ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2018 Free Agents (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=313128)

pugsnotdrugs19 03-08-2018 10:05 PM

Just thought about this—if we do sign Watkins, we get Cheetah and Sammy vs. Peters and Talib in Mexico next year. PPV entertainment.

Strongside 03-08-2018 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13457621)
Just thought about this—if we do sign Watkins, we get Cheetah and Sammy vs. Peters and Talib in Mexico next year. PPV entertainment.

Either Peters or Talib will be suspended by then so your point is null.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-08-2018 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13457626)
Either Peters or Talib will be suspended by then so your point is null.

Week 1?

:D

Strongside 03-08-2018 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13457632)
Week 1?

:D

A lot can happen in the preseason man.

bigjosh 03-08-2018 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13457626)
Either Peters or Talib will be suspended by then so your point is null.

Is LA playing the raiders this year? It would be fun to see talib rip off coopers chain and peters throw it into the stands.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-08-2018 10:15 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sd1BJGjqt70?rel=0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That’s one explosive ass wideout.

Simply Red 03-08-2018 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13457619)
My man. This is all good and everything, but “pretty decent” is how we’ve managed to shit our pants in meaningful games in the past several years. “Pretty decent” is the Kansas City Chiefs slogan since 1969. How about we say **** “pretty decent” and shoot for depth that can actually contribute when called upon instead?

we don't need that though - we need health upon the starters, bru-heim!

Strongside 03-08-2018 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 13457656)
we don't need that though - we need health upon the starters, bru-heim!

We need bof

RunKC 03-08-2018 10:38 PM

<a href="https://imgflip.com/gif/2616bi"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/2616bi.gif" title="made at imgflip.com"/></a>

I agree. Didn’t think they would, but here we are.

Simply Red 03-08-2018 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13457658)
We need bof

bof=best of friends?!!

Simply Red 03-08-2018 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13457684)
<a href="https://imgflip.com/gif/2616bi"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/2616bi.gif" title="made at imgflip.com"/></a>

I agree. Didn’t think they would, but here we are.

#CHUEFS!!!

Strongside 03-08-2018 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13457684)
<a href="https://imgflip.com/gif/2616bi"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/2616bi.gif" title="made at imgflip.com"/></a>

I agree. Didn’t think they would, but here we are.

Oh man this is so exciting. I hope it’s Jeff George!

Chief Northman 03-08-2018 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13457700)
Oh man this is so exciting. I hope it’s Jeff George!

Kendrell Bell is still my favourite Chiefs FA flop.

I laugh remembering how King Carl and the coaching staff were just gushing and patting themselves on the back for his acquisition.

Good times.

aturnis 03-08-2018 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13456311)
While Odell and Hill would be a sick combo.....there's no way that you're paying both of them. That and Odell would need a new deal after this year. So we'd either be renting him for 1-2 years or you're trading for Odell and letting Hill walk when his rookie deal is up.

Who else are we going to pay? We're going cheap QB and young for a reason.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Couch-Potato 03-09-2018 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13457644)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sd1BJGjqt70?rel=0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That’s one explosive ass wideout.

I'm with you, would be an electric offense!

GayFrogs 03-09-2018 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13457644)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sd1BJGjqt70?rel=0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That’s one explosive ass wideout.

His ability to track the ball is insane

Chargem 03-09-2018 01:53 AM

bit worrying how much he juggles balls in his highlights, at least he hangs on to them I guess.

I do agree the Offense would be scary if they got him

Jamie 03-09-2018 09:23 AM

The idea has grown on me. Given what's available in free agency, it's probably easier to raise the ceiling of the offense than raise the floor of the defense.

Dunerdr 03-09-2018 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chargem (Post 13457822)
bit worrying how much he juggles balls in his highlights, at least he hangs on to them I guess.

I do agree the Offense would be scary if they got him

I noticed that too. A co-worker is a bills fan and he said sammys first few seasons qb ball placement led to alot of unnecessary contact that kept him banged up. And even when it wasn't placement he'd try to get a bump in on a guy instead of going out of bounds. Love it and hate it. Not scared of contact but also a little fragile. And at this level the best ability is availability.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie (Post 13457975)
The idea has grown on me. Given what's available in free agency, it's probably easier to raise the ceiling of the offense than raise the floor of the defense.

This is where I’m at.

