ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805333)
I've already stated multiple times that I believe a ND commitment will end all of this.

Notre Dame will not move just to be No. 12 and make the Big Ten a superconference.

If Notre Dame moves to the Big Ten, it will be as the fifth of five teams. They aren't going there unless the superconference movement is happening.

Too much income lost for them to merely be No. 12. The Irish only do it IF they have no other choice.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 06:36 PM

Has there been a non-KU fan seriously argue that ND is NOT better off as an independent?

Bambi 06-07-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6805336)
You've also stated that basketball makes more money than football and that there's no way MU gets a Big 10 invite.

You're almost as good at this as CoMoChief.

You must have missed this article about profits for teams (basketball vs football). Here it is again.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/15/comm...sbiz/index.htm

That left Villanova with only a 38 percent profit margin, a bit below the combined 45 percent profit margin for the 64 tournament teams that report results (Air Force is exempt from reporting).

Together those schools had a combined $330.8 million in revenue during the 2004-05 school year, and $148.3 million in profits, even when including results from the 14 money-losing basketball programs involved in March Madness.

Based on those numbers, basketball is more of a sure money maker for schools than college football -- at least for the schools in the so-called six major conferences.


Really, I don't make stuff up. I swear...

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805337)
I believed she called to encourage them not to throw away 100 years of tradition and rivalry.

Then again for MU you might as well throw away the last 100 years.

They know they'll be ****ed over, they are looking out for themselves pleading to Nebraska mainly and MU not to leave.

chiefsfan987 06-07-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6805321)
Hey, if you think the Josh Selby's of the world are really going to keep flocking to the MWC instead of going to the new 'SuperPac', more power to you.

I truly believe you are greatly underestimating the impact of becoming a mid-major. Maybe the SEC or even the ACC will toss you a life preserver, but if KU ends up in the Mountain West, say goodbye to being a national power (if ever you truly were. 2 championships in 50 years is hardly what I'd consider a powerhouse, but that's a separate debate...)

Notre Dame is your white knight. You'd better hope those fellas commit and stop this expansion talk soon...

Why wouldn't they? They kept going to Memphis while Calipari was there.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805337)
I believed she called to encourage them not to throw away 100 years of tradition and rivalry.

Then again for MU you might as well throw away the last 100 years.

She called them to get on her knees and see if there was something, ANYTHING she could do to convince them to stick around.

Sorry Ms. Gray-Little. We have tickets to the next rodeo. This one is breaking up. We're out. Later.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfan987 (Post 6805349)
Why wouldn't they? They kept going to Memphis while Calipari was there.

And Cal was content to stay at a mid-major. Wait.

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfan987 (Post 6805349)
Why wouldn't they? They kept going to Memphis while Calipari was there.

Where's memphis now? Self will follow that route as well and so will his recruits

Bearcat 06-07-2010 06:49 PM

Wow, some of you go all out and jump on the short bus just to feel better about yourselves or the team you root for. FFS, of course it would hurt KU to move to the MWC, and the school and fans should be a little scared...... but not to be outdone, in the other corner are Mizzou fans mocking, get this, winning & success... and trying to be superior because their school is closer to St. Louis. Seriously? Get a ****ing grip, people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6805321)

Notre Dame is your white knight. You'd better hope those fellas commit and stop this expansion talk soon...

From what I've heard, it hinges on what Nebraska does... if they decide to leave, Texas and the little ones are more likely to leave. If Nebraska stays, regardless of what Mizzou does, Texas is more likely to stay and the Big 12 could be the Big 11. I really don't know, as it's all just speculation, of course.... in the long run, it might not matter anyway.

kstater 06-07-2010 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsfan987 (Post 6805349)
Why wouldn't they? They kept going to Memphis while Calipari was there.

So when the Big 12 disbands and Self leaves, they plan on hiring Cal?

kcpasco 06-07-2010 06:53 PM

Kansas is on its knees begging NU and MU to stay.

Gotta love that

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6805360)
Wow, some of you go all out and jump on the short bus just to feel better about yourselves or the team you root for. FFS, of course it would hurt KU to move to the MWC, and the school and fans should be a little scared...... but not to be outdone, in the other corner are Mizzou fans mocking, get this, winning & success... and trying to be superior because their school is closer to St. Louis. Seriously? Get a ****ing grip, people.



From what I've heard, it hinges on what Nebraska does... if they decide to leave, Texas and the little ones are more likely to leave. If Nebraska stays, regardless of what Mizzou does, Texas is more likely to stay and the Big 12 could be the Big 11. I really don't know, as it's all just speculation, of course.... in the long run, it might not matter anyway.

Nah, I think most MU fans are mocking the rampant basketball-centricism of many KU fans.

Bambi 06-07-2010 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805364)
Nah, I think most MU fans are mocking the rampant basketball-centricism of many KU fans.

On the KU boards 90% of my posts are on football.

Basketball is just a nice little gem that some of us keep in our back pocket.

I actually find the KU fan and KU football fan to be completely different, which I'd expect is true of the MU football vs MU basketball fan.

