For someone who claims that you're not blackbob. You sure are trying to prove hard that you're not blackbob. Why would someone who is not blackbob try so hard to prove you're not blackbob?

Would a Blackbob mult try to prove he's not Blackbob?

Until hours later when he's spotted with a Georgia signature, of course.

Or how about you contact a mod and have them run an IP check? I'm not blackbob lol.

Maybe because they assume being blackbob is bad, and I'm not actually blackbob?

But I like Iowa.:hmmm:

Woodchuck Spongepants claimed for about 1,000 posts that he wasn't BlackBob, either, yet he was quickly outed and admitted it about 800 posts in.

This guy, Man.

:shake:

So I'm guessing you're using AOL?

ROFL

In circumstances like these, the best thing you can do is simply admit that you are, in fact, Mr. BlackBob ... well, I take that back ... it's actually the worst thing you can do, but that doesn't matter. Once a Mr. BlackBob, always a Mr. BlackBob.

Just go with it and hope for the best.

FAX

One thing I forgot to mention: Just our luck - Chiefs hire Reid and the Giants opponents on the road will include the Chiefs in 2013.

Reid always seemed to have the Giants number when it mattered most to them. They beat us so many times -

Wall Street Journal: 14 Years of Stomping Giants

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...992975030.html

Then out me, by having a mod or admin run an IP check on me. You'll find out that I am not Blackbob fairly quickly.

Using a what?

Basically, don't admit to being blackbob? Awesome, because I'm not.

Although I live about a block away from Blackbob.............:D

(now I'm guaranteed to get you guys rolling on this blackbob trip)

It's blackbob alright.

That was a basis for argument, not a basis for comparison you nitwhit.

Can you not discern the difference?

We were defining "playmakers" on one hand, then this douche decided to counter with him not being a playmaker because of his ratio, I didn't bring it up as a basis of comparison at all.

Then again, you probably don't know how to tell the difference between a statement as fact, and a debunking retort using someone else's words.

ROFL

You said how do his numbers compare, followed by you weren't comparing them. I'm not arguing with you, just pointing out your stupidity blackbob.

DMC is not a playmaker, simply due to the fact he hasn't made plays.

I'd love it if he could turn into Sproles, Westbrook, Welker, etc. It isn't going to happen though.

Complete bust for an extremely high 2nd round pick, even with hindsight not considered.

Really?


Do me a favor and bring up the 3 responses prior to the quoted responses and then tell me that I brought it up again.

My god.ROFL

He is a playmaker, because he has made plays. In the most dismal of offenses, he's been pretty effective compared to the rest of the team. If we didn't have Charles here we'd use McCluster nearly as much as the Raiders use McFadden and just LEAN on him for production. Luckily Charles is here and one of the best backs in the league, so we don't have to use McCluster like that. Instead, since our WR group blows ass, we can line him up in the slot and toss little baby screens over his head for incompletions.

Let me ask you this question, who is the bigger bust?

Baldwin with the 1st round pick, or McCluster with the 2nd round pick?