ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ***** 2017 Chiefs Training Camp Megathread ***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308928)

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12991649)
Sounds like a Flynn/Wilson situation coming up.

Not even close! Flynn played 2 good games and got offered a contract. Smith is a proven winner and has been to the playoffs. Mahomes has yet to take a single snap in any meaningful game

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991648)
If only the punt returner hadn't fumbled twice, the 49ers would have beat the G-men. I used to believe that too!

I now understand what the 1 for 13 on third down side of the arguement was saying. It is who Alex is.

He also drove his team down the field and hit Vernon Davis for a td with about 10 seconds left when it was fourth down. The biggest pair of balls I have seen from Smith

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12991651)
Exact quote from your post just minutes ago:



Not a single mention of Alex missing multiple wide open receivers throughout that game, even though that is what all of the analysts point to as the primary reason for the loss (Chris Simms, Baldinger, etc.)

You could also point to Fishers crucial hold on the two point try on why we loss. It was a bundle of things that happened

pugsnotdrugs19 08-04-2017 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991660)
He also drove his team down the field and hit Vernon Davis for a td with about 10 seconds left when it was fourth down. The biggest pair of balls I have seen from Smith

You've went full Tiger. Never go full Tiger.

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 03:30 PM

Bout time for the barrage of Smith gifs from the playoff gaffe...

BigCatDaddy 08-04-2017 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991656)
Not even close! Flynn played 2 good games and got offered a contract. Smith is a proven winner and has been to the playoffs. Mahomes has yet to take a single snap in any meaningful game

So you dont want to win a SB?

Coogs 08-04-2017 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991660)
He also drove his team down the field and hit Vernon Davis for a td with about 10 seconds left when it was fourth down. The biggest pair of balls I have seen from Smith

Don't think so.

https://www.pro-football-reference.c...1201220sfo.htm

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12991672)
So you dont want to win a SB?

Who even says Mahomes will win a super bowl?

BigCatDaddy 08-04-2017 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991679)
Who even says Mahomes will win a super bowl?

All reports from camp say he is the most talented QB there.

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12991685)
All reports from camp say he is the most talented QB there.

Really because Terez, Sweeney and BJ say otherwise.

Coogs 08-04-2017 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991679)
Who even says Mahomes will win a super bowl?

He may not. But his odds are much better as of right now. Alex is on his last shot. Mahomes could have 15 or so chances ahead of him.

BigCatDaddy 08-04-2017 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991688)
Really because Terez, Sweeney and BJ say otherwise.

Link?

Discuss Thrower 08-04-2017 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991648)
If only the punt returner hadn't fumbled twice, the 49ers would have beat the G-men. I used to believe that too!

I now understand what the 1 for 13 on third down side of the arguement was saying. It is who Alex is.

40% of 49er drives ending after three plays and a punt.

Nope. Totally Kyle Williams' fault.

The Franchise 08-04-2017 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991676)

https://media.giphy.com/media/26AHvF...aSf6/giphy.gif

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:38 PM

The one thing Smith does well is he able to read defenses and make pre snap adjustments. Mahomes so far who knows but he needs work.

The Franchise 08-04-2017 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991693)
The one thing Smith does well is he able to read defenses and make pre snap adjustments. Mahomes so far who knows but he needs work.

ROFL

RunKC 08-04-2017 03:39 PM

This is the most disappointing year ever for the AFC. It's almost a foregone conclusion that the Patriots make the SB again unless Brady gets hurt.

Tannehill is done and the rest of the division dusks so that's 6 wins alone. Brady never losses at home so that's 6 games. They have their best offense ever IMO.

Think about this. Brady has made the SB in 46% of his years starting healthy for the Pats. There's a better chance that Tom Brady makes the SB than Steph Curry has making a 3 point shot.

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991676)

But it's true!!! Best chance ever!

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991693)
The one thing Smith does well is he able to read defenses and make pre snap adjustments. Mahomes so far who knows but he needs work.

ROFL

ToxSocks 08-04-2017 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991688)
Really because Terez, Sweeney and BJ say otherwise.

No they didn't. They said Alex is having the best camp. Which is to be expected considering the inexperience of the other 3 QB's on the roster.

