ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Media Mocks (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=356945)

DJ's left nut 04-03-2025 09:31 AM

Yeeeiiiikes.

I might - might - look at Cameron Williams at the back of 2. Honestly he feels like a 3rd rounder to me.

That would be just hilariously terrible. Then again, he also has Donovan Jackson going to the Lions.

Mostly this dude's just been spending the off-season talking himself into fringy OL prospects in a mediocre OL draft and pushing them up the board. I mean c'mon - Grey Zabel at 14?

Guy's just got tunnel vision.

Couch-Potato 04-03-2025 10:26 AM

Sport Illustrated has us taking RB Henderson at #31 and I’m starting to believe more and more that it’s a possibility.

Dunerdr 04-03-2025 12:57 PM

I'd take that 10/10 over Cam Williams lol

Bowser 04-03-2025 01:41 PM

Hard pass on another Trezelle Jenkins-ian first round pick. Any of the listed skipped players would be a better pick at 31, forcryinoutloud.

Fortunately, Veach is way better at his job than Warren Sharp pretends to be at his.

staylor26 04-03-2025 02:28 PM

Henderson at 31 is definitely a possibility that isn't talked about enough.

The fact that he came come in and play right away, because the Chiefs won't have to be concerned about pass pro (like CEH), makes me think it's a decent possibility. He's a perfect fit, and they might just have a raging hard on for him.

SAGA45 04-03-2025 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18018852)
Henderson at 31 is definitely a possibility that isn't talked about enough.

How about Henderson at #10 to Chicago? - https://www.nfl.com/news/maurice-jon...iders-pick-rbs

MJD also says the Chiefs take Jahdae Barron, passing on Nolen and Connerly among others. Even Crazier, the Eagles pass on Nolen, too.

DJ's left nut 04-04-2025 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 18019058)
How about Henderson at #10 to Chicago? - https://www.nfl.com/news/maurice-jon...iders-pick-rbs

MJD also says the Chiefs take Jahdae Barron, passing on Nolen and Connerly among others. Even Crazier, the Eagles pass on Nolen, too.

DTs seem to slide further than conventional wisdom says they should every year.

Nolen could very easily be the surprising slide this season. He could also go top 15. It's probably the hardest position on the board to predict in any given season.

SAGA45 04-04-2025 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18019587)
Nolen could very easily be the surprising slide this season. He could also go top 15.

Let's hope it's the former.

Bowser 04-04-2025 11:23 AM

MJD looks like he went the route of teams drafting certain guys due to their free agency losses. It's not a BAD way of looking at what a team might do, but it just seems lazy when you take a look at the talent on the board when some of these teams pick. For example - are we really going to leave all of Conerly, Nolen, Burden, or Harmon on the board to take Barron? Maybe, and I know guys like him, but damn that feels like a stretch to me.

On a side note, I don't think the Broncos let Loveland get past them if he's there. I don't like that MJD sent him to the Chargers either, even if it makes total sense Harbaugh would take one of his superstar players. Colston Loveland to Denver seems like a no-brainer considering their offensive play and Bo Nix's ascension last season.

DJ's left nut 04-04-2025 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 18019058)
How about Henderson at #10 to Chicago? - https://www.nfl.com/news/maurice-jon...iders-pick-rbs

MJD also says the Chiefs take Jahdae Barron, passing on Nolen and Connerly among others. Even Crazier, the Eagles pass on Nolen, too.

I just can't see a team having Starks and Warren on the board when they're up and deciding "Lets go with Starks..."

I mean the potential for catastrophe there is just enormous. Let's presume that both guys have equal floors and equal ceilings (a fair presumption, IMO) -- if both guys hit their ceiling, isn't Warren going to be FAR more impactful?

And if both guys are nothing but their floors, isn't a solid pass-catching TE going to be more useful than a solid hybrid sort of safety?

Maybe that's just a too "Maddenish" way of looking at things, but I just couldn't talk myself into taking Starks that high if Warren is still there.

That said - I wholeheartedly endorse this draft. If Jahdae Barron slides to 31, I'd be friggen stoked to get him. And honestly, I just don't see it happening because if he IS there around 24, Veach will move up. That's just too good a fit in terms of talent/fit.

I just don't see any way that happens.

poolboy 04-04-2025 04:23 PM

Im starting to see Grey Zabels name mentioned by some going to the Chiefs
Not familiar with the guy

DJ's left nut 04-04-2025 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 18020041)
Im starting to see Grey Zabels name mentioned by some going to the Chiefs
Not familiar with the guy

Probably on OG.

High floor, low ceiling, IMO.

Gonna be an NFL starter, probably for while. Just don't know that he truly moves the needle much.

poolboy 04-07-2025 02:24 PM

Nick Wright goes with Simmons to the Chiefs....

In58men 04-08-2025 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 18022747)
Nick Wright goes with Simmons to the Chiefs....

Same as Mel Kiper

In58men 04-08-2025 08:01 AM

Not sure if anyone has access, but here’s a link to Kipers latest mock.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My guy ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/MelKiperESPN?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MelKiperESPN</a>⁩ has dropped his final mock draft. A two-rounder for the people: <a href="https://t.co/qJY3kXI7ey">https://t.co/qJY3kXI7ey</a></p>&mdash; Field Yates (@FieldYates) <a href="https://twitter.com/FieldYates/status/1909576831080014050?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RunKC 04-08-2025 09:39 AM

Kiper’s new mock

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This might be a “friend who’s too woke” type take but an actual major site and app like Sleeper taking Kiper’s paywall content and using it themselves for their own interactions doesn’t sit right with me… <a href="https://t.co/6Tg9qeUjWR">https://t.co/6Tg9qeUjWR</a></p>&mdash; Carter Donnick (@CDonnick1) <a href="https://twitter.com/CDonnick1/status/1909609007636951323?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In58men 04-08-2025 10:08 AM

I like the Kaleb Johnson pick.

kccrow 04-08-2025 10:34 AM

lol... Kiper calling Tuimoloau his No 2 DE, yet putting him at 49 in the 2nd round. Umm... something doesn't compute, Mel.

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 02:09 PM

That Kiper mock is gross. I’d be so sad and nervous about.

