ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Derek Carr ****ing sucks (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=312224)

Coochie liquor 01-09-2023 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloucesterChief (Post 16724656)
Getting out of the dysfunctional Raiders organization will probably help. I could see NYJ, ATL, Tampa, Colts, or Commies being landing places.

Jets would actually be a solid landing spot for him.

Wallcrawler 01-12-2023 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16697593)
Since Denver he has three Super Bowl rings as the offensive coordinator of the Patriots.

He has made millions of dollars in salary since the Denver job.

Which of these two statements is supposed to refute the fact that Josh McDaniels is a trash head coach?

As said, the towel boys got rings too.

So it must be your position that because he's made a lot of money, he must be good then, right?

Matt Cassel made millions of dollars as the starting quarterback of the Kansas City Chiefs. Do you believe that Matt Cassel was a great quarterback because he was paid millions of dollars? Salary does not equal talent.

There is no way that anyone without a severely addled mind is thinking that Josh McDaniels is going to do anything but embarrass himself further, and plant the Raiders franchise further into the ground.

Fortunately for the AFC West, Mark Davis appears to be just as reeruned as you are.

FloridaMan88 01-12-2023 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16724651)
Someone will make him their starter...lotta bad QB's.

Carr looks like Joe Namath to the Jets compared to the shitty QB's they have had forever.

TribalElder 01-12-2023 09:31 AM

I'm gonna miss Carr being the Raiders QB

he kept them from going anywhere, and as a Chiefs fan I appreciate that

Chris Meck 01-12-2023 09:32 AM

there are a few teams with a solid defense that really just need a solid, dependable veteran to be winners. Carr is that, he just wasn't able to make the jump to elite. Needing him to be that was always a fool's errand.

But he's certainly a good mid-level starter. He's in the Cousins class, which can be good enough if everything falls just right to win a Super Bowl.

Red Dawg 01-12-2023 09:39 AM

I don't think Carr is awful and he is a leader but he's had years to prove he was worth the big money and he just hasn't.

If they get Brady I will laugh. He has zero shot to win anything in the AFC.

Radar Chief 01-12-2023 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16729711)
I'm gonna miss Carr being the Raiders QB

he kept them from going anywhere, and as a Chiefs fan I appreciate that

Same, Carr is a turnover pinata. Smack him around a little bit and he coughs them up like candy. It's as predictable as the sunrise.
I once saw him flop to the ground and turtle up for pressure that wasn't even getting to him.

DrunkBassGuitar 01-12-2023 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 16729706)
Which of these two statements is supposed to refute the fact that Josh McDaniels is a trash head coach?

As said, the towel boys got rings too.

So it must be your position that because he's made a lot of money, he must be good then, right?

Matt Cassel made millions of dollars as the starting quarterback of the Kansas City Chiefs. Do you believe that Matt Cassel was a great quarterback because he was paid millions of dollars? Salary does not equal talent.

There is no way that anyone without a severely addled mind is thinking that Josh McDaniels is going to do anything but embarrass himself further, and plant the Raiders franchise further into the ground.

Fortunately for the AFC West, Mark Davis appears to be just as reeruned as you are.

more money = better than

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25sSLBvk_M8

FloridaMan88 01-12-2023 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 16729706)
Which of these two statements is supposed to refute the fact that Josh McDaniels is a trash head coach?

As said, the towel boys got rings too.

So it must be your position that because he's made a lot of money, he must be good then, right?

Matt Cassel made millions of dollars as the starting quarterback of the Kansas City Chiefs. Do you believe that Matt Cassel was a great quarterback because he was paid millions of dollars? Salary does not equal talent.

There is no way that anyone without a severely addled mind is thinking that Josh McDaniels is going to do anything but embarrass himself further, and plant the Raiders franchise further into the ground.

Fortunately for the AFC West, Mark Davis appears to be just as reeruned as you are.

Dumbshit Jettio conveniently leaves out how many Super Bowl rings McDaniels won as OC in New England WITHOUT Tom Brady as his QB.

I count zero.

But he still made millions of $$$ so I guess that alone qualifies him to be a good HC, according to Jettio logic.

lawrenceRaider 01-12-2023 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief (Post 16729727)
Same, Carr is a turnover pinata. Smack him around a little bit and he coughs them up like candy. It's as predictable as the sunrise.
I once saw him flop to the ground and turtle up for pressure that wasn't even getting to him.

TBF, dude was playing with broken bones in his back when that happened.

lawrenceRaider 01-12-2023 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 16729711)
I'm gonna miss Carr being the Raiders QB

he kept them from going anywhere, and as a Chiefs fan I appreciate that

Raiders trash defenses had more to do with the failures of the Raiders than Carr did. Rodgers and Brady in the rare years they had trash D's like Carr has had his entire career didn't even make the playoffs.

The Franchise 01-12-2023 10:17 AM

Didn’t know he had a no trade clause. Good luck getting the best offer.

FloridaMan88 01-12-2023 10:42 AM

<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;">View this post on Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div></div></a><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A post shared by Derek Carr (@derekcarrqb)</a></p></div></blockquote> <script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

Rainbarrel 01-12-2023 11:58 AM

Derek would have been an improvement on several Chiefs and most Donkey QBs(long list)

lawrenceRaider 01-12-2023 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16729815)
Didn’t know he had a no trade clause. Good luck getting the best offer.