DaneMcCloud 08-04-2017 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12991691)
40% of 49er drives ending after three plays and a punt.

Nope. Totally Kyle Williams' fault.

Against the best defense in the NFL.

The 49ers scored as many points as the New England Patriots did in the Super Bowl vs. the Giants.

Williams fumbled twice, the final time in Giants territory, so yeah.

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12991696)
This is the most disappointing year ever for the AFC. It's almost a foregone conclusion that the Patriots make the SB again unless Brady gets hurt.

Tannehill is done and the rest of the division dusks so that's 6 wins alone. Brady never losses at home so that's 6 games. They have their best offense ever IMO.

Think about this. Brady has made the SB in 46% of his years starting healthy for the Pats. There's a better chance that Tom Brady makes the SB than Steph Curry has making a 3 point shot.

All Russell Westbrook FG % is 43%. So just think Brady has a higher chance of making the super bowl than Westbrook does making a shot period

DaneMcCloud 08-04-2017 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12991703)
No they didn't. They said Alex is having the best camp. Which is to be expected considering the inexperience of the other 3 QB's on the roster.

Terez was visibly pissed off when someone asked if the Chiefs trade Smith to the Dolphins in their Facebook Live chat yesterday.

He was so steamed that he said to Vahe and Blair "One of you fellas take this question".

It's stupid. The Chiefs aren't trading Alex Smith this preaseason.

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12991711)
Terez was visibly pissed off when someone asked if the Chiefs trade Smith to the Dolphins in their Facebook Live chat yesterday.

He was so steamed that he said to Vahe and Blair "One of you fellas take this question".

It's stupid. The Chiefs aren't trading Alex Smith this preaseason.

I doubt they trade him eaither. But its funny as shit to watch the Alex homers menstruation cycles go off the charts at the possibility....

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12991717)
I doubt they trade him eaither. But its funny as shit to watch the Alex homers menstruation cycles go off the charts at the possibility....

It's not even a slight of possibility

DaneMcCloud 08-04-2017 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12991717)
I doubt they trade him eaither. But its funny as shit to watch the Alex homers menstruation cycles go off the charts at the possibility....

The Dolphins aren't an Alex Smith away from the Super Bowl, so there's no reason to think they'd give up 1st and 2nd rounders for him, especially since he's under contract for only 2 more seasons and will be 34 next year.

If Cutler doesn't unretire (and I'm better he won't), Osweiler, McCarron or someone else's backup makes more sense than Smith, because he doesn't fit the Gase offense.

Hell, Mike Glennon would be a better and more logical trade target.

Coogs 08-04-2017 03:48 PM

I doubt they trade him either. But if the Dolphins call and offer a 1st... :shrug:

ToxSocks 08-04-2017 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991726)
I doubt they trade him either. But if the Dolphins call and offer a 1st... :shrug:

Keep dreaming. They're not paying a 1st for a 1 year rental.

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991726)
I doubt they trade him either. But if the Dolphins call and offer a 1st... :shrug:

Dolphins have already called Cutler and Jeff Darlington said on NFL Live that he believes Cutler would be a perfect fit because he has worked with Gase before

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12991728)
Keep dreaming. They're not paying a 1st for a 1 year rental.

He's signed for 2 years

eDave 08-04-2017 03:50 PM

Keep dreaming.

Coogs 08-04-2017 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12991728)
Keep dreaming. They're not paying a 1st for a 1 year rental.

They were talking about it on the radio,610, just like we are here. This is just not a CP thing.

No one thinks it will happen. Just hypothetical.

penbrook 08-04-2017 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991734)
They were talking about it on the radio,610, just like we are here. This is just not a CP thing.

No one thinks it will happen. Just hypothetical.

It's just hypothetical until Nick Athan says otherwise.

Discuss Thrower 08-04-2017 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12991705)
Against the best defense in the NFL.

The 49ers scored as many points as the New England Patriots did in the Super Bowl vs. the Giants.

Williams fumbled twice, the final time in Giants territory, so yeah.

25th in points allowed, 19th in rushing defense, 29th in pass defense and 8th in takeaways.