Johnson is going to suck in the nfl and data says Simmons odds of getting back to what he was before the injury are, at best, 12/56.

I’d like better than 21 percent odds on a guy you’re spending a 1st round pick on.

RunKC 04-08-2025 02:38 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If the 2nd rd is goes like this I’d be thrilled

Tweet was deleted but I got a screen shot

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18024039)
If the 2nd rd is goes like this I’d be thrilled

Tweet was deleted but I got a screen shot

Gross man. Just gross.

RunKC 04-08-2025 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024054)
Gross man. Just gross.

Not talking about our pick. Just the picks in general and what will be available to us.

Kaleb Johnson is one of the few backs I don’t like btw

In58men 04-08-2025 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024017)
That Kiper mock is gross. I’d be so sad and nervous about.

Johnson is going to suck in the nfl and data says Simmons odds of getting back to what he was before the injury are, at best, 12/56.

I’d like better than 21 percent odds on a guy you’re spending a 1st round pick on.

What’s your knock on Johnson?

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 18024066)
What’s your knock on Johnson?

I don't like the skill package

Don't think he has enough speed to be a difference maker in the NFL. His YAC in college is about running through guys, not making them miss or beating angles. I don't think it translates to the NFL. He doesn't move great laterally. Contact balance isn't special. Doesn't make guys miss in the backfield enough.

I think he's a bigger B1G back who just won't translate to the NFL. I think his NFL career looks like the Pittsburgh back's, at best.

He's certainly not worth a 2nd round pick in THIS draft, with this group of running backs.

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18024064)
Not talking about our pick. Just the picks in general and what will be available to us.

Kaleb Johnson is one of the few backs I don’t like btw

Just looking at those picks in the 30s, there are a bunch of guys I'd be annoyed about passing upon. Who did the Chiefs take in the 1st in this one?

Bowser 04-08-2025 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024131)
Just looking at those picks in the 30s, there are a bunch of guys I'd be annoyed about passing upon. Who did the Chiefs take in the 1st in this one?

Simmons, iirc.

I'd be pissed if we skipped those guys for him.

kccrow 04-08-2025 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18024039)
If the 2nd rd is goes like this I’d be thrilled

Tweet was deleted but I got a screen shot

Everyone gets a good player except KC

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 18024152)
Simmons, iirc.

I'd be pissed if we skipped those guys for him.

I would also be pissed if they skipped Nolen and Burden and Conerly and Azareyah Thomas and Grant to take Simmons.

smithandrew051 04-08-2025 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024196)
I would also be pissed if they skipped Nolen and Burden and Conerly and Azareyah Thomas and Grant to take Simmons.

That’s ultimately why I’m so anti Simmons.

With that injury concern and what’s likely to be available, no way would I consider him BPA.

I just don’t see the board going to such shit that he’s the obvious pick.

staylor26 04-08-2025 06:01 PM

A healthy Simmons is better than any player that will possibly be available other than Nolen, who will also only be there for reasons other than football.

Some of you are just way too extreme with the anti-Simmons stuff. And I'm just not seeing it outside of CP. I'm starting to think we have some groupthink going on here.

It's one thing to be concerned about the injury and not wanting to take the risk. It's another to pretend he isn't a top 15 talent when healthy that has no business being available at 31 otherwise.

staylor26 04-08-2025 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024196)
I would also be pissed if they skipped Nolen and Burden and Conerly and Azareyah Thomas and Grant to take Simmons.

I'm with you on Nolen, possibly Burden too.

But Conerly, Thomas, and Grant aren't head and shoulders above Simmons.

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18024221)
I'm with you on Nolen, possibly Burden too.

But Conerly, Thomas, and Grant aren't head and shoulders above Simmons.


For me, they are, when they aren’t staring down an 80 percent likelihood they’re never the same physically.

kccrow 04-08-2025 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18024219)
A healthy Simmons is better than any player that will possibly be available other than Nolen, who will also only be there for reasons other than football.

Some of you are just way too extreme with the anti-Simmons stuff. And I'm just not seeing it outside of CP. I'm starting to think we have some groupthink going on here.

It's one thing to be concerned about the injury and not wanting to take the risk. It's another to pretend he isn't a top 15 talent when healthy that has no business being available at 31 otherwise.

The issue isn't talent. The issue is that he actually did get injured. He has a very severe injury when it comes to football. Sorry if talent gets trumped by the reality of the injury for many of us but it absolutely is an issue. The issue as a whole in the national media is that most of them don't know he had a patella tendon tear; you still have them regurgitating "ACL injury." I screamed from the mountain tops that it would be idiotic of teams to take a player in the 1st round, or even the 2nd, coming off an Achilles. That turned out to be spot on because none of them have produced anywhere near average. Taking Simmons coming off this injury is an enormous risk. It's not about what he was, it's about what he might be now. This injury healing has absolutely no bearing on that.

duncan_idaho 04-08-2025 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18024219)
A healthy Simmons is better than any player that will possibly be available other than Nolen, who will also only be there for reasons other than football.

Some of you are just way too extreme with the anti-Simmons stuff. And I'm just not seeing it outside of CP. I'm starting to think we have some groupthink going on here.

It's one thing to be concerned about the injury and not wanting to take the risk. It's another to pretend he isn't a top 15 talent when healthy that has no business being available at 31 otherwise.


He absolutely was a top 15 talent.

The issue is that, even if he is what is “healthy” for him now, the athleticism and explosion off that leg might not be the same as it was before the injury.

Most of the guy who suffer this injury lose some explosiveness coming back from it. Even when healthy and cleared to play.

Healthy Simmons now just might not ever be what healthy Simmons was before.

In58men 04-09-2025 06:20 AM

Does anybody have access?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Beast is here!<br><br>The 2025 NFL Draft Guide - new and improved.<a href="https://t.co/uFiwIP1xMq">https://t.co/uFiwIP1xMq</a></p>&mdash; Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1909939992358420964?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

kccrow 04-09-2025 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 18024525)
Does anybody have access?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Beast is here!<br><br>The 2025 NFL Draft Guide - new and improved.<a href="https://t.co/uFiwIP1xMq">https://t.co/uFiwIP1xMq</a></p>&mdash; Dane Brugler (@dpbrugler) <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler/status/1909939992358420964?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yes.