DenverChief 06-07-2010 07:09 PM

So...Big 14

Kansas
Kansas State
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Colorado
Colorado St
Iowa St
Wyoming
UNLV
TCU
BYU
New Mexico
San Diego State
Utah

Pablo 06-07-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6805361)
So when the Big 12 disbands and Self leaves, they plan on hiring Cal?

Nah, we'll poach Frank Martin then.

KcMizzou 06-07-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805373)
I actually find the KU fan and KU football fan to be completely different, which I'd expect is true of the MU football vs MU basketball fan.

:spock:

For us, they're the same people.

ChiefsCountry 06-07-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 6805381)
So...Big 14

Kansas
Kansas State
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Colorado
Colorado St
Iowa St
Wyoming
UNLV
TCU
BYU
New Mexico
San Diego State
Utah

Oklahoma, Okie State and Colorado will be in the PAC-10. If its Big 14 time it will be this:

Air Force
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
New Mexico
TCU

Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
San Diego State
UNLV
Utah
Wyoming

vailpass 06-07-2010 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805347)
You must have missed this article about profits for teams (basketball vs football). Here it is again.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/15/comm...sbiz/index.htm

That left Villanova with only a 38 percent profit margin, a bit below the combined 45 percent profit margin for the 64 tournament teams that report results (Air Force is exempt from reporting).

Together those schools had a combined $330.8 million in revenue during the 2004-05 school year, and $148.3 million in profits, even when including results from the 14 money-losing basketball programs involved in March Madness.

Based on those numbers, basketball is more of a sure money maker for schools than college football -- at least for the schools in the so-called six major conferences.


Really, I don't make stuff up. I swear...

This data is 5 years old. It is so out of date the program in this article that makes the most $ is U of A basketball which is now making about nothing if not losing $.
Let's see the current revenue$ numbers of football and basketball side by side, conference by conference.
If data age makes no difference I can prove to you why the Model T is the most profitable car to produce.

Frazod 06-07-2010 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 6805362)
Kansas is on its knees begging NU and MU to stay.

Gotta love that

You mean all of them, or just Lew?

Bambi 06-07-2010 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6805389)
Oklahoma, Okie State and Colorado will be in the PAC-10. If its Big 14 time it will be this:

Air Force
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
New Mexico
TCU

Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
San Diego State
UNLV
Utah
Wyoming


Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805404)
Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick.

You're absolutely delusional (if serious) if you think the MWC is going to command a big Monday basketball game in the new landscape.

DenverChief 06-07-2010 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6805389)
Oklahoma, Okie State and Colorado will be in the PAC-10. If its Big 14 time it will be this:

Air Force
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
New Mexico
TCU

Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
San Diego State
UNLV
Utah
Wyoming

I forgot about Air Force

Bambi 06-07-2010 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6805389)
Oklahoma, Okie State and Colorado will be in the PAC-10. If its Big 14 time it will be this:

Air Force
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
New Mexico
TCU

Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
San Diego State
UNLV
Utah
Wyoming


Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick.

Bearcat 06-07-2010 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805409)
You're absolutely delusional (if serious) if you think the MWC is going to command a big Monday basketball game in the new landscape.

It'll start at midnight eastern, so why not...

:deevee:

Mr. Plow 06-07-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805416)
Whacky! I can't wait for those Big Mondays in Vegas. That shit's gonna be sick.

Uhhhh....this.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805409)
You're absolutely delusional (if serious) if you think the MWC is going to command a big Monday basketball game in the new landscape.


Mr. Plow 06-07-2010 07:39 PM

Here is something that was posted over at phog.net. I don't vouch for the validity of it.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=6010537

Total AD Revenue v Football Revenue last year

School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Notre Dame....................$56,929,397............... ................$81,088,368



Big 12 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................

School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Texas.......................$87,583,986........... ............................$138,459,149

Oklahoma.................$42,638,431.............. ..........................$81,487,835

Nebraska................. $55,226,605....................................... ..$74,881,383

Texas A&M............... $38,358,422....................................... ..$72,886,100

Oklahoma State........$26,536,625.......................... ...............$71,805,825

Kansas.................... $17,676,175....................................... .$70,614,953

Missouri...................$24,141,873............ ............................$57,778,668

Colorado................. $27,827,286....................................... ..$49,859,693

Baylor.....................$11,896,723............ ............................ $48,545,254

Kansas State............ $21,378,813....................................... .$47,399,903

Texas Tech...............$23,581,188.................... .....................$46,632,263

Iowa State...............$21,261,439................... ......................$45,813,189




PAC 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ..........................................


School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue

Southern Cal...................$35,203,483................. ...............$80,151,282

Stanford.........................$14,178,256...... ..........................$74,695,254

California...................... $27,747,396................................$73,354 ,967

UCLA.............................$26,640,759...... ..........................$66,177,866

Washington.....................$34,177,030........ .......................$60,575,780

Oregon...........................$24,789,755...... .........................$60,283,512

Arizona State................. $29,857,334................................$53,297 ,963

Arizona......................... $20,927,253................................$51,822 ,629

Oregon State.................. $30,874,059.............................. $50,211,404

Washington State.............$11,415,496..................... ..........$38,293,754



SEC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................


