![]() |
He's old and injury prone. But this is a good situation for that. It buys some time for Niang. And it gives an extra veteran option which is fine since what we most need is someone to hold the fort down until fisher is back, right? But only at the right price of course.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
39 years old.
Insane that he’s played this long, but he’s done. |
We need young hungry players that can stay awhile- not turn into a retirement home for washed up players.
|
If Schwartz calls it a career, Remmers and Niang will start at tackle opening week. Fish back mid-season.
|
I've got a better idea, let's trade for Cam Erving instead.
|
He’s going to be here guys. I’m shocked you all don’t see it. It’s dirt cheap, no risk and familiar. Reid is not just throwing out 2 new tackles next year who don’t know the system. He’s certainly not lining Remmers up at LT to start the year.
I’m not saying he’s playing 16 games. He’s just the kind of guy who teams like the ‘new’ Chiefs sign. I think there’s an obvious connection. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People seem to think I’m saying KC should hand him a 4 year, 40 million deal. We literally have no healthy tackles who have played a single snap under contract for next year. Andy does not play rookie linemen, especially at tackle. The dots are very easy to connect. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.