ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Our d-line is just disappointing. Time to start over again. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263465)

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 8898207)
20 rushes, 67 yds = 3.1ypc = meh, not good when it's only 20 carries in a game.

I'll put it this way, 3.1ypc isn't going to scare OC's away from the run game. What did effect this game was the fact the Falcons score on short field possessions. That means this defense got off easy in terms of PG stats. It was a lot worse than stats indicate, mugs.

I don't know man. It looked like they stopped them pretty well. Even Rodgers, who is a speed freak like Charles and Spiller. The best run I saw all day was the Matt Ryan TD run.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-10-2012 12:26 PM

The guys on Sirius were saying we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. We'd be dominate if we ran a 4-3 they said.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898227)
Anybody from the Patriots that can do that? :D


Seriously though.....Poe needs to be rotating in at DE. Powe showed flashes at NT. He should be getting snaps there.

I want Powe to be good. He was my favorite pick last year. He hardly played against the ones in the preseason. I saw him a little yesterday. I don't think we can really say we know the whole story there. However, I somewhat agree. I think rotating Poe across the WHOLE d-line would be pretty special. To this point, Poe has been much better than Powe in my opinion. We need Powe to be more destructive if he is going to be the starting NT. He's just not as destructive as Poe yet. Powe had a sack in the preseason but Poe has collapsed the pocket multiple times. He has made plays in every game.

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898227)
Anybody from the Patriots that can do that? :D


Seriously though.....Poe needs to be rotating in at DE. Powe showed flashes at NT. He should be getting snaps there.

I'm fine with Poe playing both.


The main thing i want is for the Oline to not be so comfortable with our DLine. The 2-gap system is very passive for the DLine. They intentionally engage the Oline and that takes a lot of pressure off the offensive lineman.

Now if every so often the Dline would just attack then the offensive lineman couldn't be so comfortable with their techniques etc.

1 down the Dline is responsible for 2-gap and have to maintain position

next down the Dline attacks and the linebackers have to be responsible for 1 of the gaps.

This would screw with the Olines blocking assignments and we would create more broken play and have guys running open in the backfield.

JMO

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898132)
Are you mentally challenged?

Brian Orapko, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing, Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman would have been far better selections than Jackson, as would Alex Mack, Jeremy Maclin, Percy Harvin, Eric Wood or Vontae Davis.

Tyson Jackson would have been a good choice in the third round. Number three overall?

Not so much.

Hindsight is 20/20. This is a horrible post. Look at the next ten picks after ours. Everyone passed on the guys you list there. The earliest any of those guys went was #13.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8898213)
I LOVE this idea. Absolutely love it.

Which is why it'll never happen.

Plus, Pioli's set in his ways. If he's here next year, you can damn sure bet they'll be running the same schemes on both sides of the ball.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 12:35 PM

Poe could be a better DE than NT and Pioli would refuse to move him because it would be admitting a mistake.

HemiEd 09-10-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898110)
Second, Look at the picks the year Pioli took Jackson. They aren't very good players. maybe we could have taken Raji but he hasn't been that great. Jackson looks pretty good to me when you look at that class. I'm not really sure where you think we were going to get an impact player in that bunch?

Green Bay found one, similar to when they found Rodgers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Matthews_III

The Franchise 09-10-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898287)
Green Bay found one, similar to when they found Rodgers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Matthews_III

And IIRC....didn't they trade back into the 1st round to get him?

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898261)
Hindsight is 20/20. This is a horrible post. Look at the next ten picks after ours. Everyone passed on the guys you list there. The earliest any of those guys went was #13.

Urine idiot.

I'd suggest you stop posting and have a brain scan asap.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:42 PM

The only way that Dallas 1 gap system would work is if we moved Jackson to NT and we aren't going to do that. He has rotated in there a little bit in the past and it didn't work. Essentially, we have ran this formation as a sub package in previous years with little success. The only 1 gap we currently run is with Poe at NT. Romeo has talked about it before.

Maybe we would have done this more if we had signed Franklin but we didn't. It would be stupid to run this defense because we don't have the personnel. Also, Bailey hasn't done shit lately and you are crazy if you think he could take a JJ Watt type of role.

