Man.

This thread has a little bit of everything.

The onscreen score was 149 but the email says 147. Did anybody else get this?

130 Without cheating
140 With cheating

Cheating makes you smarter.

so now it's an IQ test..wow..

:)

How did you cheat? Multiple tests?

Keep in mind that you had to enter your age to take the test. IQ tests are often scored based on your age, so Skip may have gotten a favorable curve for being older than dirt. :D

Considering the time lapse between the posting of the IQ Test link, and the posting of my score vs Skip's score, he is the one who likely took it six times.

Wow. You're really smart.

That is my first and only test. You can't say the same. You are nowhere near a 138.

wow!!
your really smart!!!!

Actually, I can say the same.

I posted the IQ link at 12:14 AM.

I then posted that I had finished the IQ test at 12:40 AM.

There's no way I could have taken it 6 times in that span of time.

You certainly could have, though. I posted the link last night. You didn't post your score until this evening.

Busted.

I wrote down the answers and flew through the test the second time. I only changed 3 of my answers on the 2nd test.

So that's how Skip cheated.

I guess he's smarter than I give him credit for.

You already had it rigged before you posted anything about it. You lost once again. Admit it looser.

Why couldn't you take it 6 times in 26 minutes?

This reminds me of Chiefsplanet Madness. ROFL

cheaters

Someone tell me which ones I missed.
1. T
2. T
3. F
4. T
5. T
6. T
7. T
8. F
9. T
10. T
11. T
12. T
13. F
14. F
15. T
16. F
17. T
18. F
19. F
20.F
21. F
22. F
23. F
24. F
25. T
26. T
27. T
28. F
29. T
30. F
31. F
32. F
33. F
34. T
35. T
36. T
37. T
38. F

According to this , there are no "wrong" answers.

"There are no right answers for this free IQ test-- instead your answers are compared to the answers of people at different levels of intelligence. As a result there are several "correct" answers to each question, depending on your interpretation. So don't think too hard-- the first answer that pops into your head is the best measure of your thought process. Plus, the less time it takes you to complete the test, the higher your score. Clock the time it takes you to answer 38 questions (you have 13 minutes total) and you'll receive a score upon completion. Go to the FAQ to see what your score means, or order a comprehensive report for $9.95 that outlines your ability in the thirteen competencies measured: visual apprehension, spatial, arithmetic, logical, general knowledge, spelling, rote utilization, intuition, short term memory, geometric, algebraic, vocabulary, and computational speed. TAKE THE PRACTICE TEST FIRST-- it helps your brain get in the proper mind set for the questions you'll be asked and also clues you in to the types of questions asked and the scoring methodology."

his virginity....

ouch

LMAO

I don't know if you missed them or I did but we differ on 24, 31, 36 and 37.

I had a 148 after taking it a coupe if times. About 2/3 of the questions I was sure about, the other 1/3 I went the opposite on some and finally worked my way up to the 148 mark. That was the highest I could get it to go.

We need a new IQ test.

I got a 152 on a retake. I'm pretty sure that these are correct:

1. T
2. T
3. F
4. T
5. T
6. T
7. T
8. F
9. T
10. T
11. T
12. T
13. F
14. F
15. T
16. F
17. T
18. F
19. F
20.F
21. F
22. F
23. F
24. F
25. T
26. T
27. T
28. F
29. T
30. F
31. T
32. F
33. F
34. T
35. T
36. F
37. F
38. F

HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAROFL

ROFL

Seen that one coming a mile away.

Let's just let you and Skip race to put together a home entertainment system. I bought a DVDR this week to record the games on DVD disks and the thing had me to the point of calling a teenager to come hook it up for me. I don't know if I am starting to slip in my old age or if they are making things tougher to hook together. It took me 2 hours to get the thing hooked in and working. I kept sitting there and saying to myself "It's just like the instructions said, why won't it work?"

These online tests are nowhere near accurate. Who ever heard of a True-False IQ test? Plus, the average range (on the Stanford Binet) is 90-110. 110 is a good score. How many on here reported a score in that range? So we are all geniouses then? Yeah, right.