Commonly discussed early prospects here...

DE Mykel Williams #21
DE J.T. Tuimoloau #42
DE Nic Scourton #59
DT Derrick Harmon #16
DT Kenneth Grant #25
DT Walter Nolen #31
DT Tyleik Williams #40
LB Carson Schwesinger #38
CB Trey Amos #39
LT Josh Simmons #20
LT Josh Conerly #23
LT Kelvin Banks #26
WR Luther Burden III #27
WR Emeka Egbuka #28
TE Mason Taylor #33
TE Elijah Arroyo #41
RB TreVeyon Henderson #46

DJ's left nut 04-09-2025 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18024320)
He absolutely was a top 15 talent.

The issue is that, even if he is what is “healthy” for him now, the athleticism and explosion off that leg might not be the same as it was before the injury.

Most of the guy who suffer this injury lose some explosiveness coming back from it. Even when healthy and cleared to play.

Healthy Simmons now just might not ever be what healthy Simmons was before.

With that level or risk, him getting back to 'what he was before' has to mean a top 5 talent, IMO. That's where the risk is worth the reward.

Simmons is, IMO, a guy who wouldn't have clearly set himself apart from the Campbell or Membou in an OT draft that is pretty dang weak at the top. Even healthy, I'm not sure he's the top OT in the class.

"What he was" has to be INCREDIBLY valuable in order for me to be willing to look past the injury and be willing to take the risk. I just don't think he was THAT good. Top 15 -- sure.

But top 5? Nah. The best OT in the class? Probably not. And when you're a good but not elite prospect to begin with, you just don't have that far you can drop off to begin with. If he was an elite prospect at comes back at 90% of what he was, that's probably still an NFL starter. If he was a good prospect and comes back at 90%, it almost certainly isn't.

Then you have some questions as to Ohio State offensive linemen -- notably the fact that Paris Johnson, who was definitely a better pure prospect than Simmons, hasn't been what anyone hoped. Taylor Decker was quite some time ago and really that's the only successful OL to have come from Ohio State of late, is it not? Am I missing anyone?

There are just too many flags there. Maybe the board gets massacred and I'd take him anyway, but it seems really really unlikely.

duncan_idaho 04-09-2025 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18024833)
With that level or risk, him getting back to 'what he was before' has to mean a top 5 talent, IMO. That's where the risk is worth the reward.

Simmons is, IMO, a guy who wouldn't have clearly set himself apart from the Campbell or Membou in an OT draft that is pretty dang weak at the top. Even healthy, I'm not sure he's the top OT in the class.

"What he was" has to be INCREDIBLY valuable in order for me to be willing to look past the injury and be willing to take the risk. I just don't think he was THAT good. Top 15 -- sure.

But top 5? Nah. The best OT in the class? Probably not. And when you're a good but not elite prospect to begin with, you just don't have that far you can drop off to begin with. If he was an elite prospect at comes back at 90% of what he was, that's probably still an NFL starter. If he was a good prospect and comes back at 90%, it almost certainly isn't.

Then you have some questions as to Ohio State offensive linemen -- notably the fact that Paris Johnson, who was definitely a better pure prospect than Simmons, hasn't been what anyone hoped. Taylor Decker was quite some time ago and really that's the only successful OL to have come from Ohio State of late, is it not? Am I missing anyone?

There are just too many flags there. Maybe the board gets massacred and I'd take him anyway, but it seems really really unlikely.

Hadn't really considered the track record of Ohio State linemen of late.

Decker is a Michigan product, though.

kccrow 04-09-2025 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18024833)
With that level or risk, him getting back to 'what he was before' has to mean a top 5 talent, IMO. That's where the risk is worth the reward.

Simmons is, IMO, a guy who wouldn't have clearly set himself apart from the Campbell or Membou in an OT draft that is pretty dang weak at the top. Even healthy, I'm not sure he's the top OT in the class.

"What he was" has to be INCREDIBLY valuable in order for me to be willing to look past the injury and be willing to take the risk. I just don't think he was THAT good. Top 15 -- sure.

But top 5? Nah. The best OT in the class? Probably not. And when you're a good but not elite prospect to begin with, you just don't have that far you can drop off to begin with. If he was an elite prospect at comes back at 90% of what he was, that's probably still an NFL starter. If he was a good prospect and comes back at 90%, it almost certainly isn't.

Then you have some questions as to Ohio State offensive linemen -- notably the fact that Paris Johnson, who was definitely a better pure prospect than Simmons, hasn't been what anyone hoped. Taylor Decker was quite some time ago and really that's the only successful OL to have come from Ohio State of late, is it not? Am I missing anyone?

There are just too many flags there. Maybe the board gets massacred and I'd take him anyway, but it seems really really unlikely.

Paris Johnson has been quite good. You're thinking of Petit-Friere who has sucked ass. Dawand Jones probably will too, at least if they have any considerations of putting him at LT instead of RT.

Decker was OSU duncan.

duncan_idaho 04-09-2025 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 18024876)
Paris Johnson has been quite good. You're thinking of Petit-Friere who has sucked ass. Dawand Jones probably will too, at least if they have any considerations of putting him at LT instead of RT.

Decker was OSU duncan.

Nice. I don't know why I thought he was a Michigan kid.

RunKC 04-09-2025 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18024833)
With that level or risk, him getting back to 'what he was before' has to mean a top 5 talent, IMO. That's where the risk is worth the reward.

Simmons is, IMO, a guy who wouldn't have clearly set himself apart from the Campbell or Membou in an OT draft that is pretty dang weak at the top. Even healthy, I'm not sure he's the top OT in the class.

"What he was" has to be INCREDIBLY valuable in order for me to be willing to look past the injury and be willing to take the risk. I just don't think he was THAT good. Top 15 -- sure.

But top 5? Nah. The best OT in the class? Probably not. And when you're a good but not elite prospect to begin with, you just don't have that far you can drop off to begin with. If he was an elite prospect at comes back at 90% of what he was, that's probably still an NFL starter. If he was a good prospect and comes back at 90%, it almost certainly isn't.

Then you have some questions as to Ohio State offensive linemen -- notably the fact that Paris Johnson, who was definitely a better pure prospect than Simmons, hasn't been what anyone hoped. Taylor Decker was quite some time ago and really that's the only successful OL to have come from Ohio State of late, is it not? Am I missing anyone?