The problem isn't the defense. It's the injuries imo.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898274)
Poe could be a better DE than NT and Pioli would refuse to move him because it would be admitting a mistake.

Pioli has no say on how Romeo uses Poe.... Why do people think he does???

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898287)
Green Bay found one, similar to when they found Rodgers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Matthews_III

:banghead: This concept is to big for some of you to understand.

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898300)
Pioli has no say on how Romeo uses Poe.... Why do people think he does???

because they are paranoid and hate Pioli

They think that Pioli forced Haley to suck, bugged his phone and did all sorts of ridiculous crap.

Ace Gunner 09-10-2012 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898236)
I don't know man. It looked like they stopped them pretty well. Even Rodgers, who is a speed freak like Charles and Spiller. The best run I saw all day was the Matt Ryan TD run.

I think they are planning to replace Dorsey with Poe until they can find another guy to play that RDE position.

I thought Poe played okay yesterday, which is a huge jump compared to other Chiefs DL who started as a rook. And, he did it at the position perhaps most challenging -- NT.

Jackson played okay, got some push. Rapoli played LDE and did okay. Bailey played alright but needs to finish now.

They have some guys from recent draft/FA aquisitions, but there are no veteran players to learn from and to me, that is a huge deficit with this team.

BossChief 09-10-2012 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898274)
Poe could be a better DE than NT and Pioli would refuse to move him because it would be admitting a mistake.

What makes you think this?

The responsibilities of ends and the NT in this defense are nearly identical.

Did you go to ups house and watch a bunch of Memphis games or something?

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 8898316)
I think they are planning to replace Dorsey with Poe until they can find another guy to play that RDE position.

I thought Poe played okay yesterday, which is a huge jump compared to other Chiefs DL who started as a rook. And, he did it at the position perhaps most challenging -- NT.

Jackson played okay, got some push. Rapoli played LDE and did okay. Bailey played alright but needs to finish now.

They have some guys from recent draft/FA aquisitions, but there are no veteran players to learn from and to me, that is a huge deficit with this team.

Dorsey has been pretty good considering he's not really built for the 3-4 DE position. He is a large part of the reason for Hali's success. He helps Hali stay one vs. one. I won't be suprised if they resign Dorsey but he will probably walk.

A vet would be nice.

HemiEd 09-10-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898291)
And IIRC....didn't they trade back into the 1st round to get him?

yep, they took Raji with their first pick. No talent whatsoever in that draft.

HemiEd 09-10-2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898300)



:banghead: This concept is to big for some of you to understand.

Please help me understand.

Green Bay killed that draft, and they have a history of doing so.

MahiMike 09-10-2012 12:55 PM

Agreed. I don't give a shit if it's our personnel or our scheme. I don't care if they put Jerrell Powe at safety and run him around the end. Just do SOMETHING different. Watching that game last night, I saw 2 QB's scrambling for their lives. Our guys aren't scary w/halloween masks on.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898328)
yep, they took Raji with their first pick. No talent whatsoever in that draft.

Raji hasn't been that good. He's had one good year and is about equal to Jackson as far as his whole body of work.

Everyone in the top 10 missed on guys like Mathews and that's the point. that is well known to be the worst draft class and biggest crapshoot of all time. We came out OK.

The Pack had Ted Thompson who is one of the best. Which goes back to my original point. It's stupid just to take a QB in the top 10 for the sake of taking one. We need to know what we are taking. Getting a bad QB can set you back further than any position.

Molitoth 09-10-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Our d-line is just disappointing. Time to start over again.
No thanks. No more wasted D-Line picks. How about a QB for once?

the Talking Can 09-10-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898340)
Raji hasn't been that good. He's had one good year and is about equal to Jackson as far as his whole body of work.

jesus

HemiEd 09-10-2012 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898340)
Raji hasn't been that good. He's had one good year and is about equal to Jackson.

Everyone in the top 10 missed on guys like Mathews and that's the point. that is well known to be the worst draft class and biggest crapshoot of all time. We came out OK.

