ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Vindication for Carl? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191801)

007 09-16-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5027317)
You're probably right and that is why if they don't win 1 game by the bye week I see no use for him to still be the head coach. That would make 15 straight losses.

Agreed on that. I see no use for him now.

OF course, I saw no use for him when they hired him.:#

Valiant 09-16-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5027292)
I think you're missing the point of the article. He's saying that maybe Carl knew best and Chiefs fans really can't stomach a true rebuild.

I think your a ignorant twunt if you believe this is a true rebuild..

BigRock 09-16-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5027296)
**** the fans.

They don't know shit.

That's exactly what this column is saying. Why are you attacking it?

Hammock Parties 09-16-2008 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 5027321)
I think your a ignorant twunt if you believe this is a true rebuild..

What is it, then?

Valiant 09-16-2008 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5027301)
I totally agree. Heck I don't really care if they win or lose just as long as the effort is there and you can see improvement. These young guys are going to make mistakes and I could care less about that.

What I don't want to see is the head coach playing all safe and conservative and not letting the full potential of these young guys shine through. That means stop running 90% of the time up the middle on first and second down.

And this is what the dumb ****ers are doing so far through two games.. They knew we would not be in contention, but they are still not putting their young players in situations to progress..

007 09-16-2008 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 5027329)
And this is what the dumb ****ers are doing so far through two games.. They knew we would not be in contention, but they are still not putting their young players in situations to progress..

1st down run it up the gut. BRILLIANT:cuss:

SBK 09-16-2008 10:58 PM

We're missing 3 key things for a proper rebuild.

GM
Coach
QB

Other than that we're on our way.

dirk digler 09-16-2008 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 5027329)
And this is what the dumb ****ers are doing so far through two games.. They knew we would not be in contention, but they are still not putting their young players in situations to progress..

Yep. If it was me I would be throwing 2 out of 3 downs and let it all hang out.

Same thing on D. Just blitz like a mother****er and let the young rooks go 1 one 1 the whole game.

dirk digler 09-16-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5027339)
We're missing 3 key things for a proper rebuild.

GM
Coach
QB

Other than that we're on our way.

So what you are saying is that we are pretty much screwed? :D

SBK 09-16-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5027339)
We're missing 3 key things for a proper rebuild.

GM
Coach
QB

Other than that we're on our way.

Well, that 'coach' part should really be the whole staff, so it's a lot more than 3 things....

Fish 09-16-2008 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5027301)
I totally agree. Heck I don't really care if they win or lose just as long as the effort is there and you can see improvement. These young guys are going to make mistakes and I could care less about that.

What I don't want to see is the head coach playing all safe and conservative and not letting the full potential of these young guys shine through. That means stop running 90% of the time up the middle on first and second down.

I really think they're trying to protect the young guys by keeping it conservative and trying to get momentum going with the simple stuff. But for the love of bacon, they've got to get to the point where they say "**** it, let them make mistakes in the passing game, and hopefully the improvement will outweigh the mistakes." With the state of the OLine, that could be a "win big - lose big" decision, but hell it's not like it would ruin the season's aspirations....

Gotta let the dogs loose, or we'll never know what we've got.....

dirk digler 09-16-2008 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5027352)
I really think they're trying to protect the young guys by keeping it conservative and trying to get momentum going with the simple stuff. But for the love of bacon, they've got to get to the point where they say "**** it, let them make mistakes in the passing game, and hopefully the improvement will outweigh the mistakes." With the state of the OLine, that could be a "win big - lose big" decision, but hell it's not like it would ruin the season's aspirations....

Gotta let the dogs loose, or we'll never know what we've got.....

100% agree Fish :thumb:

teedubya 09-16-2008 11:22 PM

Carl can lick my unwashed taint. **** him. And Herm can eat cow dingleberries. **** that guy.

I don't mind rebuilding, when it looks like the person running the team has sense. This ****ing moron starts calling stupid shit. How about basic foundational shit so the team can actually build a solid foundation.

No, lets throw the ****ing option in there, because its part of our long term winning strategy.

Did I mention **** CARL?

FAX 09-16-2008 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5027352)
I really think they're trying to protect the young guys by keeping it conservative and trying to get momentum going with the simple stuff. But for the love of bacon, they've got to get to the point where they say "**** it, let them make mistakes in the passing game, and hopefully the improvement will outweigh the mistakes." With the state of the OLine, that could be a "win big - lose big" decision, but hell it's not like it would ruin the season's aspirations....