School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Florida....................$66,150,063............ .......................$108,309,060

Alabama.................$64,606,392............... ....................$103,934,873

LSU.........................$61,868,953........... ......................$100,077,884

Tennessee...............$42,805,360............... ...................$92,524,125

Auburn....................$58,618,819............. .....................$87,001,416

Georgia....................$65,218,406............ .....................$81,496,357

South Carolina..........$57,118,519..................... .............$76,254,236

Kentucky...................$26,143,126............ .....................$72,057,751

Arkansas...................$38,630,265............ .....................$63,978,641

Vanderbilt..................$18,564,940........... .....................$45,582,274

Ole Miss.....................$18,688,648.............. .................$41,318,068

Miss State...................$18,732,248............... ...............$36,536,152


Big 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ..........................................


School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue

Ohio State...................$68,196,195............... ..............$119,859,607

Penn State...................$61,767,717............... .............$95,978,243

Michigan.....................$52,246,025.......... ...................$95,193,030

Wisconsin....................$40,005,517.......... ..................$89,842,749

Iowa............................$38,896,234....... .....................$79,521,143

Michigan State.............$43,506,725..................... ........$75,624,811

Minnesota....................$25,594,942.......... ...................$70,322,992

Indiana.........................$20,836,473....... ....................$60,615,528

Purdue.........................$18,320,608........ ....................$59,919,102

Illinois..........................$25,710,645..... ......................$55,609,086

Northwestern...............$23,951,794............ .................$48,582,384



ACC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ......................

School.........................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Florida State......................$24,877,536............ .....................$74,417,324

Duke...............................$9,029,583..... ................................$71,072,431

UNC.................................$24,163,760... ...............................$70,152,767

Virginia............................$20,210,563... ................................$67,141,170

Boston College...................$20,711,067............. .....................$64,157,876

Miami...............................$27,155,010... ..............................$61,969,808

Clemson.......................... $35,205,168..................................$60,1 67,535

Maryland..........................$13,980,823..... ..............................$59,966,862

Virginia Tech.....................$27,749,586.............. .................... $52,838,905

Georgia Tech.................... $22,830,766..................................$48,0 61,053

NC State.......................... $21,772,446..................................$46,4 91,105

Wake Forest..................... $10,346,081...................................$44, 649,063

Tiger's Fan 06-07-2010 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805169)
Notre Dame will not move until/unless it becomes clear the super conference is coming.

I think the writing is on the wall with that.

My favorite thing in all this... Texas' "Ultimatum" is just going to work in Missouri and Nebraska's favor. Best thing that could happen for those schools:

1) Friday "Ultimatum" deadline comes and goes, and the Texas 6 depart as a result.
2) THOSE schools are the ones that get nailed for leaving the league on short notice. (LOLZ)
3) The Big Ten, in response to the Pac-16, goes to 16 (or possibly even 18). Notre Dame, seeing the super conference movement pick up speed, agrees to join the new Big 16 (rather than get left behind. All that NBC money dwindles if all the rest of the good football schools take their balls to a new league)
4) Missouri, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Rutgers and Syracuse join the Big 16.
5) kansas, kansas state, Iowa State and the loser of the Baylor/Colorado feud for the Texas 6's final spot join the MWC (which likely gains BCS status in a year or two... and then sees the BCS disappear when the fourth super conference is formed).

This is extremely beneficial for Missouri and Nebraska recruiting (both in KC, Missouri in St. Louis).

And I'll wish ku good luck recruiting Josh Shelby's when they are playing in the MWC and not on national TV weekly...

You think being in the Big XII has anything to do with KU being on national TV? Wow. I know it sucks being a MUron but, just wow.

vailpass 06-07-2010 07:43 PM

Thanks Plow, that data appears to be more current though as you say we don't have verification of data validity.
I just can't picture how bball could make more $ than fball.

Mr. Plow 06-07-2010 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805446)
Thanks Plow, that data appears to be more current though as you say we don't have verification of data validity.
I just can't picture how bball could make more $ than fball.

Another post in that thread......


Quote:

According to the Department of Education website, here are the men's basketball numbers:

KU: $15,737,145
Duke: $11,842,009
UNC: $19,852,544

Yes, serious money, but still pales in comparison to the $87 mill for Texas football or the $50+ mil for football at schools like Nebraska, Ohio State, Florida, Notre Dame, Georgia, etc.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6805445)
You think being in the Big XII has anything to do with KU being on national TV? Wow. I know it sucks being a MUron but, just wow.

I'm talking specifically about the Big 12's Big Monday contract with ESPN. ku dominates that TV slot, and it won't be accessible to them if they aren't in the Big 12.

Look at Memphis. They do OK in the non-conference season on TV, but as soon as they hit the CUSA, their TV coverage drops off the map. If ku is in the MWC, they'll still get good coverage in the pre-conference season when they're playing good teams.