We came out ok? I am going on memory here, but didn't the Chiefs have about 10 picks?

Who is left on the team from that draft? Jackson and Succop? Washington?

I would take Raji, Lang and Mathews over that trio, even though I do agree Jackson is improving. (his contract about to come up?)

BossChief 09-10-2012 01:02 PM

Raji might be the most overrated player this board has a love affair with IMO.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898340)
Raji hasn't been that good. He's had one good year and is about equal to Jackson as far as his whole body of work.

Everyone in the top 10 missed on guys like Mathews and that's the point. that is well known to be the worst draft class and biggest crapshoot of all time. We came out OK.

The Pack had Ted Thompson who is one of the best. Which goes back to my original point. It's stupid just to take a QB in the top 10 for the sake of taking one. We need to know what we are taking. Getting a bad QB can set you back further than any position.

You are either a mult or the dumbest ****ing person on Chiefsplanet.

ChiefsCountry 09-10-2012 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898351)
You are either a mult or the dumbest ****ing person on Chiefsplanet.

He came from the Colation. That should explain it for you.

the Talking Can 09-10-2012 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8898349)
Raji might be the most overrated player this board has a love affair with IMO.

feel free to compare his first years to jackson for us...thanks

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8898349)
Raji might be the most overrated player this board has a love affair with IMO.

Considering the fact that the Packers can't stop anyone and their defense flat out sucks, I think it's hard to know Raji's value at this point in time.

Put him on a defense surrounded by talent and he could be a top ten defensive lineman.

Tombstone RJ 09-10-2012 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898314)
because they are paranoid and hate Pioli

They think that Pioli forced Haley to suck, bugged his phone and did all sorts of ridiculous crap.

well the man did leave a candy wrapper on the floor for two weeks just to see if anyone would pick it up... :)

LVNHACK 09-10-2012 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898058)
I don't get it.


You should stop right there.....Most intelligent thing you've ****ing posted in 1,104 tries...

Buckweath 09-10-2012 01:07 PM

Some of you guys are ridiculous. That Chiefs defense, without Berry, was 11th overall last year, and 4th in the second half of last season after those dreadful first few games where the whole team was unprepared.

Didn't you see watch Chiefs football when this D was dominant against Big Ben, Aaron Rodgers, and Tom Brady for a half?

What did you guys really expect to do against probably a top 3-5 passing offense, when missing your two most important players against the pass in Hali and Flowers and a guy like Lewis who is underrated and whom is good in coverage, better than Elam?

Between Hali, Houston, and Poe and Bailey when they develop, the Chiefs are fine at passrushing.

Remember, 6th in passing defense last year despite no Erib Berry and playing the likes of Rodgers, Big Ben, Brady and others.

As for Dorsey and Jackson, they are solid players. You just can't hit on every first round pick, no matter how high. Compare the Chiefs first round picks since 2005 with the rest of the league, the Chiefs have had great success with their 1st round picks overall.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8898349)
Raji might be the most overrated player this board has a love affair with IMO.

Thanks man and good post. Green Bay hasn't been the same since Jenkins left.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898314)
because they are paranoid and hate Pioli

They think that Pioli forced Haley to suck, bugged his phone and did all sorts of ridiculous crap.

Where there's smoke, there's fire.

I have a friend from junior high and high school that's worked for the Chiefs off and on for the past two decades.

Let's just say that his stories aren't much different than what Babb reported.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8898354)
He came from the Colation. That should explain it for you.

JFC.

These people should be required to take an intelligence test before posting here.

BossChief 09-10-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8898356)
feel free to compare his first years to jackson for us...thanks

We are both biased in different ways.

The unbiased opinion (PFF) had Tyson as the better player last year.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898340)
Everyone in the top 10 missed on guys like Mathews and that's the point. that is well known to be the worst draft class and biggest crapshoot of all time. We came out OK.

No, the point is that Scott Pioli is paid $5 million dollars per year to be smarter than not only the other 31 GM's in the NFL, but smarter than the average poster on a football forum.

And the Chiefs did NOT come out "OK".

JFC, I've just about run out of adjectives for your dumbassery.

