Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17454932)

Name a ****ing name, moron. Who should we have signed day one?

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17454936)

And proceeded to have one of the best seasons by a corner in the modern era.

Yeah - ****ing knee really wrecked him.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17454950)

Cool.

Done.

Again - a day ago it was 'keep sneed or get draft capital, either is great!' Now it's 'man, good thing we dumped sneed for nothing but cap space...'

Was anyone at all okay with that prospect yesterday? Eager to do it? Now it just elicits a shoulder shrug or worse, vehement defense?

This is rearview mirror rationalizing.

If we weren't prepared to restructure, we shouldn't have tagged him. It's a bad practice and it's going to cause us more problems going forward because now the tag bluff has no teeth to it.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17454947)

Verderame on his pod confirming Sneed’s knee was a major issue with his value as well as his price tag.

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17454935)

If you guys want a little something to feel better about this trade, Sneed kinda shoulda allowed a TD on the 9ers final offensive play in OT. Thankfully they weren't smart enough to block Chris Jones and he had to rush the throw.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6gnFk3R9s5c?si=fmMfz2bUabT7-8bG" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 17454951)

Tyron Smith rather than Donovan Smith.

They could have been active in the RB free agency market to get a legit RB2 to compliment Pacheco.

If your mindset is that there were no upgrades available over just resigning Donovan Smith, MEHHH, etc, then you are just myopically stupid.

They could have done that with this salary cap flexibility two weeks ago.

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 17454954)

I’d be hesitant to give out big guaranteed money to a 27 year old corner with a bum knee. You don’t give out contracts based on past performance. Corners have a short shelf life in the NFL.

Originally Posted by Womble (Post 17454958)

Any chance he fails his medical and remains a chief?

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17454947)

Verderame on his pod confirming Sneed’s knee was a major issue with his value as well as his price tag.

Sneed originally injured his knee in practice the week before the Eagles Super Bowl. Then 5 months later came back and had to miss all of camp/preseason with swelling to that knee. Then he was on the injury report throughout the season with that knee causing him problems. Doesn’t matter if he didn’t miss a game. That’s 2023.

There’s a reason so many teams stopped calling. If you’re a GM interested in Sneed and you learn that not only is he wanting $22 million AAV with $55 million gauranteed, but he’s a 27 year old corner who has never been an all pro and has had a knee issue for over a year?

That’s called a depreciating asset.

Originally Posted by AusChief (Post 17454697)

Embarrassing trade. 3rd year in a row with a sub par FA period that has blown a huge headwind for this team. How was that not done two weeks ago before every FA was signed.

Lucky Veach can draft players. (& has Mahomes).