And that MWC lineup isn't exactly going to compare well with what the major conferences bring to the table for national broadcasters... if ku ends up in the MWC, no matter how you slice it, the national TV profile and the opportunities to be on national TV are going to decrease.

You're :homer:ing if you don't see that.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 6805435)
Here is something that was posted over at phog.net. I don't vouch for the validity of it.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=172&f=2481&t=6010537

Total AD Revenue v Football Revenue last year

School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Notre Dame....................$56,929,397............... ................$81,088,368



Big 12 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................

School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Texas.......................$87,583,986........... ............................$138,459,149

Oklahoma.................$42,638,431.............. ..........................$81,487,835

Nebraska................. $55,226,605....................................... ..$74,881,383

Texas A&M............... $38,358,422....................................... ..$72,886,100

Oklahoma State........$26,536,625.......................... ...............$71,805,825

Kansas.................... $17,676,175....................................... .$70,614,953

Missouri...................$24,141,873............ ............................$57,778,668

Colorado................. $27,827,286....................................... ..$49,859,693

Baylor.....................$11,896,723............ ............................ $48,545,254

Kansas State............ $21,378,813....................................... .$47,399,903

Texas Tech...............$23,581,188.................... .....................$46,632,263

Iowa State...............$21,261,439................... ......................$45,813,189




PAC 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ..........................................


School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue

Southern Cal...................$35,203,483................. ...............$80,151,282

Stanford.........................$14,178,256...... ..........................$74,695,254

California...................... $27,747,396................................$73,354 ,967

UCLA.............................$26,640,759...... ..........................$66,177,866

Washington.....................$34,177,030........ .......................$60,575,780

Oregon...........................$24,789,755...... .........................$60,283,512

Arizona State................. $29,857,334................................$53,297 ,963

Arizona......................... $20,927,253................................$51,822 ,629

Oregon State.................. $30,874,059.............................. $50,211,404

Washington State.............$11,415,496..................... ..........$38,293,754



SEC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ................................


School.....................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Florida....................$66,150,063............ .......................$108,309,060

Alabama.................$64,606,392............... ....................$103,934,873

LSU.........................$61,868,953........... ......................$100,077,884

Tennessee...............$42,805,360............... ...................$92,524,125

Auburn....................$58,618,819............. .....................$87,001,416

Georgia....................$65,218,406............ .....................$81,496,357

South Carolina..........$57,118,519..................... .............$76,254,236

Kentucky...................$26,143,126............ .....................$72,057,751

Arkansas...................$38,630,265............ .....................$63,978,641

Vanderbilt..................$18,564,940........... .....................$45,582,274

Ole Miss.....................$18,688,648.............. .................$41,318,068

Miss State...................$18,732,248............... ...............$36,536,152


Big 10 Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ..........................................


School.......................Football Revenue................Athletic Department Revenue

Ohio State...................$68,196,195............... ..............$119,859,607

Penn State...................$61,767,717............... .............$95,978,243

Michigan.....................$52,246,025.......... ...................$95,193,030

Wisconsin....................$40,005,517.......... ..................$89,842,749

Iowa............................$38,896,234....... .....................$79,521,143

Michigan State.............$43,506,725..................... ........$75,624,811

Minnesota....................$25,594,942.......... ...................$70,322,992

Indiana.........................$20,836,473....... ....................$60,615,528

Purdue.........................$18,320,608........ ....................$59,919,102

Illinois..........................$25,710,645..... ......................$55,609,086

Northwestern...............$23,951,794............ .................$48,582,384



ACC Schools 2008-2009 revenue........................................... ......................

School.........................Football Revenue...............Total Athletic Department Revenue

Florida State......................$24,877,536............ .....................$74,417,324

Duke...............................$9,029,583..... ................................$71,072,431

UNC.................................$24,163,760... ...............................$70,152,767

Virginia............................$20,210,563... ................................$67,141,170

Boston College...................$20,711,067............. .....................$64,157,876

Miami...............................$27,155,010... ..............................$61,969,808

Clemson.......................... $35,205,168..................................$60,1 67,535

Maryland..........................$13,980,823..... ..............................$59,966,862

Virginia Tech.....................$27,749,586.............. .................... $52,838,905

Georgia Tech.................... $22,830,766..................................$48,0 61,053

NC State.......................... $21,772,446..................................$46,4 91,105

Wake Forest..................... $10,346,081...................................$44, 649,063


I see many schools where the basketball revenue is a much bigger contribution than football.

Do you have the Big East numbers too from this link? Let's look at those

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805494)
I see many schools where the basketball revenue is a much bigger contribution than football.

Post them?

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805464)
I'm talking specifically about the Big 12's Big Monday contract with ESPN. ku dominates that TV slot, and it won't be accessible to them if they aren't in the Big 12.

Look at Memphis. They do OK in the non-conference season on TV, but as soon as they hit the CUSA, their TV coverage drops off the map. If ku is in the MWC, they'll still get good coverage in the pre-conference season when they're playing good teams.