In their FAQ's, they say that their AVERAGE score is around 110. That means that they're around 10 points off on average, but who knows how accurate it is.

I thought to post at Chiefsplanet, one had to be a genious.

I think it's the other way around.

You're right. That would explain these test results.

Heh heh.

Pastor, did you buy a DVD Writer for your PC?

An average with a range, eh?

That's interesting.

I had the same answers as you except for #24.

No, one to take the place of the VCR. I have two DVD Burners in the computers, one dual layer that I have yet to use the DL on because of the price of media and a single layer.

This one is a magnavox that I picked up at hillbilly-mart. Our VCR is acting up and since you can't buy a decent VCR anymore I went with the DVDR setup. I have a vid-capture on the desktop but it just doesn't do as well through the PC as a VCR even. (Cheap capture card).

Three of mine were different than yours but after looking at them again, yours are right.

Yep. At least it was when I went to school 80 years ago. 90 is low average and 110 is high average. Below 90 goes downhill pretty quickly and above 110 does also on a Bell curve. 130 is a lot better than 120 but 95-105 not much difference.

That's one funky, asymmetrical bell.

I was bored, so I finally clicked on this thread and read through it all.

I have only two things to say.

First, I have never cried over spilled milk, and I guarantee you I've spilled more milk than anyone here.

Second, after reading through this thread, I think my IQ dipped by 20 points.

No, it is symmetrical. I may have said it wrong but the big differences in IQ occur outside the 90-110 range. Something like 90% of all people are in the 90-110 range. It is all subjective but I consider Festus on Gunsmoke as a 90. I hope to find 110's when I'm hiring but I rarely do. I have always considered IQ tests as BS. I really don't see what they accomplish.

Do you know what symmetrical means?

While 110 is a decent score, I would expect an on-line IQ test to have a higher average than a clinically administered test for the following reasons:

* People taking the test multiple times

* People who think they will score well are more likely to voluntarily take such a test than someone who doesn't think they will score well.

I also don't find it too surprising that regular members of CP would consistently score higher than average. This place tends to weed out the idiots, on average.

I respectfully disagree.

Your and idiot.

chiefs4me agrees with your disagreement.

FYP

I agree. But we don't have ANY average people. And no morons either. We KNOW better than that.

Thank God. How boring would that be?

I would disagree with that. Just like with any community, you have your resident idiots, your ditch-diggers and Direct TV installers, your average people, your relatively bright people, and your "How the hell does he/she think of this sh*t?" people.

Rainman, I assume.

So the Planet is comprised largely of geniouses. Just as I suspected.

Amongst others, yes.

Which one am I?

You presume that I'm qualified to make such a determination?

absolutely

Of course I do.

OK. You were talking about IQ scores again. Again, self selection. If you scored a 95 and everyone else is bragging about their 130's, are you going to step up and post about that? I mean it would be like constantly bringing up the fact you were a virgin.

How others view you is irrelevant. How you view yourself is the only measure of importance.

Yeah but tell me anyway

Sorry, but I can't say that I've observed you well enough to make such a determination.

http://i.walmart.com/i/p/00/87/49/95...59_215X215.jpg
and don't ever buy that

Low sexual activity significantly lowers my chances of STD.

But you can still eat snack cakes

I don't even like snack cakes.

So does life long monogomy by both partners, and it's a heck of a lot more fun.

Exactly. This whole thing is a farce. I haven't seen an online IQ test, personality test or any other psychological test that is statistically valid. Dipshits like Gochiefs bring them up as they are too stupid to realize this.

The other person could be raped by someone with STD and pass it on to you.

I had an IQ test on a disk that was much better than that crappy online one. I think it was 90 questions and it wasn't T/F. I lost it though.

Yeah right. Who here hasn't tried to screw a slightly-nuked Twinkie or Cupcake?

You could be raped and given STD's

YOU ARE THE ONE THAT STARTED IT.

ROFL

How many gay rapists are out there?

Skip, are you an alcoholic?

I don't know of any statistics, most guys are probably too embarassed to admit they were raped by a man.

The one "WHO" started it, you fucking dipshit!

Man. That really is my achilles heel. I need shock therapy.

Lowers your chances? Hell, you are exempt.