ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Congrats to your 5-8-1 first place Carolina Panthers! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289159)

Deberg_1990 12-14-2014 08:42 PM

The Cardinals were 10-6 last year and didn't make the playoffs as well.

TEX 12-14-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11193387)
I don't want it changed. Division games should mean the most and with the current setup, we have that. Maybe you could say they can't host a playoff game but in no way should a division winner, as shitty as their record, not make the playoffs.

Home field in the playoffs should be based on best record. Then you can respect the division format where a shit division winner gets in, but must play on the road. In any case, no way should the NFL expand the current amount of playoff teams. Just my opinion...

Deberg_1990 12-14-2014 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 11193402)
In any case, no way should the NFL expand the current amount of playoff teams. Just my opinion...

Get ready for it, because it's probably going to happen in the next few years.

displacedinMN 12-14-2014 08:54 PM

Woudn't it be something if after 3 8-8 seasons, Dallas still misses the playoffs?

9-4 now, winning tonight. Have two winnable games.

Jerry would be the one to demand the changes in playoff structure.

Al Bundy 12-14-2014 08:58 PM

The Panthers stink, the Bucs are just that much worse. Home or road, I don't think any of the 3 remaining NFC South teams will win a playoff game.

Valiant 12-14-2014 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 11193374)
If you win a division at 8-8, 7-9, you do not get a home playoff game OR
you get bumped by a team with a better record.


from a column






Yea, no kidding

From those stats, I do not see a problem with it. Win your division.. It is perfect how it is now.. If every team played every team, then it would make sense.. Hell I would be down for it if all games played were conference games. But now, a division that is decent could go up against a really bad or really good noncon division and swing their wins by +/-4 which is huge..

TEX 12-14-2014 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 11193409)
Get ready for it, because it's probably going to happen in the next few years.

Oh, I know it is. Just going to lead to teams with sub par records making the playoffs.

tk13 12-14-2014 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 11193603)
Oh, I know it is. Just going to lead to teams with sub par records making the playoffs.

Probably, the AFC struggled to even get 6 teams with a winning record the last couple years. This year though 3/4ths of the teams are .500 or better.

The problem with changing it up is everyone doesn't play the same schedule. Doing it by division promotes rivalries, but it also compares you to teams with basically the same schedule. Just look at the AFC. The Chiefs and Chargers had to play the NFC West... and now they're sitting behind the Steelers and Ravens, who might end up getting the WC spots because they got to beat the crap out of the NFC South.

No one is going to question that because though. That's why you have to give divisions some weight.

Silock 12-14-2014 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11193387)
I don't want it changed. Division games should mean the most and with the current setup, we have that. Maybe you could say they can't host a playoff game but in no way should a division winner, as shitty as their record, not make the playoffs.

I disagree. You shouldn't make the playoffs when you lose a bunch of non-division games just because your division is shitty.

MMXcalibur 12-14-2014 09:58 PM

One more Saints loss away from clinching a sub-.500 record for the NFC South champion.

tk13 12-14-2014 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 11193646)
I disagree. You shouldn't make the playoffs when you lose a bunch of non-division games just because your division is shitty.

Yeah, but on the flipside, you're going to be rewarding teams that beat up on terrible divisions. You basically have to choose your weakness.

Hammock Parties 12-14-2014 09:59 PM

They would probably beat KC.

Renegade 12-14-2014 10:18 PM

Just a question I have been wondering lately. Lets say the Chiefs finish at 8-8 and the NFC South best is 7-9, who has the higher draft order--us or the "winner" of the NFC south?

Just Passin' By 12-14-2014 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 11193387)
I don't want it changed. Division games should mean the most and with the current setup, we have that. Maybe you could say they can't host a playoff game but in no way should a division winner, as shitty as their record, not make the playoffs.

I'm with you on this. As long as they're playing unbalanced schedules, there's no reason to change the current system.

tk13 12-14-2014 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Renegade (Post 11193707)
Just a question I have been wondering lately. Lets say the Chiefs finish at 8-8 and the NFC South best is 7-9, who has the higher draft order--us or the "winner" of the NFC south?

The Chiefs would. Whoever wins that division is going to drop down in the order.

It's funny because take Atlanta... they were in 1st, now that they aren't, they are actually the 14 seed in the NFC due to tiebreakers. They are in the running for the 6th pick in the draft. But they could still win the division and drop down to 20.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.