ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs trade Tyreek Hill to the Dolphins (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343099)

penguinz 03-24-2022 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16212160)
If Mahomes restructures and we signed OBJ to a deal, we could go from $28M to like $45M I’d cap space.

Tons of flexibility to add vets via trade or FA.

Stupid to restructure PM. We have 28M in space.

Only restructure if $ is needed otherwise it just makes PMs cap hit more than it needs to be in future years.

TwistedChief 03-24-2022 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 16212122)
Veach allowed everything to be completely dictated by the Fade. He slow played negotiations like a moron and then got caught with his pants down by letting another team act first and drive the price up.

The dismantling of the Dorsey dynasty is well underway thanks to this clown.

Do you ignore reality? There was no slow playing of negotiations. Hill wasn't going to sign until the free agent WR carousel got sorted out and that included Adams who was widely presumed to get record-breaking money.

In what alternate reality would it have made sense for Hill to agree to his extension earlier than that?

I'd say to stop because you're embarrassing yourself, but that hasn't stopped you in months.

Pitt Gorilla 03-24-2022 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 16212151)
Chiefs got Mahomes and Kareem Hunt in the same draft. Hunt I'm convinced would be on his way to a HOF career if he just stayed in the damned hotel room, or if the TMZ asshole was a Chiefs fan instead of a Pats fan. :(

Or if Clark Hunt had any sort of presence to not be a reactionary idiot.

OnTheWarpath15 03-24-2022 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 16212190)
Stupid to restructure PM. We have 28M in space.

Only restructure if $ is needed otherwise it just makes PMs cap hit more than it needs to be in future years.

We actually have less than that after these last 8-ish small signings, but your point stands.

Nirvana58 03-24-2022 11:29 AM

We kept Frank Clark and gave Hill away for peanuts. As everybody in our division improved their roster over the off-season.

I don't know what the hell Veach is thinking. But you don't let a hall a fame player go in his prime. Especially when your Franchise quarterback already has exactly dog shit for weapons at the wide receiver position.

crispystl 03-24-2022 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16212039)
and that’s why he’ll probably be here through his entire contract.

It would be a sad day if Kelce left.

OnTheWarpath15 03-24-2022 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16212207)
We actually have less than that after these last 8-ish small signings, but your point stands.

EDIT: 9 signings.

Luq Barcoo
Blake Bell
Deon Bush
Geron Christian
Corey Coleman
Chad Henne
Elijah Lee
Derrick Nnadi
Austin Reiter

Sure-Oz 03-24-2022 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt_Von_Trapp (Post 16212084)
Excited to meet Waddle but not Tua?

Lol...maybe he thinks waddles a QB

Rasputin 03-24-2022 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 16212122)
Veach allowed everything to be completely dictated by the Fade. He slow played negotiations like a moron and then got caught with his pants down by letting another team act first and drive the price up.

The dismantling of the Dorsey dynasty is well underway thanks to this clown.

Dorsey was Andy Reid puppet get over Dorsey he got fired and can't keep a GM job anywhere.


No matter the draft picks we pick you are going hate them and bitch and moan about them. No matter what the Chiefs do you don't like. Did Veach **** your wife? Or when is the last time you got laid man? I'm in a lot of pain from breathing issues but I'm not a miserable fan that can't enjoy all the success that Andy Reid and Veach gave us. Also as the years go by so will any draft pick from Dorsey they won't stay here forever.


Veach revamped our offensive line that was depleted in one offseason. This is going be one of the best offensive lines in the NFL that will be like Dick Vermiel Offensive line only nastier Trey Smith likes to bully linebackers or any defender he is going pancake. We haven't had a losing record under Andy Reid and we won't again this year we will be in contention for a Super Bowl.

You are just a hater . The first pick of the Draft you will pop off how bad of a pick it was and so on every pick you won't like . Please go find another team or something. We are still building a dynasty and now we got the tools to do it because of a trade that nets 5 draft picks. One guy that defenses figured out or 5 fresh flesh that develop and dominate.

Look how many people rip on you and you still don't ****ing get it. I'm going say Veach ****ed your wife or your sister or your mom.

Aspengc8 03-24-2022 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 16212208)
We kept Frank Clark and gave Hill away for peanuts. As everybody in our division improved their roster over the off-season.

I don't know what the hell Veach is thinking. But you don't let a hall a fame player go in his prime. Especially when your Franchise quarterback already has exactly dog shit for weapons at the wide receiver position.

I'm surprised they got what they did considering it was contract time and Adam's big deal. Id hardly call those picks + cap room, 'peanuts'.

Rasputin 03-24-2022 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 16212208)
We kept Frank Clark and gave Hill away for peanuts. As everybody in our division improved their roster over the off-season.

