FAN. And im NOT a troll account. I said, the Chiefs are ****ed. They scored 44 points without Jamal Charles. The qb threw 4 tds, no picks, and 380 yards and accounted for about 440 yards of offense. That's FRANCHISE qb numbers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Bingo...that is why Smith isn't starting in San Francisco
|
If we get Kelce back healthy and add a tight end like Amaro or Ebron or a receiver like Lee, this offense is gonna explode next year.
Alex will have 4000+ yards and 30+ touchdowns. Not saving a good tight end held us back most of the year. |
Quote:
Did I think it would limit the playbook? Yes. Did I think it would kill any dynamism the Chiefs' offense had? Yes. I still thought they could win though. Now, you answer me this: with a 28 point lead and basically the entire second half yet to play; isn't it still the offenses responsibility to be efficient and put points on the board? (The Chiefs scored a total of 6 points after the Davis TD reception BTW) |
Quote:
Remember that 3rd and Short where they ran that middle screen to Fasano? That was the slowest four yards in the history of football. It was timed with a sun dial. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree ceebz. ...it is the o's responsibility to at least milk the clock and put a few points on the board.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.