12th/16th in DVOA and late-season weighted DVOA respectively.

I get the argument for saying it's an above average defense at worst, but to say they were the best by most objective measures doesn't follow.

PAChiefsGuy 08-04-2017 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12991696)
This is the most disappointing year ever for the AFC. It's almost a foregone conclusion that the Patriots make the SB again unless Brady gets hurt.

Tannehill is done and the rest of the division dusks so that's 6 wins alone. Brady never losses at home so that's 6 games. They have their best offense ever IMO.

Think about this. Brady has made the SB in 46% of his years starting healthy for the Pats. There's a better chance that Tom Brady makes the SB than Steph Curry has making a 3 point shot.

He was a great game manager who was clutch for his first three SBs (2001,2003,2004). Look at his stats.

2001 - 63.9 comp %, 2,814 yds, 18 TDs, 12 INTs, 86.5 Rate
2003 - 60.9 compl %, 3620 yds, 23 TDs, 12 INTs, 85.9 Rate
2004 - 60.8 compl %, 3692 yds, 28 TDs, 14 INTs, 92.6 Rate

Nothing spectacular there. They won mostly because of their D back then. Now they win mostly because of their O but their D is still very good (#8 in total yds, #1 in league ppg last year giving up just 15.6 ppg).

Pats are more than just Tom Brady. Obviously he is the main reason but there is a lot of reasons for the Pats success. It isn't just him. They went 11-5 with Matt Cassell as their QB not that long ago.

Team game. So it is not a forgone conclusion that they will win. There's a lot that can happen. Maybe their D or Oline sucks this year and if that is the case they won't win again. So you never know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12991746)
25th in points allowed, 19th in rushing defense, 29th in pass defense and 8th in takeaways.

12th/16th in DVOA and late-season weigthed DVOA respectively/

I get the argument for saying it's an above average defense at worst, but to say they were the best by most objective measures doesn't follow.

Their D, particularly their Dline, was never healthy until the playoffs. Once they were they shut down everyone including offenses led by Matt Ryan, Rodgers and Brady.

BigCatDaddy 08-04-2017 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991709)
All Russell Westbrook FG % is 43%. So just think Brady has a higher chance of making the super bowl than Westbrook does making a shot period

I think you stole that tweet from Stephen a Smith. Wrong sport bro

penbrook 08-04-2017 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12991762)
I think you stole that tweet from Stephen a Smith. Wrong sport bro

I'm comparing the two

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991751)
2003 - 60.9 compl %, 3620 yds, 23 TDs, 12 INTs, 85.9 Rate
2004 - 60.8 compl %, 3692 yds, 28 TDs, 14 INTs, 92.6 Rate

Nothing spectacular there.

This is incorrect.

In 2003 Brady was 6th in the league in passing, 10th in TDs and had SEVEN game-winning drives.

In 2004 he was 10th in the league in passing, 6th in TDs, 9th in yards per attempt and 5th in yards per completion.

Those aren't game manager numbers. Those are top ten passing numbers.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 08-04-2017 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12991766)
This is incorrect.

In 2003 Brady was 6th in the league in passing, 10th in TDs and had SEVEN game-winning drives.

In 2004 he was 10th in the league in passing, 6th in TDs, 9th in yards per attempt and 5th in yards per completion.

Those aren't game manager numbers. Those are top ten passing numbers.

60% completion and a 2:1 TD ratio is absolute shit compared to what he put up 5 years later.

Move along.

BigCatDaddy 08-04-2017 04:15 PM

Not sure why so many people have a vested interest in a mediocre QB been the best guy on the field

ToxSocks 08-04-2017 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12991731)
He's signed for 2 years

Missed my point.

Tannehill has a $96 Million contract that pays him through 2020.

Like i said, Smith would be a 1 year rental.

ToxSocks 08-04-2017 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12991734)
They were talking about it on the radio,610, just like we are here. This is just not a CP thing.

No one thinks it will happen. Just hypothetical.

It doesn't make a lick of sense for the Dolphins, and he's too valuable for the Chiefs to let him go for any less than a 2nd this season.