I don't know what the hell Veach is thinking. But you don't let a hall a fame player go in his prime. Especially when your Franchise quarterback already has exactly dog shit for weapons at the wide receiver position.

Peanuts? We got 5 draft picks. Holy shit that's a pretty good haul and gives us ammo in the draft to get solid players and revamp our D line and get pass rushers and we have our own picks so we are loaded with picks. This may go down as best draft ever next to drafting Patrick Mahomes.

Veach was thinking long term success and whats best for the team. No way was Tyreek worth the most WR money because that screws our cap space and not be able retain Orlando Brown

Nirvana58 03-24-2022 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspengc8 (Post 16212224)
I'm surprised they got what they did considering it was contract time and Adam's big deal. Id hardly call those picks + cap room, 'peanuts'.

I don't know how the numbers compare up exactly. But it feels like we received better compensation in the Jared Allen trade. Allen was a great player but Hill is a hall a famer. Either way I am not trading Hill for anything less than multiple first round picks.

Other than Mahommes he was the best player on our team. Super bowl teams don't trade away a hall a fame player in their prime.

burt 03-24-2022 11:46 AM

OH NOES, THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!

I love Hill. I wish him the best in Miami. Hell, I root for him except when he plays against us. BUT....Professional Football is a business. He went to get PAID.I will root harder for his replacement. Veach negotiated the best deal he could. I'm good. We good.

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16211610)
Can't remember the last time something player related effected me this much, probably when DT died.

I know exactly what the feeling in the pit of my stomach was, what I felt the morning Willie Roaf retired. Predicted 4-5 years of pain that day, and it turned out to be a decade. More confidence in a bounceback here, but the enormity of the setback is about the same. Confidence in a bounceback is hopefulness more than confidence, to be fully frank. But it is hopefulness. Future is wide open, but a lot of people need to learn from a lot of mistakes so we can be successful in more diverse ways, if we don't have '**** it, reek down there somewhere' to save our bacon in tight situations.

Mr. Plow 03-24-2022 11:54 AM

Is como the dumbest Chiefs fan on CP?

Zap Rowsdower 03-24-2022 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 16211820)
Your screen names leads me to believe you also love MST3K

Yes sir! Love that show!

Rasputin 03-24-2022 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 16212254)
I don't know how the numbers compare up exactly. But it feels like we received better compensation in the Jared Allen trade. Allen was a great player but Hill is a hall a famer. Either way I am not trading Hill for anything less than multiple first round picks.

Other than Mahommes he was the best player on our team. Super bowl teams don't trade away a hall a fame player in their prime.

Patriots did it all the time how'd that work out for them? Not wanting to be like the Patriots but getting rid of players just before their prime is up and hauling in draft picks Patriots got rid of HOFers for their team. If you can upgrade multiple possessions of need and fix many things and get younger and stronger and save cap space for a rainy day or an acquisition can't resist.

Keeping Tyreek would have cost this team ability to improve on both sides of the ball and others that deserve a nice pay day you can say goodbye too.

Keeping Tyreek at the cost he wanted would have been detrimental to this team.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-24-2022 11:55 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A final note on <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> trading Tyreek Hill to <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiDolphins?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MiamiDolphins</a>. Hill wanted to beat Davante Adams deal or had no interest in staying in KC. No team discount in play and team was concerned about him being a distraction without a deal getting done. Best move for both parties.</p>&mdash; Jeffri Chadiha (@jeffrichadiha) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeffrichadiha/status/1507049274453987335?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

TEX 03-24-2022 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 16212254)
I don't know how the numbers compare up exactly. But it feels like we received better compensation in the Jared Allen trade. Allen was a great player but Hill is a hall a famer. Either way I am not trading Hill for anything less than multiple first round picks.

Other than Mahommes he was the best player on our team. Super bowl teams don't trade away a hall a fame player in their prime.

Exactly this. The window is shut now for awhile. No guarantee if /when it will open again. You keep him, the window remains open. It is for that reason that I'd have kept him, since he was under contract, and probably paid him next season. Sure we got draft picks, and a chance to re-tool quickly, but Varch can't miss on them. Regardless, none will be another Reek.

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16211732)
Keeping Hill and having never signed Clark sounds great in hindsight, but that's all it is.

It's a LITTLE more than hindsight, it's relevant to assessing the propositions that Mahomes alone can fix all problems that get thrown at the franchise and Reid and Veach don't make mistakes.