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 8898369)
Some of you guys are ridiculous. That Chiefs defense, without Berry, was 11th overall last year, and 4th in the second half of last season after those dreadful first few games where the whole team was unprepared.

Didn't you see watch Chiefs football when this D was dominant against Big Ben, Aaron Rodgers, and Tom Brady for a half?

What did you guys really expect to do against probably a top 3-5 passing offense, when missing your two most important players against the pass in Hali and Flowers and a guy like Lewis who is underrated and whom is good in coverage, better than Elam?

Between Hali, Houston, and Poe and Bailey when they develop, the Chiefs are fine at passrushing.

Remember, 6th in passing defense last year despite no Erib Berry and playing the likes of Rodgers, Big Ben, Brady and others.

As for Dorsey and Jackson, they are solid players. You just can't hit on every first round pick, no matter how high. Compare the Chiefs first round picks since 2005 with the rest of the league, the Chiefs have had great success with their 1st round picks overall.

understood but i want our defense to be more flexible.

Crennel seems to have 2 ways of calling a defense ... bend/don't break and super bend/don't break.

We gotta have more

Buckweath 09-10-2012 01:12 PM

People criticize Dorsey and Jackson for not being good enough against the pass but the Chiefs D finished 6th overall in pass D and 26th in rush D last year, how funny is that?

And I'll add that they were 14th overall in YPC allowed.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8898375)
We are both biased in different ways.

The unbiased opinion (PFF) had Tyson as the better player last year.

Who gives a shit. Really?

The Packers were 15-1 last year and won the Super Bowl since Raji was drafted.

Neither the Chiefs nor Jackson have done dick in that time period.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898382)
understood but i want our defense to be more flexible.

Crennel seems to have 2 ways of calling a defense ... bend/don't break and super bend/don't break.

We gotta have more

He's 65. Therefore, I don't think you're going to see anything more.

the Talking Can 09-10-2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8898375)
We are both biased in different ways.

The unbiased opinion (PFF) had Tyson as the better player last year.

their careers are not equal...to the eye, or the stats

Jackson was a complete worthless pussy his first two years in the league...not bad, worthless...

i'm not even going to bother with stats to refute this nonsense from blackbob:

Quote:

Raji hasn't been that good. He's had one good year and is about equal to Jackson as far as his whole body of work.

Molitoth 09-10-2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Crennel seems to have 2 ways of calling a defense ... bend/don't break and super bend/don't break.
Yesterday we saw bend over and take it right up the ass.
That's 3 ways.

BigMeatballDave 09-10-2012 01:16 PM

Devil's 3 way.

BoneKrusher 09-10-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 8898391)
Yesterday we saw bend over and take it right up the ass.
That's 3 ways.

good one. :D

HemiEd 09-10-2012 01:21 PM

Perhaps, but saying that draft class was bad is not accurate. GB has 3 starters from that class that I know of. The Chiefs had more picks, and higher picks.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898407)
Perhaps, but saying that draft class was bad is not accurate. GB has 3 starters from that class that I know of. The Chiefs had more picks, and higher picks.

Blackbob is a drooling, slobbering Mongo.

There were plenty of first rounders that would have had a bigger, more immediate and long term impact than Tyson Jackson.

And if the draft was bad, why didn't Cannoli trade back to pick up, well, anything? Future draft choices? Later 2009 choices? Anything?

The Franchise 09-10-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898414)
Blackbob is a drooling, slobbering Mongo.

There were plenty of first rounders that would have had a bigger, more immediate and long term impact than Tyson Jackson.

And if the draft was bad, why didn't Cannoli trade back to pick up, well, anything? Future draft choices? Later 2009 choices? Anything?

Check my sig for some more Blackbob reeruned thoughts.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8898407)
Perhaps, but saying that draft class was bad is not accurate. GB has 3 starters from that class that I know of. The Chiefs had more picks, and higher picks.

No, we traded our second for Cassel which was smart because it was a bad class. Green bay had two firsts. The one they took mathews with was one of the few trades in the first round. If I remember right, there were fewer trades in the first round of that draft than any other in history.