Fun to think about? Sure. But not grounded in reality.

bigjosh 08-04-2017 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12991773)
60% completion and a 2:1 TD ratio is absolute shit compared to what he put up 5 years later.

Move along.

The NFL has changed a lot in the last 15 years buddy.

5000 yards in a season was unheard of just a few years ago. Now there is someone doing it every season. cant compare stats from when they allowed defense to play to stats in 2017.

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12991773)
60% completion and a 2:1 TD ratio is absolute shit compared to what he put up 5 years later.

Move along.

TOP TEN passing numbers.

Facts, not fiction.

Brady's prolific passing was a huge part of those championship teams in 2003 and 2004.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 08-04-2017 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12991793)
TOP TEN passing numbers.

Facts, not fiction.

Brady's prolific passing was a huge part of those championship teams in 2003 and 2004.

Prolific passing? 226 yards a game is prolific??? ROFL

Shut the hell up , Geno.

Coogs 08-04-2017 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12991790)
It doesn't make a lick of sense for the Dolphins, and he's too valuable for the Chiefs to let him go for any less than a 2nd this season.

Fun to think about? Sure. But not grounded in reality.

I was just listening.

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12991807)
Prolific passing? 226 yards a game is prolific??? ROFL

Shut the hell up , Geno.

In 2003 and 2004, those were top ten passing numbers.

You apparently have no clue about the rules changes to the passing game that made everything explode in the last 10 years.

RunKC 08-04-2017 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991751)
He was a great game manager who was clutch for his first three SBs (2001,2003,2004). Look at his stats.

2001 - 63.9 comp %, 2,814 yds, 18 TDs, 12 INTs, 86.5 Rate
2003 - 60.9 compl %, 3620 yds, 23 TDs, 12 INTs, 85.9 Rate
2004 - 60.8 compl %, 3692 yds, 28 TDs, 14 INTs, 92.6 Rate

Nothing spectacular there. They won mostly because of their D back then. Now they win mostly because of their O but their D is still very good (#8 in total yds, #1 in league ppg last year giving up just 15.6 ppg).

Pats are more than just Tom Brady. Obviously he is the main reason but there is a lot of reasons for the Pats success. It isn't just him. They went 11-5 with Matt Cassell as their QB not that long ago.

Team game. So it is not a forgone conclusion that they will win. There's a lot that can happen. Maybe their D or Oline sucks this year and if that is the case they won't win again. So you never know.



Their D, particularly their Dline, was never healthy until the playoffs. Once they were they shut down everyone including offenses led by Matt Ryan, Rodgers and Brady.

Brady from years ago isn't playing today and if he was playing against his older self on a loaded team this year, he'd lose.

The Franchise 08-04-2017 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991751)
He was a great game manager who was clutch for his first three SBs (2001,2003,2004). Look at his stats.

2001 - 63.9 comp %, 2,814 yds, 18 TDs, 12 INTs, 86.5 Rate
2003 - 60.9 compl %, 3620 yds, 23 TDs, 12 INTs, 85.9 Rate
2004 - 60.8 compl %, 3692 yds, 28 TDs, 14 INTs, 92.6 Rate

Nothing spectacular there. They won mostly because of their D back then. Now they win mostly because of their O but their D is still very good (#8 in total yds, #1 in league ppg last year giving up just 15.6 ppg).

Pats are more than just Tom Brady. Obviously he is the main reason but there is a lot of reasons for the Pats success. It isn't just him. They went 11-5 with Matt Cassell as their QB not that long ago.

Team game. So it is not a forgone conclusion that they will win. There's a lot that can happen. Maybe their D or Oline sucks this year and if that is the case they won't win again. So you never know.



Their D, particularly their Dline, was never healthy until the playoffs. Once they were they shut down everyone including offenses led by Matt Ryan, Rodgers and Brady.

Funny that Smith has never eclipsed 3600 yards....in his career......ever.

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:30 PM

I mean Brady had to throw for 354 yards and 3 TD to beat the Panthers in the Super Bowl, and the next season he had to put up 24 points without much of a running game to beat Philly, but yeah, those teams were all defense.