Mr. Plow 03-24-2022 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16212293)
Exactly this. The window is shut now for awhile. No guarantee if /when it will open again. You keep him, the window remains open. It is for that reason that I'd have kept him, since he was under contract, and probably paid him next season. Sure we got draft picks, and a chance to re-tool quickly, but Varch can't miss on them. Regardless, none will be another Reek.

So basically what you are saying is that Hill was the entire reason we were competing for Superbowls.

Rasputin 03-24-2022 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16212293)
Exactly this. The window is shut now for awhile. No guarantee if /when it will open again. You keep him, the window remains open. It is for that reason that I'd have kept him, since he was under contract, and probably paid him next season. Sure we got draft picks, and a chance to re-tool quickly, but Varch can't miss on them. Regardless, none will be another Reek.

BULL ****ING SHIT

Our window is open every year we have Patrick Mahomes. We will have a better defense because we traded Tyreek Hill and we can find other WR in the draft. We don't need another Reek he couldn't out jump DBs to catch the ball and tipped for interceptions . We are going have a stout defense because we traded away Tyreek Hill and our offense will be humming along just fine because Patrick will spread the ball around. We've played games without Tyreek and still put up 30+ points. Our offensive line is a cohesive unit that will be in the business of pancaking defenders. We revamp our defensive line we can win the war in the trenches. This trade is a blessing and will pay off for years to come. Maybe some rookies will struggle but every player starts somewhere. Tyreek was a 4th round pick we can find a stud WR in just about any round.

This trade is best for Chiefs to stay competitive for a long time and compete for championships. Our offense will be just fine and our defense line is going be stout so relax. We have not had a losing record under Andy Reid and we wont' this year either.

Mr. Plow 03-24-2022 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212299)
that Mahomes alone can fix all problems that get thrown at the franchise and Reid and Veach don't make mistakes.

Nobody is saying either of these things.

Mecca 03-24-2022 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16212286)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A final note on <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> trading Tyreek Hill to <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiDolphins?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MiamiDolphins</a>. Hill wanted to beat Davante Adams deal or had no interest in staying in KC. No team discount in play and team was concerned about him being a distraction without a deal getting done. Best move for both parties.</p>&mdash; Jeffri Chadiha (@jeffrichadiha) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeffrichadiha/status/1507049274453987335?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

It's also a tough move to make when your franchise player signed a deal that is flexible to help the team. Do you then give big money to the guy being completely inflexible also?

Tyreek got his ring and getting paid mattered to him more than anything, looks it was just time to move on.

staylor26 03-24-2022 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212299)
It's a LITTLE more than hindsight, it's relevant to assessing the propositions that Mahomes alone can fix all problems that get thrown at the franchise and Reid and Veach don't make mistakes.

Literally nobody is saying that.

When you have an elite HC/QB/GM trio, you have A LOT more room for error though.

saphojunkie 03-24-2022 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 16211872)
I mean let’s be honest what has been beached best draft pick so far?

Creed/Smith are only home runs he’s hit this far

Sneed, mother ****er!

Bolton.

Gay.

Fenton.

And I still believe in Thornhill.

Nirvana58 03-24-2022 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 16212284)
Patriots did it all the time how'd that work out for them? Not wanting to be like the Patriots but getting rid of players just before their prime is up and hauling in draft picks Patriots got rid of HOFers for their team. If you can upgrade multiple possessions of need and fix many things and get younger and stronger and save cap space for a rainy day or an acquisition can't resist.

Keeping Tyreek would have cost this team ability to improve on both sides of the ball and others that deserve a nice pay day you can say goodbye too.

Keeping Tyreek at the cost he wanted would have been detrimental to this team.

Name 1 player of Hills caliber that New England traded away in their prime.

dirk digler 03-24-2022 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16211762)
I can appreciate that. I think it's difficult to visualize the Chiefs without Hill because he's become such an important part of the fabric of the team. The guy is legitimately the most exciting player in the entire league and he played on OUR TEAM. It's infinite the number of times I've thought, "Gosh, I'm so happy that guy is on our side."

It feels weird now. But we almost lost him to ignominious circumstances a few years ago. At least we got another 3 years from him, a Super Bowl title, and some real compensation in return.

My advice would be to just wait until the draft. We all have a tendency to massively overrate our picks, and given how many we have this year, we'll have a lot to be excited about and hopeful for.

The sadness around losing Tyreek will fade like anything else.

Oh I know it will just right now it is a tough pill to swallow. I feel like though we picked CJ over Hill and I think that was the wrong decision. I would have rode with Mahomes, Hill, and Kelce until their wheels fell off but that is just me.

In58men 03-24-2022 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 16212324)
Sneed, mother ****er!

Bolton.

Gay.

Fenton.

And I still believe in Thornhill.

He acts like every ****ing GM hits on every ****ing pick.