Teams are desperate for a halfway competent QB and will pay to ensure he doesn't hit the open market.

Raiders aren't getting what the Rams paid for Stafford, but they'll get decent comp.

ToxSocks 01-12-2023 02:00 PM

Carr is a better Qb than the Raiders are a franchise. Much like Stafford, he's a good talent in a bad organization. I wish him the best somewhere in the NFC.

Carr in SF? Dundundun

BWillie 01-12-2023 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16729865)
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;">View this post on Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div></div></a><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUgOoNpvrY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A post shared by Derek Carr (@derekcarrqb)</a></p></div></blockquote> <script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

Quitting crying mascara wearing loser.

Eleazar 01-12-2023 02:06 PM

He's a league average QB. A journeyman who would be an upgrade for a QB-poor team but isn't going to win any titles. Since there are always going to be QB-poor teams, I would guess Carr will find work for a number of years yet in the league.

I don't know why he'd want to be traded, though. He could pick a team on the open market and not set them back in draft capital on his way in.

Don't the Raiders have to cut him by Feb 15 IIRC or his numbers become guaranteed for the year?

Eureka 01-12-2023 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele (Post 16730304)
He's a league average QB. A journeyman who would be an upgrade for a QB-poor team but isn't going to win any titles. Since there are always going to be QB-poor teams, I would guess Carr will find work for a number of years yet in the league.

I don't know why he'd want to be traded, though. He could pick a team on the open market and not set them back in draft capital on his way in.

Don't the Raiders have to cut him by Feb 15 IIRC or his numbers become guaranteed for the year?

It guarantees the rest of his 60+ million contract for the next two years and for the team it insures that they get his services and not some other team. Carr still gets to choose his team via his no trade clause.

Carr might not get as much $ as a free agent. It's all a gamble.

I'm guessing the Raiders will get two 2nd rd picks (2023, 2024) for Carr.

Carolina will probably be the landing spot for him.

DJ's left nut 01-12-2023 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eureka (Post 16730325)
It guarantees the rest of his 60+ million contract for the next two years and for the team it insures that they get his services and not some other team. Carr still gets to choose his team via his no trade clause.

Carr might not get as much $ as a free agent. It's all a gamble.

I'm guessing the Raiders will get two 2nd rd picks (2023, 2024) for Carr.

Carolina will probably be the landing spot for him.

If you're Carolina or Atlanta and see that division as eminently winnable, not just now but for the next 3-5 seasons given the state of the division, he should absolutely be an attractive option.

Because whichever of those 2 lands him is going to be the prohibitive favorite, as sad as that is, for the next several seasons.

Sassy Squatch 01-12-2023 05:00 PM

Interesting. Was wondering why he'd even accept a trade instead of forcing the Raiders hand to just cut him and hit the open market but he's got some pretty big base salaries, even if traded. 33, 42, and 41 over the next 3 seasons. Provided the right team comes calling he may just keep what he's got currently, provided the trading team shifts some of it into guaranteed $$$ for him.

Kman34 01-12-2023 05:50 PM

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SeriousBit...le-max-1mb.gif

DJ's left nut 01-12-2023 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16730572)
Interesting. Was wondering why he'd even accept a trade instead of forcing the Raiders hand to just cut him and hit the open market but he's got some pretty big base salaries, even if traded. 33, 42, and 41 over the next 3 seasons. Provided the right team comes calling he may just keep what he's got currently, provided the trading team shifts some of it into guaranteed $$$ for him.

That's easily his best use of that NTC.

You leverage your willingness/ability to waive it to secure additional salary guarantees.

And if you're an NFC south team with a lot of cap space and no viable alternative, you go ahead and give him the guarantees.

staylor26 01-12-2023 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16730373)
If you're Carolina or Atlanta and see that division as eminently winnable, not just now but for the next 3-5 seasons given the state of the division, he should absolutely be an attractive option.

Because whichever of those 2 lands him is going to be the prohibitive favorite, as sad as that is, for the next several seasons.

Hopefully he goes to Atlanta so I can draft Pitts at a more reasonable spot than people were drafting him this year since many will now be scared off.

jdubya 01-12-2023 06:03 PM

See ya later Derek

https://media0.giphy.com/media/QVP7D...giphy.gif&ct=g

FloridaMan88 01-12-2023 06:03 PM

Why would any team trade for Carr if they know he will ultimately get cut?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the Raiders can’t trade Derek Carr by Feb. 15, they will cut him. He is not extending the deadline.</p>&mdash; Vic Tafur (@VicTafur) <a href="https://twitter.com/VicTafur/status/1613571429110538241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

DJ's left nut 01-12-2023 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16730626)
Why would any team trade for Carr if they know he will ultimately get cut?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the Raiders can’t trade Derek Carr by Feb. 15, they will cut him. He is not extending the deadline.</p>&mdash; Vic Tafur (@VicTafur) <a href="https://twitter.com/VicTafur/status/1613571429110538241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Because you control the landing.

Nobody's gonna give a 1st for him, but a 2nd? High 3rd? Sure.

I mean everyone knew the 49ers were going to cut or trade Alex Smith but they still got him traded and somehow, against all odds, everyone came out ahead in that deal.