Gotta let the dogs loose, or we'll never know what we've got.....

Your words of fishiness ring loudly through the gill slits of truth.

FAX

FAX 09-16-2008 11:40 PM

So ... let me get this straight ... the article vindicates Carl because it states that Carl's demeaning, disrespectful view of the fans is a more accurate, appropriate assessment than Clark's? Is that right?

FAX

BigRock 09-17-2008 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5027461)
So ... let me get this straight ... the article vindicates Carl because it states that Carl's demeaning, disrespectful view of the fans is a more accurate, appropriate assessment than Clark's? Is that right?

Pretty much, yeah. But is it really a demeaning, disrespectful view if it's true? Why not just say "accurate view"?

Logical 09-17-2008 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5027247)
Vindication for Carl?

This is some funny ****ing shit.

The Chiefs are rebuilding and have been in need of a complete enema for more than a ****ing decade.

Yet, Kansas City's main psychiatrist, Carl Peterson, has a solution.

The Chiefs need to be just good enough to give the good people of Kansas City hope. Hope that they'll be in the NFL playoffs and once you're in the "tournament", great things can happen.

Well **** me with a goddamn crystal plunger!

Carl Peterson for President of the Universe!

All Chiefs fans need is HOPE!

AND CHANGE (entire front office to start)

DaneMcCloud 09-17-2008 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5027461)
So ... let me get this straight ... the article vindicates Carl because it states that Carl's demeaning, disrespectful view of the fans is a more accurate, appropriate assessment than Clark's? Is that right?

FAX

In a word, Yes.

Pure, utter bullshit.

Boris The Great 09-17-2008 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5027574)
In a word, Yes.

Pure, utter bullshit.

Except that it is 100% correct. Most of the fans who talked a good game this offseason turned out to be frauds. They say they want a winner, but they gladly spend their money for Carl and his 9-7 crap year after year. And when the team tries to do the right things to build a winner, they freak out because losing ruins their Sunday afternoon.

If the Chiefs had gone out and spent a bunch of cash on overpriced overrated FAs this offseason, the seats would still be full and everyone would be lapping up Carls BS about how the team was just a few players away.

All the masses really care about is a shiny object to distract them on Sunday. How else do you explain the obsession people still have with Dick Vermeil, even though he never won anything and his years here were a disaster for the team.

Tribal Warfare 09-17-2008 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 5027607)
Except that it is 100% correct. Most of the fans who talked a good game this offseason turned out to be frauds. They say they want a winner, but they gladly spend their money for Carl and his 9-7 crap year after year. And when the team tries to do the right things to build a winner, they freak out because losing ruins their Sunday afternoon.

If the Chiefs had gone out and spent a bunch of cash on overpriced overrated FAs this offseason, the seats would still be full and everyone would be lapping up Carls BS about how the team was just a few players away.

All the masses really care about is a shiny object to distract them on Sunday. How else do you explain the obsession people still have with Dick Vermeil, even though he never won anything and his years here were a disaster for the team.

I'll repeat once again, I understand KC is in a rebuilding phase, but their is no signs of progress or signs that the process is working. Essentially, they don't know WTF they are doing.

007 09-17-2008 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5027610)
I'll repeat once again, I understand KC is in a rebuilding phase, but their is no signs of progress or signs that the process is working. Essentially, they don't know WTF they are doing.

He obviously doesn't understand what you understand.

BigRock 09-17-2008 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5027610)
I'll repeat once again, I understand KC is in a rebuilding phase, but their is no signs of progress or signs that the process is working. Essentially, they don't know WTF they are doing.

Because there really should be visible, tangible progress. After two games.

triple 09-17-2008 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5027461)
So ... let me get this straight ... the article vindicates Carl because it states that Carl's demeaning, disrespectful view of the fans is a more accurate, appropriate assessment than Clark's? Is that right?

FAX

so are these Scout people surreptitiously on the Chiefs payroll? you wouldn't know they weren't by reading this crap

triple 09-17-2008 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5027668)
Because there really should be visible, tangible progress. After two games.

the team has been demonstrably worse every year during Herm's tenure. it's not like this started last week

milkman 09-17-2008 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5027218)
And I think that only you and I were saying he was injury prone and incapable of being a franchise QB from the beginning.