And that MWC lineup isn't exactly going to compare well with what the major conferences bring to the table for national broadcasters... if ku ends up in the MWC, no matter how you slice it, the national TV profile and the opportunities to be on national TV are going to decrease.

You're :homer:ing if you don't see that.


What would you think of KU attempting to go independent in basketball ala Notre Dame football?

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805500)
What would you think of KU attempting to go independent in basketball ala Notre Dame football?

There isn't close to the national "affection" (for lack of a better word) for Kansas basketball. Hell, though a great program, it ranks behind UNC, Duke, and maybe even Kentucky in this regard.

No chance that a CBS is handing KU a sweetheart TV deal because there frankly isn't the demand nationwide.

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805494)
I see many schools where the basketball revenue is a much bigger contribution than football.
Do you have the Big East numbers too from this link? Let's look at those

Which schools are those? Or are you assuming the difference between football revenue and total athletic dept. revenue = basketball revenue?
Considering the majority of the US would sign off on eliminating college hoops completely if it meant saving college football I don't see how anyone can think bball makes more $ than fball.

OnTheWarpath15 06-07-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 6805201)
Good God...
You may very well have "had" my girlfriend at the time. Same dorm, same years, and she did screw around...

You bastard!!!

I never ****ed anyone that told me they had a boyfriend. Didn't need the drama.

Now, if she was a liar as well as a whore, then yeah, it could well have been her.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805496)
Post them?

Well from that list posted it would appear the following schools make more money playing basketball over football:

Kansas

maybe Missouri

Stanford? where's all that money coming from?

Kentucky

Indiana

Purdue?

Duke

North Carolina

Virginia?

Maryland

Boston College?

Again, let's see the numbers from the Big East...

I think what college basketball earns is tremendously underestimated on this board.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805507)
There isn't close to the national "affection" (for lack of a better word) for Kansas basketball. Hell, though a great program, it ranks behind UNC, Duke, and maybe even Kentucky in this regard.

No chance that a CBS is handing KU a sweetheart TV deal because there frankly isn't the demand nationwide.

Nah it wouldn't be a deal like NBC.

I was thinking more like CBS college or FSN... Or maybe a new player like TNT. Who knows. I'm sure you can sell it though.

I agree with KU ranking 4th behind those schools. But I KNOW that those 4 schools could get a nightly TV deal with a network if they were independent.

What else are people gonna watch during cold winter nights?

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805510)
Well from that list posted it would appear the following schools make more money playing basketball over football:

Kansas

maybe Missouri

Stanford? where's all that money coming from?

Kentucky

Indiana

Purdue?

Duke

North Carolina

Virginia?

Maryland

Boston College?

Again, let's see the numbers from the Big East...

I think what college basketball earns is tremendously underestimated on this board.

total revenue - football revenue = bball revenue? Is that what you are reading? And btw you just named the only bball-first schools in the country.Now name the rest.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805510)
Well from that list posted it would appear the following schools make more money playing basketball over football:

Kansas

Stop right there; you're wrong.

$17,676,175 = KU football.
$15M and some change = KU basketball.

Even the mighty KU basketball bows to the football program. Look back a few posts, as Plow posted this info. You can't just subtract football from the total budget and assume the rest is basketball.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805510)
Well from that list posted it would appear the following schools make more money playing basketball over football:

Kansas

maybe Missouri

Stanford? where's all that money coming from?

Kentucky

Indiana

Purdue?

Duke

North Carolina

Virginia?

Maryland

Boston College?

Again, let's see the numbers from the Big East...

I think what college basketball earns is tremendously underestimated on this board.

All that list contains is football and overall... basketball is the only thing accounting for the rest of that revenue (if it was just football vs.. basketball, it would be labeled that way).

Donations are included in those revenue reports. Schools that had major renovation projects during those years are going to place extremely well.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805508)
Which schools are those? Or are you assuming the difference between football revenue and total athletic dept. revenue = basketball revenue?
Considering the majority of the US would sign off on eliminating college hoops completely if it meant saving college football I don't see how anyone can think bball makes more $ than fball.

I agree 100% that CFB is more popular than CBB. Shoot, even I like football more. But that doesn't mean it's more profitable.

I'm well aware that huge football schools like Texas, OSU, the SEC all make more with their football teams. I also realize that football is what drives these huge conf TV deals being that per game football gets many more viewers than basketball.

But when you combine the fact that CBB is 300 teams. Plays many more games. Has a HUGE cash cow in the Mach Madness tournament. Less facilities, travel needs, player expenses, scholarships...then yes, overall it earns more for American Universities collectively than football.

Problem with bball is that it's revenue is MAXED OUT with the tourney. It's gone as far as it can go. And if CFB ever forms a playoff the same thing will happen. Not a bad thing just that eventually there will be a limit to what these "amateur sports" make. Realignment will increase revenue for schools with TV deals, I agree and that's why footballs' driving it.

It's just naive to believe that CBB is a speck on the surface of CFB because it's not.

kepp 06-07-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805059)
Have we just identified the "tight little ass" in question?

ROFL Though I do pride myself in keeping in shape, this door only swings one way.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805516)
Stop right there; you're wrong.