Obviously Carr's NTC could allow him to still blow any potential acquiring team out of the water if he really doesn't want to go there, but that's where the ability to guarantee additional salary comes in.

Someone will trade for him.

RunKC 01-12-2023 06:23 PM

I don’t think Chris Ballard can afford to take another old retread bc his seat is on fire. Fortunately for him his old pal Ryan Poles has the 1st overall pick so he could ultimately trade with him to get his guy.

I think Tampa would be a nice landing spot with Tom leaving. Bad division and a good surrounding cast

DJ's left nut 01-12-2023 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16730643)
I don’t think Chris Ballard can afford to take another old retread bc his seat is on fire. Fortunately for him his old pal Ryan Poles has the 1st overall pick so he could ultimately trade with him to get his guy.

I think Tampa would be a nice landing spot with Tom leaving. Bad division and a good surrounding cast

Yeah, Ballard almost has to go QB at 4.

But man, think of the position he COULD find himself in. This deal has to get done by mid-February, right?

So let's say Carr gets traded elsewhere and come draft time, the Seahawks trade up to 1 for Bryce Young, the Texans go with Stroud at 2. Now you've got Will Levis and Anthony Richardson on the board at 4 - who are BOTH going to take just long enough to perform to get you fired.

So if I'm Ballard and Feb 12 gets here and the Raiders call and offer Carr for a 2nd, I ask for a future 4th back in the deal, grit my teeth and pull the trigger. I guarantee the 2023 and 2024 salaries if necessary to get Carr to accept the deal and waive his NTC.

Then I take a small trade-back into the 8-10 range and draft Anthony Richardson to sit for a couple years because I think it will take him at least a full season and maybe 2 to become an NFL ready player. This may allow me to recover a good chunk of the capital I gave up to get Carr.

In 2025 I hope that Carr has played well enough to spin the trade roulette wheel again and maybe recover a little bit of the draft capital I gave up to get him. And in the meantime I can immediately win football games and I STILL have my really high ceiling potential QBOTF on the roster.

RunKC 01-12-2023 07:08 PM

Yeah I agree DJ. Ballard does have a few things in his favor though.

He knows Poles. There’s a relationship there from their time in KC. I severely doubt Poles wants to trade down past 4 if he decides to keep Justin Fields. With the Texans undoubtedly picking a QB at 2, he’d be guaranteed Jalen Carter or Will Anderson.

It seems like a perfect trade for both teams that is just waiting to happen

Sassy Squatch 01-12-2023 07:15 PM

Is Ballard even going to be there? Seems like Irsay has pretty much taken over most major moves in the last year or so.

Demanded Wentz be gone.
Demanded Ryan be benched
Fired Reich
Hired Saturday

I seriously doubt Ballard gets to do anything that Irsay doesn't explicitly want him to do anymore. Ballard may just want to part ways if it comes to that.

Buehler445 01-12-2023 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16730654)
Yeah, Ballard almost has to go QB at 4.

But man, think of the position he COULD find himself in. This deal has to get done by mid-February, right?

So let's say Carr gets traded elsewhere and come draft time, the Seahawks trade up to 1 for Bryce Young, the Texans go with Stroud at 2. Now you've got Will Levis and Anthony Richardson on the board at 4 - who are BOTH going to take just long enough to perform to get you fired.

So if I'm Ballard and Feb 12 gets here and the Raiders call and offer Carr for a 2nd, I ask for a future 4th back in the deal, grit my teeth and pull the trigger. I guarantee the 2023 and 2024 salaries if necessary to get Carr to accept the deal and waive his NTC.

Then I take a small trade-back into the 8-10 range and draft Anthony Richardson to sit for a couple years because I think it will take him at least a full season and maybe 2 to become an NFL ready player. This may allow me to recover a good chunk of the capital I gave up to get Carr.

In 2025 I hope that Carr has played well enough to spin the trade roulette wheel again and maybe recover a little bit of the draft capital I gave up to get him. And in the meantime I can immediately win football games and I STILL have my really high ceiling potential QBOTF on the roster.

This is what Ballard should do.

This is what Ballard absolutely will not do.

Buehler445 01-12-2023 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16730685)
Is Ballard even going to be there? Seems like Irsay has pretty much taken over most major moves in the last year or so.

Demanded Wentz be gone.
Demanded Ryan be benched
Fired Reich
Hired Saturday

I seriously doubt Ballard gets to do anything that Irsay doesn't explicitly want him to do anymore. Ballard may just want to part ways if it comes to that.

Heh.

Good point

lawrenceRaider 01-13-2023 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16730654)
Yeah, Ballard almost has to go QB at 4.

But man, think of the position he COULD find himself in. This deal has to get done by mid-February, right?

So let's say Carr gets traded elsewhere and come draft time, the Seahawks trade up to 1 for Bryce Young, the Texans go with Stroud at 2. Now you've got Will Levis and Anthony Richardson on the board at 4 - who are BOTH going to take just long enough to perform to get you fired.

So if I'm Ballard and Feb 12 gets here and the Raiders call and offer Carr for a 2nd, I ask for a future 4th back in the deal, grit my teeth and pull the trigger. I guarantee the 2023 and 2024 salaries if necessary to get Carr to accept the deal and waive his NTC.

