ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Felix Anudike-Uzomah Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348536)

KCUnited 03-19-2025 04:15 PM

Unless KState is teaching slow get off, and they very well could be, I'm just not sure what the upside they saw in this guy outside of bulking up to become a power rusher because you don't get faster as you age

Sure you can miss with the last pick of the 1st, and I'm not trying to crucify anyone in hindsight, but I mean, you can't beat out Mike Danna? IDGAF how old you are

Deberg_1990 03-19-2025 04:17 PM

Not sure who the Chiefs could have taken there that would have been better?

LaPorta I suppose….

KCUnited 03-19-2025 04:37 PM

Bro has the get off of the CP server but maybe Tamba can roll with him on the mat in the offseason

Sure-Oz 03-19-2025 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 18003602)
Not sure who the Chiefs could have taken there that would have been better?

LaPorta I suppose….

Should've taken LaPorta

JPH83 03-20-2025 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 18003578)
There aren't any 245 pound DE's kicking ass in the NFL 3-4 rushbackers maybe. In college, they can get by being a faster, better athlete than the guy across from them who will usually not be heading to the NFL. But that's not going to fly on Sundays with the best of the best.

No, I reject the notion that these guys are finished products at 21 or 22. There's just far too much evidence to the contrary.

Nolan Smith i think qualifies, although I guess could be seen as a rush backer. I remember a lot of people thinking he was too light despite him stonewalling plenty of capable college OLs. Turns out the tape didn't lie, and being really fast also translates to the NFL.

smithandrew051 03-20-2025 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 18003765)
Should've taken LaPorta

He’s been pretty good. Numbers are good, not elite like some believe.

I’d probably argue Brian Branch would’ve been the pick in hindsight.

Bump 03-20-2025 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 18003602)
Not sure who the Chiefs could have taken there that would have been better?

LaPorta I suppose….

I wanted Joey Porter Jr

OKchiefs 03-20-2025 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 18003602)
Not sure who the Chiefs could have taken there that would have been better?

LaPorta I suppose….

Porter Jr or Laporta were obvious picks that would have been better, Brian Branch was maybe a little less obvious but yea would have been better.

I don’t recall if Tuli Tuipulotu was thought of highly enough to go late first but in hindsight he would have been a pretty solid pick at DE.

FAU probably maxes out as an AJ Epenesa type with 6-7 sacks likely being his ceiling. It happens, at this point I just hope he actually gets the snaps to get to that point and shows enough that they can save $9 million next year by letting go of Danna.

staylor26 03-20-2025 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 18004135)
Porter Jr or Laporta were obvious picks that would have been better, Brian Branch was maybe a little less obvious but yea would have been better.

I don’t recall if Tuli Tuipulotu was thought of highly enough to go late first but in hindsight he would have been a pretty solid pick at DE.

FAU probably maxes out as an AJ Epenesa type with 6-7 sacks likely being his ceiling. It happens, at this point I just hope he actually gets the snaps to get to that point and shows enough that they can save $9 million next year by letting go of Danna.

In hindsight, right? Because I'd love to see the receipts of you or anyone banging the table for LaPorta in the 1st before the draft.

Do you understand how stupid and futile it is to play this dumb game?

The only one that works without hindsight is Porter Jr. and they were never going to draft a CB in the 1st for the 2nd year in a row. They drafted 4 CBs total the year before. FAU was a solid pick at the time that made sense. It is what it is. You idiots will never learn that nobody bats a thousand.

Too bad you didn't have the balls to join the CP mock. Would've been a good way to show you this shit isn't easy, and that's going against other reeruns too.

Sure-Oz 03-20-2025 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18004151)
In hindsight, right? Because I'd love to see the receipts of you or anyone banging the table for LaPorta in the 1st before the draft.

Do you understand how stupid and futile it is to play this dumb game?

The only one that works without hindsight is Porter Jr. and they were never going to draft a CB in the 1st for the 2nd year in a row. They drafted 4 CBs total the year before. FAU was a solid pick at the time that made sense. It is what it is. You idiots will never learn that nobody bats a thousand.

Too bad you didn't have the balls to join the CP mock. Would've been a good way to show you this shit isn't easy, and that's going against other reeruns too.

I wanted LaPorta over Felix then...and when they passed was hoping they'd try to get Mayer that the Raiders picked just cause I wanted Kelce replacement and see both play. Wasn't that mad but disappointed at the time

staylor26 03-20-2025 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 18004187)
I wanted LaPorta over Felix then...and when they passed was hoping they'd try to get Mayer that the Raiders picked just cause I wanted Kelce replacement and see both play. Wasn't that mad but disappointed at the time

Where's the receipts? You also had LaPorta over Mayer?

RealSNR 03-20-2025 12:13 PM

I had Tom Brady as the #1 QB in the 2000 draft.

No, really, I did. Just believe me.

Gary Cooper 03-20-2025 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 18004498)
I had Tom Brady as the #1 QB in the 2000 draft.

No, really, I did. Just believe me.

I told everyone we should draft Puka Nacua in the 1st round over that JAG from Lee's Summit. People just didn't listen.

BigRedChief 04-10-2025 09:18 AM

Is FAU every going to be a starting DE for us or in the NFL?

DJ's left nut 04-10-2025 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 18025885)
Is FAU every going to be a starting DE for us or in the NFL?

Probably not.

Guess it depends mostly on how broadly you define the term. I mean technically Mike Danna was a starting DE for us -- FAU can be that. He can be as good or better than Danna was.

But is he ever going to be the sort of genuine asset as a starter that Karlaftis is? Nah -- I don't really think he will.

Sofa King 04-10-2025 10:28 AM

This will be the year we find out. This is when he should take the leap.

notorious 04-10-2025 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 18025954)
This will be the year we find out. This is when he should take the leap.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/media...gif.25766/full

DJ's left nut 04-10-2025 10:48 AM

The fact that they were happy to slow play Omenihu creates some confidence.

The fact that they still brought Omenihu back then shakes it a bit.

I really don't know what he's going to be. But I think a better version of Danna and/or lesser version of Omenihu should be a fair bar for him to clear. Somewhere between those 2 guys is a fine, if unspectacular, use of the 1st rounder.

Obviously you're not gonna go very far if that's all you EVER get from your 1st round picks, but if that's what your 1st round 'busts' amount to, you're in really really good shape.

PHOG 04-10-2025 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 18025980)

LMAO

InChiefsHeaven 04-10-2025 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 18025980)

LMAO I just can't stop watching it...

RunKC 04-10-2025 01:55 PM

I expect career years from Omenihu, Felix and Karlaftis. 2 of these guys are in money years and Felix knows it’s time to put up or shut up. He wants that 5th yr option. That’s money on the table for him too.

KCUnited 04-10-2025 01:57 PM

Hard not to have a career year for Felix with the bar laying on the ground

BigRedChief 04-10-2025 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18025940)
Probably not.

Guess it depends mostly on how broadly you define the term. I mean technically Mike Danna was a starting DE for us -- FAU can be that. He can be as good or better than Danna was.

But is he ever going to be the sort of genuine asset as a starter that Karlaftis is? Nah -- I don't really think he will.

wiffing on a 1st rounder happens but still hurts you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.