He still doesn’t understand that every pick is a dart throw. Dude needs to change his name to bleeding vagina.

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 16212320)
Nobody is saying either of these things.

Plenty have said exactly that, and every time I suggest it's an idiotic take, I get tons of pushback and passionate anger.

FloridaMan88 03-24-2022 12:25 PM

Let’s be clear… in order for the Chiefs to “win” this trade, Veach needs to land an instant WR1 in the draft.

If the likes of Miami, Cincinnati and Minnesota can all hit on instant impact WR1’s in recent drafts then there is no excuse for Veach not to aggressively identify/draft a WR1 and for Andy Reid and his coaching staff to ensure the rookie WR has immediate success.

If the idea is to replace Tyreek with a combination of broke dick complimentary (at best) free agent WR’s and then draft Pringle/DRob-level replacements in the middle rounds of the draft… then the trade is a failure.

You don’t waste a season with a 26 year Patrick Mahomes by doing a “reset”, or “step back”… it’s still Super Bowl or bust.

dirk digler 03-24-2022 12:25 PM

Don't if this was posted or not but sounds like we were close until the Davante deal.

Quote:

Wednesday’s trade sending wide receiver Tyreek Hill from the Chiefs to the Dolphins had its roots in another recent NFL trade.

Hill’s agent Drew Rosenhaus was on 560 Sports in Miami on Thursday and said that he was working toward a contract extension for Hill in Kansas City when the Packers traded Davante Adams to the Raiders. The Raiders then gave Adams a contract that made him the highest-paid wide receiver in the league.

Rosenhaus said he told the Chiefs “that this should be the market for Tyreek” and that it would be to everyone’s benefit if they traded the wideout if they weren’t willing to make that deal.

“The bottom line is he was in the last year of his contract,” Rosenhaus said. “We had actually worked out a restructure that the Chiefs had wanted a week before, and it really looked like we were going to work toward a contract extension. There was even a report that we were close to a deal, that was inaccurate, but we were working on it. Then the Adams deal really flipped everything upside down. The Chiefs, I think they had the foresight to see that Tyreek was in the last year of his contract and we weren’t going to take a deal that wasn’t better than Adams, so they recognized this would probably be their last year with Tyreek, and this was their opportunity to potentially rebuild at that position.”

Mr. Plow 03-24-2022 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212380)
Plenty have said exactly that, and every time I suggest it's an idiotic take, I get tons of pushback and passionate anger.

You'd have to show some examples of it, otherwise, most are going to just chalk it up to you being emotional. Like staylor said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16212323)
Literally nobody is saying that.

When you have an elite HC/QB/GM trio, you have A LOT more room for error though.


tk13 03-24-2022 12:28 PM

I don't think anyone really knows what Veach will do in this situation. It's partly his own fault because he's traded picks for players, but Veach has only had 1 first round pick in 4 years, and that was pick 32 at the end of the 1st round so that barely counts. The team has been so good he's barely had any top 50 picks even.

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16211933)
guys, we won a SB with a 'stars and scrubs' roster. Then we made one more.

But the lack of quality depth cost us that ring, and now the bill has come due.

No, you're not going to replace Hill with any ONE PLAYER. But other offenses are just as productive with a combination of guys if not more so, and that's what we'll need to do going forward.

This is the Way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16211950)
And even when we won that ring, how many of us were loudly advocating for that approach?

Not to bring Dorsey back into this, but what I loved about Dorsey's approach here was that he was a Ron Wolf 'roster layers' guy. He treated the draft as an opportunity to add talent EVERYWHERE and if that meant some of those guys were depth for a year or two - so be it? Depth will win you football games in this league and a lack of it will lose them.

Then for a couple years on Mahomes rookie deal we went away from that approach and just went on the attack for 3 years. But it's not sustainable at all.

So now we're getting back to building through layers. And that's the way you have to do it. And if that works and you get a new 'foundation' in place, you can then take another 2-3 attack years to try to put some top end on those layers.

This just seems like such a no-brainer to me. I just don't see how anyone can think this is the wrong path forward.

Case in point, people get hella mad every time I characterize the franchise in recent years as Entourage, Vinny Mahomes and a bunch of Turtles. But they also get hella mad that I explain myself in detail, because it's all 'babbling.'

And here, Meck and DJ make the EXACT SAME POINT in a more verbose manner, and everyone says, 'huh, makes sense.'

tk13 03-24-2022 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212385)
Let’s be clear… in order for the Chiefs to “win” this trade, Veach needs to land an instant WR1 in the draft.

If the likes of Miami, Cincinnati and Minnesota can all hit on instant impact WR1’s in recent drafts then there is no excuse for Veach not to aggressively identify/draft a WR1 and for Andy Reid and his coaching staff to ensure the rookie WR has immediate success.

