ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   The NFL doesn't think Mahomes is a first rounder. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307147)

kccrow 09-19-2018 12:14 AM

Ok, so I probably was a condescending prick in this thread but **** if I didn't give everything I had pounding that imaginary table on the interwebs for Pat Mahomes.

Mother****erJones 09-19-2018 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 12827253)
What will it take to get a universal **** YEAH from our draft?

Round 1 - TJ Watt

Round 2 - Alvin Kamara

Round 3 - Pat Mahomes (I learned he sucks from this thread)

Would that do it?

LOL imagine if KC had this draft? I originally wanted Kamara over Hunt because of his speed and ability but loved Hunt as well. Was stoked about that pick and he's played college ball in my hometown.

Mother****erJones 09-19-2018 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12824173)
The only people who believe Mahomes is a first rounder are desperate fans.

ROFL holy shit Clay :facepalm:

Come on bud :)

RealSNR 09-19-2018 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12825855)
Wait... Mechanics are easy flaws to fix? ROFL Is that why Blake Bortles is about to rehire his mechanics coach after 3 years in the league?
Posted via Mobile Device

Okay, so look...

People can give me shit for liking Geno Smith to the degree that I did. That's fine. But they should also know that I while I was thinking with my heart, I was moreso thinking from a perspective of, "Well, what ****ing better choice do we have at 1.1 in this draft class considering who's on our team and what we need?" Luke ****ing Joeckel? That's who all the NFL Draft guys wanted us to take. The fact that Dorsey took Fisher is inconsequential to the idea that you may as well aim high and fail spectacularly even if it doesn't work out.

However, assholes like King need to realize that for every QB you take pride in that you correctly pooh-poohed, you deserve MORE criticism than the people who dream if you get a guy wrong.

If you were to pick any drafted QB in a given draft class, what are the odds that guy will be a bust? 80%? 90%? 95%? It's easy to say, "Geno is a bust." It's easy to say that about any QB barring the ones everybody slobbers over like Andrew Luck.

So that means when you get one of those picks dead wrong, you should get ****ed way harder than somebody who ****ing DARED to pick a QB who would actually succeed.

Just my opinion, of course.

RealSNR 09-19-2018 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 12826607)
The funny thing is that a bunch of people on here thought that Geno Smith would have been a worthy #1 overall pick. ROFL

Those same people are hyping up these mediocre QB prospects as 1st round talents. ROFL

The cycle continues at CP.

Another example.

From the dipshit who brought you the phrase, "I just don't think any of the QBs in this draft class are Andrew Luck" and says it every ****ing year.

There probably isn't an Andrew Luck in the 2019 class, either. OldSchool doesn't have opinions on college QB prospects. Why have one of those when you can just assume they'll all bust except for any Andrew Lucks that come around once in awhile? You'll be correct most of the time! Makes total pussy sense to me!

WhiteWhale 09-19-2018 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12824609)
That year it was between Smith and Rodgers for who would be the 1.1, it has been well covered with McCarthy supposedly telling Rodgers that he was going to be the pick at 1.1 If Rodgers was thought of as a project there would not have been all the talk about his fall down the 1st round and the video of him setting there waiting to be picked.
Keep it real instead of pushing your agenda.

Yeah, I remember. I know this is old, but there's some revisionist history going on here. Most teams felt NEITHER guy was a #1 overall quality pick, but SF was awful and QB desperate after jettisoning Garcia and T.O.

It was pretty well known SF would pick one of the two (there was no consensus) and the other guy would fall at LEAST to the 15th pick. Multiple mocks predicted the slide of the 2nd QB. Rogers was a guy where people spent too much time scouting his school and the system he played in rather than his talent. "Oh, Tedford QB's always suck"

Most people felt SF was reaching for either guy, which is why they couldn't trade the pick. They tried to trade it too, because they knew they'd get the top QB if they did trade down. They could have traded down to 10 and got Smith. Most teams at the top of the draft didn't want EITHER GUY.

DRM08 09-19-2018 12:13 PM

Some of the comments about Webb and Mahomes make me shake my head. Watched every snap of those guys at Tech. Webb has a big arm but he struggles with accuracy. I don’t mean completion percentage, I mean putting the ball on the money for YAC. Mahomes was an immediate upgrade in this area. Kind of important to set up your receiver for YAC in the Air Raid offense.

