![]() |
DVOA says the Titans have the stronger rushing attack, the stronger overall offense, and the better QB. The Niners should be very worried about their ability to score points on this defense. Jimmy G actually graded out slightly worse than Kirk Cousins in the regular season this year.
https://i.imgur.com/jRkmwck.png |
Quote:
And I asked you for a metric... And all those things you name we have. Bye Weeks, Injuries, Travel. Not that anything before 2002 is going to help you anyway. No one traveled more miles per year than the 49ers. ATL, NO, STL was our division. |
Quote:
What’s up Bart. Glad you’re back. I disagree tho. Many times I’ve started a football convo then the reply’s regarding my convo end up being about poop on the SF streets. And other jokes that I rather not throw out. I’m here to talk football Burk. Not derail the thread topic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you travel to Mexico? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Road Dogs!! |
Quote:
Obviously, the 49ers are a better team than the Vikings. And Jimmy is a better QB than Kirk. Though I'm curious to see how Jimmy does when pressured consistently, and he can't rely on the run game. But I wonder just how much better. Because I'm seeing trends in their performances that lead me to believe that the 49ers defense isn't that great against the run. And that there are holes in the secondary that can be exploited by a passing attack like ours. Because it's going to come down to once Pat figures out what those weaknesses are, and cancels out the running attack of SF, can Jimmy go throw for throw against Pat? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is what you said. It is you that is dishonest for backpeddling faster than a fat lesbian on a bicycle going down a hill in SF. Look at this quote, BY YOU. Then actually read all of my arguments. You cannot prove this statement, as I have spent post after post explaining to you. It is also difficult for me (as I have explained) to write a 200 page thesis and do the studies necessary to prove that your stupid statement is not provable. You can claim I am being dishonest, but how? I used the word "tough" instead of "hard" ? Come on MAN. Just admit that this statement above isn't provable by any means and move on. They played a bunch of teams with a high win % on the back stretch.....but the "hardest 6 game stretch" of all time? Thats a little much.....as I have explained over and over. ANd no I am not being dishonest. Thats your words...which youre walking back on now...my point (if you need a summary) is win % is not a good measure of a hard opponent sometimes, and then trying to extrapolate that over a huge history of the NFL with different schedules and bye weeks etc...impossible... |
Quote:
Did you play in one single game that was not in a dome or the temperature was below 70 degrees? Paper Tigers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think it works too well. It's better to load up against the pass, try to contain big plays in the run game then try to score on offense. Easier said than done though. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.