Then I take a small trade-back into the 8-10 range and draft Anthony Richardson to sit for a couple years because I think it will take him at least a full season and maybe 2 to become an NFL ready player. This may allow me to recover a good chunk of the capital I gave up to get Carr.

In 2025 I hope that Carr has played well enough to spin the trade roulette wheel again and maybe recover a little bit of the draft capital I gave up to get him. And in the meantime I can immediately win football games and I STILL have my really high ceiling potential QBOTF on the roster.

In your scenario, Raiders should trade #7 and Carr for #4. We need playmakers on D, and the best ones will be gone by 7.

Rainbarrel 01-13-2023 08:41 AM

From eyeliner to lipstick on some pig, I guess Commanders

Eureka 01-13-2023 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider (Post 16730982)
In your scenario, Raiders should trade #7 and Carr for #4. We need playmakers on D, and the best ones will be gone by 7.

That seems like little compensation for Carr. I think more picks would be better for the Raiders with all the positions of need.

DJ's left nut 01-13-2023 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider (Post 16730982)
In your scenario, Raiders should trade #7 and Carr for #4. We need playmakers on D, and the best ones will be gone by 7.

It would certainly be a more direct path to a similar result.

I just figured the Raiders would be looking to add picks, not move them around. There's gonna be some pretty solid talent at 7, especially if 3 QBs go before then.

Hammock Parties 01-14-2023 04:45 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Former <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raider?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raider</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/KJ_WRIGHT34?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KJ_WRIGHT34</a>, who played with Derek Carr is saying what most of the guys on the team CAN&#39;T say right now. Nice guy but he wasn&#39;t the RIGHT guy. It is what it is <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RaiderNation?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RaiderNation</a> <a href="https://t.co/I2Vf464Jsp">pic.twitter.com/I2Vf464Jsp</a></p>&mdash; JAYFORCE (@Jayforce) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jayforce/status/1613929458137792513?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chris Meck 01-14-2023 04:50 PM

One thing you should consider is that none of these GMs that are on the hotseat are going to want to bet their own career on one of these QB's-none are a lock (or a LUck, if you will), and none are likely to turn around a shit franchise right away.

Nobody wants to draft the QB for their successor.

Indian Chief 01-16-2023 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16733380)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Former <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Raider?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Raider</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/KJ_WRIGHT34?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KJ_WRIGHT34</a>, who played with Derek Carr is saying what most of the guys on the team CAN&#39;T say right now. Nice guy but he wasn&#39;t the RIGHT guy. It is what it is <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RaiderNation?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RaiderNation</a> <a href="https://t.co/I2Vf464Jsp">pic.twitter.com/I2Vf464Jsp</a></p>&mdash; JAYFORCE (@Jayforce) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jayforce/status/1613929458137792513?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This KJ Wright?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/KJ_WRIGHT34?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KJ_WRIGHT34</a> says the <a href="https://twitter.com/Raiders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Raiders</a> are the team to beat in the AFC West <a href="https://t.co/rxJQYy7cVe">pic.twitter.com/rxJQYy7cVe</a></p>&mdash; NFL Total Access (@NFLTotalAccess) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLTotalAccess/status/1527068498890878977?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Eleazar 01-16-2023 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16733403)
One thing you should consider is that none of these GMs that are on the hotseat are going to want to bet their own career on one of these QB's-none are a lock (or a LUck, if you will), and none are likely to turn around a shit franchise right away.

Nobody wants to draft the QB for their successor.

If you're coming into a place like Carolina where things are bad, bringing in a journeyman QB will be a drop-in upgrade and will make it look like you've got things headed in the right direction. The down side of that is that you won't have the draft capital to pick the QB who could really be the guy.

The only way to build what the Chiefs, Bengals, Bills etc. have is to push all your career's chips in on one guy.

O.city 01-16-2023 09:08 AM

I was about to say what Razaele said.

The only way to get to the Bills or the Eagles or the Chiefs level is to draft and develop your own guy, likely taking a highly rated guy pretty early.

Otherwise, you have to build your team up ala the 9ers and have a guy steer the ship.

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razaele (Post 16740947)
If you're coming into a place like Carolina where things are bad, bringing in a journeyman QB will be a drop-in upgrade and will make it look like you've got things headed in the right direction. The down side of that is that you won't have the draft capital to pick the QB who could really be the guy.

The only way to build what the Chiefs, Bengals, Bills etc. have is to push all your career's chips in on one guy.

And that's why a smart executive would do both.

It's what the Chiefs did with Smith/Mahomes. They had it coming and going.

Get your veteran with a year or two left on his deal and while you have a shit team with a high end draft pick, take your chances on a high ceiling young guy.

Because at worst, the young guy craters and you still have a solid veteran in your pocket. And you keep your job.

Hoover 01-16-2023 10:59 AM

Can we stop all the trade Carr talk? I don't see any team giving up draft picks for a player the team HAS to cut.

Buehler445 01-16-2023 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741052)
And that's why a smart executive would do both.

It's what the Chiefs did with Smith/Mahomes. They had it coming and going.

Get your veteran with a year or two left on his deal and while you have a shit team with a high end draft pick, take your chances on a high ceiling young guy.