There are just too many flags there. Maybe the board gets massacred and I'd take him anyway, but it seems really really unlikely.

I get that Jaylon Moore was on a prove it deal, but the Chiefs were lightning fast on that guy. The deal was announced like 10 seconds after the tampering period opened.

I think they know how hard they have it picking so late. They know if Simmons is there at 31 it’s bc a shit ton of highly paid Dr’s on other teams staffs think his injury isn’t worth it so early. Packers and Ravens are successful franchises that just had him in on a visit, likely to have him meet with their own staff to check out his leg up close.

Conerly is the only LT I could see them picking in rd 1 assuming they do at all.

In58men 04-11-2025 12:18 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Love it. <a href="https://twitter.com/McShay13?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@McShay13</a>’s latest mock has the Chiefs getting Walter Nolen at 31 ��<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a> <a href="https://t.co/Ufprba7LgB">pic.twitter.com/Ufprba7LgB</a></p>&mdash; Chief Concerns (@ConcernsChief) <a href="https://twitter.com/ConcernsChief/status/1910758661837779446?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 04-11-2025 12:25 PM

Yes please!

poolboy 04-14-2025 03:07 PM

Nick Wright 2.0 has us going Derrick Harmon....Nolen was grabbed earlier by the Ravens

TRR 04-14-2025 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poolboy (Post 18029441)
Nick Wright 2.0 has us going Derrick Harmon....Nolen was grabbed earlier by the Ravens

Would love either to fall to 31...I think both are going to be extremely productive DL's in the league...and quickly. I just don't know if that will actually happen.

Couch-Potato 04-15-2025 03:08 PM

Anyone have ESPN+ and want to post results from their 3 rounder today?

kccrow 04-15-2025 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 18030447)
Anyone have ESPN+ and want to post results from their 3 rounder today?

Enjoy the ride

ROUND 1

Spoiler!


Round 2

Spoiler!


ROUND 3

Spoiler!

kccrow 04-15-2025 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18024219)
A healthy Simmons is better than any player that will possibly be available other than Nolen, who will also only be there for reasons other than football.

Some of you are just way too extreme with the anti-Simmons stuff. And I'm just not seeing it outside of CP. I'm starting to think we have some groupthink going on here.

It's one thing to be concerned about the injury and not wanting to take the risk. It's another to pretend he isn't a top 15 talent when healthy that has no business being available at 31 otherwise.

Personally, I think Conerly is a better OT than Simmons when Simmons is healthy, which I haven't spoken much about. I'm not in the consensus there by any means, but there are some who agree. I think Simmons is a bit better in the run game but not as good in pass protection. I like Conerly's movement better. It's close, but if Simmons didn't have the injury, I'd still go with Conerly as my preference.

The very fact that Simmons has the injury just drives him out of round 1 for me. That doesn't mean it drives him out of round 1 for some team that feels comfortable with where he'll be at or even takes a chance just on need alone. I'll be very, very nervous if that team is the Chiefs.

RunKC 04-16-2025 07:02 AM

Love Dane but I would not like this draft at all

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Kansas City Chiefs Full 7 Round Mock Draft Haul from <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@dpbrugler</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheAthletic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheAthletic</a> <br><br>Top 3 is a great start in my book.<br>I would have preferred RJ Harvey, Jordan James, or Damien Martinez to Skattebo<br>Would have Gone Cam Williams or Mukuba to Cabeldue at 133<br>And changed the… <a href="https://t.co/l0VEoWnZ0P">pic.twitter.com/l0VEoWnZ0P</a></p>&mdash; DMac Wake (@DMacWake316) <a href="https://twitter.com/DMacWake316/status/1912482304967983351?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

duncan_idaho 04-16-2025 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18030880)
Love Dane but I would not like this draft at all

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Kansas City Chiefs Full 7 Round Mock Draft Haul from <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@dpbrugler</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheAthletic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheAthletic</a> <br><br>Top 3 is a great start in my book.<br>I would have preferred RJ Harvey, Jordan James, or Damien Martinez to Skattebo<br>Would have Gone Cam Williams or Mukuba to Cabeldue at 133<br>And changed the… <a href="https://t.co/l0VEoWnZ0P">pic.twitter.com/l0VEoWnZ0P</a></p>— DMac Wake (@DMacWake316) <a href="https://twitter.com/DMacWake316/status/1912482304967983351?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


No thank. No thank you at all. Only pick I really like is Alfred Collins.

DJ's left nut 04-16-2025 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18030880)
Love Dane but I would not like this draft at all

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Kansas City Chiefs Full 7 Round Mock Draft Haul from <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@dpbrugler</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheAthletic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheAthletic</a> <br><br>Top 3 is a great start in my book.<br>I would have preferred RJ Harvey, Jordan James, or Damien Martinez to Skattebo<br>Would have Gone Cam Williams or Mukuba to Cabeldue at 133<br>And changed the… <a href="https://t.co/l0VEoWnZ0P">pic.twitter.com/l0VEoWnZ0P</a></p>&mdash; DMac Wake (@DMacWake316) <a href="https://twitter.com/DMacWake316/status/1912482304967983351?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

An injured OT, a contested catch WR we won't use, a 2 down run-stuffer at DT and a limited try-hard RB.

Yeah -- gross.

DJ's left nut 04-16-2025 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18030894)
No thank. No thank you at all. Only pick I really like is Alfred Collins.

It's the most defensible but using a top 75 pick on a guy who might be as good as Mike Pennel in a year or two doesn't feel like our style at all.

The Chiefs are convinced (and perhaps rightly so) that they can keep getting run-stuffing 0-techs either as cheap veterans or 3rd day flyers. They've seemingly had little interest in really attacking the position for years.

There's a non-zero chance that he'd end up being the Derrick Nnadi of the class -- the best pick of a draft who ends up being a quality player for awhile but who shouldn't be the most valuable pick from any draft class.

My favorite pick out of that group would be Lachey. Not sure you'd get anything out of him for at least a season, but there are some tools there and as a 7th round pick, that's worth the gamble.

