![]() |
Quote:
As a matter of course, Les Snead just doesn't use the franchise tag. With Trumaine Johnson, he was undervalued on the tag vs. the market. LeMarcus Joyner was a S on the tag and those are typically cheaper. A $25 million cap hold for a good, not elite, OT doesn't seem to be Snead's MO. He's just not someone that's ever been very aggressive with the franchise tag. |
Quote:
The Rams have never been hesitant to pay up for guys they love especially OL. We'll see what they offer him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
One offense almost never asks the LT to vertical set, the other wants it almost exclusively and with as little help as possible. |
I guess the way I look at Jackson is best case scenario in this type of system, he's OBJr.
Not most likely, but best case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🚨 ONE TO WATCH 🚨<br><br>According to ESPN, Los Angeles Rams do not plan to franchise tag left tackle Alaric Jackson.<br><br>Jackson is steady as both a run-blocker and pass-protector. His 22 QB pressures allowed in 2024 matched the likes of Dion Dawkins.<br><br>He is projected to land $16…</p>— Chiefs Blitz (@ChiefsBlitz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsBlitz/status/1892966824385429873?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 21, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
I'm in agreement with you guys. I've said for a couple weeks no matter who LT is, Andy needs to evolve with the times. Tackle play sucks compared to the days when he first built his offenses.
But I'm not going to hold my breath. |
I’d rather draft a LT. I feel like we have a unique opportunity to get a top 15 talent (maybe top 10) in Josh Simmons and he wouldn’t be available if wasn’t injured. If his medical is clean, I’d trade up 10 spots and get him. We don’t normally have the opportunity to draft a LT with his talent. Simmons can move. He has great feet and he’s also physical. Pair Simmons with a vet and move forward.
https://youtu.be/WBM6VJvyens?si=QZ9YNZPdhJjnZU8U https://youtu.be/WBM6VJvyens?si=QZ9YNZPdhJjnZU8U |
Quote:
|
I don't think people understand the argument.
Of course Andy can get good results with Jackson. He did it with OBJ with much less to work with in terms of weapons. That's not the point. The question is whether it's worth the money, because even though McVay and company can make it work with Jackson, they aren't rushing to pay up for him either. If we have to change the offense and constantly give him help, is it worth paying starting LT money? Even if he's good enough to get us back to being a top 5 offense, the same people screaming to pay Jackson will be furious if he's a disappointment in terms of what we pay if keeps us from being the best offense in the NFL. |
Quote:
I can see a scenario where the Chiefs decide it's worth the price, even if he isn't a made-in-the-lab fit for what they've traditionally done at LT. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A guy like that on a rookie deal is a huge + whereas paying a guy like that could hold you back a bit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They haven't been able to find even that baseline of play in the draft for a little while. Niang, Morris, and Suamataia are all not it to this point in their careers, and if the talking heads locally are to be believed they're already gearing towards Suamataia shifting inside.
|
Quote:
|
Elite left tackle taken outside the top 10 is what, a once every five years proposition in the modern era?
Going to be hard for KC. Only shot is luck or a guy like Simmons dropping due to injury, or a Tunsil who dropped over a stupid video. We don't need elite though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The issue is putting all your eggs into that basket as if you're assured to get that player. You'd have to bandaid LT just in case the plan fails with someone like DJ Humphries who you've been adamantly against keeping. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even OBJ nearly cost us LVII with the ankle sprain. |
Quote:
|
Andy Reid would've rather played Suamataia over Humphries in the Super Bowl. That's how ****ing useless he is.
|
Quote:
When Bill dominated teams with a 3-4 defense, teams tried copying it. Bill saw this and pivoted to a 4-3. Teams were drafting all of the 3-4 DL early which meant the traditional 4-3 DE’s would fall to him. Same in FA. That’s what made him outsmart everybody. Andy has got to put his pride away and take advantage. Perfect example is the Broncos. They had the best pass rushing unit in football leading the league in sacks and pressures. Their one flaw was undersized DL. Bonitto and Cooper were 250 lbs and Zack Allen/John-Franklin Myers were 280 lbs. The Bills recognized that huge disparity in size and just bullied the **** out of them running the ball down their throat and moving their smaller DL at will at will all day. We are too one dimensional. That’s a major part of our asswhooping. These teams do not respect our run game at all. They know Andy doesn’t want to do it and they know we aren’t good at it, so they pin their ears back and rush the same as if they have a lead. Andy watching our QB and OL struggle badly immediately and not even bothering to run the ball until the 12th offensive play of the game is full proof of this. Not saying we should convert to a run first offense by any means, but we need to be 2 dimensional. We need to be able to run the ball well when needed which will open up play action. We also need to help our QB. We can’t keep putting everything on him with little help. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hell we were the best offense in 2022 and people were still pissy with OBJ’s performance |
Quote:
|
Drafting Simmons would require signing Tyron Smith/similar veteran LT as a veteran stopgap.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But second and more importantly, we have Patrick Mahomes. We need to throw the ball…..a lot. So figure out what he needs to get comfortable in the pocket and not freak out. We’re all tap dancing around the fact that we seemingly need all this help for our elite qb to play at an elite level being an issue |
If the qb doesn’t want all that put on him, he’s gonna need to take less money so we can go buy more weapons I guess
|
LMAO Again, who the **** has said Mahomes has to have an absolutely stacked roster to be effective? We just need his tools to not be completely ****ing useless like certain aspects have been in 23 and 24.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It’s an opinion for sure |
The eagles defenders were talking about Pat the way CP talks about Lamar Jackson
|
Quote:
|
You said “completely useless”
So that’s worst in the league territory. No? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your SB window with Jalen Hurts isn't 10 years like it is with Mahomes. It's absolutely hilarious that the Chiefs are in the AFCCG at worst every year and you people act like they're just wasting prime Mahomes years being cheap. That is 100% not the case, and it's just today's narrative because of the Eagles success. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I honestly don't even think it really caught up to the Saints or Bucs very much either. They both still have a lot of the same players on their roster, when one might expect them to be in such trouble with the salary cap that they would need to totally wipe out the roster. |
Quote:
Nothing we can't do. We just need to coach players up better and Mahomes needs to start making their jobs easier. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also, did you really just say it hasn't caught up with the Saints?