Because at worst, the young guy craters and you still have a solid veteran in your pocket. And you keep your job.

Yep. No question.

The problem lies with you have to go ahead and un**** to at least a base level of competency with the following:

Roster: QBs are all well and good, but you have to find 25 dudes that can play and hope you can find some depth somewhere. This is hard. Obviously, because there are some shit rosters in there. Obviously if you are getting a job, good chance the roster is shit.

General Staff: Good chance that if your administration is full of ****, so is your training staff and equipment guys. You have to make sure you address it at some point.

Assistant Coaches: You can't turn loose your shiny new problem solving dudes on coaches that suck.

There are so damn many places that can make an otherwise good coach/QB/System/Approach fail it's ridiculous. That's why the failure rate is through the roof.

But yeah, the smart guys get a competent guy to plug the holes and bring some professionalism. Then you can look for YOUR guy. Not A guy, but YOUR guy.

Hammock Parties 01-16-2023 11:15 AM

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ho9v9NE2Htg" title="DEREK CARR TRIBUTE VIDEO" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 16741112)
Yep. No question.

The problem lies with you have to go ahead and un**** to at least a base level of competency with the following:

Roster: QBs are all well and good, but you have to find 25 dudes that can play and hope you can find some depth somewhere. This is hard. Obviously, because there are some shit rosters in there. Obviously if you are getting a job, good chance the roster is shit.

General Staff: Good chance that if your administration is full of ****, so is your training staff and equipment guys. You have to make sure you address it at some point.

Assistant Coaches: You can't turn loose your shiny new problem solving dudes on coaches that suck.

There are so damn many places that can make an otherwise good coach/QB/System/Approach fail it's ridiculous. That's why the failure rate is through the roof.

But yeah, the smart guys get a competent guy to plug the holes and bring some professionalism. Then you can look for YOUR guy. Not A guy, but YOUR guy.

There are maybe a half dozen teams out there right now being held back by trash QB play.

Just off the top of my head I think you have the Falcons, Panthers, Colts and Jets. The Lions would qualify, IMO, as would the Commanders. The Texans suck too hard to make that list. The Bears and Broncos might be pot-committed.

But any of those other teams have a path to both trading for Carr and acquiring a young QB who can take them the rest of the way over the top. And I think both Levis and Richardson have the right mix of tools to be great and warts to push them into gettable range.

So now you just gotta get it right. The plan is the easy part - this seems like a no brainer. The execution is the problem. We'll see if any of these GMs have the chops/stones to pull it off.

Buehler445 01-16-2023 11:18 AM

Jesus Clay. That is ****ing SAVAGE.

Did you make that?

Buehler445 01-16-2023 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 16741099)
Can we stop all the trade Carr talk? I don't see any team giving up draft picks for a player the team HAS to cut.

I dunno, if he'd be happy as a backup, I might flip him for a 7th.

He's better than Henne who at his age has to be about done anyway, and IDK if Buchele is the guy or not, but Carr is better than him. If he'll work for free and be part of something, I'd dump a 7th on him to keep him off the market.

Hammock Parties 01-16-2023 11:20 AM

it's clearly barry mccockiner's LMAO

IowaHawkeyeChief 01-16-2023 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 16741099)
Can we stop all the trade Carr talk? I don't see any team giving up draft picks for a player the team HAS to cut.

Don't under estimate the stupidity of some GM's... He will most likely get traded and worst case for a mid round pick...

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 16741099)
Can we stop all the trade Carr talk? I don't see any team giving up draft picks for a player the team HAS to cut.

Someone will give up a 3rd for him. At worst.

Betting he gets a 2nd.

Wentz got traded when everyone knew he was getting cut. Smith got traded when everyone knew he was getting cut.

Carr will have trade value.

O.city 01-16-2023 11:32 AM

The issue is people want to compare them to guys like Burrow or Mahomes.

Well, yeah, that's not what I'm looking for if I'm in this hunt. Same with Alex Smith.

I need a guy in here that plays to a baseline and lets me evaluate the rest of the situation and build it up and know what I have or need.

Now, I probably do or atleast should know I'm not winning a SB that way (unless the stars just align), but that's not my goal yet.

Hoover 01-16-2023 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 16741133)
I dunno, if he'd be happy as a backup, I might flip him for a 7th.

He's better than Henne who at his age has to be about done anyway, and IDK if Buchele is the guy or not, but Carr is better than him. If he'll work for free and be part of something, I'd dump a 7th on him to keep him off the market.

Yeah but you get the contract with the player. He has a team option that comes due the Tuesday after the Super Bowl you are not going to pay 40M for a backup QB now are you?

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 16741159)
Yeah but you get the contract with the player. He has a team option that comes due the Tuesday after the Super Bowl you are not going to pay 40M for a backup QB now are you?

The Falcons have $60 million in cap space right now, with more guys signed for next season they have roster spots available for.

That's before another easy $10 million freed up by cutting Mariotta. A likely cut/restructure for Grady Jarret and they could either trade/cut Matthews and free up quite a bit more (upwards of $20 million depending on how they do it).

No, the Chiefs aren't gonna pay $40 million for a backup. But would Atlanta pay $33 million for a starter? Why the hell not? You give them Carr this year and they win the south. And with Brady gone next season, put Carr on that squad and it's almost a foregone conclusion.

