ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

vailpass 10-05-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7969606)
Yes. Your football team is the second-least profitable team of the original 12 teams at $4.3 million in net profit. Meanwhile, Texas has a profit of $65 million.

How close do you think basketball comes to bridging that gap?

Not only does KU bball bridge that gap it surpasses it/wickeddumb

Saul Good 10-05-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7969594)
So you were out there petitioning the Big 12 when every school signed on to unregulated 3rd tier rights when the Big 12 began?

If so then I suppose I have no argument against your stance that MU should leave for the SEC.

I personally enjoy it when a school (Texas) outspends everyone else tenfold and still fields mediocre sports teams.

No, I was like 16 years old and didn't focus on the business side of things.

Pants 10-05-2011 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7969597)
That doesn't rebuild the rest of the burned-out shell of a hotel, and the two guests with the quickest access to the emergency exits are still setting off fireworks in the lobby.

The burned out shell of a hotel? Each school is going to make more money as a result of that initial fire. Was it not reported that FOX was willing to keep the initial contract intact even after the TAMU departure?

If MU can make more money in the SEC dude to the inability to generate any kind of T3 here in the B12, then I can see why you would want to leave. If the school stands to make more money in the B12 than it would in the SEC and be guaranteed stability for the next 10 years, would you prefer MU to stay or leave?

Pants 10-05-2011 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trevo_410 (Post 7969607)
You guys ever think that maybe Mizzou got tired of all the shit you've said through this whole thing? It seems like every school except ISU in the big12 has been a part of this group thought Missouri would never have the balls to change conferences...

"What has Missouri won? No-one would care of Missouri left."

"Easily Replaceable."

Something about us getting left out of the big10 last year...

So now that we're on the brink of leaving all this big12 all you guys are kissing our asses -- particularly most of the smaller schools including kU. We're doing what's doing best for us, not for you guys. The only negative about going to the SEC would be losing to the best football teams in the country. That's it.

So it's all about the bruised ego for this kid. This is the reason 90% of the MU fans want to GTFO, I bet. Who's kissing your ass anyway, little buddy?

mnchiefsguy 10-05-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969614)
The burned out shell of a hotel? Each school is going to make more money as a result of that initial fire. Was it not reported that FOX was willing to keep the initial contract intact even after the TAMU departure?

If MU can make more money in the SEC dude to the inability to generate any kind of T3 here in the B12, then I can see why you would want to leave. If the school stands to make more money in the B12 than it would in the SEC and be guaranteed stability for the next 10 years, would you prefer MU to stay or leave?

BIG XII might be able to guarantee stability for 10 years (I doubt it, Texas is not willing to commit that long), but no way BIG XII will be able to match SEC money, since the SEC is on the verge of creating an SEC network, which the BIG XII will never have because of the LHN in Texas. So your question is a non-starter until Texas decides to give up on LHN and help form a BIG XII network.

Pants 10-05-2011 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7969620)
BIG XII might be able to guarantee stability for 10 years (I doubt it, Texas is not willing to commit that long), but no way BIG XII will be able to match SEC money, since the SEC is on the verge of creating an SEC network, which the BIG XII will never have because of the LHN in Texas. So your question is a non-starter until Texas decides to give up on LHN and help form a BIG XII network.

Like I said, if MU stands to make more money in the SEC, by all means, you guys should have been out of here yesterday.

Crush 10-05-2011 12:22 PM

DanBeebe Fake Dan Beebe
Has anybody in the Big 12 asked for permission to look elsewhere today? Still getting used to the Neinas way of things.

Saul Good 10-05-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969614)
The burned out shell of a hotel? Each school is going to make more money as a result of that initial fire. Was it not reported that FOX was willing to keep the initial contract intact even after the TAMU departure?

If MU can make more money in the SEC dude to the inability to generate any kind of T3 here in the B12, then I can see why you would want to leave. If the school stands to make more money in the B12 than it would in the SEC and be guaranteed stability for the next 10 years, would you prefer MU to stay or leave?

I'd still prefer to leave, but the decision wouldn't be quite as easy. There has already been too much damage done, in my mind, to make it worth staying. The SEC will bring in a ton more in revenue than the Big XII under any model. The SEC doesn't have a history of screwing over our program by allowing shady back-room deals when it comes to bowl selections. The SEC doesn't have a bunch of teams constantly looking for a way to leave the rest of the conference high and dry.

Basically, the Big XII is proposing marriage as a way of assuring Mizzou that the Texas and Oklahoma schools will stop sleeping around the way they did when we were just living together. I'm not having it. If you're honest with yourself, you'd admit that KU would jump to the B1G in an instant if the offer were on the table.

Saul Good 10-05-2011 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969622)
Like I said, if MU stands to make more money in the SEC, by all means, you guys should have been out of here yesterday.

/tips cap

Now is the border-war worth preserving when there is no conference schedule to mandate playing each other, or was all that "rivalry" talk just a bunch of flowery talk that didn't really mean anything?

Frazod 10-05-2011 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969618)
So it's all about the bruised ego for this kid. This is the reason 90% of the MU fans want to GTFO, I bet. Who's kissing your ass anyway, little buddy?

I'm not sensing much ass kissing, but it would probably be a good idea to put a padlock on the kid's pet rabbit cage, lest it end up boiling in a pot on the stove.

Saul Good 10-05-2011 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969618)
Who's kissing your ass anyway, little buddy?

Remember the good times! /Chuck Neinas

Pants 10-05-2011 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7969629)
/tips cap

Now is the border-war worth preserving when there is no conference schedule to mandate playing each other, or was all that "rivalry" talk just a bunch of flowery talk that didn't really mean anything?

I'm down for whatever is in the best interest of KU.

Saul Good 10-05-2011 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7969637)
I'm down for whatever is in the best interest of KU.

And what is best for KU in your opinion?

1. "Punishing" Mizzou for doing what you have acknowledged is best for the university by refusing to keep the border-war alive

or

2. Playing a non-con game against your biggest rival even though you are no longer in the same conference a la Iowa-ISU

Pants 10-05-2011 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7969639)
And what is best for KU in your opinion?

1. "Punishing" Mizzou for doing what you have acknowledged is best for the university by refusing to keep the border-war alive

or

2. Playing a non-con game against your biggest rival even though you are no longer in the same conference a la Iowa-ISU

That depends. Are we going to play MU instead of tOSU for example? If that's the case, I think it would be in the best interest of KU to go ahead and play tOSU instead.

As far as football is concerned, I'd like to keep the Arrowhead showdown.

tooge 10-05-2011 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 7969580)
Is the mini bar free?

Only for a few people in the hotel. You are not one of them


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.