:facepalm: It's been an absolute disaster, but sure, hasn't caught up with them. |
Quote:
This year was the worst roster he’s ever had. Rice/Hollywood/Pacheco out 90% of season, Justin Watson 2nd in WR snaps, old washed players making up the rest. We didn’t have a true LT until Humphries was signed and he played one game. We were first on 3rd down offense, 9th in points per drive and had 7 game-winning drives. This team was absolute ass on offense for the most part and begged Mahomes to bail them out of it. This years team doesn’t even make the playoffs with Alex Smith starting. Mahomes carried these ****ing bums until we played a team that was so stacked that it was impossible |
Quote:
|
Quote:
All the data says it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They were able to have success with void years bc they traded Carson Wentz for assets that were used to get AJ Brown, Devonta Smith, Jalen Carter and Cooper DeJean. So when you say you want to implement the Eagles plan, that means you want to trade Mahomes for assets like the Eagles did with Wentz |
Andy heck takes a lot of shit for being one of the better ol coaches in the league
|
Well said. Mahomes has had issues but you’re right. Any qb would have had problems with the state or the availability of the offensive roster.
Quote:
|
Quote:
No QB is having success when teams can get consistent historic pressure only rushing 4. We saw the Giants beat the shit out of Tom Brady in 2 SB’s utilizing that scheme and rarely blitzing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But people overstate the amount of times you have to run in order to get them to honor it. It's more along the lines of 12-15 times/gm. They also presume a linear relationship that doesn't seem to exist -- i.e. a team that runs the ball 25 times is going to have greater success with play-fakes because teams honor the run MORE than a team that runs it 15 times. That linear relationship also doesn't appear to exist. Tendencies matter more than raw numbers. Perhaps that's where we're struggling -- maybe we have obvious tendencies in certain down/distance situations that opposing DCs have picked up on. But as far as us needing to run the ball more to establish the play action passing game or something like that? Not really - we run it enough based on any real research done on the matter. |
We need OT and WR help this offseason and Simmons is a stud that could slip to 10-15 because of injury, otherwise top 5 talent..BUT yes still raw.
Phins have #13 pick! Phins get: 2025, 2026 ans 2027 1st round picks! Chiefs get: Tyreek Armstead #13-Draft Simmons Tyreek comes home! Armstead is starter at LT while both Simmons and Kingsley develop! IF Armstead goes down Simmons/Kingsley can step in. The goal will be for Simmons to replace Armstead and Kingsley replace Taylor in a year or two. |
Quote:
But if you never run, or never run it in THIS situation, and I'm, say the MLB, I'm not going bite on that fake, I'm looking for the slot or TE coming across. |
Quote:
Also not great for KC as we can't really afford those cap numbers. |
Quote:
How could you possibly look at this years offense post Rice injury and think it’s anything close to the same? |
Quote:
It also was a zag in terms of offensive approach and scheme. Kansas City was still defended with two deep shells, like it was when Hill was here, but the offense shifted into killing teams underneath and with YAC. It became a really efficient, consistent, Inevitable machine. Once teams came out of the shell and started playing more man coverage and single high against that, it squeezed off the YAC yardage. Pair that with Kelce finally losing a step and talent step backs at WR, and you’ve got what happened the last two years. |
I have zero interest in Tyreek. Zero. In fact I think he would destroy this team.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Compare Worthy and Tyreek's rookie seasons. Not even close. Worthy will be in the Pro Bowl next season. |
Quote:
Quote:
Left tackle play and tight end play was much worse in 2024 compared to 2022. And that is the difference. |
Quote:
Tough trade proposal you’ve cooked up I think. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.