If the idea is to replace Tyreek with a combination of broke dick complimentary (at best) free agent WR’s and then draft Pringle/DRob-level replacements in the middle rounds of the draft… then the trade is a failure.

You don’t waste a season with a 26 year Patrick Mahomes by doing a “reset”, or “step back”… it’s still Super Bowl or bust.

Two of those guys were top 10 picks though. And even then it's really hard to find a WR who will impact right away, Chase and Jefferson have basically rewritten history with what they've done. I wouldn't hold my breath.

RunKC 03-24-2022 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212385)
Let’s be clear… in order for the Chiefs to “win” this trade, Veach needs to land an instant WR1 in the draft.

If the likes of Miami, Cincinnati and Minnesota can all hit on instant impact WR1’s in recent drafts then there is no excuse for Veach not to aggressively identify/draft a WR1 and for Andy Reid and his coaching staff to ensure the rookie WR has immediate success.

If the idea is to replace Tyreek with a combination of broke dick complimentary (at best) free agent WR’s and then draft Pringle/DRob-level replacements in the middle rounds of the draft… then the trade is a failure.

You don’t waste a season with a 26 year Patrick Mahomes by doing a “reset”, or “step back”… it’s still Super Bowl or bust.

Keeping Tyreek and his contract would have made things significantly harder. Only 1 draft pick in the top 60, no cap space.

Regardless of Tyreek staying or not we need a replacement for Charvarious Ward, Chris Jones (contract ends after 2023) , Frank Clark and Okafor/Ingram. Dude our DL and corner situations are BAD.

We now have 4 picks in the top 62 and cap space open to solve those problems. This is a very good draft for WR, DL and corner. We have a great opportunity.

It’s up to Veach and the scouts to find the right players

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 16212389)
You'd have to show some examples of it, otherwise, most are going to just chalk it up to you being emotional. Like staylor said...

Catch 22, . . . I devote the time to track down and document everyone who has said it, . . . you shrug and call me obsessed.

And then all I've done is waste my time and given you another reason to do what you want to do all along, deride my positions without rebutting them.

You disagree, that's fine. You assert I'm making shit up or lying, or having an ulterior motive, . . . not as fine.

Molitoth 03-24-2022 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212385)
Let’s be clear… in order for the Chiefs to “win” this trade, Veach needs to land an instant WR1 in the draft.

If the likes of Miami, Cincinnati and Minnesota can all hit on instant impact WR1’s in recent drafts then there is no excuse for Veach not to aggressively identify/draft a WR1 and for Andy Reid and his coaching staff to ensure the rookie WR has immediate success.

If the idea is to replace Tyreek with a combination of broke dick complimentary (at best) free agent WR’s and then draft Pringle/DRob-level replacements in the middle rounds of the draft… then the trade is a failure.

You don’t waste a season with a 26 year Patrick Mahomes by doing a “reset”, or “step back”… it’s still Super Bowl or bust.

So basically, you are on the "Mahomes is only good because of his weapons" train, that everyone outside of KC seems to be on.

Nightfyre 03-24-2022 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212385)
Let’s be clear… in order for the Chiefs to “win” this trade, Veach needs to land an instant WR1 in the draft.

If the likes of Miami, Cincinnati and Minnesota can all hit on instant impact WR1’s in recent drafts then there is no excuse for Veach not to aggressively identify/draft a WR1 and for Andy Reid and his coaching staff to ensure the rookie WR has immediate success.

If the idea is to replace Tyreek with a combination of broke dick complimentary (at best) free agent WR’s and then draft Pringle/DRob-level replacements in the middle rounds of the draft… then the trade is a failure.

You don’t waste a season with a 26 year Patrick Mahomes by doing a “reset”, or “step back”… it’s still Super Bowl or bust.

I don't agree. The measure of success does not hinge on adequately replacing hill. The measure is what Veach does with the draft picks acquired. The chiefs should still contend.

Mr. Plow 03-24-2022 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212405)
Catch 22, . . . I devote the time to track down and document everyone who has said it, . . . you shrug and call me obsessed.

And then all I've done is waste my time and given you another reason to do what you want to do all along, deride my positions without rebutting them.

You disagree, that's fine. You assert I'm making shit up or lying, or having an ulterior motive, . . . not as fine.

I'm not the one that said....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212299)
that Mahomes alone can fix all problems that get thrown at the franchise and Reid and Veach don't make mistakes.

Nobody is saying that. People may be saying that because of those 3 we have a better chance than average, but nobody is saying just BECAUSE of those 3 we will overcome any mistakes.