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2018 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 13744962)
Okay, so look...

People can give me shit for liking Geno Smith to the degree that I did. That's fine. But they should also know that I while I was thinking with my heart, I was moreso thinking from a perspective of, "Well, what ****ing better choice do we have at 1.1 in this draft class considering who's on our team and what we need?" Luke ****ing Joeckel? That's who all the NFL Draft guys wanted us to take. The fact that Dorsey took Fisher is inconsequential to the idea that you may as well aim high and fail spectacularly even if it doesn't work out.

However, assholes like King need to realize that for every QB you take pride in that you correctly pooh-poohed, you deserve MORE criticism than the people who dream if you get a guy wrong.

If you were to pick any drafted QB in a given draft class, what are the odds that guy will be a bust? 80%? 90%? 95%? It's easy to say, "Geno is a bust." It's easy to say that about any QB barring the ones everybody slobbers over like Andrew Luck.

So that means when you get one of those picks dead wrong, you should get ****ed way harder than somebody who ****ing DARED to pick a QB who would actually succeed.

Just my opinion, of course.

Geno Smith was NEVER going to be an NFL QB.

carcosa 09-19-2018 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12824173)
The only people who believe Mahomes is a first rounder are desperate fans.

lol

SAUTO 09-19-2018 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13745898)
Geno Smith was NEVER going to be an NFL QB.

He still is, isn't he?

wazu 09-22-2018 05:22 PM

This thread is a gold mine! The good news is no matter where anybody stood on Mahomes at the time, we are all smiling now.

FlopMahomesNuts 09-24-2018 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12826971)
I'll gladly eat a monster pile of Geno Smith level shit if I'm wrong about this kid. If I'm right, there's a few that need to belly up to the table as well.

this thread is GREAT!!!

Buehler445 09-24-2018 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13745898)
Geno Smith was NEVER going to be an NFL QB.

Except you know, he is. And has been for 5 years (longer than the average career)

Al Bundy 09-24-2018 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12824173)
The only people who believe Mahomes is a first rounder are desperate fans.

Yo.

kccrow 09-24-2018 02:00 PM

The ascent of my man-crush on Mahomes... Probably more comedy gold in these...

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307108

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307367

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307102

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306744

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306566
1. Patrick Mahomes II - QB - Texas Tech (6'2" 225)
Solidly built QB with a rocket arm and the ability to make throws on the run and off balance. Gunslinger mentality that can get him into to trouble at times, but if he learns to play less backyard football in a system that sets him up for success and better protection, he should ascend. Despite awkward deliveries at times, still hits a requisite completion percentage and has a healthy TD to INT ratio. Those numbers should improve in a more refined NFL. From all accounts he has the mental fortitude to learn an NFL offense and be successful. Boom or bust type with a big arm similar to Brett Favre and Matthew Stafford if he works at his craft. Excellent pocket awareness that allows him to run to extend plays. Generally sets his feet and delivers strikes to all areas of the field from a clean pocket. Most mechanical issues come to surface under pressure, but seems to make plays few QBs will make. Throws with good trajectory and touch on deep balls and corner routes. Lays balls softly into the hands of backs and tight ends underneath. Will need to learn to make read progressions after coming from Air Raid. Needs to become a better decision maker and lay off putting the ball in to crowded windows in the NFL.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306077

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305915

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305348

KChiefs1 09-28-2018 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12825695)
What? No. Aaron Rodgers was in no way comparable to Pat Mahomes. He was always going to go in the first round, that's why people were shocked he dropped so far.

This revisionist history on actual, legit first round QBs to prop up this middling prospect is embarrassing.



LMAO

kccrow 09-29-2018 06:21 AM

I started in the same spot as Clay on Mahomes... January I was like nah, this kid is no way going first 3 rounds. Then just started watching everything on the kid and it went from there to having him mocked in the first to KC February forward. There were more than a few that kept the belief I had, and Clay isn't the only one. Can't really fault him for that thought process. Hell, there were plenty of media "experts" that didn't kept that thought process throughout.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.