Why wouldn't they pay that?

The Franchise 01-16-2023 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741193)
The Falcons have $60 million in cap space right now, with more guys signed for next season they have roster spots available for.

That's before another easy $10 million freed up by cutting Mariotta. A likely cut/restructure for Grady Jarret and they could either trade/cut Matthews and free up quite a bit more (upwards of $20 million depending on how they do it).

No, the Chiefs aren't gonna pay $40 million for a backup. But would Atlanta pay $33 million for a starter? Why the hell not? You give them Carr this year and they win the south. And with Brady gone next season, put Carr on that squad and it's almost a foregone conclusion.

Why wouldn't they pay that?

God...that Mariotta experiment made no ****ing sense. And it made even less sense when they stuck with him at the end of the year. Ridder should have been in at the halfway point. See what the **** he has FFS.

Chief Pagan 01-16-2023 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16740950)
I was about to say what Razaele said.

The only way to get to the Bills or the Eagles or the Chiefs level is to draft and develop your own guy, likely taking a highly rated guy pretty early.

Otherwise, you have to build your team up ala the 9ers and have a guy steer the ship.

And the ironic thing is the 9ers have a third overall QB pick that they gave up a lot of draft capital to go get, not even playing...

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16741202)
God...that Mariotta experiment made no ****ing sense. And it made even less sense when they stuck with him at the end of the year. Ridder should have been in at the halfway point. See what the **** he has FFS.

Wouldn't you like to see even 2 more games of Ridder coming into this off-season?

Because he got better every single game. And really, his last 2 games were legit starting caliber play - maybe even playoff caliber. And that was from a guy who hadn't figured out how to use his athleticism yet (which he clearly demonstrated in college).

You'd sure like to have seen if he could maintain or continue to build on that. Because there's a non-zero chance that he could give them anything Carr could, plus some added mobility. But his first 2 games of awful play and his last 2 games of really solid play just aren't enough to answer that question either way.

The experiment was okay - but it was so clearly not working by week 8 that it's just ridiculous that they didn't pivot.

RealSNR 01-16-2023 12:47 PM

Carr has a no trade clause. Is he going to play ball with the team showing him the door like that?

Frosty 01-16-2023 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741125)
Just off the top of my head I think you have the Falcons, Panthers, Colts and Jets. The Lions would qualify, IMO, as would the Commanders. The Texans suck too hard to make that list. The Bears and Broncos might be pot-committed.

Patriots, too. IMO.

lawrenceRaider 01-16-2023 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16741265)
Carr has a no trade clause. Is he going to play ball with the team showing him the door like that?

We'll see if he's the good guy he's always put himself out there to be.

I'd shaft 'em myself. McBugel did him dirty IMHO.

ChiefsCountry 01-16-2023 01:10 PM

Carr is no different than Trent Green

jdubya 01-16-2023 02:50 PM

Article by Hondo Carpenter who has always had Carrs back and has always been a Carr fanboy. Great read:

https://www.si.com/nfl/raiders/the-b...els-mark-davis


"ENDERSON, Nev.-As with any divorce, there are always two sides to what went wrong, and usually, the truth is somewhere in the middle.

In doing my due diligence for this article, I spoke to multiple sources from the Raiders and others who gave me superb information about Derek Carr throughout my three years covering him and this team. I talked to numerous players about the situation and others who would lend credibility to the situation. Here is what I have learned.


After you read this, my goal is not to be happy for one side or the other, and my goal is to tell you the truth, so you can learn how complicated this past season was and why this divorce is better for Derek Carr and the Las Vegas Raiders."

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 16741270)
Patriots, too. IMO.

I don't think he'd have moved the needle for NE this year.

Might have made them a little better, but not enough to matter. Mac Jones is pretty similar and I don't see Carr excelling there. The issue in NE is more than their QB - they just lack offensive talent and don't have a viable offensive coaching staff.

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 16741429)
Article by Hondo Carpenter who has always had Carrs back and has always been a Carr fanboy. Great read:

https://www.si.com/nfl/raiders/the-b...els-mark-davis


"ENDERSON, Nev.-As with any divorce, there are always two sides to what went wrong, and usually, the truth is somewhere in the middle.

In doing my due diligence for this article, I spoke to multiple sources from the Raiders and others who gave me superb information about Derek Carr throughout my three years covering him and this team. I talked to numerous players about the situation and others who would lend credibility to the situation. Here is what I have learned.


After you read this, my goal is not to be happy for one side or the other, and my goal is to tell you the truth, so you can learn how complicated this past season was and why this divorce is better for Derek Carr and the Las Vegas Raiders."

So the Chiefs broke them.

By putting it out there and then snatching it away, they gave the Raiders a tiny glimpse of hope and it really sent their season of the rails.

The number of times you see them reference that KC game is really just pretty damn surprising. They really did let one game torpedo the entire year and they are FIRMLY convinced that, had they won it, things would've been different.

KC really is an 800 lb gorilla at this point, either. Merely almost beating them is enough to throw everything into complete chaos.

Megatron96 01-16-2023 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741528)
So the Chiefs broke them.

By putting it out there and then snatching it away, they gave the Raiders a tiny glimpse of hope and it really sent their season of the rails.