The Franchise 08-04-2017 04:30 PM

Or 28 TDs. ROFL

pugsnotdrugs19 08-04-2017 04:31 PM

:facepalm:

The league has changed a ton in the past several years. Everyone's stats have inflated in terms of QB play. Why do you think the sport is as popular as ever?

If Brady was top 10 in those categories, he was clearly a really productive QB at the time.

The Franchise 08-04-2017 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12991819)
:facepalm:

The league has changed a ton in the past several years. Everyone's stats have inflated in terms of QB play.

Alex Smith missed that memo.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 08-04-2017 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12991811)
In 2003 and 2004, those were top ten passing numbers.

You apparently have no clue about the rules changes to the passing game that made everything explode in the last 10 years.

When there was absolute shit going around for quarterbacks in the league.

That's paltry. Look up steve young and see what he was doing the decade prior.

Move along, Geno.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 08-04-2017 04:35 PM

Tom Brady was far better in the second half of his career. End of story.

pugsnotdrugs19 08-04-2017 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12991830)
Tom Brady was far better in the second half of his career. End of story.

Don't all QBs get a little better with age?... I mean if we look around the league, it holds true for almost all of them.

Yet Brady's stats from the early 2000s that you frown upon are still better than Smith at his best. :facepalm:

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12991826)
When there was absolute shit going around for quarterbacks in the league.
.

Are you brain dead?

Peyton Manning
Daunte Culpepper
Donovan McNabb
Brett Favre
Tom Brady
Trent Green
Drew Brees
Matt Hasselbeck
Ben Roethlisberger
Carson Palmer

There was a LOT of QB talent in the league back then. When former Super Bowl QBs like Drew Bledsoe were the mediocre QBs of the day you know it was more than fine.

You're just digging some idiotic hole deeper for god knows what reason.

Why tear down Brady's top ten passing seasons? What's the point?

SAUTO 08-04-2017 04:46 PM

I thought this was the ****ing training camp thread.

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12991841)
I thought this was the ****ing training camp thread.

You can blame PAChiefsGuy.

eDave 08-04-2017 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12991844)
You can blame PAChiefsGuy.

You are all acting like god damned children. This thread has gone to shit and it all of ya'll's fault.

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12991872)
You are all acting like god damned children. This thread has gone to shit and it all of ya'll's fault.

Hurtful

PAChiefsGuy 08-04-2017 05:18 PM

Back on topic

Training camp is hard for me to get excited about because if one player looks good it means in a sense another one of our players is looking bad.

I am glad to hear Mahomes, DJ, Alex Smith and Tyreek Hill are all doing well. Hope they keep it up. I'd like to hear more about Beenie Logan but I understand it's probably hard for dlineman to show much in training camp.

Ahhhh when does regular season start again?

New World Order 08-04-2017 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991882)
Back on topic

Training camp is hard for me to get excited about because if one player looks good it means in a sense another one of our players is looking bad.

I am glad to hear Mahomes, DJ, Alex Smith and Tyreek Hill are all doing well. Hope they keep it up. I'd like to hear more about Beenie Logan but I understand it's probably hard for dlineman to show much in training camp.

Ahhhh when does regular season start again?


Everyone is anticipating preseason to see our future football savior, Mahomes.

PAChiefsGuy 08-04-2017 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12991890)
Everyone is anticipating preseason to see Mahomes.

That's great but I'm excited to see everyone including Alex Smith and our defense. Not just Mahomes.

eDave 08-04-2017 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991891)
That's great but I'm excited to see everyone including Alex Smith and our defense. Not just Mahomes.


Well then watch that.

mdchiefsfan 08-04-2017 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12991893)
Well then watch that.

LMAO

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12991893)
Well then watch that.

ROFL

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991882)
Back on topic

Training camp is hard for me to get excited about because if one player looks good it means in a sense another one of our players is looking bad.

I am glad to hear Mahomes, DJ, Alex Smith and Tyreek Hill are all doing well. Hope they keep it up. I'd like to hear more about Beenie Logan but I understand it's probably hard for dlineman to show much in training camp.

Ahhhh when does regular season start again?

I'm looking forward to more training camp and pre season games.... Dreading the regular season and so ready for 2018.