And the two of you (who were far from the only two, so get over yourself) may be right, still.

However, the fact that he has played behind some terrible O-Lines in both college and now with the Chiefs just might have something to do with his durability issues.

He's taken a beating.

And anyone who says that hit he took to separate his shoulder woudn't have taken out any other QB is just showing their bias.

His shoulder was ground into the turf.

Baby Lee 09-17-2008 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillip (Post 5026960)
That's the boat I'm in. I want to have fun watching the Chiefs. That's why I don't like Herm. He makes the game so F-ing boring to watch. Even if we're winning the way he does things (which we won't because those days are long gone) it will be like watching the Ravens super bowl run some years back. Snooze.

Go watch basketball, pansy.

milkman 09-17-2008 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5027668)
Because there really should be visible, tangible progress. After two games.

Anyone who expected to see progress from the players at this point in the season was sure to be disappointed.

But I expected to some some more imaginitive playcalling from Chan Gaily.

We keep seeing the same stupid shit.

We keep running into brick walls and putting ourselves into known passing situations, and that is a formula for failure.

It's non productive, and QB destructive.

It's the Bag 'em and Tag 'em offense.

FAX 09-17-2008 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5027526)
Pretty much, yeah. But is it really a demeaning, disrespectful view if it's true? Why not just say "accurate view"?

Well, here's the thing, Mr. BigRock. A lot of Chiefs fans can differentiate between a "rebuild" and a deperate attempt to steal a cheap win by running the sloption.

In fact, I think a lot of Chiefs fans are sufficiently sophisticated to know the difference between playing young players in a scheme that allows them to maximize their skills, gain valuable playing time, and grow as both individual performers and as a team vs. dialing back, dumbing down, and displaying disorganized dumbassery.

Personally, I think that, if Hermoine were to just go for it, open up the offense, and take his lumps along the way, most peeps would understand and he would be far better off - both in the short term and in the long run. Besides, that's what he clearly indicated he was going to do and, you know, Chiefs fans don't like being lied to, either.

FAX

Mecca 09-17-2008 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5027668)
Because there really should be visible, tangible progress. After two games.

The problem with this is, with a young team you don't want a coach who looks lost on the sideline, having a coach and frankly a front office that appears to be completely lost is not good for the development of these players.

I said long ago the idea of going young is correct, but he isn't the right guy to get it done. He isn't the kind of coach to do this...the Chiefs have very very little leadership and it starts with Herm Edwards.

I don't have a problem rebuilding I have a problem with the people leading it, I feel that they are more likely to lead us to being Detroit. I don't feel we have the coaching staff to develop these players to their full potential or establish any leadership or confidence in them.

We have a head coach who in a rebuilding year where nothing is expected still coaches like his asshole is puckered with pressure.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5027713)
Anyone who expected to see progress from the players at this point in the season was sure to be disappointed.

But I expected to some some more imaginitive playcalling from Chan Gaily.

We keep seeing the same stupid shit.

We keep running into brick walls and putting ourselves into known passing situations, and that is a formula for failure.

It's non productive, and QB destructive.

It's the Bag 'em and Tag 'em offense.


QFT.

Mecca 09-17-2008 05:56 AM

We'll never see change in the offense because Herm is here, it's his offense. He then will fire the OC as the scapegoat, it's why he's had 5 of them in 7 years....a new guy comes in and it's the same offense.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 05:58 AM

Keep complaining, people.

Then maybe, Herm will get his shit together, this team might gel, and we might win 4 games, giving Herm ANOTHER YEAR.

Christ, people should be doing ****ing backflips over Herm's incompetence, he's signing his own death notice.

Mecca 09-17-2008 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5027720)
Keep complaining, people.

Then maybe, Herm will get his shit together, this team might gel, and we might win 4 games, giving Herm ANOTHER YEAR.

Christ, people should be doing ****ing backflips over Herm's incompetence, he's signing his own death notice.

The problem is there are some people that will say even if they go 1-15 no one will get fired, I know that sounds laughable but this is the Chiefs so that though does cross my mind.

