![]() |
Verderame on his pod:
“Outside of Campbell, this is not viewed as a good tackle class. Many people I’ve talked to have said they think Kelvin Banks and Armond Membou are looked at more as Guards by a lot of these teams. Simmons may be a Tackle but he’s considered to be better on the right side than the left. Conerly could be an option but there’s a reason he might be there when KC picks. He’s viewed as a project. He’s gonna take some time.” Yeesh |
They're 100% going to pay a veteran and to the extent of the money will tell you what they think about Kingsley's future position, LT or LG.
|
Quote:
And all the more reason to spend available cap space on the OL in FA and perhaps in retaining Smith. |
Quote:
I wanted to hate the WHOLE class, but I do think Campbell will stick at LT and be a good one. And I think he'll probably be an adequate starter at LT even as a rookie. Not good. Probably not even average. But he won't kill ya. He's the outlier from this OT class. But I do think at some point down the road one of the more toolsy but raw guys could develop past him. I mean, not here. We'd leave him to die, bench him then move him to guard. But somewhere. |
Tyron Smith gonna end up the Chiefs LT.
|
Sounds like they’re ready to flush the turd Kingsley
|
Quote:
|
So now that the DL class is getting all this hype, wonder if it means we could get Turk and/or Omenihu back on a bit of a discount given many teams may be content to wait and draft their DL primarily
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they will let CEH and Skyy play out there contracts, there's no way they are "flushing" Kingsley after one season. |
Quote:
He’s an afterthought now. |
Quote:
Remember, the dude is only 21 years old. There's no chance they're giving up on him this quickly. He's not in their immediate plans because he was even more raw than they anticipated. I'd bet my bottom dollar he's your opening game starter at LG in 2027, though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Folks will always hate developing players man. Kingsley was the 63rd pick. 2nd to last pick of the 2nd rd.
He’s only 21. Let’s pump the brakes a bit |
Chiefs are the ones that expected him to operate on an island, benched him twice mid game when he couldn't do it, then relegated him to a project at LG.
|
Quote:
We all love Andy Reid, but he isn't infallible |
They can’t draft a good tackle bc that would involve trading major assets to move up too far, so they took a shot on a player that has a very high ceiling due to traits that other players at his position just don’t have and may be moving him to G.
They literally had success doing this with with Tyreek, Chris and Patrick. Nobody should bitch if the kid gives us solid G play, even in 2026. Worst case scenario he fails and it was worth taking a shot, but the kid still has plenty of time. |
Rams close to a deal with Alaric Jackson
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Rams?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Rams</a> and offensive tackle Alaric Jackson are getting close on a long-term extension, per sources. <br><br>The deal is not done but is trending in the right direction. <a href="https://t.co/jkzH5jhe2T">pic.twitter.com/jkzH5jhe2T</a></p>— Jeremy Fowler (@JFowlerESPN) <a href="https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1895576813117845939?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Least surprising news of the day. No chance they were letting Jackson leave after reupping with Stafford.
|
Alaric Jackson back to Rams at 3/57
That should set the market for Cam Robinson |
I think he left money on the table by not getting to free agency.
We were speculating he’d get more than that. |
Quote:
Just because you can't see a spot for him in February means almost nothing. Skyy Moore was here for his entire contract. No matter how much you wish, they're not giving up on Kingsley any time soon. |
Quote:
|
Well that sucks about Jackson, looks like it is looking more and more like DJ Humphries at LT and then being forced to draft LT in the first by moving up
|
Rams paying their entire OL. Huh.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We'll land Robinson for around the same I would imagine. |
Quote:
Furthermore, Veach doesn't decide who plays where. We've seen it before where Veach talks up a guy and Andy decides differently . |
I mean, Veach would absolutely know what the plan is with Suamataia. He's not going out signing Cam Robinson to a long term deal if Reid still wants Suamataia to take that job.
|
2025-$14 million
2026-$18 million 2027-$28 million (cut with minimal dead money) You could probably do this for Cam Robinson on an Alaric Jackson type deal. Basically a 2 year $16 million APY deal. |
Quote:
|
By comparison , Jawaan Taylor got $80 million over four years with $40 million fully guaranteed.
|
Yeah, I think that deal is a huge win for the Ram. I wouldn’t call it a loss for Jackson - that’s a lot of guaranteed money for a guy who hasn’t made much yet.