$17,676,175 = KU football.
$15M and some change = KU basketball.

Even the mighty KU basketball bows to the football program. Look back a few posts, as Plow posted this info. You can't just subtract football from the total budget and assume the rest is basketball.

I'm not simply subtracting. Yes I'm making guestimations but when you look at the schools I listed they have HUGE separation between football and overall revenue.

Where's that coming from? tennis??

It's obviously CBB.

Do you guys not fill out office pools or something? Why are you pretending basketball doesn't exist?

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805513)
total revenue - football revenue = bball revenue? Is that what you are reading? And btw you just named the only bball-first schools in the country.Now name the rest.

Let's see the Big East list.

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805528)
I agree 100% that CFB is more popular than CBB. Shoot, even I like football more. But that doesn't mean it's more profitable.

I'm well aware that huge football schools like Texas, OSU, the SEC all make more with their football teams. I also realize that football is what drives these huge conf TV deals being that per game football gets many more viewers than basketball.

But when you combine the fact that CBB is 300 teams. Plays many more games. Has a HUGE cash cow in the Mach Madness tournament. Less facilities, travel needs, player expenses, scholarships...then yes, overall it earns more for American Universities collectively than football.

Problem with bball is that it's revenue is MAXED OUT with the tourney. It's gone as far as it can go. And if CFB ever forms a playoff the same thing will happen. Not a bad thing just that eventually there will be a limit to what these "amateur sports" make. Realignment will increase revenue for schools with TV deals, I agree and that's why footballs' driving it.

It's just naive to believe that CBB is a speck on the surface of CFB because it's not.

I respect your consistency and admire your sticking to your guns in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I used to love college hoops back in the day. As a kid I would go see Iowa play in the old Field House, feel the place shake as our coach Lute Olson battled Bob Knight, Jud Heathcote, Lou Henson, Gene Keady, etc.
At halftime you could go behind the bleachers and shoot hoops on the practice court.
Recently I'm not so into it because of the transient nature of the players and the resultant way some teams have changed how the game is played but I still have soft spot for it and commend you on the way you defend the game.

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6805533)
ROFL Though I do pride myself in keeping in shape, this door only swings one way.

Yeah, damn right!

(thanks for keeping it on the down low kepp, just like you promised;))

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805535)
I'm not simply subtracting. Yes I'm making guestimations but when you look at the schools I listed they have HUGE separation between football and overall revenue.

Where's that coming from? tennis??

It's obviously CBB.

Do you guys not fill out office pools or something? Why are you pretending basketball doesn't exist?

It's coming from donations, general budget allocations from universities, NCAA disbursements, etc. And yes, college basketball is the second-biggest money-maker... but it's clearly and distinctly No. 2.

If it wasn't, college hoops would be driving expansion.

It's certainly not all coming from basketball.

kepp 06-07-2010 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805337)
I believed she called to encourage them not to throw away 100 years of tradition and rivalry.

And in honor of this, we're marching on Lawrence tonight!

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805539)
I respect your consistency and admire your sticking to your guns in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I used to love college hoops back in the day. As a kid I would go see Iowa play in the old Field House, feel the place shake as our coach Lute Olson battled Bob Knight, Jud Heathcote, Lou Henson, Gene Keady, etc.
At halftime you could go behind the bleachers and shoot hoops on the practice court.
Recently I'm not so into it because of the transient nature of the players and the resultant way some teams have changed how the game is played but I still have soft spot for it and commend you on the way you defend the game.

CBS and TNT just paid $10.8 billion, that's billion with a "B" to broadcast the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament. The game doesn't need defending.

kepp 06-07-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805373)
Basketball is just a nice little gem that some of us keep in our back pocket.

Actually, its more like that huge, over-packed wallet that tips you over to one side.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805535)
I'm not simply subtracting. Yes I'm making guestimations but when you look at the schools I listed they have HUGE separation between football and overall revenue.

Where's that coming from? tennis??

It's obviously CBB.

Do you guys not fill out office pools or something? Why are you pretending basketball doesn't exist?

Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805544)
It's coming from donations, general budget allocations from universities, NCAA disbursements, etc. And yes, college basketball is the second-biggest money-maker... but it's clearly and distinctly No. 2.

If it wasn't, college hoops would be driving expansion.

It's certainly not all coming from basketball.

You didn't read my post. College basketball is making all it can.

College football isn't. There is more to be made based on cable television subscriptions. More people watch 11 games a year then they do 36 games per capita.

Getting the TV networks into cable subscriptions that's what it is. Why is this so hard to get?

MU is being invited for cable subscribers, not football. We've been over this.

MU is getting helped because of people living in Missouri. Many of which couldn't care less about the Tigers.

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:42 PM

Just got this piece of news from the SEC office — the revenue distribution for the 2009-10 fiscal year. It will make every conference save the Big Ten jealous … or depressed.

Total: $209 million.

According to the league, that’s the highest total in SEC history and represents a 57.7 percent increase from the $132.5 million distributed in 2008-2009.

Average per school: $17.3 million.