I’d rather pay Watkins or Robinson, guys who have the actual talent to match the money they will receive, than to overpay for a need when the production very likely won’t match their salary. Plus, they are essentially 3rd year players at age 24 going on 25.

Since we are meeting with Wilkerson, I hope we can bring him in to improve the front. If we do that, and maybe sign one other defender somewhere, we can draft the rest of our needs. All signs point to this being Veach’s plan. He said we’d be in the market for fast outside WRs, and our plan on defense is to go young and fast.

The Franchise 03-09-2018 10:36 AM

What do you think it'll take to get Watkins?

3 year deal? $10 million a season?

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13458068)
What do you think it'll take to get Watkins?

3 year deal? $10 million a season?

Pure guess: 4 years/$40-45M. If the Chiefs did a deal similar to this, I’d certainly expect a backload, although it wouldn’t be drastic I don’t believe because I don’t expect us to be super active in FA this year.

I think Shanahan will want Robinson to come in and be his Julio Jones at 6’3”. I think the Bears will go after him too. I’m not sure on Watkins. Maybe there’s a team out there ready to pay him whatever it takes?

The Chiefs and Rams were rumored to be the contenders at the combine. But the Rams didn’t use Watkins most efficiently to my eyes. He was their red zone guy it appears (8 TDs), but Goff is a more limited QB than Mahomes IMO.

His market could be dryer than I suspect though.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458074)
Pure guess: 4 years/$40-45M.

**** that. Hill's gonna get $15+ million and Kelce's already at $9 million.

Hunt, Jones, Fuller and Ragland will all be coming up soon, too.

That's just too much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458074)
His market could be dryer than I suspect though.

San Fran will be in on him, as will other teams. But teams with massive cap space can afford him at that price.

The Chiefs can't.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13458068)
What do you think it'll take to get Watkins?

3 year deal? $10 million a season?

I wouldn't pay a penny over $7 million per season for Watkins.

He's had some issues with effort in Buffalo and has been injured all too often for my taste.

3 years, $21 million, $11 million guaranteed.

Mecca 03-09-2018 10:56 AM

You are mentioning signing Hunt...why? And by the time those guys are up Justin Houston likely isn't here any more either.

Red Dawg 03-09-2018 10:58 AM

Hill at 15 mil? **** no.

Mecca 03-09-2018 10:59 AM

The missing point to a lot of that is several huge contracts won't even be here in 3 years, if anyone thinks Justin Houston is still on that deal or Eric Berry sees most of his are not living in reality.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13458091)
You are mentioning signing Hunt...why? And by the time those guys are up Justin Houston likely isn't here any more either.

It doesn't matter if Houston is with the Chiefs in 2020 because Mahomes is going to eat up $30+ million soon.

What has Sammy Watkins ever done to prove he's worth $10 million per year?

Certainly not last year or the year before. The guy's had a total of 67 receptions in the past two seasons.

You're giving a guy $10 million per for 33 catches a year?

No thanks.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13458098)
The missing point to a lot of that is several huge contracts won't even be here in 3 years, if anyone thinks Justin Houston is still on that deal or Eric Berry sees most of his are not living in reality.

The point still stands: Paying ****ing Sammy Watkins $10 million per is absolutely ****ing lunacy.

Mecca 03-09-2018 11:00 AM

Watkins is a playmaker, if you are going to develop a young QB it's best to give them a lot of weapons.

I'm sorry this team has a ****ing guard with a 40 million dollar contract.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 13458097)
Hill at 15 mil? **** no.

:shake:

You'd better prepare yourself now because he's going to break the bank.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13458103)
Watkins is a playmaker, if you are going to develop a young QB it's best to give them a lot of weapons.

I'm sorry this team has a ****ing guard with a 40 million dollar contract.

He's SUCH a playmaker that he's averaged 33 catches the past 2 seasons.

STUD!

LMAO

Mecca 03-09-2018 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458102)
The point still stands: Paying ****ing Sammy Watkins $10 million per is absolutely ****ing lunacy.

Keenan Allen makes 11 and he's hurt every 5 minutes..lets see here

Emmanuel Sanders 11
Fitzgerald 11
Allen Hurns 10
Randall Cobb 10
Jordy Nelson and Pierre Garcon are just under

Doesn't really sound like that is to much looking at who else is there.