RunKC 04-16-2025 09:17 AM

I’m glad I’m not the only one who feels that way about Alfred Collins. I much prefer his teammate Vernon Broughton who has excellent size and had 32 pressures (pressure every 18 snaps avg) and 4 sacks in his first year as a starter.

kccrow 04-16-2025 12:31 PM

I disagree with you guys a bit on Dane's mock. I don't love it either, to start with.

I just can't get on board with drafting Simmons, so I'll start there. I just think that's an asinine selection but I get the draw of giving KC a LT. I want one to, I just don't want THAT one.

Tre Harris is NOT a contested catch WR. He's a bit on the larger side at 6'2" 205, but he's not "too big." He actually fits what we do really well in terms of how Ole Miss used him. I just don't know if his speed and short-area quickness are enough for Reid. I could support that pick, though.

I actually like Collins quite a bit, and at that spot feel like he'd be a high-quality pick. I think there is a lot of meat on the bone yet with him in terms of getting him to produce more of a pass rush. That said, I can see wanting more juice. That's why I'm a big fan of TJ Sanders. Maybe he won't be as stout versus the run, but he's going to get after the QB more.

I don't get the Skattebo hate, honestly. Kid is tough as shit to take down and that's not going to magically change in the NFL. Sure, he's not the explosive guy we want on 3rd down, but this guy is going to be an every down starter for a team. Can't judge a football player just on 40 time.

The rest are stabs in the dark just like everyone else makes. I don't hate any of them. I love Downs but his arms are so ****ing short. Wish he was a couple inches longer there. I think the OL stabs are reasonable where they are, honestly.

DJ's left nut 04-16-2025 01:09 PM

The problem is that Harris isn't an early separation, short area guy either. And he's not a downfield specialist.

So I thought I was being diplomatic in calling him a 'contested catch' guy because ultimately I don't see him being particularly adept at...anything. He's just there.

I don't think I'd have him in my top 10 WRs. I just can't see why I should like him more than someone like Tory Horton or Kyle Williams. Those are 3rd and 4th round guys by most and that's about how I see Harris.

Admittedly, I can be dogmatic especially when it comes to WRs, but it's served me well more often than it hasn't. I just don't see a guy that does anything particularly well.

I think you can get away with that at a lot of positions but I just don't see it at WR. I'd take a RB with no standout traits but who does everything at a reasonably solid level. But at WR I need to see SOMETHING you do specifically well. In Harris I see a guy who's not particularly fast, not particularly physical, not particularly polished and doesn't run exceptional routes.

He's game. He's willing to put his body out there to take a hit and make a catch. He's willing to block. I guess you could argue that he doesn't look a ton different than Rice did coming out, but I just liked what I saw in Rice quite a bit more than Harris.

kccrow 04-16-2025 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18031284)
The problem is that Harris isn't an early separation, short area guy either. And he's not a downfield specialist.

So I thought I was being diplomatic in calling him a 'contested catch' guy because ultimately I don't see him being particularly adept at...anything. He's just there.

I don't think I'd have him in my top 10 WRs. I just can't see why I should like him more than someone like Tory Horton or Kyle Williams. Those are 3rd and 4th round guys by most and that's about how I see Harris.

Admittedly, I can be dogmatic especially when it comes to WRs, but it's served me well more often than it hasn't. I just don't see a guy that does anything particularly well.

I think you can get away with that at a lot of positions but I just don't see it at WR. I'd take a RB with no standout traits but who does everything at a reasonably solid level. But at WR I need to see SOMETHING you do specifically well. In Harris I see a guy who's not particularly fast, not particularly physical, not particularly polished and doesn't run exceptional routes.

He's game. He's willing to put his body out there to take a hit and make a catch. He's willing to block. I guess you could argue that he doesn't look a ton different than Rice did coming out, but I just liked what I saw in Rice quite a bit more than Harris.

My personal opinion is that you nailed the Rice comp. He is a slightly taller, slightly slower version of Rice. Not too much slower, though. I thought Rice showed marginally better quickness in his breaks and stuff.

Honestly, the biggest concern for me wouldn't be projecting his impact, it'd be his availability. You can't play from the tub.

DJ's left nut 04-16-2025 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 18031372)
My personal opinion is that you nailed the Rice comp. He is a slightly taller, slightly slower version of Rice. Not too much slower, though. I thought Rice showed marginally better quickness in his breaks and stuff.

Honestly, the biggest concern for me wouldn't be projecting his impact, it'd be his availability. You can't play from the tub.

With Rice it was his first gear and body control that I really loved along with his willingness to be physical.

I see the willingness with Harris but I don't see the 1st gear out of the cuts (and as I said when Rice timed, I was floored by his poor time; I really saw more deep speed than the stopwatch showed). With Harris the body control is good but I viewed Rice as College Elite and NFL premier. Like really damn good from day 1. I see Harris as a step below that -- simply good for a college player. And I don't see the deep speed I saw with Rice (that the stopwatch didn't support).

Said it for years that I'm a traits/measurables whore with WRs. I really can't shy away from the label and wouldn't if I could. And with Harris I see a collection of solid traits that just don't look like they add up to a genuine top 60ish prospect. Back of 3? Sure -- take a shot. But he was too productive out of an SEC program for that. And there are teams that won't be bothered as much by the average short-area quickness.

So in the end I just won't get him. And I'd be fine with that. Not because I dislike him in a vacuum, but because there are going to be guys I like more.

kccrow 04-16-2025 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18031409)
With Rice it was his first gear and body control that I really loved along with his willingness to be physical.

I see the willingness with Harris but I don't see the 1st gear out of the cuts (and as I said when Rice timed, I was floored by his poor time; I really saw more deep speed than the stopwatch showed). With Harris the body control is good but I viewed Rice as College Elite and NFL premier. Like really damn good from day 1. I see Harris as a step below that -- simply good for a college player. And I don't see the deep speed I saw with Rice (that the stopwatch didn't support).

Said it for years that I'm a traits/measurables whore with WRs. I really can't shy away from the label and wouldn't if I could. And with Harris I see a collection of solid traits that just don't look like they add up to a genuine top 60ish prospect. Back of 3? Sure -- take a shot. But he was too productive out of an SEC program for that. And there are teams that won't be bothered as much by the average short-area quickness.