The only guys from that class that are still on the packers are Mathews, Raji, and Lang.

The only guys left on the Chiefs roster are O'connell, Jackson, and Succop. However, we traded McGee to Tampa and it was good we got something for him.

You can argue that Pioli failed because he didn't move back into the first but that's about it. Like I said, there weren't many trades and Green Bay got lucky. They gave a second and two thirds to the Pats to get him. It was the year the Pats had all of those 2nd and 3rds and they bombed. A second for Cassel and Vrabel was a good deal imo. Even if Cassel is just a back up it's a good deal. Vrabel really helped Hali learn what he was doing.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898414)
Blackbob is a drooling, slobbering Mongo.

There were plenty of first rounders that would have had a bigger, more immediate and long term impact than Tyson Jackson.

And if the draft was bad, why didn't Cannoli trade back to pick up, well, anything? Future draft choices? Later 2009 choices? Anything?

No one wanted to trade because the draft class was shit.

Also, not only did Jenkins leaving hurt Raji but, it also hurt Mathews. Both are good players but how good?

They sure got run over last night.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898446)
No, we traded our second for Cassel which was smart because it was a bad class. Green bay had two firsts. The one they took mathews with was one of the few trades in the first round. If I remember right, there were fewer trades in the first round of that draft than any other in history.

The only guys from that class that are still on the packers are Mathews, Raji, and Lang.

The only guys left on the Chiefs roster are O'connell, Jackson, and Succop. However, we traded McGee to Tampa and it was good we got something for him.

You can argue that Pioli failed because he didn't move back into the first but that's about it. Like I said, there weren't many trades and Green Bay got lucky. They gave a second and two thirds to the Pats to get him. It was the year the Pats had all of those 2nd and 3rds and they bombed. A second for Cassel and Vrabel was a good deal imo. Even if Cassel is just a back up it's a good deal. Vrabel really helped Hali learn what he was doing.

AIDS gunfire

:bang:

HemiEd 09-10-2012 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8898414)
Blackbob is a drooling, slobbering Mongo.

There were plenty of first rounders that would have had a bigger, more immediate and long term impact than Tyson Jackson.

And if the draft was bad, why didn't Cannoli trade back to pick up, well, anything? Future draft choices? Later 2009 choices? Anything?

Yep,
That is one BB card he hasn't played yet, and it sure would have been nice.


drum roll please, waiting for the excuses that Pioli didn't have time to prepare for that draft.

I hear it, it's coming.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898446)
Vrabel really helped Hali learn what he was doing.

****ing excuse me?

No he didn't.

Hoover 09-10-2012 01:41 PM

People just look for stats like tackles and sacks from D-Linemen. That's not their job.

I would have liked to see this game played with Hali, Flowers, and Lewis.

That is all.

DaneMcCloud 09-10-2012 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898455)
****ing excuse me?

No he didn't.

This guy HAS to be a mult or troll.

No one is this ****ing stupid.

Fish 09-10-2012 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898455)
****ing excuse me?

No he didn't.

There were reports that Vrabel was about the most unfriendly guy in the locker room, and was never any kind of team player..

Molitoth 09-10-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 8898476)
There were reports that Vrabel was about the most unfriendly guy in the locker room, and was never any kind of team player..

Can you blame him? He went from the Pats to rebuilding Chiefs.
See Randy Moss.

Nobody would be glad getting traded from Champion to shitfest.

Except Cassel, whom got to fulfill his dream of casting an illusion over a GM and a good percentage of the chiefs idiotic fanbase.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898455)
****ing excuse me?

No he didn't.

He didn't make the move from 4-3 DE to 3-4 OLB just like Hali did? That wasn't part of the reason Pioli wanted him in the trade?

Black Bob 09-10-2012 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 8898476)
There were reports that Vrabel was about the most unfriendly guy in the locker room, and was never any kind of team player..

Then why did the players vote him captain twice? He looked like a leader on Sundays to me...

Molitoth 09-10-2012 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898490)
Then why did the players vote him captain twice? He looked like a leader on Sundays to me...

Why is the american public voting for Obama or Romney?

