![]() |
Quote:
1. ohio state (even though some of my closest friends are osu fans) 2. Miami, FL (especially since most of their fans didn't go to school there and they can't even sell out their games) But, whatever. I'm sure Gator fans rank high on this list for most other team's fans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
North Oklahoma Oklahoma State Missouri Kansas Kansas State Iowa State South Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech TCU Houston Baylor |
Quote:
Also, it doesn't kill the red rivalry game. Just because they're in different divisions doesn't mean they can't play each year. In the SEC, Florida rotates the West teams they play except LSU, who they play every year. |
This "does not have an invitation" stuff is dumb. the formal invitation is a formality at the end of the process. Nebraska just got one and the deal has been in the works for weeks.
"Does not have an invitation" and "the deal is basically done" can occupy the same space. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. FSU, Miami, Ga Tech, Clemson 2. FSU, Clemson, Texas, Texas A&M 3. FSU, Ga Tech, Texas, Texas A&M 4. FSU, Clemson, Texas A&M, Miami 5. FSU, Ga Tech, Texas A&M, Miami 6. FSU, Clemson, Texas A&M, Ga Tech |
My wife works at MU and she received this email from someone at UM. She wouldn't tell me who.
----------------------------------------------- From someone as much in the know as there is: I've talked to about 15 people today who I consider to be very close to the AD, or have some business reason or another to be in Mizzou Arena, or are in the media, or are major boosters, or are in other booster groups where they have tremendous access to Mizzou Athletics. This is outside of even my own personal contacts. Thus far I've heard NOTHING that changes my opinion that Mizzou is heading to the Big 10. In fact, that's their opinion too. Not one person who I consider credible has presented any sense at all of disheartening news within Mizzou Athletics. Keitzmann today stated that MU athletics department staff were "walking around in a shocked daze," after the Big 10, "dropped a bomb on Columbia today." Wrong. It was business as usual, with no outward appearance in the least of stress or concern. None. It's fairly easy to read Mike Alden when he's upset. No indication of that whatsoever, and this is coming from folks who have been around him for YEARS. I will say this, that it takes some serious digging to find out anything. You have to know who you've trusted in the past and who's never led you astray in the past. And you go with them when you can't get it directly from the top. I have NEVER seen Mizzou this quiet - not just today, but from day one. It's telling, which is why on top of what I've been hearing for months now, I also believe Mizzou has felt very positively about this since day one. I'm positive that wasn't based on a pipe dream. Soooo... unless there is a Mizzou-to-the-Big-10 fabrication network larger than the nationwide effort to frame O.J. (RIP Johnny Cochran), then everyone who I truly believe is in an absolute position to know is saying the same things, that we're going to be a part of the Big 10. Another comment... has anyone noticed how nearly EVERYTHING negative regarding Mizzou to the Big 10 is originating from a source called "orangebloods.com?" Even when I see things like, "Oh shit, we're effed, now ESPN is report Mizzou is screwed," when I go take a look at the article it will say, "According to website orangebloods.com, Mizzou is screwed." |
THE DEAL IS DONE!!1!1!!
|
Quote:
|
okay gang
|
TrebMaxx, I think that sounds true.
There is a LOT of FUD going on here. And it seems to be 80% coming from Texas and 20% from KS, unsurprisingly the schools that seem to have the most to lose. But I think FUD is all it is. Fans afraid of what it might mean for the future of their team. Time will tell all. We probably have no more than a week or two more to wait to see the finalizing landscape. Posted via Mobile Device |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.