Hootie 09-17-2008 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5027005)
Anyone that thinks Herm is going to win a SB I really want the drugs you are taking

I doubt Herm, too...I really do...

But I think Giants fans were probably saying the same thing about Tom Coughlin the last few years...

Just sayin'...

Fire Me Boy! 09-17-2008 06:02 AM

Might want to edit the online version -

"You see, if the Chiefs’ recent decent into also-ran status has shown us anything, it’s that Peterson may be a lot smarter than anyone’s been giving him credit for."

I'm pretty sure he meant "recent descent".

dirk digler 09-17-2008 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5027713)

But I expected to some some more imaginitive playcalling from Chan Gaily.

We keep seeing the same stupid shit.

We keep running into brick walls and putting ourselves into known passing situations, and that is a formula for failure.

It's non productive, and QB destructive.

It's the Bag 'em and Tag 'em offense.

Yep I agree. It is like giving them a stick and send them off to fight the guy with an AK-47

milkman 09-17-2008 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5027732)
Yep I agree. It is like giving them a stick and send them off to fight the guy with an AK-47

That's actually a good analogy.

In most cases though, the guy with the stick would be smart enough to hide.

Herman ****ing Edwards is the guy with the stick that is so stupid, he stands out in the open and yells that he's going to kick some ass.

Bowser 09-17-2008 07:07 AM

Every good rebuild starts with losing to an incompetent floundering division rival in your home opener that got embarassed themselves the week before in THEIR home opener! Everything is going according to plan!

Chiefnj2 09-17-2008 07:32 AM

It's been a rebuild for three years. Herm came in and immediately made changes to the defense and special teams. He brought his own special teams coach. He implemented the cover 2 and brought over a host of NY Jets to try to get it done and focussed on defense in his drafts. The rebuild didn't begin this year. .

Bowser 09-17-2008 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5027787)
It's been a rebuild for three years. Herm came in and immediately made changes to the defense and special teams. He brought his own special teams coach. He implemented the cover 2 and brought over a host of NY Jets to try to get it done and focussed on defense in his drafts. The rebuild didn't begin this year. .

So this is the first year they are actually ADMITTING to rebuilding. Got it.

Mecca 09-17-2008 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5027787)
It's been a rebuild for three years. Herm came in and immediately made changes to the defense and special teams. He brought his own special teams coach. He implemented the cover 2 and brought over a host of NY Jets to try to get it done and focussed on defense in his drafts. The rebuild didn't begin this year. .

And so far it's been bad because his first draft, the 2006 draft which can be judged now looks like a whiff.

StcChief 09-17-2008 07:43 AM

it's a work in progress. long 2008, hoping for development as players, a good draft in 2009....
by 2011 we might contend if or draft picks gell as a team

Chiefnj2 09-17-2008 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5027797)
And so far it's been bad because his first draft, the 2006 draft which can be judged now looks like a whiff.

You think it is a whiff? I don't.

1 20 20 Tamba Hali DE Penn State
** A good LDE. He's being played out of position this year. Bad coaching/GM move with Allen and forcing Hali to play the right side.

2 2 22 54 Bernard Pollard DB Purdue
** Not a great safety, but I think he's good and he is still improving.

3 3 21 85 Brodie Croyle QB Alabama
** at this point a bust because of injury problems.

4 5 22 154 Marcus Maxey DB Miami (FL)
** bust

5 6 17 186 Tre' Stallings G Mississippi
** bust

6 6 21 190 Jeff Webb WR San Diego State
** underperforming this year.

7 7 20 228 Jarrad Page DB UCLA
** excellent pick for a 7th rounder.

Mecca 09-17-2008 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5027825)
You think it is a whiff? I don't.

1 20 20 Tamba Hali DE Penn State
** A good LDE. He's being played out of position this year. Bad coaching/GM move with Allen and forcing Hali to play the right side.

2 2 22 54 Bernard Pollard DB Purdue
** Not a great safety, but I think he's good and he is still improving.

3 3 21 85 Brodie Croyle QB Alabama
** at this point a bust because of injury problems.

4 5 22 154 Marcus Maxey DB Miami (FL)
** bust

5 6 17 186 Tre' Stallings G Mississippi
** bust

6 6 21 190 Jeff Webb WR San Diego State
** underperforming this year.