The Franchise 09-10-2012 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898486)
He didn't make the move from 4-3 DE to 3-4 OLB just like Hali did? That wasn't part of the reason Pioli wanted him in the trade?

So in your ****ed up head.....that means that Vrabel showed Hali how to make the transition?

The Franchise 09-10-2012 01:56 PM

Oh...and in response to your neg rep message...

Quote:

I went 2-4 yesterday. Bowe was a none factor and DJ missed a tackle at 10:02 in the 2nd. McCluster looked quicker to me too but, that's just speculation LOL
Bowe was a non-factor because Cassel never looked past the TEs or McCluster.

What did Siler do again?

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898502)
So in your ****ed up head.....that means that Vrabel showed Hali how to make the transition?

He helped dumbass. I said he helped. Hali's transformation was one of the keys to turing things around when Pioli got the job, no? Vrabel was brought in to be a leader and help Hali transition.

Also, the locker room reports were bullshit.

Quote:

He endured daily “old man” jokes and took plenty of flack for his bizarre styling of facial hair. Vrabel even saw the nameplate over his locker replaced with “Jerry Atricks” midway through the 2010 season.

He never removed it.

But make no mistake. When it came down to learning what it takes to be a successful NFL player, there were no jokes. Vrabel was the center of attention and his teammates were always listening.

The way Vrabel gained respect was simple. Plenty of aging players can pull out a resume of past success, but Vrabel lived it every day.

Vrabel knew just as much as anyone else that the game would eventually pass him by. It was only a matter of time before a younger, quicker, stronger, new generation of football player unseated Vrabel as a starter.

Instead of shying away from competition, Vrabel embraced it.

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...3-d495c4cbb17f

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898506)
Oh...and in response to your neg rep message...



Bowe was a non-factor because Cassel never looked past the TEs or McCluster.

What did Siler do again?

He didn't look at Bowe because he knew he was covered. Don't worry, we still get Champ twice and Joe Haden late in the year. Other than that, it should be smooth sailing for Bowe this year. It's hands down the easiest CB schedule he's ever faced.

Siler didn't miss a tackle like DJ did. I know that much. It might have been better if he had started.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898525)
He helped dumbass. I said he helped. Hali's transformation was one of the keys to turing things around when Pioli got the job, no? Vrabel was brought in to be a leader and help Hali transition.

Also, the locker room reports were bullshit.

Show me where he specifically helped out Hali. All it says in the article is this...

Quote:

He worked daily in developing Andy Studebaker, a mid-20s ball of energy that continually pushed the veteran for playing time. At the time of his arrival, Vrabel was the only outside linebacker on the Chiefs roster with any experience at the position. Everyone else was a converted defensive end.
Yeah.....I'm so glad he rubbed off on Studebaker. You know....the OLB that shouldn't be on the field.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898532)
He didn't look at Bowe because he knew he was covered. Don't worry, we still get Champ twice and Joe Haden late in the year. Other than that, it should be smooth sailing for Bowe this year. It's hands down the easiest CB schedule he's ever faced.

Siler didn't miss a tackle like DJ did. I know that much. It might have been better if he had started.

Yeah it's easy to never miss a tackle when you're never on the field to attempt one.

Fish 09-10-2012 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898532)
He didn't look at Bowe because he knew he was covered.

Quite an impressive feat. Also explains a lot...

NJChiefsFan 09-10-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898532)
He didn't look at Bowe because he knew he was covered. Don't worry, we still get Champ twice and Joe Haden late in the year. Other than that, it should be smooth sailing for Bowe this year. It's hands down the easiest CB schedule he's ever faced.

Siler didn't miss a tackle like DJ did. I know that much. It might have been better if he had started.

You got a lot of things wrong yesterday. Perhaps not talking about what you got right would be wise. Not to mention that nobody denied the fact that DJ could miss a tackle during the game. You yourself said every LB will.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898547)
Show me where he specifically helped out Hali. All it says in the article is this...

How about you just add it to your list man? LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 8898569)
You got a lot of things wrong yesterday. Perhaps not talking about what you got right would be wise. Not to mention that nobody denied the fact that DJ could miss a tackle during the game. You yourself said every LB will.

