![]() |
30+ points in 6/8 games against cover 3 the last 2 years.
1 of those games we had 24 points at the end of the 3rd and took our foot off the pedal when it was 24-9 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Cover 3 the last two years <br>2018: 38 LAC, 38 SF, 30 JAC, 28 LAC, 31 SEA <br>2019: 40 JAC, 24 LAC, 31 LAC <a href="https://t.co/TSi5GsX4VS">https://t.co/TSi5GsX4VS</a></p>— Nick Jacobs (@Jacobs71) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jacobs71/status/1220584971125100544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 24, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks for asking. |
Quote:
They face Aaron Donald twice a year. Think they’ll do ok with Jones. Donald got his sacks but didn’t really dominate the way he usually does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We only played a ‘stacked’ box against then Titans on 11% of their offensive snaps. And the goal line defense that you are referring to that we used in the middle of the field against Henry was literally used TWO times the entire ****ing game by Spags, outside of actual goal line formations when the Titans were inside the 5. So we spent 85% of the game NOT using a stacked box against Henry and the Titans excellent running game. Probably similar to what you will see against us. Please do a little more research before making stupid hyperbolic statements. It makes you look dumb. |
Quote:
You have to remember that prices (& caps) go up and up and up and what seems like a crazy deal at 1st looks pretty good by a few years into the contract. I expect (barring injury of course) like a decade of deep playoff runs with mahomes.....im sure there will be some bad years and years where we lose guys and stuff...I am not expecting a brady type of dynasty where we are disappointed not winning 12 games every single year.....But I do expect a winning culture and a decade+ of having a real shot. Clearly QB is the single most important piece and we have that. Pay the man and worry about the money later...yes it will hurt at 1st but the sting will fade. Quote:
Idiot |
Quote:
Solid book-end Ts w/ questionable interior line play. And the problem with both IOLs isn't that they are routinely bad, it's that they're fairly inconsistent. Both will do their jobs very well at times and look like they've never worn pads before at other times. And just as injury could have improved the 49ers OL, replacing Wylie w/ Wiz has almost certainly improved the Chiefs OL as well. I also think it's worth noting that the Chiefs DL is comparable to the 49ers DL in how it matches up vs. its opponents strengths. Jones/Clark are a comparable duo to Buckner/Bosa w/ Clark playing at full strength. Where the 49ers are a little ahead is that they have Armstead as the 3rd leg of their stool and a strong rotational player in Ford. Against a passing offense, that's a real asset. But now lets take a look at the 3rd leg and rotational player(s) the Chiefs have and how they matchup against the running defense of the 49ers. Pennel/Nnadi and Suggs are the Chiefs answer at opposte DE and DT, no? Well aren't Pennel/Nnadi and Suggs just as good against the rush as Armstead/Ford are against the pass? Those guys are DAMN strong run defenders. I just think the OL/DL matchups are far closer to a wash than anyone is acknowledging. Would I trade our 'tertiary' players for theirs over a 16 game season? Oh without question. But going against this 49ers offense, I'd be hard-pressed to find 3 complementary players that are better equipped for the task than Nnadi, Pennel and Suggs. |
Quote:
IDIOT |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.