So in the end I just won't get him. And I'd be fine with that. Not because I dislike him in a vacuum, but because there are going to be guys I like more.

I've been a measurables whore as well. I'm starting, VERY slowly, to learn my lesson after love affairs with Phillip Dorsett, Will Fuller, Parris Campbell, and Jaylin Hyatt. Who did I put in my mock? Dymere Miller, another Dorsett carbon. It's a bleepin disease man. I love Jaylin Noel as well, no surprise.

I was high on Rice and I desperately for us to move up to take Brian Thomas, so we're getting somewhere.

All things told, if you held a gun to my head and said pick a WR in any round, ignoring other needs, that you think will be available at our pick, I'd actually take Emeka Egbuka in round 1 with strong consideration for Jayden Higgins. So, maybe, there's hope.

DJ's left nut 04-16-2025 08:06 PM

I wanted Egbuka in the 1st round last year and then he screwed me and went back to Ohio State.

He's just so damn smooth.

RunKC 04-19-2025 04:26 PM

Nate Taylor’s mock:

1 trade up for Mykel Williams DE Georgia
2. Tre Harris set Ole Miss
3. Trade down for Alfred Collins
4. Trevor Etienne RB Georgia
5. Zy Alexander CB LSU
7. Luke Lachey TE Iowa
7. Jalen Travis OT Iowa State

I like Williams but either way a deep class? He also had us trading down to take Alfred Collins so the Patriots could take Judkins.

God help Veach if he did that stupid ass shit

staylor26 04-19-2025 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18030880)
Love Dane but I would not like this draft at all

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Kansas City Chiefs Full 7 Round Mock Draft Haul from <a href="https://twitter.com/dpbrugler?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@dpbrugler</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheAthletic?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheAthletic</a> <br><br>Top 3 is a great start in my book.<br>I would have preferred RJ Harvey, Jordan James, or Damien Martinez to Skattebo<br>Would have Gone Cam Williams or Mukuba to Cabeldue at 133<br>And changed the… <a href="https://t.co/l0VEoWnZ0P">pic.twitter.com/l0VEoWnZ0P</a></p>&mdash; DMac Wake (@DMacWake316) <a href="https://twitter.com/DMacWake316/status/1912482304967983351?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yall are trippin I'd like this.

Bowser 04-19-2025 05:20 PM

I've been talked out of wanting Josh Simmons. I'd be willing to change my mind if next year's OT's look to be even less impressive than this year's at this point.

And I'm in agreement with wanting RJ Harvey over Skattebo, but I'd certainly not be pissed with Skattebo.

duncan_idaho 04-19-2025 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18034752)
Yall are trippin I'd like this.


If you don’t like Simmmons and/or Skattebo, it’s pretty tragic.

staylor26 04-19-2025 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18034824)
If you don’t like Simmmons and/or Skattebo, it’s pretty tragic.

Honestly, would prefer Martinez or Goddens at that spot.

RunKC 04-19-2025 07:45 PM

Yeah a WR that doesn’t fit our system that well and no real improvement to the pass rush would really piss me off

staylor26 04-19-2025 09:15 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/NFLSEshow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NFLSEshow</a>’s 7 Round <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Mock:<br><br>Pick 31: Josh Simmons • T<br>Pick 63: Omarr Norman-Lott • DT<br>Pick 66: Elic Ayomanor • WR<br>Pick 95: Jaydon Blue • RB<br>Pick 133: Elijah Roberts • DE<br>Pick 226: Kaimon Rucker • DE<br>Pick 251: Teddye Buchanan • LB<br>Pick 257: Kitan Crawford • S</p>&mdash; Chiefs Blitz (@ChiefsBlitz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsBlitz/status/1913712669997101185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 04-19-2025 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18034879)
Yeah a WR that doesn’t fit our system that well and no real improvement to the pass rush would really piss me off

Fully disagree that Tre Harris doesn't fit our offense.

Coach 04-20-2025 08:08 AM

Forgive me, as I have not followed closely this year compared to the past, but is Simmons the guy who has his knee injury or patellar tendon if I am not mistaken?

Can that be an issue? Is there history of players who suffered similar injury as this and affected their play in a bad way?

Only reason I ask is that I remember Victor Cruz, Jerod Mayo, and that Jackson guy from the Chargers had similar injury. Also (and I can be mistaken here), their return-to-play performance definitely decreased?

Maybe it's just me, but this feels a lot of high risk and low reward.

RunKC 04-20-2025 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18034988)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/NFLSEshow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NFLSEshow</a>’s 7 Round <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Mock:<br><br>Pick 31: Josh Simmons • T<br>Pick 63: Omarr Norman-Lott • DT<br>Pick 66: Elic Ayomanor • WR<br>Pick 95: Jaydon Blue • RB<br>Pick 133: Elijah Roberts • DE<br>Pick 226: Kaimon Rucker • DE<br>Pick 251: Teddye Buchanan • LB<br>Pick 257: Kitan Crawford • S</p>&mdash; Chiefs Blitz (@ChiefsBlitz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsBlitz/status/1913712669997101185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Okay this one ****s. I’d be happy with this

kccrow 04-20-2025 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18034988)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/NFLSEshow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NFLSEshow</a>’s 7 Round <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> Mock:<br><br>Pick 31: Josh Simmons • T<br>Pick 63: Omarr Norman-Lott • DT<br>Pick 66: Elic Ayomanor • WR<br>Pick 95: Jaydon Blue • RB<br>Pick 133: Elijah Roberts • DE<br>Pick 226: Kaimon Rucker • DE<br>Pick 251: Teddye Buchanan • LB<br>Pick 257: Kitan Crawford • S</p>&mdash; Chiefs Blitz (@ChiefsBlitz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChiefsBlitz/status/1913712669997101185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I would be thrilled with some gets here but I don't see this as realistic.

I just don't get the Simmons to KC stuff. I can't fathom this team taking that chance in round 1. If it's what they do, I guess.

I feel like the late 2nd is about a round early on Norman-Lott but who knows for sure on that one. I do like him, but he lacks experience. I feel like there will be better options at that pick. I'd like him more in the 3rd. I think you can work with him. Wouldn't hate it though.