You are the one who said it, it's not on me to prove it.

tk13 03-24-2022 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 16212408)
So basically, you are on the "Mahomes is only good because of his weapons" train, that everyone outside of KC seems to be on.

We are going to lose the ability for Mahomes to run around and have Tyreek use his speed to get open down the field and play streetball, but defenses were basically selling all the way out to stop that already.

The other missing factor here is we have Andy Reid. He's going to get the most out of the guys we do have.

RunKC 03-24-2022 12:37 PM

The Chiefs didn’t become the Chiefs under Andy Reid through free agency.

All these guys we talk about. Mahomes, Tyreek, Kelce, Jones. They were all drafted.

That’s how you win in this league. Draft well

FloridaMan88 03-24-2022 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 16212408)
So basically, you are on the "Mahomes is only good because of his weapons" train, that everyone outside of KC seems to be on.

The train I am on is great/Tyreek-caliber playmakers gives any QB and team a better chance to have success… seems pretty obvious.

Veach needs to go draft an instant WR1.

kcbubb 03-24-2022 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 16212016)
How the hell would the Chiefs TRADE him after getting one more year out of him? He only had one year left on his contract. Had they kept him another year, he would have been a free agent and they wouldn't have got shit for him. This was a great move by the Chiefs.

Are you serious? Franchise tag hill next year and then trade him, which is what the packers did with davante Adams. There is No reason to trade hill this year.

In58men 03-24-2022 12:43 PM

Here comes the shit talking

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...43c9f5768d.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The Franchise 03-24-2022 12:45 PM

Como is Tyreek Hill. That’s a huge twist.

Marcellus 03-24-2022 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16212299)
It's a LITTLE more than hindsight, it's relevant to assessing the propositions that Mahomes alone can fix all problems that get thrown at the franchise and Reid and Veach don't make mistakes.

I don't remember anyone ever saying signing Clark was going to cost us Hill down the road, and I'm quite certain Veach didn't expect that either.

Clark was a position of need 3 years ago so they tried to fill that need. No way to know the WR market was going to go absolutely insane in 3 years and Hill was going to decide he wanted be #1 in pay with no budging. Frankly I'm still shocked he pulled this shit.

So yea its hindsight.

I do know my biggest wish for this offseason was a better defense. Still hoping for that.

FloridaMan88 03-24-2022 12:47 PM

Pretty sure Dorsey was out of KC and it was Veach/Andy in 2019 who were Tyreek’s biggest advocates when many wanted to end his football career after the (false) child abuse allegations.

Show some class/appreciation, Tyreek.

Marcellus 03-24-2022 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 16212437)
Are you serious? Franchise tag hill next year and then trade him, which is what the packers did with davante Adams. There is No reason to trade hill this year.

I would point out the flaw in your idea but its been explained to you about 50 times and you still keep regurgitating the same shit and ignoring what you are being told.

The Franchise 03-24-2022 12:49 PM

You assholes have me agreeing with Marcellus. Come on now.

staylor26 03-24-2022 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212449)
Pretty sure Dorsey was out of KC and it was Veach/Andy in 2019 who were Tyreek’s biggest advocates when many wanted to end his football career after the (false) child abuse allegations.

Show some class/appreciation, Tyreek.

Yea, that kind of rubs me the wrong way to be honest.

**** him. I was sad/sentimental yesterday, now he’s the enemy like everybody else.

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16212444)
Here comes the shit talking

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...43c9f5768d.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

This is going to make the narrative drivers upset

The Franchise 03-24-2022 12:53 PM

I can’t tell if he’s trying to replace Reid’s name with Dorsey or if he’s saying to add Dorsey to that list. Either way I don’t really give a shit.

RunKC 03-24-2022 12:53 PM

The curtains are starting to be lifted. Kind of see why Veach traded him now. Dude was a selfish prick and didn’t want to restructure to get money instantly and now this.

Him and Rosenhaus tried to strong arm us into paying him a ridiculous salary.

Yeah. Veach did the right thing

Baby Lee 03-24-2022 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16212424)
The Chiefs didn’t become the Chiefs under Andy Reid through free agency.

All these guys we talk about. Mahomes, Tyreek, Kelce, Jones. They were all drafted.

That’s how you win in this league. Draft well

That's the thing, EVERYTHING optimistic goes back to Mahomes being a supernatural talent.

And we just eliminated his most potent force multiplier, but everything is going to be fine because Reid and Veach are awesome [for drafting Mahomes] so they won't use our draft picks to assemble a historically bad defense like they did, or a bunch of scrub WRs outside Tyreek, like they did. They'll do awesome rebuilding an entire team because they drafted Mahomes.

