ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs tagging Trey Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357317)

T-post Tom 03-01-2025 02:34 PM

Would NOT be surprised if this ends with a sign & trade. Non-exclusive tag. Bears come to mind. Hope he stays under a reasonable contract, but a good draft pick(s) wouldn’t be terrible.

chiefforlife 03-01-2025 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17984213)
Armstead can’t stay healthy. He’s worse than Stanley as far as that goes.

I don’t get the appeal there personally.

Didnt realize that, sounds like hes going to retire anyways.

Looked it up, has never played a full season, yikes.

DJ's left nut 03-01-2025 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17984030)
A team isn’t gonna give more than a 3rd for Trey bc he has to be paid top of market. We also don’t have leverage. They know that $23 million cap anchor is something we don’t want on our cap when FA starts so they can just wait us out.

Bears and Patriots visited with Wyatt Millum this week. Pretty sure they’d rather draft him in rd 2 than give that pick up for Trey and pay him top of the market.

I think you're underestimating how many teams have more cap space than they have good players looking to sign with them.

I think it's nuts ruling out a 2nd round pick for him.

smithandrew051 03-01-2025 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17984439)
I think you're underestimating how many teams have more cap space than they have good players looking to sign with them.

I think it's nuts ruling out a 2nd round pick for him.

To draft Trey Smith in the 6th, get 4 good years of play out of him, then flip him for a 2nd would be awesome.

Chris Meck 03-01-2025 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17983998)
Surely they aren’t gonna have the highest paid c and the highest paid g

Just doesn’t seem like a smart move

Don't we already have pretty much that right now with Thuney and Creed? But Thuney's deal is almost up and he'll retire soon-either way.

And if your top two WR's are years away from an extension, with your HOF TE probably going one, two years more tops-why does it matter?

Keeping your good offensive linemen seems like a perfectly smart thing to do as long as it's not problematic elsewhere.

And it's not.

Chris Meck 03-01-2025 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17984458)
To draft Trey Smith in the 6th, get 4 good years of play out of him, then flip him for a 2nd would be awesome.

yeah, it would be.

I don't think I'm seeing a team want to pay a top of the market RG AND give up an early pick, but what do I know?

DJ's left nut 03-01-2025 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17984464)
yeah, it would be.

I don't think I'm seeing a team want to pay a top of the market RG AND give up an early pick, but what do I know?

The issue is that most teams DONT have a Thuney or Creed and may really want a blue chip IOL.

If you want that and you have plenty of cap space...well, gotta pay to play.

Sure, they'd rather give a 2 for a cheap premier OG. Or pay for a premier OG and not give a 2nd. But to my eyes, neither of those options are on the table.

New World Order 03-01-2025 04:04 PM

Trade Trey smith for Allergic Jackson

Chris Meck 03-01-2025 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17984468)
The issue is that most teams DONT have a Thuney or Creed and may really want a blue chip IOL.

If you want that and you have plenty of cap space...well, gotta pay to play.

Sure, they'd rather give a 2 for a cheap premier OG. Or pay for a premier OG and not give a 2nd. But to my eyes, neither of those options are on the table.

Sure. Well, you know, maybe. That'd be cool. We'll see, I guess.

RunKC 03-04-2025 01:01 PM

Welp. Think this says what the market feels will happen with Trey. Think they know Veach wants to keep him

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bears?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bears</a> are trading a 6th-round pick to LA for Jonah Jackson. Chicago is taking on the entire contract, which was a 3-year, $51M contract signed last offseason. <a href="https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F">https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F</a></p>&mdash; Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1896979293240246537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

kccrow 03-04-2025 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17987093)
Welp. Think this says what the market feels will happen with Trey. Think they know Veach wants to keep him

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Bears?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Bears</a> are trading a 6th-round pick to LA for Jonah Jackson. Chicago is taking on the entire contract, which was a 3-year, $51M contract signed last offseason. <a href="https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F">https://t.co/MLWWMBDg6F</a></p>&mdash; Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1896979293240246537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Maybe... but Jackson has been a career LG. Played some OC last year. They might want both. I think it's indicative of the compensation on the market though. We won't get shit for Trey of any substance if Jackson is only worth a 6th.

Red Dawg 03-04-2025 04:22 PM

Is this necessary? Tag him?

siberian khatru 03-04-2025 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17987488)
Maybe... but Jackson has been a career LG. Played some OC last year. They might want both. I think it's indicative of the compensation on the market though. We won't get shit for Trey of any substance if Jackson is only worth a 6th.

Soren Petro said yesterday the Chiefs could’ve traded Smith for a second and a third or a fourth. :rolleyes:

kccrow 03-04-2025 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 17987533)
Soren Petro said yesterday the Chiefs could’ve traded Smith for a second and a third or a fourth. :rolleyes:

If Veach could get a 2nd and 3rd, I think the deal would already be done. No way he'd be that stupid.

Chris Meck 03-04-2025 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 17987533)
Soren Petro said yesterday the Chiefs could’ve traded Smith for a second and a third or a fourth. :rolleyes:

Yeah, well, he's a piece of shit who knows **** all


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.