That’s about double (maybe a bit more than double) what the Pac-10 distributes to its schools and does not include what the schools generate from their local media deals.


Football TV: $109.5 million.

(Big 12 is in the $60 million range, I believe, while the Pac-10 in the 40s.)

Bowls: $26.5 million.

Football championship game: $14.5 million.

(You can see why Pac-10 commish Larry Scott is looking into a title game of his own.)

Basketball TV: $30 million

SEC tournament: $5 million

NCAA tournament: $23.5 million.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/college...fallen-behind/

KcMizzou 06-07-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805554)
Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

I think you can consider yourself disregarded.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6805568)
I think you can consider yourself disregarded.

No shit.

This is an amazing display in the face of irrefutable evidence. But, but, but...

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805554)
Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

kepp 06-07-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805572)
No shit.

This is an amazing display in the face of irrefutable evidence. But, but, but...

It's actually a lot like the ku fans that were calling in to 810 this afternoon:

"But our basketball program is top 5..."
"I can't fathom that we'd be left out with our basketball program..."
etc, etc, etc

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805576)
I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

dude.

kepp 06-07-2010 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805576)
I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

I'm Ron Burgandy?

kepp 06-07-2010 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6805065)
Blair-Shannon my Freshman year, then moved to a house near the corner of East Monroe and South Kimbrough, just a couple blocks from JQH Arena.

The house and the parties were epic, my grades, however, were not.

Thus, I'm back in school many, many years later.

:D

Ah, you were in the plush, upscale dorm. I was in Freddy...the ghetto. But we had a lot of fun there.

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6805577)
It's actually a lot like the ku fans that were calling in to 810 this afternoon:

"But our basketball program is top 5..."
"I can't fathom that we'd be left out with our basketball program..."
etc, etc, etc

There were alot of those on 610 not understanding how this shit is working. Atleast the KU fans on here know wtf the deal is, $$$ period. "we got basketball" doesn't mean shit in this instance.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805552)
CBS and TNT just paid $10.8 billion, that's billion with a "B" to broadcast the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament. The game doesn't need defending.

Over 14 years. To be split by ALL schools that identify as D-I basketball schools (there are over 300). Even with 100 percent PURE profit, that deal chips in a mere $2.5 million a year/team (on average).

10.8 billion is a nice number. But you have to put it into context to really understand it.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805560)
You didn't read my post. College basketball is making all it can.

College football isn't. There is more to be made based on cable television subscriptions. More people watch 11 games a year then they do 36 games per capita.

Getting the TV networks into cable subscriptions that's what it is. Why is this so hard to get?

MU is being invited for cable subscribers, not football. We've been over this.

MU is getting helped because of people living in Missouri. Many of which couldn't care less about the Tigers.

I "get it." I've "gotten it" for a long time.

I was at the forefront of people on this board talking about Big 10 expansion. I've been stumping from the beginning that this is a deal strictly about demographics and cable TV sets.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805578)
dude.

LMAO. That's the sound of me ending this conversation.

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805602)
I "get it." I've "gotten it" for a long time.

I was at the forefront of people on this board talking about Big 10 expansion. I've been stumping from the beginning that this is a deal strictly about demographics and cable TV sets.

Just a friendly reminder from big brother, we need it on every single discussion possible regarding anything that has to do with the 2 schools

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805593)
Over 14 years. To be split by ALL schools that identify as D-I basketball schools (there are over 300). Even with 100 percent PURE profit, that deal chips in a mere $2.5 million a year/team (on average).

10.8 billion is a nice number. But you have to put it into context to really understand it.

I think it only goes to participants in the tourney each year and conferences running on some 6 year cycle or something.

Where did you read it goes to all 300 teams equally?

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:59 PM

from wikipedia

Revenues

The Division I Men's Basketball tournament is the only NCAA championship tournament (officially, the BCS Football Championship is not an NCAA event) where the NCAA does not keep the profits. Instead, the money from the multi-billion-dollar television contract is divided among the Division I basketball playing schools and conferences as follows:[16]
1/6 of the money goes directly to the schools based on how many sports they play (one "share" for each sport starting with 14, which is the minimum needed for Division I membership).
1/3 of the money goes directly to the schools based on how many scholarships they give out (one share for each of the first 50, two for each of the next 50, ten for each of the next 50, and 20 for each scholarship above 150).
1/2 of the money goes to the conferences based on how well they did in the six previous men's basketball tournaments (counting each year separately, one share for each team getting in, and one share for each win except in the Final Four and, prior to the 2008 tournament, the Play-in game). In 2007, based on the 2001 through 2006 tournaments, the Big East received over $14.85 million, while the eight conferences that did not win a first-round game in those six years received slightly more than $1 million each.[17]

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805608)
I think it only goes to participants in the tourney each year and conferences running on some 6 year cycle or something.

Where did you read it goes to all 300 teams equally?

I didn't say it was split evenly. The pie is distributed throughout the NCAA. Everyone sees a piece of it.