The Franchise 03-09-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13458098)
The missing point to a lot of that is several huge contracts won't even be here in 3 years, if anyone thinks Justin Houston is still on that deal or Eric Berry sees most of his are not living in reality.

Houston will be gone after this year.....I think.

Mecca 03-09-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458105)
He's SUCH a playmaker that he's averaged 33 catches the past 2 seasons.

STUD!

LMAO

Yes it's his fault he was playing with the black hole of Tyrod Taylor

chiefforlife 03-09-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458102)
The point still stands: Paying ****ing Sammy Watkins $10 million per is absolutely ****ing lunacy.

I would hope that if they sign him to a similar number, in two years we look at it as a steal. He outplays that to a super bowl. Ha!

Mecca 03-09-2018 11:07 AM

He's also still only 24 years old and you're being misleading with his stats..

2014 BUF 16 16 65 982 15.1 84 6 1
2015 BUF 13 13 60 1,047 17.5 63 9 0
2016 BUF 8 8 28 430 15.4 62 2 0
2017 LA 15 14 39 593 15.2 67T 8 0
Total 52 51 192 3,052 15.9 84 25 1

Still think his best years are ahead of him.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458105)
He's SUCH a playmaker that he's averaged 33 catches the past 2 seasons.

STUD!

LMAO

That’s an easy claim if you’re just looking at the numbers.

Anyone who watches him play knows he’s much better than that.

People have GOT to stop counting on a bunch of unproven young WRs on this team that can’t do half the things Watkins can. You’re worried about money when our QB makes $4M for the next 3 years. The Chiefs have $83+M in 2019 cap space right now, and that number can jump very easily if they need it to. Money is not an issue.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:14 AM

They’re gonna pay big $ to a wr. Too much smoke around it

Atleast Watkins is young I guess

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458121)
That’s an easy claim if you’re just looking at the numbers.

Anyone who watches him play knows he’s much better than that.

**** you, I live in LA and watched him many times, even in person.

I also have a friend that's super close with ownership of the Bills and their entire organization that said Watkins was a headache, which is why they traded him.

You wanna give him $10 million? Fine. Those contracts have been an epic disaster for the Chiefs and this one will be no different if it goes down that way.

The Franchise 03-09-2018 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458136)
They’re gonna pay big $ to a wr. Too much smoke around it

Atleast Watkins is young I guess

I'm fine with either Robinson, Watkins or Richardson.

I'd even take Moncrief on a cheap 1-2 year deal as well.

I wonder if Veach is interested in moving Conley. You can't really play him out of the slot. Or maybe they just don't think he'll be 100% ready at the beginning of the season.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458136)
They’re gonna pay big $ to a wr. Too much smoke around it

Atleast Watkins is young I guess

Young, underproductive and expensive.

Perfect combo.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458121)
People have GOT to stop counting on a bunch of unproven young WRs on this team that can’t do half the things Watkins can

Yeah, that 5th rounder, Ty Hill, what a bust.

Never count on young WR's.

RunKC 03-09-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458121)
That’s an easy claim if you’re just looking at the numbers.

Anyone who watches him play knows he’s much better than that.

People have GOT to stop counting on a bunch of unproven young WRs on this team that can’t do half the things Watkins can. You’re worried about money when our QB makes $4M for the next 3 years. The Chiefs have $83+M in 2019 cap space right now, and that number can jump very easily if they need it to. Money is not an issue.

After the 2019 season is over the following players will be FA’s:

Tyreek Hill
Chris Jones
Reggie Ragland
Kendall Fuller

Veach can’t afford to make the mistake Dorsey did and wait. He’s got to start extending these guys as early as next Spring....and they won’t be cheap.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458137)
**** you, I live in LA and watched him many times, even in person.

I also have a friend that's super close with ownership of the Bills and their entire organization that said Watkins was a headache, which is why they traded him.

You wanna give him $10 million? Fine. Those contracts have been an epic disaster for the Chiefs and this one will be no different if it goes down that way.

ROFL

I can only laugh at how short fused you are. Glad to know you live in LA, again, though!

O.city 03-09-2018 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458140)
Young, underproductive and expensive.

Perfect combo.

Atleast with the young part you’ve got a chance to actually pay for future production vs prior

He’ll get his chances here with pat and hill Kelce and hunt

I’d go a different direction but sadly, they haven’t asked me my opinion

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458141)
Yeah, that 5th rounder, Ty Hill, what a bust.

