ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Log jam at RB (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=298811)

TimBone 03-10-2016 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125083)
Why do people not just answer the question is read of jump to butt hurt?

I did answer the question. The answer is he continues to play for the Chiefs.

RealSNR 03-10-2016 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125080)
Ah yes I remember how well RBBC worked under Marty. Thanks for the trip down memory lane.

It's not RBBC.

We're not paying Ware/West shit. They're undrafted turds. We can tell them to eat cat poop and they'll do it if it helps the team win.

If it were just Charles, people would be concerned about drafting another RB and maybe finding a guy in free agency. Why? So they can suck shit?

Just because our backup guys are good, that means we have a logjam at the position?

**** you.

DenverChief 03-10-2016 07:30 PM

I think Charles has excellent trade value as long as you aren't looking to trade him for Tom Brady.

DenverChief 03-10-2016 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12125089)
It's not RBBC.

We're not paying Ware/West shit. They're undrafted turds. We can tell them to eat cat poop and they'll do it if it helps the team win.

If it were just Charles, people would be concerned about drafting another RB and maybe finding a guy in free agency. Why? So they can suck shit?

Just because our backup guys are good, that means we have a logjam at the position?

**** you.

What the **** does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

I think we have one expendable running back. With ware, West, Sherman, Davis and Charles on the roster we have plenty of opportunities to use the depth to fill other needs.

Oh and lick my hairless perfectly bleached asshole.

TimBone 03-10-2016 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125091)
I think Charles has excellent trade value as long as you aren't looking to trade him for Tom Brady.

You're wrong.

DenverChief 03-10-2016 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12125094)
You're wrong.

Because....

RealSNR 03-10-2016 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125093)
What the **** does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

I think we have one expendable running back. With ware, West, Sherman, Davis and Charles on the roster we have plenty of opportunities to use the depth to fill other needs.

Oh and lick my hairless perfectly bleached asshole.

Because the price of tea in China isn't a ****ing logjam.

The Chiefs don't have a logjam at the RB position.

You called it a logjam.

Therefore, you deserve AIDS of the labia.

Mr. Laz 03-10-2016 07:41 PM

Charles and Ware

West as relief for Charles


It would really be nice if West could return kicks and punts

mcaj22 03-10-2016 07:41 PM

Yea huge problem. I miss the days of Peyton Hillis

Kman34 03-10-2016 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125091)
I think Charles has excellent trade value as long as you aren't looking to trade him for Tom Brady.

Not coming off an ACL injury.....He is not going anywhere...Didn't last season prove to you that you can't have too many good RBs????

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125091)
I think Charles has excellent trade value as long as you aren't looking to trade him for Tom Brady.

No offense but you couldn't be more wrong.

Matt Forte, who's not been injured and offers similar value as Charles was released by the Bears because they couldn't find a trade partner.

Yesterday, Forte signed a 3 year, $12 million dollar deal with the Jets.

There isn't a team in the league trading for a soon to be 30 year old running back coming off an ACL injury.

Not one.

Mr. Laz 03-10-2016 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12125098)
Because....

running back just don't carry the value they used to

especially as they get close to 30


worth more to us on the team than the market


Maybe a low 2nd round pick on the market?

Otter 03-10-2016 07:48 PM

As a management decision I'd trade Charles for a high draft pick if a team was willing to part. By 'high' I mean a 1st or 2nd rounder. Or two 3rds or two 4ths given the Chiefs updated draft status. West and Ware are just an awesome 1&2 punch.</br></br>As a Chiefs fan, let him retire a Chief.</br></br>I'd like to see a super bowl within the next 5 years so I'm going with the management decision.

DaneMcCloud 03-10-2016 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter (Post 12125122)
As a management decision I'd trade Charles for a high draft pick if a team was willing to part. By 'high' I'm mean a 1st or 2nd rounder. Or a 3rd and a 4th given the Chiefs updated draft status.

There's not a chance in hell that happens.

You guys are severely overrating Charles and the running back position as it exists in today's NFL.

Otter 03-10-2016 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12125125)
There's not a chance in hell that happens.

Yeah, I really don't know shit about the back end of football. That's what message boards are for. :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.