I wouldn’t call have been fine with the Chiefs coming in over top of him. |
Quote:
On the plus side Jackson only had 1 really good year, so who knows. But that Taylor contract, yuck. |
Oh God, we're getting Cam Robinson aren't we?
|
Quote:
All the big name guys know what they’re getting after this week. |
Seeing what Jackson got makes me feel good about what they can get Robinson for.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Can we get Doug Pederson back in KC too? Let’s get all of the former Jags here, maybe Kirk too if he’s released.
On a serious note, would we say Robinson is comparable to OBJ? Because while I never cared much for OBJ the offense could at least function when he was here, if Robinson is comparable in performance but isn’t represented by a dumb **** agent like OBJ then perhaps that same level of performance is palatable at a better price. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On balance, Robinson is a better pass protector, IMO. OBJ, on balance, is probably a slightly more consistent player. Where OBJ wins on power more, Robinson is more likely to win on athleticism. He's by no means elite in that regard but where OBJ had bad feet and made up for it by just being very very long, Robinson has average feet but isn't quite as long. If you're Madden ranking them, giving them both an 80 grade is probably fair -- but their respective category scores would be quite a bit different. Ultimately I'd rather have Robinson than OBJ. Some teams might prefer OBJ. |
Quote:
He's better than Donovan Smith for sure. The OL was good when we had either of those guys. We really don't need more than adequate. |
If we could go back in time. I would have locked up OBJ when we had the chance.
Rare misstep by Veach there. |
Quote:
That was 100% on OBJ and his "agent". That's why he lost money. Get a ****ing clue. |
Quote:
Well aware of all that. Veach clearly didn’t prioritize re-signing him or negotiations would never have soured to the point they did. He thought he could get equal production at a better value and more importantly he underestimated the value in the fact that Patrick trusted OBJ. He gambled and lost. It happens sometimes. |
Quote:
OBJ is the reason he's not a Chief. And not necessarily because of the 2023 off-season. That was standard tag games that didn't ultimately work out. It was the goddamn 2022 offseason where he absolutely screwed us. And he was such a damn weirdo about the whole thing and tied our hands so long that Veach was unwilling to do that dance again the following year. So even to the extent we 'messed up' the 2023 off-season with Brown, it was a consequence of how badly he and his 'agent' duffed the spring/summer of 2022. I have no problem saying Veach made a mistake if I think he did (I think he's about to). But in this case, OBJ operated strangely and/or in bad faith and in so doing wrote his own ticket to Cincinnati. Brown is just a really odd guy. I don't miss him. If Robinson signs and works out to be the slightly above average player I think he'll be, that's a swap I'm content making. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
First Brown wouldn't engage because he wanted to do it on his own. Then when he tried to do it on his own it was evidently a fools errand. Then he wanted to get an agent and slow-walked the hell out of it. Then when he got the agent he hired someone with no experience "Because I don't want him to be part of the old boys network" and that guy didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. Veach absolutely approached the 2022 offseason with Brown as a priority. And in the 2023 off-season he COULDN'T prioritize Brown anymore because Brown was a damn flake the year prior and we couldn't let him hold the off-season hostage again. This ain't the place to plant a flag. You're just wrong. |
Quote:
He simply doesn't have the facts straight. He'd be wise to pull the ejection handle on this one. We all eat a little shit from time time. |
I don't think Veach is going to pay top $ for a LT. He's targeting one in the draft. And I think he's hinted that this is the approach the chiefs are going to take.
|
Quote:
Everyone is looking for a LT in the draft. Unfortunately, there is only one guy in the draft that considered sure to stick at LT. And KC won’t get a chance at him. I don’t expect KC to be thinking it can solve LT from this draft. At least not for 2025. They’re going to either sign Cam Robinson or sign Humphries and have him compete (probably while taking another stab at a T in the draft). I’d go get Jedrick Wills, too, if they go the Humphries route and just try to create as much competition as possible. |
Well guys, the obvious answer here is Cam Robinson. And honestly he’s not a bad option all things considered.