The irony is, if people were correct about my ulterior motivations, I would be super stoked about this. If I hated Mahomes, and wanted a return of Marty ball, I'd be ECSTATIC that Mahomes lost his security blanket and our best chance to return to championship form would be to draft defense and a running game.

I want the franchise to succeed with the lot we have at present. If everything goes well, good players are drafted, emerging talents start paying dividends, units start gelling in schemes, etc., well be well positioned to do so.

But that's the story for EVERY franchise in a parity league, and no one outside Mahomes and Kelce have an outsized pedigree in performing above average in their respective roles.

I'd love to think, with all our draft capital, Spags and Reid are philosophically set to mold WHATEVER talent we collect into WHATEVER form of excellence maximizes that talent. Maybe we're a bruising running team [with the O-Line we've assembled, that would be a shortcut. Maybe we get a ravenous set of pass rushers. Maybe we luck into a Chase-level WR that miraculously drops to us. The possibilities are endless.

But they're philosophically set in their ways and dependent on long learning curves to get teams to perform exactly as they envisioned in their head and drafted in their existing schemes. Which means we're more likely in for a lot more beautiful ideas that the personnel have trouble executing, for at least a while.

FloridaMan88 03-24-2022 12:55 PM

Nick Wright is all of us. LMAO

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The camera was rolling while <a href="https://twitter.com/getnickwright?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@getnickwright</a> got the Tyreek Hill news. His instant reaction ⬇️<br><br>You won&#39;t want to miss tomorrow&#39;s episode of What&#39;s Wright!<br>Subscribe:<br>Apple: <a href="https://t.co/37iikED1qH">https://t.co/37iikED1qH</a><br>Spotify: <a href="https://t.co/zUwsfiZHAs">https://t.co/zUwsfiZHAs</a> <a href="https://t.co/puF8RIGUlZ">pic.twitter.com/puF8RIGUlZ</a></p>&mdash; What’s Wright? with Nick Wright (@WhatsWrightShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhatsWrightShow/status/1506693230749966344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16212467)
The curtains are starting to be lifted. Kind of see why Veach traded him now. Dude was a selfish prick and didn’t want to restructure to get money instantly and now this.

Him and Rosenhaus tried to strong arm us into paying him a ridiculous salary.

Yeah. Veach did the right thing

If you has the chance to be the highest paid at your job you'd do the same. Stop with the false narratives.

RunKC 03-24-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212476)
If you has the chance to be the highest paid at your job you'd do the same. Stop with the false narratives.

That’s fine. I’m happy for him. I’m glad that Veach did what was best for us.

KChiefs1 03-24-2022 01:00 PM

NFLN carrying Tyreek’s presser in Miami.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

staylor26 03-24-2022 01:01 PM

No1curr

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16212481)
That’s fine. I’m happy for him. I’m glad that Veach did what was best for us.

Yup agree Veach did a great job given the situation now if he can hit this draft out of the park we'll be fine

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16211950)
And even when we won that ring, how many of us were loudly advocating for that approach?

Not to bring Dorsey back into this, but what I loved about Dorsey's approach here was that he was a Ron Wolf 'roster layers' guy. He treated the draft as an opportunity to add talent EVERYWHERE and if that meant some of those guys were depth for a year or two - so be it? Depth will win you football games in this league and a lack of it will lose them.

Then for a couple years on Mahomes rookie deal we went away from that approach and just went on the attack for 3 years. But it's not sustainable at all.

So now we're getting back to building through layers. And that's the way you have to do it. And if that works and you get a new 'foundation' in place, you can then take another 2-3 attack years to try to put some top end on those layers.

This just seems like such a no-brainer to me. I just don't see how anyone can think this is the wrong path forward.

I agree with the approach of layers but if we're being honest about what set us back year was a series of mistakes made by Veach in the past. Poor drafting/Clark trade at the edge really sticks out

PAChiefsGuy 03-24-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212476)
If you has the chance to be the highest paid at your job you'd do the same. Stop with the false narratives.

No I wouldnt I'd go work at place i enjoyed the most because id be confident enough in my abilities to know ill be well off either way. Especially if the place i enjoyed the most hey played a huge part in getting me to where I was.

Money isn't everything to every person and there's numerous examples of people turning down high paying jobs for a variety of reasons.

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 16212502)
No I would I'd go work at place i enjoyed the most especially if they played a huge part in getting me to where I was.

Money isn't everything to every person and there's numerous examples of people turning down high paying jobs for a variety of reasons.

Yeah you would turn down millions. Sure you would.

Kman34 03-24-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb (Post 16212437)
Are you serious? Franchise tag hill next year and then trade him, which is what the packers did with davante Adams. There is No reason to trade hill this year.

