![]() |
Quote:
If Notre Dame moves to the Big Ten, it will be as the fifth of five teams. They aren't going there unless the superconference movement is happening. Too much income lost for them to merely be No. 12. The Irish only do it IF they have no other choice. |
Has there been a non-KU fan seriously argue that ND is NOT better off as an independent?
|
Quote:
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/15/comm...sbiz/index.htm That left Villanova with only a 38 percent profit margin, a bit below the combined 45 percent profit margin for the 64 tournament teams that report results (Air Force is exempt from reporting). Together those schools had a combined $330.8 million in revenue during the 2004-05 school year, and $148.3 million in profits, even when including results from the 14 money-losing basketball programs involved in March Madness. Based on those numbers, basketball is more of a sure money maker for schools than college football -- at least for the schools in the so-called six major conferences. Really, I don't make stuff up. I swear... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sorry Ms. Gray-Little. We have tickets to the next rodeo. This one is breaking up. We're out. Later. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wow, some of you go all out and jump on the short bus just to feel better about yourselves or the team you root for. FFS, of course it would hurt KU to move to the MWC, and the school and fans should be a little scared...... but not to be outdone, in the other corner are Mizzou fans mocking, get this, winning & success... and trying to be superior because their school is closer to St. Louis. Seriously? Get a ****ing grip, people.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Kansas is on its knees begging NU and MU to stay.
Gotta love that |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Basketball is just a nice little gem that some of us keep in our back pocket. I actually find the KU fan and KU football fan to be completely different, which I'd expect is true of the MU football vs MU basketball fan. |
So...Big 14
Kansas Kansas State Oklahoma Oklahoma State Colorado Colorado St Iowa St Wyoming UNLV TCU BYU New Mexico San Diego State Utah |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For us, they're the same people. |
Quote:
Air Force Baylor Iowa State Kansas Kansas State New Mexico TCU Boise State BYU Colorado State San Diego State UNLV Utah Wyoming |
Quote:
Let's see the current revenue$ numbers of football and basketball side by side, conference by conference. If data age makes no difference I can prove to you why the Model T is the most profitable car to produce. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick. |
Quote:
:deevee: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Here is something that was posted over at phog.net. I don't vouch for the validity of it.
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=6010537 Total AD Revenue v Football Revenue last year School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue Notre Dame....................$56,929,397............... ................$81,088,368 Big 12 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................ School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue Texas.......................$87,583,986........... ............................$138,459,149 Oklahoma.................$42,638,431.............. ..........................$81,487,835 Nebraska................. $55,226,605....................................... ..$74,881,383 Texas A&M............... $38,358,422....................................... ..$72,886,100 Oklahoma State........$26,536,625.......................... ...............$71,805,825 Kansas.................... $17,676,175....................................... .$70,614,953 Missouri...................$24,141,873............ ............................$57,778,668 Colorado................. $27,827,286....................................... ..$49,859,693 Baylor.....................$11,896,723............ ............................ $48,545,254 Kansas State............ $21,378,813....................................... .$47,399,903 Texas Tech...............$23,581,188.................... .....................$46,632,263 Iowa State...............$21,261,439................... ......................$45,813,189 PAC 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... .......................................... School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue Southern Cal...................$35,203,483................. ...............$80,151,282 Stanford.........................$14,178,256...... ..........................$74,695,254 California...................... $27,747,396................................$73,354 ,967 UCLA.............................$26,640,759...... ..........................$66,177,866 Washington.....................$34,177,030........ .......................$60,575,780 Oregon...........................$24,789,755...... .........................$60,283,512 Arizona State................. $29,857,334................................$53,297 ,963 Arizona......................... $20,927,253................................$51,822 ,629 Oregon State.................. $30,874,059.............................. $50,211,404 Washington State.............$11,415,496..................... ..........$38,293,754 SEC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................ School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue Florida....................$66,150,063............ .......................$108,309,060 Alabama.................$64,606,392............... ....................$103,934,873 LSU.........................$61,868,953........... ......................$100,077,884 Tennessee...............$42,805,360............... ...................$92,524,125 Auburn....................$58,618,819............. .....................$87,001,416 Georgia....................$65,218,406............ .....................$81,496,357 South Carolina..........$57,118,519..................... .............$76,254,236 Kentucky...................$26,143,126............ .....................$72,057,751 Arkansas...................$38,630,265............ .....................$63,978,641 Vanderbilt..................$18,564,940........... .....................$45,582,274 Ole Miss.....................$18,688,648.............. .................$41,318,068 Miss State...................$18,732,248............... ...............$36,536,152 Big 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... .......................................... School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue Ohio State...................$68,196,195............... ..............$119,859,607 Penn State...................$61,767,717............... .............$95,978,243 Michigan.....................$52,246,025.......... ...................$95,193,030 Wisconsin....................$40,005,517.......... ..................$89,842,749 Iowa............................$38,896,234....... .....................$79,521,143 Michigan State.............$43,506,725..................... ........$75,624,811 Minnesota....................$25,594,942.......... ...................$70,322,992 Indiana.........................$20,836,473....... ....................$60,615,528 Purdue.........................$18,320,608........ ....................$59,919,102 Illinois..........................$25,710,645..... ......................$55,609,086 Northwestern...............$23,951,794............ .................$48,582,384 ACC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ...................... School.........................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue Florida State......................$24,877,536............ .....................$74,417,324 Duke...............................$9,029,583..... ................................$71,072,431 UNC.................................$24,163,760... ...............................$70,152,767 Virginia............................$20,210,563... ................................$67,141,170 Boston College...................$20,711,067............. .....................$64,157,876 Miami...............................$27,155,010... ..............................$61,969,808 Clemson.......................... $35,205,168..................................$60,1 67,535 Maryland..........................$13,980,823..... ..............................$59,966,862 Virginia Tech.....................$27,749,586.............. .................... $52,838,905 Georgia Tech.................... $22,830,766..................................$48,0 61,053 NC State.......................... $21,772,446..................................$46,4 91,105 Wake Forest..................... $10,346,081...................................$44, 649,063 |
Quote:
|
Thanks Plow, that data appears to be more current though as you say we don't have verification of data validity.
I just can't picture how bball could make more $ than fball. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look at Memphis. They do OK in the non-conference season on TV, but as soon as they hit the CUSA, their TV coverage drops off the map. If ku is in the MWC, they'll still get good coverage in the pre-conference season when they're playing good teams. And that MWC lineup isn't exactly going to compare well with what the major conferences bring to the table for national broadcasters... if ku ends up in the MWC, no matter how you slice it, the national TV profile and the opportunities to be on national TV are going to decrease. You're :homer:ing if you don't see that. |
Quote:
I see many schools where the basketball revenue is a much bigger contribution than football. Do you have the Big East numbers too from this link? Let's look at those |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What would you think of KU attempting to go independent in basketball ala Notre Dame football? |
Quote:
No chance that a CBS is handing KU a sweetheart TV deal because there frankly isn't the demand nationwide. |
Quote:
Considering the majority of the US would sign off on eliminating college hoops completely if it meant saving college football I don't see how anyone can think bball makes more $ than fball. |
Quote:
Now, if she was a liar as well as a whore, then yeah, it could well have been her. |
Quote:
Kansas maybe Missouri Stanford? where's all that money coming from? Kentucky Indiana Purdue? Duke North Carolina Virginia? Maryland Boston College? Again, let's see the numbers from the Big East... I think what college basketball earns is tremendously underestimated on this board. |
Quote:
I was thinking more like CBS college or FSN... Or maybe a new player like TNT. Who knows. I'm sure you can sell it though. I agree with KU ranking 4th behind those schools. But I KNOW that those 4 schools could get a nightly TV deal with a network if they were independent. What else are people gonna watch during cold winter nights? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