Never count on young WR's.

Why was he 5th rounder again?

If you seriously are counting on Chesson or Robinson... :facepalm:

O.city 03-09-2018 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13458143)
After the 2019 season is over the following players will be FA’s:

Tyreek Hill
Chris Jones
Reggie Ragland
Kendall Fuller

Veach can’t afford to make the mistake Dorsey did and wait. He’s got to start extending these guys as early as next Spring....and they won’t be cheap.

As of right now, 1 of those players is on track to make big money

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:19 AM

Any contract they sign Watkins or another WR to is going to be one they can move on from after two years anyways. I don’t think they’d regret it, but if they did.

Dane—you say your buddy heard Watkins was a huge headache. If that’s the case, why are the Rams ‘aggressively ‘ trying to retain him?

O.city 03-09-2018 11:19 AM

Ragland is an ILB that’s had half a good season, Jones hasn’t been the most reliable and fuller is going into his 3rd year with 1 good season under his belt.

I’m all for keeping our own but it’s not time yet

The Franchise 03-09-2018 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458152)
Any contract they sign Watkins or another WR to is going to be one they can move on from after two years anyways. I don’t think they’d regret it, but if they did.

Dane—you say your buddy heard Watkins was a huge headache. If that’s the case, why are the Rams ‘aggressively ‘ trying to retain him?

Because McVay has shown that he has no problem with "players with issues"?

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458153)
Ragland is an ILB that’s had half a good season, Jones hasn’t been the most reliable and fuller is going into his 3rd year with 1 good season under his belt.

I’m all for keeping our own but it’s not time yet

Ragland is also a 2-down ILB until proven otherwise. Not exactly something you sink a huge cost into.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:20 AM

I still think it’s gonna be Odell

:)

Mark it down

RunKC 03-09-2018 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458147)
Why was he 5th rounder again?

If you seriously are counting on Chesson or Robinson... :facepalm:

Did you see what Mahomes did for Albert Wilson? How about Demetrius Harris?

Do not give Watkins stupid money unless we can come out clean after 2019. I don’t want to sink money long term on this guy.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13458154)
Because McVay has shown that he has no problem with "players with issues"?

He hasn’t coached Peters or Talib yet, nor has he extended their contracts.

chiefforlife 03-09-2018 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458153)
Ragland is an ILB that’s had half a good season, Jones hasn’t been the most reliable and fuller is going into his 3rd year with 1 good season under his belt.

I’m all for keeping our own but it’s not time yet

Thats the tricky part, if you wait you end up with Houston/Berry situation. You have to sign early to really manage the cap well. Risky I know.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13458157)
Did you see what Mahomes did for Albert Wilson? How about Demetrius Harris?

Do not give Watkins stupid money unless we can come out clean after 2019. I don’t want to sink money long term on this guy.

If they’re doing it, they don’t think very highly of the current WRs I’d imagine

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:23 AM

Ragland is overrated on here, honestly. We haven’t even saw him cover backs or TEs yet cause he never played 3rd downs and everyone thinks he’s the next DJ.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 13458161)
Thats the tricky part, if you wait you end up with Houston/Berry situation. You have to sign early to really manage the cap well. Risky I know.

With the others maybe.

Unless Ragland turns into kuechly, I don’t think he’ll get a crazy desl

RunKC 03-09-2018 11:27 AM

I wouldn’t mind Watkins for 2 years, but I would put higher priority on trading for a known young defensive player and extending them.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458147)
Why was he 5th rounder again?

If you seriously are counting on Chesson or Robinson... :facepalm:

Your comment was ****ing absolute bullshit.

Last year, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Cooper Cupp and Keelan Cole had as many or more receiving yards than Watkins.

Chris Godwin had 521, Trent Taylor had 440 and they were rookies as well.

There is just no way to justify spending $10 million per on Sammy ****ing Watkins.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458165)
Ragland is overrated on here, honestly.

:facepalm:

O.city 03-09-2018 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13458168)
I wouldn’t mind Watkins for 2 years, but I would put higher priority on trading for a known young defensive player and extending them.

Suggestions?

I was looking around for some recently

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458145)
ROFL

I can only laugh at how short fused you are. Glad to know you live in LA, again, though!

Short fused? You're a punkass 20 year old kid that thinks he has all the answers in every ****ing thread.