7 7 20 228 Jarrad Page DB UCLA
** excellent pick for a 7th rounder.

I think it's a whiff in terms of building a top level team through the draft, if you are comparing it to say Vermiel drafts then it's not.

All of the players that can contribute from that draft are role players and nothing more guys that frankly shouldn't be every down players.

beach tribe 09-17-2008 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillip (Post 5026960)
That's the boat I'm in. I want to have fun watching the Chiefs. That's why I don't like Herm. He makes the game so F-ing boring to watch. Even if we're winning the way he does things (which we won't because those days are long gone) it will be like watching the Ravens super bowl run some years back. Snooze.

Are you kidding me?

I'd give my left nut for the Chiefs to be as good as those Ravens. Your and idiot.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 5027726)
Might want to edit the online version -

"You see, if the Chiefs’ recent decent into also-ran status has shown us anything, it’s that Peterson may be a lot smarter than anyone’s been giving him credit for."

I'm pretty sure he meant "recent descent".

Yeah suffice it to say there was a HURRICANE and I couldn't edit anything the last few days.

You want to see some spelling errors on our front page just click on over.

beach tribe 09-17-2008 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5027828)
I think it's a whiff in terms of building a top level team through the draft, if you are comparing it to say Vermiel drafts then it's not.

All of the players that can contribute from that draft are role players and nothing more guys that frankly shouldn't be every down players.

We basically got shit from that draft. A wash as much as I hate to say it. Hali gets run right over in the run game, left side right side doesn't matter. Pollard will lose his job to morgan, and Page can't tackle a 3rd string RB in the open field. I would like to see Morgan take Page's Job. The guy just can't tackle.

triple 09-17-2008 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5027825)
You think it is a whiff? I don't.

1 20 20 Tamba Hali DE Penn State
** A good LDE. He's being played out of position this year. Bad coaching/GM move with Allen and forcing Hali to play the right side.

2 2 22 54 Bernard Pollard DB Purdue
** Not a great safety, but I think he's good and he is still improving.

3 3 21 85 Brodie Croyle QB Alabama
** at this point a bust because of injury problems.

4 5 22 154 Marcus Maxey DB Miami (FL)
** bust

5 6 17 186 Tre' Stallings G Mississippi
** bust

6 6 21 190 Jeff Webb WR San Diego State
** underperforming this year.

7 7 20 228 Jarrad Page DB UCLA
** excellent pick for a 7th rounder.

Hali is just a guy.

Pollard is only a special teams player.

Croyle is not an NFL quarterback.

Maxey didn't even make the team his first year.

Stallings, Webb, Page - nothing


So in that entire draft we got Hali, who is invisible most of the time. None of these guys will be key contributors when (if?) we return to respectability.

Time's Yours 09-17-2008 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5027000)
49-41..... it's a Celebration of the game!

Oh come on, I'm not saying it needs to be a Vermeil era or Eagles-Cowbows MNF style game.

I'm saying run, run, swingpass, punt is no fun to watch, even if you win 3-0 or 6-3.

Time's Yours 09-17-2008 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5027856)
Are you kidding me?

I'd give my left nut for the Chiefs to be as good as those Ravens. Your and idiot.

Yeah, I'm an idiot because I'm tired of Herm's boring-ass r2p2 gameplan.

Good call. Guess my law school should take back that full-tuition scholarship they gave me.

Next time I post, I guess I'll have to conform to the majority opinion here so I don't get called names, online, by grown men.

triple 09-17-2008 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillip (Post 5027907)
Good call. Guess my law school should take back that full-tuition scholarship they gave me.

to use in situations like this, and the other day when someone was bragging in another thread about their supposed connections in the chiefs organization, there should be a smiley called :bigtime:, maybe with an image of carl peterson

COchief 09-17-2008 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillip (Post 5027907)
Good call. Guess my law school should take back that full-tuition scholarship they gave me.

A group of douchebag slimy laywers looking at you and deciding: "We have to have this kid, he will make an excellent attorney" is not something I would brag about.

Congratulations, you've won the "most likely to grow up to be an asshole award", the funny thing is that you think this is an accomplishment.

beach tribe 09-17-2008 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phillip (Post 5027907)
Yeah, I'm an idiot because I'm tired of Herm's boring-ass r2p2 gameplan.