Ayomanor is a guy I don't know if he fits in this offense really well, too straight tline, and the drops are a very real thing. Doesn't feel like something we'd go after in the 2nd round. Maybe the 4th round on that type.

Blue is probably a 5th or 6th rounder, talent doesn't equate with his speed at all. 3rd is way too high. I don't think he's a guy Reid would sign off on with the fumbling issues.

Rucker is meh. Short frame, short arms. I don't think that will play with Spags. I get that Danna has been a guy here who's played, but he's kind of an enigma.

Buchanan is probably a 5th-rounder, could even sneak into the 4th. He's a really solid LB. I don't know why he'd slip to the end of the 7th round. I can't see it as even remotely realistic.

Crawford is probably a 6th-rounder, could sneak into the 5th with his workout. A lot of teams have looked at him. No way he's the last pick in the draft.

duncan_idaho 04-20-2025 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 18035103)
Forgive me, as I have not followed closely this year compared to the past, but is Simmons the guy who has his knee injury or patellar tendon if I am not mistaken?

Can that be an issue? Is there history of players who suffered similar injury as this and affected their play in a bad way?

Only reason I ask is that I remember Victor Cruz, Jerod Mayo, and that Jackson guy from the Chargers had similar injury. Also (and I can be mistaken here), their return-to-play performance definitely decreased?

Maybe it's just me, but this feels a lot of high risk and low reward.

The patellar tendon tear is the single-worst injury an athlete can suffer. NFL guys, NBA guys, no one has ever been the same. Like, ever. You can MAYBE argue that Jimmy Graham came ALL the way back (he had one more productive season after returning), but he wasn't as explosive at leaping and cutting and had lost some speed.

It's super high risk. The highest risk possible, really. The reward is high - if he is the unicorn who cruises on like the injury never happened.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18035109)
Okay this one ****s. I’d be happy with this

"This one is ****ed" - FYP.

I think that's one of the more depressing mocks for the Chiefs that I have seen.

Simmons - huge risk
Norman-Lott - so many other guys with similar floors and more upside. His size is a limiting factor.
Stanford WR - not a fit in KC's offense
Jaydon Blue - too early, likely taking him over more proven guys who are better fits for KC
Day 3 picks - whatever. Though I think the track record for Day 3 DEs is probably one of the lowest for success, especially for guys who were not at small schools.

RunKC 04-20-2025 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 18035141)
I would be thrilled with some gets here but I don't see this as realistic.

I just don't get the Simmons to KC stuff. I can't fathom this team taking that chance in round 1. If it's what they do, I guess.

I feel like the late 2nd is about a round early on Norman-Lott but who knows for sure on that one. I do like him, but he lacks experience. I feel like there will be better options at that pick. I'd like him more in the 3rd. I think you can work with him. Wouldn't hate it though.

Ayomanor is a guy I don't know if he fits in this offense really well, too straight tline, and the drops are a very real thing. Doesn't feel like something we'd go after in the 2nd round. Maybe the 4th round on that type.

Blue is probably a 5th or 6th rounder, talent doesn't equate with his speed at all. 3rd is way too high. I don't think he's a guy Reid would sign off on with the fumbling issues.

Rucker is meh. Short frame, short arms. I don't think that will play with Spags. I get that Danna has been a guy here who's played, but he's kind of an enigma.

Buchanan is probably a 5th-rounder, could even sneak into the 4th. He's a really solid LB. I don't know why he'd slip to the end of the 7th round. I can't see it as even remotely realistic.

Crawford is probably a 6th-rounder, could sneak into the 5th with his workout. A lot of teams have looked at him. No way he's the last pick in the draft.

Josh Simmons is likely the first tackle taken if he doesn’t get injured. He’s a top 10 pick at worst. Cannot see the Patriots or Bears passing on him if he was healthy. He’s undoubtedly a favorite for this franchise based purely on his traits and film. Gonna come down to Burkholder, who has probably spent 2 months on this kid. If Burkholder signs off you make him a priority.

Farmer is who I think the Chiefs really want in rd 2. They’ve spoken to him daily per Farmer himself. He’s not tall but he’s he’s got 35 arms, big hands, is strong as hell and has a really good first step.
Omar Norman-Lott is contingency IMO. Still love the kid. Enormous hands (11+!!!) long enough arms, highest pass rush win rate. His value on passing downs alone would be great.

Jaydon Blue is the best receiving back in this class and it isn’t close. The production and fluidity there is elite. He’d be an excellent 3rd down back with time (most of these kids need to get better at blocking). He’s gonna go in rd 4 bc of that and his speed. Of course Etienne, Smith, Etc are options there too. The Chiefs had zero explosion or playmaking from their backs which is why Andy utilized Worthy there so often.

Not big on the Ayomanor kid. I’d take Royals but I don’t hate him. Roberts is one my favorite Spags edges.

And goddamn do I love Buchanan and Crawford. They’re really good for day 3 IMO. Love their fit here.

Jerm 04-20-2025 11:39 AM

The funny thing about Simmons is if the Chiefs are ok with his medicals, you can bet your ass other teams are too…and that’s exactly why I think he goes way earlier.

I’m convinced he’s in play for SF at #11, actually a really good landing spot for him,

duncan_idaho 04-20-2025 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18035209)
Josh Simmons is likely the first tackle taken if he doesn’t get injured. He’s a top 10 pick at worst. Cannot see the Patriots or Bears passing on him if he was healthy. He’s undoubtedly a favorite for this franchise based purely on his traits and film. Gonna come down to Burkholder, who has probably spent 2 months on this kid. If Burkholder signs off you make him a priority.

Farmer is who I think the Chiefs really want in rd 2. They’ve spoken to him daily per Farmer himself. He’s not tall but he’s he’s got 35 arms, big hands, is strong as hell and has a really good first step.
Omar Norman-Lott is contingency IMO. Still love the kid. Enormous hands (11+!!!) long enough arms, highest pass rush win rate. His value on passing downs alone would be great.

Jaydon Blue is the best receiving back in this class and it isn’t close. The production and fluidity there is elite. He’d be an excellent 3rd down back with time (most of these kids need to get better at blocking). He’s gonna go in rd 4 bc of that and his speed. Of course Etienne, Smith, Etc are options there too. The Chiefs had zero explosion or playmaking from their backs which is why Andy utilized Worthy there so often.