PAChiefsGuy 08-04-2017 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12991893)
Well then watch that.

I plan to. You got a problem with that?

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991904)
I plan to. You got a problem with that?

I doubt many give a shit if you sit and watch paint dry to be honest...

eDave 08-04-2017 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991904)
I plan to. You got a problem with that?

No sir. I do not.

mdchiefsfan 08-04-2017 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991904)
I plan to. You got a problem with that?

Sheesh. Lighten up, Nancy.

Rasputin 08-04-2017 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991882)
Back on topic

Training camp is hard for me to get excited about because if one player looks good it means in a sense another one of our players is looking bad.

I am glad to hear Mahomes, DJ, Alex Smith and Tyreek Hill are all doing well. Hope they keep it up. I'd like to hear more about Beenie Logan but I understand it's probably hard for dlineman to show much in training camp.

Ahhhh when does regular season start again?

Are you kidding players like Tyreek and Peters are pushing each other and that is a beautiful thing to watch and it will pay off for both of them on game days. They were fun to watch today bar none

Hog's Gone Fishin 08-04-2017 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12991907)
I doubt many give a shit if you sit and watch paint dry to be honest...

I've done that, was getting paid $12 hour too

Reerun_KC 08-04-2017 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12991953)
I've done that, was getting paid $12 hour too

:clap:

okcchief 08-04-2017 06:13 PM

Comparing stats 14 years apart is some dumb shit. Brady has always made big plays when it counts. He's managed games, but he's never been a game manager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Discuss Thrower 08-04-2017 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12991751)


Their D, particularly their Dline, was never healthy until the playoffs. Once they were they shut down everyone including offenses led by Matt Ryan, Rodgers and Brady.

Uhm..

<a href="https://gyazo.com/0c6957bea998ac71f63f650e57f1f7a2"><img src="https://i.gyazo.com/0c6957bea998ac71f63f650e57f1f7a2.png" alt="https://gyazo.com/0c6957bea998ac71f63f650e57f1f7a2" width="745"/></a>

PAChiefsGuy 08-04-2017 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 12991981)
Comparing stats 14 years apart is some dumb shit. Brady has always made big plays when it counts. He's managed games, but he's never been a game manager.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not comparing stats from then to now. I'm merely pointing out that back then it was mainly the Pats defense that was winning the Pats championships. It was not just Brady.

The guy whose post I replied to is one of the idiots who thinks football is an individual sport. It is not.

I have stats to back up my point.

Pats Ranks

2001 Offense Rank Total Yds - #19 PPG - #6
2001 Passing Yds Rank - #22
2001 Defense Rank Total Yds - #8 PPG - #6

2003 Offense Rank - Total Yds - #17 PPG - #12
2003 Passing Yds Rank #9
2003 Defense Rank - Total Tds - # 7 PPG - #1

2004 Offense Rank Total Yds - #7 PPG -#4
2004 Passing Yds Rank #11
2004 Defense Rank Total Yds - #9 PPG - #2

So don't give me that BS that Brady was the main reason they won their first three championships. He wasn't. Their defense was. Eventually he became the GOAT but lets give credit where credit is due. Pats D is usually always good when they win the championships.

You can also look at the year the Packers won their SB with Rodgers. I think their D was top 5 in yds and #2 in ppg.

Now I'm not saying Alex is as good as those guys but lets not act like Alex is the only QB that needs help. They all do. Defense is still and always will be extremely important when it comes to winning championships.

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave (Post 12991911)
No sir. I do not.

My apologies man. I didn't mean to come off as a jerk. A few too many beers tonight.

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 08-04-2017 08:08 PM

Can we please take the non-training camp stuff into their own threads?

Those of us not lucky enough to live in KC actually want to hear about the god-damn training camp and not a bunch of pissing and moaning about other crap (to include the "Oh GOD NOT AGAIN Pat/Alex bullshit).

Hammock Parties 08-04-2017 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12992131)
I
Defense is still and always will be extremely important when it comes to winning championships.

Pats 32, Panthers 29

Pats 24, Eagles 21

Thank god that elite defense won those games for the Pats and Brady didn't have to perform like a top 10 passer.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.