Good call. Guess my law school should take back that full-tuition scholarship they gave me.

Next time I post, I guess I'll have to conform to the majority opinion here so I don't get called names, online, by grown men.

When did I say anything about Herm's teams? we're talking about a SB winning Raven's team with one of the best defenses ever, your highness.

ChiefsCountry 09-17-2008 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5027828)
I think it's a whiff in terms of building a top level team through the draft, if you are comparing it to say Vermiel drafts then it's not.

All of the players that can contribute from that draft are role players and nothing more guys that frankly shouldn't be every down players.

And you dont need those on a championship type team?

the Talking Can 09-17-2008 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK (Post 5027339)
We're missing 3 key things for a proper rebuild.

GM
Coach
QB

Other than that we're on our way.

:clap:

beach tribe 09-17-2008 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5028021)
And you dont need those on a championship type team?

You do, but you also need to pull at least one impact player out of your drafts. None of these guys make a real impact. Even if they are not everydown players, you need difference makers, and thses guys just aren't.
I do think these guys will contribute, but to what?

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 09:29 AM

Page and Pollard are going to be good players. I think Hali is a solid starter if he's moved back to left end. Webb is a solid role player. I think it's a good draft overall. Better than Vermeil's, anyway.

triple 09-17-2008 09:33 AM

you're an idiot if you think pollard and page are ever going to be good starting safeties in the NFL. apparently the chiefs agree since they spent the pick on morgan

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5028044)
you're an idiot if you think pollard and page are ever going to be good starting safeties in the NFL. apparently the chiefs agree since they spent the pick on morgan

Yeah, they drafted Morgan because of their concern for Page and Pollard, not because of the ridiculous value he was in the 3rd round...

:rolleyes:

Christ, Page was a SEVENTH round pick. The fact that he's still on the roster is against all odds, much less as a contributing factor.

FFS, people are ridiculous.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5028044)
you're an idiot if you think pollard and page are ever going to be good starting safeties in the NFL. apparently the chiefs agree since they spent the pick on morgan

Page is already a good player. He's THE reason we can stop Gates when we play San Diego. Pollard has already shown strides this year.

But keep hating. Keep grasping at straws to discredit Herm.

the Talking Can 09-17-2008 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028034)
Page and Pollard are going to be good players. I think Hali is a solid starter if he's moved back to left end. Webb is a solid role player. I think it's a good draft overall. Better than Vermeil's, anyway.

Hali has proven that he can't play the run on either side...he just gets destroyed. He is ideally a #3 DE.

Webb has done nothing. Nothing. And hopefully will disappear once Franklin is healthy.

Page and Pollard are ok, but neither are the complete package. And both will be drafted over - a la morgan - until we find better players...imo.

Basically that draft gave us 3 role players. Better than DV, for sure. But not good enough.

ChiefsCountry 09-17-2008 09:40 AM

2006 Draft for the whole NFL pretty much blows balls.

milkman 09-17-2008 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028034)
Page and Pollard are going to be good players. I think Hali is a solid starter if he's moved back to left end. Webb is a solid role player. I think it's a good draft overall. Better than Vermeil's, anyway.

Hali was getting his ass kicked by the RT in run defense soundly.

He is a role player, at best.

triple 09-17-2008 09:40 AM

i dont need to do anything to discredit Herm. the fact that this team has gotten worse every year of his tenure discredits him. the fact that we've lost more games in a row than some teams have in their history discredits him. they still can't play the pass. they will still never start on a good defense in the NFL. keep drinking the kool-aide if you want

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5028064)
Hali was getting his ass kicked by the RT in run defense soundly.

He is a role player, at best.

A guy who gets 7-8 sacks a year is a solid starter in this league. And Gunther was right - he missed five sacks clean last season.

Hali doesn't get enough credit around here.

CoMoChief 09-17-2008 09:44 AM

Its one thing to rebuild. But we can't win games with the way Herm is conducting this offense. This isn't 1950.

triple 09-17-2008 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028072)
A guy who gets 7-8 sacks a year is a solid starter in this league. And Gunther was right - he missed five sacks clean last season.

Hali doesn't get enough credit around here.

i'll make sure we keep lauding him for sacks he didn't make.

by this logic greg wesley and bernard pollard might be the most prolific tacklers in NFL history

milkman 09-17-2008 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028072)
A guy who gets 7-8 sacks a year is a solid starter in this league. And Gunther was right - he missed five sacks clean last season.