I used the $2.5 million figure to show just how small the pie can be when you break it down on a more per-school basis. I know the splits aren't even. I wasn't about to sit here and figure 1/6 here, 1/3, 1/2 and all the other figures. The key thing is that... $10.8 billion is a huge figure. But it gets a lot smaller once you get subtract the costs from it, break it up over 14 years, and start thinking about how the money is actually divided.

OnTheWarpath15 06-07-2010 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6805583)
Ah, you were in the plush, upscale dorm. I was in Freddy...the ghetto. But we had a lot of fun there.

I thought Wells was the ghetto. I don't recall them having air conditioning.

And of course, 2 of my best friends to this day lived in Wells, and I owned most of the west wing of the 2nd floor, and dabbled a bit on the west wing of the 4th floor (Wells alternated floors with gender - Males on odd floors, females on evens.)

My best work was once I moved into the house.

So a buddy of mine from STL calls the summer between Fresh/Soph year and says he's moving to Springfield. Not taking classes, but wants to be near his aging grandparents, who lived out near Bolivar.

His grandparents rents this house, and he invites me to share the place with him. 2 young guys in a nice, 3 bedroom place just off campus with hardwood floors - perfect for the single life.

We're watching a ballgame the first Thursday night of the Fall semester when the doorbell rings. No one knows my friend here, none of my friends knew the address yet. We're wondering who the **** is at the door at 9:30pm on a Thursday.

A dude and 5 chicks.

I answer the door:

"Uh, yeah, can I help you?"

One of the girls: "Uh, is Dan here?"

Me: "No one named Dan lives here. We just moved in."

*uncomfortable silence*

Other girl: "Oh, that sucks. We're freshmen and were told that Dan throws parties here every Thursday, Friday and Saturday night."

Me: "Give me a sec, I'll be right back."

It took all of a nanosecond for my roommate and I to invite them in.

Without telling a SOUL, 40 people showed the following night.

Close to 60 on Saturday.

There wasn't a Thursday-Saturday night the rest of the year we didn't have at least 30 people at our place.

I have no idea who the **** Dan was, but I'd love to buy him a beer, because he's partially responsible for the amount of sweet young ass I probably never would have met had his house not been a hotspot the year before.

Yeah, majoring in booze and minoring in women (possibly reversed) ruined my early college career. But I honestly wouldn't change it now if I could. SMSU was two of the best years of my life.

Sorry to interrupt the constant, pointless bickering in this thread, carry on.

ChiTown 06-07-2010 09:22 PM

http://www.kstatesports.com//ViewArt...CLID=204957209

Regents Affirm Joint Commitment to Big 12
Released 06/07/2010 by Kansas State University

TOPEKA, Kan. - Recognizing the success of Kansas State University (K-State) and the University of Kansas (KU) within the Big 12 Conference, Board of Regents' Chair Jill Docking, of Wichita, and Board of Regents' Vice Chair Gary Sherrer, of Overland Park, today issued the following joint statement:

"We are unwavering in our belief that the best course for K-State and KU is continued joint affiliation in the Big 12. The intra-conference rivalry between the Jayhawks and Wildcats is exciting for athletics fans both within the Sunflower state and nationwide. In addition, joint affiliation in the Big 12 fosters invaluable cooperation between our two universities when it comes to serving the academic needs of Kansans and the economic development needs of the state. Chancellor Gray-Little and President Schulz will continue to keep us apprised as Conference-related discussions continue, and we know our fellow Regents support their ongoing joint efforts to sustain and advance the Big 12."

The nine-member Kansas Board of Regents is the governing board of the state's six universities and the statewide coordinating board for the state's 32 public higher education institutions (seven public universities, nineteen community colleges, and six technical colleges). In addition, the Board administers the state's student financial aid, adult education, GED, and career and technical education programs. The Board also authorizes private proprietary schools and out-of-state institutions to operate in Kansas, and administers the Kan-ed network, a statewide network that provides broadband Internet access and distance learning capabilities for schools, hospitals, and libraries.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 09:23 PM

K-State: Anchoring the state of Kansas.

KcMizzou 06-07-2010 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805686)
K-State: Anchoring the state of Kansas.

Laz is gonna flip his lid...lol

KChiefs1 06-07-2010 09:30 PM

The Deal is Done:

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/sh...d=1144&style=2

KcMizzou 06-07-2010 09:31 PM

Well, we know a couple members have boarded Beebe's plane. Who else is gonna board before takeoff?

Pitt Gorilla 06-07-2010 09:33 PM

That would be incredible. This needs to happen.

Bugeater 06-07-2010 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6805703)

Okay gang...

Bugeater 06-07-2010 09:38 PM

FWIW, this was just posted on our local radio show's facebook page:

Unsportsmanlike Conduct would like to alert everyone that Joe Schad is reporting that Notre Dame is "not budging" in their interest (or lack thereof) in the Big 10 Conference.

luv 06-07-2010 09:42 PM

I wonder how any "news flash" false alarms there are going to be?

Crush 06-07-2010 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6805703)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6805720)
Okay gang...

I hear that the Big 10 is now looking for houses in Leawood.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.