I'm not starting it. There is alot more that pertains to this conversation that I got right that I am not even going to get into. That's not my style. The bottom line is that my only mistake is being an idiot for falling into Pest's trap and talking football with him.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898576)
How about you just add it to your list man? LMAO



I'm not starting it. There is alot more that pertains to this conversation that I got right that I am not even going to get into. That's not my style. The bottom line is that my only mistake is being an idiot for falling into Pest's trap and talking football with him.

How about you back up the bullshit that you spout off about?

Show me where Vrabel helped Hali.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898600)
How about you back up the bullshit that you spout off about?

Show me where Vrabel helped Hali.

Not yet. You have to ask me nicely.

New World Order 09-10-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 8898369)
Some of you guys are ridiculous. That Chiefs defense, without Berry, was 11th overall last year, and 4th in the second half of last season after those dreadful first few games where the whole team was unprepared.

Didn't you see watch Chiefs football when this D was dominant against Big Ben, Aaron Rodgers, and Tom Brady for a half?

What did you guys really expect to do against probably a top 3-5 passing offense, when missing your two most important players against the pass in Hali and Flowers and a guy like Lewis who is underrated and whom is good in coverage, better than Elam?

Between Hali, Houston, and Poe and Bailey when they develop, the Chiefs are fine at passrushing.

Remember, 6th in passing defense last year despite no Erib Berry and playing the likes of Rodgers, Big Ben, Brady and others.

As for Dorsey and Jackson, they are solid players. You just can't hit on every first round pick, no matter how high. Compare the Chiefs first round picks since 2005 with the rest of the league, the Chiefs have had great success with their 1st round picks overall.


Chiefs fans continually underestimate Brandon Carr, a lockdown corner who we need. Remember the last game of the year when we played Denver? We were able to stack the box to contain Tebow and the running game and play lockdown man to man on the outside with Carr and Flowers, do you think we could do that with Routt?

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 8898617)
Chiefs fans continually underestimate Brandon Carr, a lockdown corner who we need. Remember the last game of the year when we played Denver? We were able to stack the box to contain Tebow and the running game and play lockdown man to man on the outside with Carr and Flowers, do you think we could do that with Routt?

No kidding. Remember the game Brandon Lloyd came into Arrowhead leading the league in receiving yards and Carr covered him all day and held him to zero catches? I'm happy to see the guy get a chance to be the #1 and follow receivers wherever they go. He's one of the best cover corners in the league and it's cool to see him shadow people.

The Franchise 09-10-2012 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898608)
Not yet. You have to ask me nicely.

That's what I thought.

Go **** yourself. You have no credibility around here.

Bump 09-10-2012 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8898625)
No kidding. Remember the game Brandon Lloyd came into Arrowhead leading the league in receiving yards and Carr covered him all day and held him to zero catches? I'm happy to see the guy get a chance to be the #1 and follow receivers wherever they go. He's one of the best cover corners in the league and it's cool to see him shadow people.

ya, letting Carr go is gonna be right up there with Joe Horn and Rich Gannon.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 8898628)
That's what I thought.

Go **** yourself. You have no credibility around here.

He is coaching linebackers at Ohio State. Ask nicely and quit being a dick and I'll show you. Otherwise, just put it on your list Mr. Meany pants. Isn't this exactly like the DJ argument? I mean is it common place to know that DJ misses tackles and Vrabel taught Tamba as well as Studebaker?

Ace Gunner 09-10-2012 02:33 PM

ROFL at "credibility around here"

BoneKrusher 09-10-2012 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8898630)
ya, letting Carr go is gonna be right up there with Joe Horn and Rich Gannon.

yep.

Black Bob 09-10-2012 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 8898640)
ROFL at "credibility around here"

No kidding... what makes you credible? Telling someone you hope they get aids?:)

Mr. Laz 09-10-2012 02:35 PM

well i see that this thread has turned to total shit.

*sigh*

BoneKrusher 09-10-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 8898647)
well i see that this thread has turned to total shit.

*sigh*

well you shouldn't have posted in it and it would still be fine. :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.