Good luck with that.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458171)
:facepalm:

Let me know when Ragland has proven he can be a 3-down LB.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13458154)
Because McVay has shown that he has no problem with "players with issues"?

And because the Pegula's, McDermott and Beane wanted a "clean" lockerroom to start the new regime.

I'd say it worked out pretty well, considering they made the playoffs for the first time since 1999.

The Franchise 03-09-2018 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458172)
Suggestions?

I was looking around for some recently

I'm still driving that "Trade for Mychal Kendricks" train.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458173)
Short fused? You're a punkass 20 year old kid that thinks he has all the answers in every ****ing thread.

Good luck with that.

Lol, well, you’re wrong... but besides that...

Way to confirm that you are in fact a raging lunatic, yet again. Hopefully you are on a watchlist. LMAO

RunKC 03-09-2018 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458147)
Why was he 5th rounder again?

If you seriously are counting on Chesson or Robinson... :facepalm:

This regime has never seriously invested in a WR through the draft. Trading up for Conley in mid rd 3 was it and or conservative QB criminally misused him.

Matt Miller mocked James Washington to us in rd 2 last week and he often says he goes by what he hears.

They clearly want a receiver. I just hope they are smart about getting him.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458174)
Let me know when Ragland has proven he can be a 3-down LB.

Ragland tore his ACL in August 2016. The Chiefs brought him along slowly in 2017 and his snaps increased each game in the second half of the season.

He'll have plenty of time to "prove" that he'll be a 3 down linebacker when he's 100%.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458179)
Lol, well, you’re wrong... but besides that...

Way to confirm that you are in fact a raging lunatic, yet again. Hopefully you are on a watchlist. LMAO

JFC, you're moron, but we all knew that.

Congrats.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458181)
Ragland tore his ACL in August 2016. The Chiefs brought him along slowly in 2017 and his snaps increased each game in the second half of the season.

He'll have plenty of time to "prove" that he'll be a 3 down linebacker when he's 100%.

For sure

But I wouldn’t be thinking about an extension until he does one way or the other

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13458180)
They clearly want a receiver. I just hope they are smart about getting him.

Yep.

You'd think that the Chiefs under Reid would have learned their lesson about heavily investing in a free agent wide receiver but time will tell.

None of these free agent WR's are "clean". Watkins has been constantly injured and his numbers were pedestrian at best the last two seasons and Allen Robinson is coming off an ACL tear.

It's going to be interesting to see what Veach decides to do but I'd rather they invest in the draft and not in FA.

O.city 03-09-2018 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13458180)
This regime has never seriously invested in a WR through the draft. Trading up for Conley in mid rd 3 was it and or conservative QB criminally misused him.

Matt Miller mocked James Washington to us in rd 2 last week and he often says he goes by what he hears.

They clearly want a receiver. I just hope they are smart about getting him.

I remember reading somewhere that Andy didn’t value taking WRs high but that was also written a year or two after he took Jackson and Maclin

Mother****erJones 03-09-2018 11:36 AM

Sheesh, level this thread for an hour and it’s a powder keg

The Franchise 03-09-2018 11:36 AM

I'd love to draft St. Brown (homer alert)....but I think he's going to go higher than we can afford to take him.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-09-2018 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458184)
JFC, you're moron, but we all knew that.

Congrats.

Did we?

Or is that just another one of your hundred separate personal attacks you have filed away on a notepad somewhere anytime someone on CP disagrees with you?

RunKC 03-09-2018 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458165)
Ragland is overrated on here, honestly. We haven’t even saw him cover backs or TEs yet cause he never played 3rd downs and everyone thinks he’s the next DJ.

If Watkins is such an incredible talent, why did the Rams choose to franchise a 5’8” midget Safety with 3 career INT’s over him?

Does that not scream “red flag” to you?

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458185)
For sure

But I wouldn’t be thinking about an extension until he does one way or the other

I wouldn't exactly say "thinking" but best case scenario is that he'll be eligible for an extension after the 2018 season and if he balls out in 2019, he'll get likely get a sizable deal after the 2019 season.

It would be a good problem to have.

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13458192)
Did we?

Or is that just another one of your hundred separate personal attacks you have filed away on a notepad somewhere anytime someone on CP disagrees with you?

You're just talking out of your ass, which is what is so annoying.

You have zero information about Watkins, other than what you read on the internet, yet you know what's best for the Chiefs.

Right.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.