| JD10367 |
06-27-2010 06:19 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv
(Post 6846561)
So, if chicks should try chicks because they know what they like, then why shouldn't guys try guys for the same reason?
|
Excellent and valid question. I can only offer my opinion, as a straight man.
When it comes to anatomy, guys are pretty simple. It's a pole. You work it until it goes off. There's not much else to worry about. Sure, some guys don't mind if you play with the back door, or give the twins a hello. But, by and large, there's not much mystery about how to please a guy. (Although that still doesn't eliminate the surprisingly large number of women who DON'T know how to give a BJ.) Women, on the other hand, have more sensitive nerve endings in more places. There's more territory to cover, and a woman knows how to cover it better because she's more familiar with it.
Not to mention, under the right circumstances for a woman, almost any part of the body can heighten sexual arousal--the neck, an earlobe, the fold of an elbow or leg, whatever. A light fingertip trailing across the surface of the skin; a breath of hot or cold air; the application of moisture... these are all things that are much more applicable to a woman than a man (although, again, we're not immune... a little crushed ice in the mouth for a BJ and you've got a friend for life, LOL).
I think, when it comes to sex, women are more about sensuality, romance, emotion, "the mood" (i.e. if a woman's brain is aroused, her body is aroused). These are all things that another woman knows well and can coax out. A man? It's more physical. Honestly, the old male saying, "they all look the same on the inside" has a lot of truth to it. If it's warm and wet and tight, it works. A guy has three routes he can go to make Old Faithful erupt: a handjob, a BJ, or a hole. Much less complicated. |
