Sorry, I don't recall. I just found it on accident on one of those various history/discovery/science channels.

OMFG.

This would have helped me SO much back when I took trig in HS.

I found Calculus to be WAAAAY easier than trig. I think it's because I had a trig teacher who couldn't teach and I wasn't smart enough to just naturally grasp the concepts. :(

This animation just made all the difference in my head.

Shot this from my front driveway in NJ.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For those of you asking - yes it is water ice.<br><br>Mars Express first detected water on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mars?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Mars</a> in 2004, see our release at the time <a href="https://t.co/oAY2Qj0U5N">https://t.co/oAY2Qj0U5N</a>. More recently, the spacecraft detected liquid water under the planet’s south pole, see: <a href="https://t.co/JnglOBBt3o">https://t.co/JnglOBBt3o</a> <a href="https://t.co/J0h3ZfYpXF">https://t.co/J0h3ZfYpXF</a></p>&mdash; ESA (@esa) <a href="https://twitter.com/esa/status/1076032022798192640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 21, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Cassini’s last image before entering Saturn’s atmosphere and burning up. Wow!

No it's not.

https://www.cnet.com/news/sorry-this...is-last-image/

This is the real one:

https://i.imgur.com/avHmkwn.jpg

So maybe it's Cassini's last image WITHOUT it's thumb over the lens?

I call shenanigans. This is math, not science. :harumph:

Damn. What kind of a setup do you have to get a shot that clear? I can always find the blur of andromeda in my scope, but never anything close to that.

It's a painting.

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/no-tha...n-from-cassini

I image with a QSI 640 CCD camera through 9.25” Celestron Edge SCT (for that shot), or a Takahashi 85mm refractor, on an Avalon Mount. That galaxy required over ten hours total exposure. Barely a smudge through the eyepiece. Here’s a nebula:

That's crazy. Nice work!

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

Very nice...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mf5otGNbkuc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

GMO corn is essentially the most safety tested food of all time at this point. This is a meta study, which is a large scale study of existing studies on a specific topic. GMO foods are proven safe yet again.

https://i.imgur.com/mdKBBOu.jpg

A Review of 6,000 Studies Over Two Decades Delivers Its Verdict on GMO Corn

There is a great deal of misinformation out there regarding genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

From monikers like "Frankenfoods" to general skepticism, there has been a variety of biased reactions to these organisms, even though we as a species have been genetically modifying our foods in one way or another for approximately 10,000 years.

Perhaps some of this distrust will be put to rest with the emergence of a 2018 meta-analysis that shows GM corn increases crop yields and provides significant health benefits.

The analysis, which was not limited to studies conducted in the US and Canada, showed that GMO corn varieties have increased crop yields worldwide 5.6 to 24.5 percent when compared to non-GMO varieties.

They also found that GM corn crops had significantly fewer (up to 36.5 percent less, depending on the species) mycotoxins - toxic chemical byproducts of crop colonization.

Some have argued that GMOs in the US and Canada haven't increased crop yields and could threaten human health; this sweeping analysis proved just the opposite.

For this study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, a group of Italian researchers took over 6,000 peer-reviewed studies from the past 21 years and performed what is known as a "meta-analysis", a cumulative analysis that draws from hundreds or thousands of credible studies.

This type of study allows researchers to draw conclusions that are more expansive and more robust than what could be taken from a single study.

There have been, for a variety of largely unscientific reasons, serious concerns surrounding the effects of GMOs on human health.

This analysis confirms that not only do GMOs pose no risk to human health, but also that they actually could have a substantive positive impact on it.

Mycotoxins, chemicals produced by fungi, are both toxic and carcinogenic to humans and animals. A significant percentage of non-GM and organic corn contain small amounts of mycotoxins. These chemicals are often removed by cleaning in developing countries, but the risk still exists.

GM corn has substantially fewer mycotoxins because the plants are modified to experience less crop damage from insects. Insects weaken a plant's immune system and make it more susceptible to developing the fungi that produce mycotoxins.

In their analysis, the researchers stated that this study allows us "to draw unequivocal conclusions, helping to increase public confidence in food produced with genetically modified plants".

While there will likely still be questions raised as GMOs are incorporated into agriculture, this analysis puts some severe concerns to rest.

Additionally, this information might convince farmers and companies to consider the potential health and financial benefits of using genetically modified corn.

Some are already calling this meta-analysis the "final chapter" in the GMO debate.