KC_Connection |
02-13-2025 12:51 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie
(Post 17967656)
Does it count the times that hes so slow to rotate that easy baskets are made or an easy 3 is made? Or hes so slow he can't get down the court, at all on transition...even sequences that arent even really transition just guys moving kinda fast. All of these analytics are hugely subjective.
There is a reason every single team including the Michigan teams underperformed every year and why Dickinson is not a pro prospect. He is not bad. He is not awful. Simply and overrated player because he doesn't play winning basketball compared to the stats he produces.
I'm not so sure we would even get worse if Hunter never played again and Bidunga played 30 mpg.
|
It counts all of it and they're still better defensively with him on the floor. You can hurt him if you bring him out to the perimeter with bigs that also shoot threes, but there are very few bigs in the NCAA that can do that enough to make that a regular problem.
The reason he's not a pro prospect is because he's not even close to athletic enough by NBA standards. Those players would absolutely run circles around him if he somehow played a game there. Has nothing to do with his aptitude for the game or his scoring/passing ability where he's quite skilled and why he remains very valuable in the NCAA (and why he'll also end up as some kind of bench big in Europe pro ball).
And if you took Dickinson off this team, there's a very good chance that their offense would barely rank in the top 100 in offensive rating. That's how bad they are statistically when he's off the floor. Our offense would probably just consist of handing the ball to Storr or Zeke and asking them to hit contested shots.
|