Hali doesn't get enough credit around here.

A guy who gets his ass run over as a run defnder, and gets 7-8 sacks as a pass rusher is a situational pass rusher.

That would be his role.

But only on the left side, because I don't think he's gotten close enough to the QB this year to be heard by him if he yelled at the top of his lungs.

the Talking Can 09-17-2008 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple (Post 5028081)
i'll make sure we keep lauding him for sacks he didn't make.

by this logic greg wesley and bernard pollard might be the most prolific tacklers in NFL history

and Linn Elliot was perfect...by that standard

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 09:52 AM

Tony and Thigpen are gay lovers.

Quote:

“We just haven’t done that much with Tyler,” said Gonzalez. “That’s how it goes, but there are no excuses. I knew he was going to get a couple of snaps. But once Damon went down, his package expanded, and that limits what we can do because we haven’t had that time together.”

beach tribe 09-17-2008 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028058)
Yeah, they drafted Morgan because of their concern for Page and Pollard, not because of the ridiculous value he was in the 3rd round...

:rolleyes:

Christ, Page was a SEVENTH round pick. The fact that he's still on the roster is against all odds, much less as a contributing factor.

FFS, people are ridiculous.

Look, I like Page, good value in the 7th WOAD, but how can you have guy on the field on 1st, and second down that CAN NOT TACKLE. I'm sorry, but that's how you give up 300 on the ground.

milkman 09-17-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028089)
Tony and Thigpen are gay lovers.

Good god.

STHU.

DaWolf 09-17-2008 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 5028076)
Its one thing to rebuild. But we can't win games with the way Herm is conducting this offense. This isn't 1950.

I contend that we could, but only if we were able to dominate at the point of attack. Teams around the league have been winning games for years by running the ball and playing good D. We just do not have the personnel, or haven't matured enough as a team, to dominate at the point of attack, so playing this type of ball gets us nowhere.

The biggest issue I have right now is that our defense is as bad as ever. Gunther should have been fired three years ago. Frankly one of the biggest issues I have with Carl is his addiction to Gunther. He's been ruining this franchise since 1999, with a couple of years gap with GRob taking his place...

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5028113)
Look, I like Page, good value in the 7th WOAD, but how can you have guy on the field on 1st, and second down that CAN NOT TACKLE. I'm sorry, but that's how you give up 300 on the ground.

If you're counting on your FREE SAFETY to make tackles in the run game, you need to take a HARD look at your front 7.

Chiefnj2 09-17-2008 10:05 AM

Bad things happen on defense when you trade away your best defensive player and leader.

Mr. Laz 09-17-2008 10:05 AM

Blame the fans .........


typical

beach tribe 09-17-2008 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028126)
If you're counting on your FREE SAFETY to make tackles in the run game, you need to take a HARD look at your front 7.

We need lots of work on the front seven, but the FS must be able to tackle if the RB gets through.

Did you see him try to tackle Bush?

Dude didn't even put amove on him, just changed direction. That's pitiful, and there are plenty more examples.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5028159)
We need lots of work on the front seven, but the FS must be able to tackle if the RB gets through.

Did you see him try to tackle Bush?

Dude didn't even put amove on him, just changed direction. That's pitiful, and there are plenty more examples.

Did you see Brian Dawkins Monday night?

He's only a 6 time Pro Bowler, and he looked like ass most of the night.

Jesus Christ, these guys aren't perfect.

Chiefnj2 09-17-2008 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5028159)
We need lots of work on the front seven, but the FS must be able to tackle if the RB gets through.

Did you see him try to tackle Bush?

Dude didn't even put amove on him, just changed direction. That's pitiful, and there are plenty more examples.

beach,

In your opinion, has Herm made any really good draft picks?

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028173)
Did you see Brian Dawkins Monday night?

He's only a 6 time Pro Bowler, and he looked like ass most of the night.

Jesus Christ, these guys aren't perfect.

People have unrealistic expectations.

And, like I said, they will grasp at ANY straw to discredit Herm. Page was drafted in the 7th round. He was an absolute gem, and he is Antonio Gates' kryptonite. That alone makes him a success as an NFL player.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.