Not big on the Ayomanor kid. I’d take Royals but I don’t hate him. Roberts is one my favorite Spags edges.

And goddamn do I love Buchanan and Crawford. They’re really good for day 3 IMO. Love their fit here.


I just don’t see any way a good medical staff CAN sign off on Simmons.


The historical precedent is so bad, I don’t see a way you can ignore the data.

kccrow 04-20-2025 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 18035209)
Josh Simmons is likely the first tackle taken if he doesn’t get injured. He’s a top 10 pick at worst. Cannot see the Patriots or Bears passing on him if he was healthy. He’s undoubtedly a favorite for this franchise based purely on his traits and film. Gonna come down to Burkholder, who has probably spent 2 months on this kid. If Burkholder signs off you make him a priority.

Farmer is who I think the Chiefs really want in rd 2. They’ve spoken to him daily per Farmer himself. He’s not tall but he’s he’s got 35 arms, big hands, is strong as hell and has a really good first step.
Omar Norman-Lott is contingency IMO. Still love the kid. Enormous hands (11+!!!) long enough arms, highest pass rush win rate. His value on passing downs alone would be great.

Jaydon Blue is the best receiving back in this class and it isn’t close. The production and fluidity there is elite. He’d be an excellent 3rd down back with time (most of these kids need to get better at blocking). He’s gonna go in rd 4 bc of that and his speed. Of course Etienne, Smith, Etc are options there too. The Chiefs had zero explosion or playmaking from their backs which is why Andy utilized Worthy there so often.

Not big on the Ayomanor kid. I’d take Royals but I don’t hate him. Roberts is one my favorite Spags edges.

And goddamn do I love Buchanan and Crawford. They’re really good for day 3 IMO. Love their fit here.

This is patently false Run. He was never considered the top tackle nor a top 15 pick. He had the potential to be in that conversation had he not gotten injured and had he finished the year with great results against the top-tier competition on their schedule. He didn't and therefore never was. He has his warts, and whether or not he would have run that gauntlet that he missed unscathed and looked like a top tackle is debatable.

The player who was in that conversation was Banks. He's inexplicably been overanalyzed, and not a single reason seems to be legitimate for his stock tanking. Meanwhile, Campbell has maintained #1 status with a legitimate reason not to.

Conerly was beginning to get that talk, and then the Mike Green thing happened at the Senior Bowl, and he went from top-20 rankings (13 on McShay's board) to dropping out of round 1 on some, all for 1 meaningless practice snap.

Coach 04-20-2025 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18035155)
The patellar tendon tear is the single-worst injury an athlete can suffer. NFL guys, NBA guys, no one has ever been the same. Like, ever. You can MAYBE argue that Jimmy Graham came ALL the way back (he had one more productive season after returning), but he wasn't as explosive at leaping and cutting and had lost some speed.

It's super high risk. The highest risk possible, really. The reward is high - if he is the unicorn who cruises on like the injury never happened.

The only question I would also consider is, have there been any offensive linemen that suffered this injury? The guys that I mentioned (Cruz, Johnson, and Mayo) were skill players.

Offensive linemen normally do not require speed. Quickness, yes and that may be the risk there, but it's not like we're asking him to go run down the field and catch footballs or chase down a QB, you know?

Jerm 04-20-2025 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 18035396)
The only question I would also consider is, have there been any offensive linemen that suffered this injury? The guys that I mentioned (Cruz, Johnson, and Mayo) were skill players.

Offensive linemen normally do not require speed. Quickness, yes and that may be the risk there, but it's not like we're asking him to go run down the field and catch footballs or chase down a QB, you know?

Lucas Niang…

duncan_idaho 04-20-2025 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 18035396)
The only question I would also consider is, have there been any offensive linemen that suffered this injury? The guys that I mentioned (Cruz, Johnson, and Mayo) were skill players.

Offensive linemen normally do not require speed. Quickness, yes and that may be the risk there, but it's not like we're asking him to go run down the field and catch footballs or chase down a QB, you know?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 18035396)
The only question I would also consider is, have there been any offensive linemen that suffered this injury? The guys that I mentioned (Cruz, Johnson, and Mayo) were skill players.

Offensive linemen normally do not require speed. Quickness, yes and that may be the risk there, but it's not like we're asking him to go run down the field and catch footballs or chase down a QB, you know?

It ended LeCharles Bentley’s career. He was all-pro before. Jack Conklin had it recently and has been an injured, diminished broke dick since. Niang also. It does not matter if you are a wide receiver, cornerback, offensive lineman, running back, shooting guard, point guard, safety, whatever. Regardless of position, the best recovery examples you can find are Morris Claiborne returning to be a first round bust and below average CB, and Jimmy Graham coming back to have one season of production before hitting the cliff, hard.

Coach 04-20-2025 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18035463)
It ended LeCharles Bentley’s career. He was all-pro before. Jack Conklin had it recently and has been an injured, diminished broke dick since. Niang also. It does not matter if you are a wide receiver, cornerback, offensive lineman, running back, shooting guard, point guard, safety, whatever. Regardless of position, the best recovery examples you can find are Morris Claiborne returning to be a first round bust and below average CB, and Jimmy Graham coming back to have one season of production before hitting the cliff, hard.

Valid points, thank you for explaining it. That's why I was asking the questions because I do not know the whole picture and thought I would provide a different perspective.

But yours also is valid too, and true. And some of us would know some of the answers like I mentioned on skill players, I am not well rehearsed on linemen, hence why I was asking. And Jerm also mentioned Niang as well as yourself, which I remembered we thought we got a good steal out of him, but was not at the end due to that injury.

So given what we all know and the evidence that supports this theory, it supports my own concerns that it would be too risky to consider him at 31 then.

Dunerdr 04-21-2025 01:20 PM

No one cares but I'm all the way out on Simmons. I started googling it. I respect Duncan and Crow as much as anyone on this board, so when they bring it up I listen. Holy hell you'd be drafting a guy in the first round whose upside is about 80% of what he was IF recovery goes VERY well. That's a nasty injury and it really sucks for the kid. I hope someone, not the chiefs drafts him and he gets a rookie contract somewhere just for his troubles.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.