You are not paying attention.. Cap space and picks..

RINGLEADER 03-24-2022 01:15 PM

Tyreek Hill coming up in Miami on NFLN.

Veach is really set for this draft. We can package our two new picks to get to the top 15. We can use our two firsts to get into the top 10. Or we could use the two new picks with our first and go all the way to a top 5 pick and get someone who is best at his position.

Or just stay pat and get four potentially solid players.

Marcellus 03-24-2022 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212504)
Yeah you would turn down millions. Sure you would.

This isn't you going from delivering pizzas and giving blowjobs on the corner to getting millions a year Billay.

This a 20%ish increase in pay and no I wouldn't leave my job to move to a more expensive area for a 20% pay increase.

staylor26 03-24-2022 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212504)
Yeah you would turn down millions. Sure you would.

I don’t expect anybody else to, but I absolutely would.

I understand why somebody wouldn’t though.

RINGLEADER 03-24-2022 01:19 PM

“My agent wanted me to kiss him on the mouth…”

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16212527)
This isn't you going from delivering pizzas and giving blowjobs on the corner to getting millions a year Billay.

This a 20%ish increase in pay and no I wouldn't leave my job to move to a more expensive area for a 20% pay increase.

Funny being lectured by someone who makes less money than me lol. It's still millions of dollars God damn you are such a moron

Marcellus 03-24-2022 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212537)
Funny being lectured by someone who makes less money than me lol. It's still millions of dollars God damn you are such a moron

LMAO dude we all know you aint making shit.

RINGLEADER 03-24-2022 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16212531)
I don’t expect anybody else to, but I absolutely would.

I understand why somebody wouldn’t though.

I think the only argument for taking less is how much different is your life at $20m/year vs $25m/year. But I also think 0 taxes, loving the area, and the weather definitely factor in. Not sure he even gets to the playoffs with Tua but happy for the guy. Wish it had worked out but time to turn the page…

irafreak 03-24-2022 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 16211827)
If your earning window was 10-15 years you would be an idiot not too change for 50% more comp.

Really? Cause I can live adequately on low income because I don't spend money on much. And I fail to see how an earning window of making 21m or 30m is do or die.

You'll never be able to convince me otherwise because I simply don't value things and money the same way others do. Plus there is always more opportunity if you work for it. I mean it's not as though football players never make another dollar again after they quit playing.

Marcellus 03-24-2022 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16212531)
I don’t expect anybody else to, but I absolutely would.

I understand why somebody wouldn’t though.

I agree with this. Its not like this was his first big contract or he wasn't going to very wealthy anyway. Maybe KC should have signed him for longer a few years ago now that I think about it.

Mahomes left $ out there.

Kelce left money out there.

Hill went for the max $. Its certainly his right but again that comes with criticism as well from fans at times.

This reminds me of Pujols going to the Angels. Hopefully like with Pujols and the Cards its a blessing in disguise.

PAChiefsGuy 03-24-2022 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16212504)
Yeah you would turn down millions. Sure you would.

I think Tyreek would be doing just fine if he accepted the contract the Chiefs offered him.

FloridaMan88 03-24-2022 01:26 PM

Tyreek was screwed out of getting his legit market value in his previous contract extension in 2019 because that took place during the child abuse smear campaign… I don’t blame him for trying to make up for that now and get every possible $$$.

InChiefsHeaven 03-24-2022 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16212463)
I can’t tell if he’s trying to replace Reid’s name with Dorsey or if he’s saying to add Dorsey to that list. Either way I don’t really give a shit.

This. I don't understand how that's a dis on the Chiefs or whatever...

...but mostly, I don't give a shit either...

Titty Meat 03-24-2022 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16212527)
This isn't you going from delivering pizzas and giving blowjobs on the corner to getting millions a year Billay.

This a 20%ish increase in pay and no I wouldn't leave my job to move to a more expensive area for a 20% pay increase.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 16212540)
LMAO dude we all know you aint making shit.

I'm sure I make more than you. You work in a warehouse loser lol

saphojunkie 03-24-2022 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16212426)
The train I am on is great/Tyreek-caliber playmakers gives any QB and team a better chance to have success… seems pretty obvious.

Veach needs to go draft an instant WR1.

You’re missing the overall.

People act like Hill’s talent is in a vacuum. It isn’t. His contract, age, and other needs factor in.

Yes, this team is substantially better by replacing Hill with a lesser talent provided they upgrade at RT, DE, CB, and add depth. Why is this hard for people to accept?

We won’t be replacing Hill’s talent, but we can absolutely field a better team with the resources this trade nets us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.