The number of times you see them reference that KC game is really just pretty damn surprising. They really did let one game toraudio the entire year and they are FIRMLY convinced that, had they won it, things would've been different.

KC really is an 800 lb gorilla at this point, either. Merely almost beating them is enough to throw everything into complete chaos.

Lol, 'toraudio'?

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16741535)
Lol, 'toraudio'?

Yeah, one of these days I'll remember that filter.

Probably not anytime soon...

Megatron96 01-16-2023 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741542)
Yeah, one of these days I'll remember that filter.

Probably not anytime soon...

LMAO
Hey, I didn't even know the filter existed until a week ago or whatever. Couldn't figure out what was going on for a minute. Just chuckling that someone else tripped over that one.

O.city 01-16-2023 04:19 PM

I mean......that article could have been written in 2009 in KC. It's just patriot way bullshit.

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16741564)
I mean......that article could have been written in 2009 in KC. It's just patriot way bullshit.

I actually had more respect for McDaniel coming out of that article than I had going into it.

But yeah, if you take Patriots Way bullshit and then put it in the hands of some half-cocked psychopath like Todd Haley....well we saw how it worked out.

I do think that sort of approach - hyperaccountability and details over everything - can work. But man, you've gotta build it from the ground up to avoid these sorts of culture shocks. And you're walking a really really thin line.

Because Carr's reaction is 100% predictable and it won't be just him that responds that way. At some point I think you need some way to salvage that kind of situation.

O.city 01-16-2023 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741569)
I actually had more respect for McDaniel coming out of that article than I had going into it.

But yeah, if you take Patriots Way bullshit and then put it in the hands of some half-cocked psychopath like Todd Haley....well we saw how it worked out.

I do think that sort of approach - hyperaccountability and details over everything - can work. But man, you've gotta build it from the ground up to avoid these sorts of culture shocks. And you're walking a really really thin line.

Because Carr's reaction is 100% predictable and it won't be just him that responds that way. At some point I think you need some way to salvage that kind of situation.

You just burn people out and they tune you out. I coached my oldest 3rd year old football team this year and it's clear even at that level. Coaching just isn't a one size fits all thing. Some guys need motivated, some guys need coddled, etc.

The biggest part of coaching is figuring out who's who and when to push the throttle, or pull the reigns back a bit.

DJ's left nut 01-16-2023 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16741575)
You just burn people out and they tune you out. I coached my oldest 3rd year old football team this year and it's clear even at that level. Coaching just isn't a one size fits all thing. Some guys need motivated, some guys need coddled, etc.

The biggest part of coaching is figuring out who's who and when to push the throttle, or pull the reigns back a bit.

Try as you might, if you do that, you'll get the 'different standards' label.

I mean, my position is typically "Yeah - I hold people to different standards because...duh, why wouldn't you?"

But you WILL lose guys doing it that way as well.

O.city 01-16-2023 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741594)
Try as you might, if you do that, you'll get the 'different standards' label.

I mean, my position is typically "Yeah - I hold people to different standards because...duh, why wouldn't you?"

But you WILL lose guys doing it that way as well.

There's a difference of holding everyone accountable vs coaching them differently though. I think atleast.

Megatron96 01-16-2023 04:51 PM

Just adding my two cents, but it's all in the presentation.

I remember reading an interview with Montana, where he was explaining his relationship with Bill Walsh. He said that during film review, Walsh would criticize Joe when necessary but wouldn't really tear into him in front of the team.

He'd do it in his office behind closed doors. Joe said some of those office sessions were the worst experiences of his career (but always accurate), but that he appreciated that Walsh never ripped him a new one in front of the team.

When I managed sales offices I took the same tack; I never ripped people in public. Criticisms, sure, but if I felt someone needed a kick in the pants, that happened in private.

Easy 6 01-16-2023 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16741143)
Someone will give up a 3rd for him. At worst.

Betting he gets a 2nd.

Wentz got traded when everyone knew he was getting cut. Smith got traded when everyone knew he was getting cut.

Carr will have trade value.

He's a clear cut upgrade for a number of teams

Buehler445 01-16-2023 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 16741429)
Article by Hondo Carpenter who has always had Carrs back and has always been a Carr fanboy. Great read:

https://www.si.com/nfl/raiders/the-b...els-mark-davis


"ENDERSON, Nev.-As with any divorce, there are always two sides to what went wrong, and usually, the truth is somewhere in the middle.

In doing my due diligence for this article, I spoke to multiple sources from the Raiders and others who gave me superb information about Derek Carr throughout my three years covering him and this team. I talked to numerous players about the situation and others who would lend credibility to the situation. Here is what I have learned.


After you read this, my goal is not to be happy for one side or the other, and my goal is to tell you the truth, so you can learn how complicated this past season was and why this divorce is better for Derek Carr and the Las Vegas Raiders."

Yeah, get used to Brother****ing Cheatriot ****bag puff pieces.

Shit like:

Quote:

While never deviating from his process, he did his best to try to keep things moving in a forward direction.
Quote:

Throughout it all, McDaniels kept preaching the process. Guys appreciated what he was trying to do.
Quote:

In both games, Carr struggled with execution at times with decisions that made no sense. While none of the losses sit squarely on his shoulders, the McDaniels and Ziegler brain trust believes that better QB play can overcome weaknesses. They had seen Brady do it for years and even Mac Jones as a rookie.
Nevermind that assuredly McDouche spouted off how he was the smartest mother****er that ever lived and could scheme around whatever. It won't ever be the process, it will always be the people. Even if the said process produced those people.

