ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****The Official NEW new new conference realignment & shit talk thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278522)

kchero 11-22-2013 07:30 AM

KU trolls full steam into bball, let's be honest they already were since august.

Saulbadguy 11-22-2013 08:29 AM

Scoreboard.

Saul Good 11-22-2013 08:40 AM

So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

Saulbadguy 11-22-2013 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10211466)
So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

Big XII. WVU is hurting right now but I think they will become competitive and a valuable addition. TCU should have never been invited, they are worthless.

After that, it's a push. CU is a mess and has been for the better part of 10 years. Rutgers? Meh.

Saul Good 11-22-2013 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 10211474)
Big XII. WVU is hurting right now but I think they will become competitive and a valuable addition. TCU should have never been invited, they are worthless.

Would you favor expanding? If so, with whom?

Cincy and UCF are looking better by the day, IMO.

Saulbadguy 11-22-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10211481)
Would you favor expanding? If so, with whom?

Cincy and UCF are looking better by the day, IMO.

Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

kchero 11-22-2013 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10211466)
So...which conference made the worst additions in their last round of realignment?

PAC: Colorado and Utah
B1G: Maryland and Rutgers
Big 12: West Virginia and TCU

I saw something like this on an SEC rivals board. The consensus there was the best move was the SEC getting Mizzou and ATM and the worst move was split between the Big 12 and the recent moves of the BIG with Maryland and Rutgers.

Saul Good 11-22-2013 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 10211485)
Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

Why not Cincy? They would be at least average in both sports, expand the footprint, and help bridge the gap to WV.

Saulbadguy 11-22-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10211496)
Why not Cincy? They would be at least average in both sports, expand the footprint, and help bridge the gap to WV.

Eh, I don't really have a good reason. They would be a better addition than TCU but worse than UCF/USF IMO.

Saul Good 11-22-2013 09:56 AM

South Florida would be a terrible add. Gross. I guess I could sort of understand taking them with UCF with the thought process being that neither of them really gives you a strong presence in Florida by themselves, but having both of them might.

Prison Bitch 11-22-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 10211485)
Might as well.

UC - no.

UCF - yes.

That's really dumb, sorry.

Prison Bitch 11-22-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchero (Post 10211491)
I saw something like this on an SEC rivals board. The consensus there was the best move was the SEC getting Mizzou and ATM and the worst move was split between the Big 12 and the recent moves of the BIG with Maryland and Rutgers.

God, this post was reeruned.

GoChargers 11-22-2013 11:23 AM

IMO, the smartest play for the Big 12 might be to add BYU and Boise. BYU brings a huge nationwide fanbase, Boise adds a strong football brand in a conference starving for those. They'd certainly get better ratings than Cincy or UCF would. This would expand the Big 12's footprint and allow them to directly compete with the PAC.

kchero 11-22-2013 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 10211631)
God, this post was reeruned.

Funny you say that considering the moronic shit that comes out of your mouth. Its funny how you consistently come in here and get your ass handed to you and yet you come back for more.

DJ's left nut 11-22-2013 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 10211799)
IMO, the smartest play for the Big 12 might be to add BYU and Boise. BYU brings a huge nationwide fanbase, Boise adds a strong football brand in a conference starving for those. They'd certainly get better ratings than Cincy or UCF would. This would expand the Big 12's footprint and allow them to directly compete with the PAC.

When I gave a large rat's ass what happened to the Big 12, I was hoping they'd add BYU (for precisely the reason you stated) and make a hard push to add Air Force.

I know, it seems like a bizarre add, but Air Force has a routinely credible football program. Moreover, there is a prestige associated with the service acadamies.

Both schools would give you something of a national cache. They'd have provided strong academics, a pretty pristine reputation for excellence in fields other than athletics, and a couple of solid football programs that occasionally make a little noise in basketball. Air Force would've even been a solid regional pickup and BYU damn sure wouldn't have been any worse from a geography perspective than WVU.

Instead they added another Texas school, just a far worse one and a school from the armpit of America that nobody gives a rip about.

Those still feel like panic adds to me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.