$17,676,175 = KU football. $15M and some change = KU basketball. Even the mighty KU basketball bows to the football program. Look back a few posts, as Plow posted this info. You can't just subtract football from the total budget and assume the rest is basketball. |
Quote:
Donations are included in those revenue reports. Schools that had major renovation projects during those years are going to place extremely well. |
Quote:
I'm well aware that huge football schools like Texas, OSU, the SEC all make more with their football teams. I also realize that football is what drives these huge conf TV deals being that per game football gets many more viewers than basketball. But when you combine the fact that CBB is 300 teams. Plays many more games. Has a HUGE cash cow in the Mach Madness tournament. Less facilities, travel needs, player expenses, scholarships...then yes, overall it earns more for American Universities collectively than football. Problem with bball is that it's revenue is MAXED OUT with the tourney. It's gone as far as it can go. And if CFB ever forms a playoff the same thing will happen. Not a bad thing just that eventually there will be a limit to what these "amateur sports" make. Realignment will increase revenue for schools with TV deals, I agree and that's why footballs' driving it. It's just naive to believe that CBB is a speck on the surface of CFB because it's not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Where's that coming from? tennis?? It's obviously CBB. Do you guys not fill out office pools or something? Why are you pretending basketball doesn't exist? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I used to love college hoops back in the day. As a kid I would go see Iowa play in the old Field House, feel the place shake as our coach Lute Olson battled Bob Knight, Jud Heathcote, Lou Henson, Gene Keady, etc. At halftime you could go behind the bleachers and shoot hoops on the practice court. Recently I'm not so into it because of the transient nature of the players and the resultant way some teams have changed how the game is played but I still have soft spot for it and commend you on the way you defend the game. |
Quote:
(thanks for keeping it on the down low kepp, just like you promised;)) |
Quote:
If it wasn't, college hoops would be driving expansion. It's certainly not all coming from basketball. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
College football isn't. There is more to be made based on cable television subscriptions. More people watch 11 games a year then they do 36 games per capita. Getting the TV networks into cable subscriptions that's what it is. Why is this so hard to get? MU is being invited for cable subscribers, not football. We've been over this. MU is getting helped because of people living in Missouri. Many of which couldn't care less about the Tigers. |
Just got this piece of news from the SEC office — the revenue distribution for the 2009-10 fiscal year. It will make every conference save the Big Ten jealous … or depressed.
Total: $209 million. According to the league, that’s the highest total in SEC history and represents a 57.7 percent increase from the $132.5 million distributed in 2008-2009. Average per school: $17.3 million. That’s about double (maybe a bit more than double) what the Pac-10 distributes to its schools and does not include what the schools generate from their local media deals. Football TV: $109.5 million. (Big 12 is in the $60 million range, I believe, while the Pac-10 in the 40s.) Bowls: $26.5 million. Football championship game: $14.5 million. (You can see why Pac-10 commish Larry Scott is looking into a title game of his own.) Basketball TV: $30 million SEC tournament: $5 million NCAA tournament: $23.5 million. http://blogs.mercurynews.com/college...fallen-behind/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is an amazing display in the face of irrefutable evidence. But, but, but... |
Quote:
Are they after expenses? Is that gross or net? |
Quote:
"But our basketball program is top 5..." "I can't fathom that we'd be left out with our basketball program..." etc, etc, etc |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
10.8 billion is a nice number. But you have to put it into context to really understand it. |
Quote:
I was at the forefront of people on this board talking about Big 10 expansion. I've been stumping from the beginning that this is a deal strictly about demographics and cable TV sets. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Where did you read it goes to all 300 teams equally? |
from wikipedia
Revenues The Division I Men's Basketball tournament is the only NCAA championship tournament (officially, the BCS Football Championship is not an NCAA event) where the NCAA does not keep the profits. Instead, the money from the multi-billion-dollar television contract is divided among the Division I basketball playing schools and conferences as follows:[16] 1/6 of the money goes directly to the schools based on how many sports they play (one "share" for each sport starting with 14, which is the minimum needed for Division I membership). 1/3 of the money goes directly to the schools based on how many scholarships they give out (one share for each of the first 50, two for each of the next 50, ten for each of the next 50, and 20 for each scholarship above 150). 1/2 of the money goes to the conferences based on how well they did in the six previous men's basketball tournaments (counting each year separately, one share for each team getting in, and one share for each win except in the Final Four and, prior to the 2008 tournament, the Play-in game). In 2007, based on the 2001 through 2006 tournaments, the Big East received over $14.85 million, while the eight conferences that did not win a first-round game in those six years received slightly more than $1 million each.[17] |