I got a little Franchise Killer Pioli PTSD reading some of that shit.

This did make me chuckle.

Quote:

As one player said, "Maxx Crosby, Josh Jacobs and Davante Adams played on the team, they played at a high level all year. Let's not pretend it was mean spirited to put the blame, when due on Derek Carr as well."
Yeah? Smoking your own guy and then shoving some 130 lb camera kid is playing at a high level? Awesome.

jdubya 01-16-2023 06:01 PM

Al Davis is credited with the "Commitment To Excellence" that is on walls all over Raider HQ and locker rooms. As a fan who has watched nearly every snap in every Raider game for decades, that slogan has meant nothing for nearly 20 years or so.

The article posted above makes total sense in why Carr needs to move on. He was comfortably coddled in a rah rah environment where "lets do our best and just have fun" was good enough. When the Mc Z team came in, they are all business about doing what it takes to win and that made some uncomfortable. If it hurts some egos and feelings, so be it. It is seemingly obvious most of the team leaders like Maxx, Adams, Jacobs and others have bought into the new regime. Time will tell but as a long time fan, it is refreshing that the expectations of excellence are back and there will be no more players on scholarships. I'm more excited with our GM Ziegler and his drive than I am about McD. Hes a very sharp dude.....I think. Lets see what happens. One thing that is certain, the Raider way of doing things the last 20 years hasn't worked.

Easy 6 01-16-2023 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 16741692)
Al Davis is credited with the "Commitment To Excellence" that is on walls all over Raider HQ and locker rooms. As a fan who has watched nearly every snap in every Raider game for decades, that slogan has meant nothing for nearly 20 years or so.

The article posted above makes total sense in why Carr needs to move on. He was comfortably coddled in a rah rah environment where "lets do our best and just have fun" was good enough. When the Mc Z team came in, they are all business about doing what it takes to win and that made some uncomfortable. If it hurts some egos and feelings, so be it. It is seemingly obvious most of the team leaders like Maxx, Adams, Jacobs and others have bought into the new regime. Time will tell but as a long time fan, it is refreshing that the expectations of excellence are back and there will be no more players on scholarships. I'm more excited with our GM Ziegler and his drive than I am about McD. Hes a very sharp dude.....I think. Lets see what happens. One thing that is certain, the Raider way of doing things the last 20 years hasn't worked.

Sooo, you all in on Brady?

jdubya 01-16-2023 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 16741694)
Sooo, you all in on Brady?

Haha....I was 2-4 years ago. Can I put his brains and work ethic in a rookies body? ;)

Buehler445 01-16-2023 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 16741692)
Al Davis is credited with the "Commitment To Excellence" that is on walls all over Raider HQ and locker rooms. As a fan who has watched nearly every snap in every Raider game for decades, that slogan has meant nothing for nearly 20 years or so.

The article posted above makes total sense in why Carr needs to move on. He was comfortably coddled in a rah rah environment where "lets do our best and just have fun" was good enough. When the Mc Z team came in, they are all business about doing what it takes to win and that made some uncomfortable. If it hurts some egos and feelings, so be it. It is seemingly obvious most of the team leaders like Maxx, Adams, Jacobs and others have bought into the new regime. Time will tell but as a long time fan, it is refreshing that the expectations of excellence are back and there will be no more players on scholarships. I'm more excited with our GM Ziegler and his drive than I am about McD. Hes a very sharp dude.....I think. Lets see what happens. One thing that is certain, the Raider way of doing things the last 20 years hasn't worked.

Not an unreasonable post.

But I will tell you, don’t buy in too much. You’re on it. Ziegler matters more than McD. Especially right now. I’m guessing McDouche can scheme. If Ziegler can’t get Dudes that can play in, the message gets stale quick. The saying goes it's not about the X's and O's its about the Jimmies and Joes. Its kind of right, scheme matters not if personnel is shit. but it does matter.

And it’s a problem. Nick Caserio is on record saying he had to go talk to Kraft about trades Belicheat would do without consulting ANYONE in personnel. Obviously Franchise Killer Pioli didn’t know ****all about personnel.

And the detail stuff might be fine for Belicheat who has shit locked down, but it typically isn’t for teams that blow ass. Essentially mental capacity is limited and using it on dumb shit (like gum wrappers and interrogating staff about leaks - like Pioli) leads to missing the boat on big shit (like oh hey, maybe we should figure out if Casshole can play). Ultimately you work on the big shit first and once you’re competent then you can dial in on the little shit.

Maybe McDouche has figured that out. But reading between the lines, it sounds like Cheatriot shit. Pioli sent some goon looking mother****ers to games to make sure everybody was compliant on the sidelines. Nevermind the tire fire on the field. Clark also had to settle some legitimate employee lawsuits because Pioi was a Nazi. Maybe he’s figured it out maybe he hasn’t.

All I can say is good luck. I’m a never a Brother****ing Cheatriot ****bag kind of guy, but maybe it will be different this time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.