| ChiefsFanatic |
02-03-2024 02:14 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfaulk34
(Post 17378127)
I've seen some of you silly nillies talking about how Browning looked "just as good" as Burrow and "system qb blahblahblah" in several threads so i'll just go ahead and address it here, since someone already bumped this.
In the 5 games Burrow appeared healthy enough to move around in and run out of the pocket, Ari-Hou, he completed 74% of his passes for 296 ypg, 12 tds and 4 ints for a 107 passer rating, going 4-1.
In his 6 best games, not including his very first start against Pitt, Jax-Cle, Browning completed 71% of his passes for 274 ypg, 10 tds and 6 ints for a 99.5 rating, going 4-2.
Now i need someone to come in here and tell me that a higher comp%, 22 more ypg, 2 more tds, 2 less ints and a difference of 8 pts in passer rating 'isn't that much different'. And he did that in one less game. But they were the same.
https://media.tenor.com/_7ubSG7AJOsA...es-deadpan.gif
|
So, you left out the main comparison that does make Browning's performance basically as good as Burrow's.
Although, this year Burrow doesn't have a huge cap hit, the true difference between what they are (and will be) paying Burrow, compared to what Browning costs, and that levels their playing statistics. |
BURROWHEAD: Bengals talking a lot of sh1ttttt
(https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=347151)