He’s a similar version of Donovan Smith but younger, has more system experience and isn’t a brokedick. People wanted Donovan Smith…well here he is. Don’t think he’s gonna have a big market either. Can’t think of a team besides us and the Patriots that need a starting LT, and the Patriots probably won’t touch him bc they have a great shot at getting Will Campbell. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If there’s a lot of teams looking for a LT, then they’re all looking at Cam Robinson too
|
Any chance the giants would trade us Andrew Thomas? Two firsts and Kingsley for Thomas?
|
Quote:
Doubtful, but that would be the hope for the Chiefs. |
Quote:
|
There are other starting caliber LTs in free agency too. I'm sure somebody is going to sign Moore to be their starter, and he might be cheaper and a better fit for other teams with his run blocking.
|
Quote:
Teams that NEED a LT: New England Cleveland (I do see Dan Moore going here) Kansas City Might be looking: Miami (if Armstead retires and they aren't convinced Paul is ready) Baltimore (if they can't re-sign Stanley) Chicago (not alot of love for Braxton Jones and Amegadjie reportedly didn't do much to instill confidence either) Green Bay (Walker isn't that great so they could look to upgrade if its there) San Francisco (They need an heir to Trent Williams asap) Tennessee (Latham wasn't very convincing last season, might want to move him to RT) Dallas (Depends on how they view Guyton's progress) Teams that NEED a RT: New England New York Jets (their backups suck and Moses is a FA) Might be looking: Miami (Austin Jackson should probably move inside) Jacksonville (Anton Harrison hasn't looked great) Las Vegas (they may want to move Glaze inside to OG and upgrade) New York Giants (upgrading from Eluemunor would be prudent) Arizona (might want to upgrade from Jonah Williams) Los Angeles Rams (Havenstein is old and falling off) |
Quote:
|
LT market isn’t very good. Just gotta hope one of these can turn into something decent in the LT spot for 2025 season: DJ Humphries, Wanya, Kingsley, and perhaps a new Draft pick.
|
Quote:
|
We're desperate. We have to make a move and it cannot be a ripple. It has to be a splash. If we can't pull it off it's hard to see us hoisting the Lombardi going against teams who do have really good T's. We may be the only top 5 team that doesn't.
|
What about Mekhi Becton? He has (or at least had) the physical tools to play tackle and he's still only 26.
|
Willie Roaf ain’t walking through that door.
|
Nothing wrong with having your 6-8 be Kingsley, Wanya, Nourzad. Those are young guys with starter upside who if you have an injury somewhere, you’re most likely going to be able to ride it out similar to how we did when Allegretti stepped in.
That’s not nothing. Caliendo cannot be our backup guard next year. Nothing worse than seeing a big guy down and wondering if your season is toast. After they bring in the sure answer at LT, I think we’ll be ok in that regard for 2-3 years and that’s not a bad way to use draft capital. |
… and now talking it through, even though I’ve been a pro-Ronnie Stanley guy thus far, I totally understand why they’d prefer Robinson even beyond the money.
Nourzad is your backup C. Kingsley can, at minimum, be a swing guard along with Nourzad. LT depth is the problem. You need a stable floor and a guy you can depend on to be there week after week. Eye test says Wanya at LT is a player they were able to win in spite of. At RT, looked like a player they could win with, not in spite of. So really, the most important thing at LT is finding that one solid floor dude who isn’t likely to miss games. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.