Quote:
I used the $2.5 million figure to show just how small the pie can be when you break it down on a more per-school basis. I know the splits aren't even. I wasn't about to sit here and figure 1/6 here, 1/3, 1/2 and all the other figures. The key thing is that... $10.8 billion is a huge figure. But it gets a lot smaller once you get subtract the costs from it, break it up over 14 years, and start thinking about how the money is actually divided. |
Quote:
And of course, 2 of my best friends to this day lived in Wells, and I owned most of the west wing of the 2nd floor, and dabbled a bit on the west wing of the 4th floor (Wells alternated floors with gender - Males on odd floors, females on evens.) My best work was once I moved into the house. So a buddy of mine from STL calls the summer between Fresh/Soph year and says he's moving to Springfield. Not taking classes, but wants to be near his aging grandparents, who lived out near Bolivar. His grandparents rents this house, and he invites me to share the place with him. 2 young guys in a nice, 3 bedroom place just off campus with hardwood floors - perfect for the single life. We're watching a ballgame the first Thursday night of the Fall semester when the doorbell rings. No one knows my friend here, none of my friends knew the address yet. We're wondering who the **** is at the door at 9:30pm on a Thursday. A dude and 5 chicks. I answer the door: "Uh, yeah, can I help you?" One of the girls: "Uh, is Dan here?" Me: "No one named Dan lives here. We just moved in." *uncomfortable silence* Other girl: "Oh, that sucks. We're freshmen and were told that Dan throws parties here every Thursday, Friday and Saturday night." Me: "Give me a sec, I'll be right back." It took all of a nanosecond for my roommate and I to invite them in. Without telling a SOUL, 40 people showed the following night. Close to 60 on Saturday. There wasn't a Thursday-Saturday night the rest of the year we didn't have at least 30 people at our place. I have no idea who the **** Dan was, but I'd love to buy him a beer, because he's partially responsible for the amount of sweet young ass I probably never would have met had his house not been a hotspot the year before. Yeah, majoring in booze and minoring in women (possibly reversed) ruined my early college career. But I honestly wouldn't change it now if I could. SMSU was two of the best years of my life. Sorry to interrupt the constant, pointless bickering in this thread, carry on. |
http://www.kstatesports.com//ViewArt...CLID=204957209
Regents Affirm Joint Commitment to Big 12 Released 06/07/2010 by Kansas State University TOPEKA, Kan. - Recognizing the success of Kansas State University (K-State) and the University of Kansas (KU) within the Big 12 Conference, Board of Regents' Chair Jill Docking, of Wichita, and Board of Regents' Vice Chair Gary Sherrer, of Overland Park, today issued the following joint statement: "We are unwavering in our belief that the best course for K-State and KU is continued joint affiliation in the Big 12. The intra-conference rivalry between the Jayhawks and Wildcats is exciting for athletics fans both within the Sunflower state and nationwide. In addition, joint affiliation in the Big 12 fosters invaluable cooperation between our two universities when it comes to serving the academic needs of Kansans and the economic development needs of the state. Chancellor Gray-Little and President Schulz will continue to keep us apprised as Conference-related discussions continue, and we know our fellow Regents support their ongoing joint efforts to sustain and advance the Big 12." The nine-member Kansas Board of Regents is the governing board of the state's six universities and the statewide coordinating board for the state's 32 public higher education institutions (seven public universities, nineteen community colleges, and six technical colleges). In addition, the Board administers the state's student financial aid, adult education, GED, and career and technical education programs. The Board also authorizes private proprietary schools and out-of-state institutions to operate in Kansas, and administers the Kan-ed network, a statewide network that provides broadband Internet access and distance learning capabilities for schools, hospitals, and libraries. |
K-State: Anchoring the state of Kansas.
|
Quote:
|
|
Well, we know a couple members have boarded Beebe's plane. Who else is gonna board before takeoff?
|
That would be incredible. This needs to happen.
|
Quote:
|
FWIW, this was just posted on our local radio show's facebook page:
Unsportsmanlike Conduct would like to alert everyone that Joe Schad is reporting that Notre Dame is "not budging" in their interest (or lack thereof) in the Big 10 Conference. |
I wonder how any "news flash" false alarms there are going to be?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.