![]() |
Would NOT be surprised if this ends with a sign & trade. Non-exclusive tag. Bears come to mind. Hope he stays under a reasonable contract, but a good draft pick(s) wouldn’t be terrible.
|
Quote:
Looked it up, has never played a full season, yikes. |
Quote:
I think it's nuts ruling out a 2nd round pick for him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And if your top two WR's are years away from an extension, with your HOF TE probably going one, two years more tops-why does it matter? Keeping your good offensive linemen seems like a perfectly smart thing to do as long as it's not problematic elsewhere. And it's not. |
Quote:
I don't think I'm seeing a team want to pay a top of the market RG AND give up an early pick, but what do I know? |
Quote:
If you want that and you have plenty of cap space...well, gotta pay to play. Sure, they'd rather give a 2 for a cheap premier OG. Or pay for a premier OG and not give a 2nd. But to my eyes, neither of those options are on the table. |
Trade Trey smith for Allergic Jackson
|
Quote:
|
Welp. Think this says what the market feels will happen with Trey. Think they know Veach wants to keep him
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bears?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bears</a> are trading a 6th-round pick to LA for Jonah Jackson. Chicago is taking on the entire contract, which was a 3-year, $51M contract signed last offseason. <a href="https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F">https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F</a></p>— Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1896979293240246537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Is this necessary? Tag him?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.