ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Caitlin Clark is ****ing awesome (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348179)

KC_Connection 04-05-2024 10:20 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The ref that called that foul should not be able to work another final four for a min! That was horrible and didn&#39;t let the players determine the outcome! I&#39;m sick for those players... a hot mess!</p>&mdash; Swin Cash (@SwinCash) <a href="https://twitter.com/SwinCash/status/1776453234124550534?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

threebag 04-05-2024 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 17473277)
Not as good as them though :LOL:

Yeah, I’m not a woke piece of shit

jettio 04-05-2024 10:24 PM

ESPN-ABC knows that they wanted Iowa in the final for ratings.

SVP is full of it complaining about the foul called on the screen. The UConn player Edwards had both of her feet moving her into a new position against a player who was already engaged with her for a couple seconds. Obviously a moving screen and then she used her arms to redirect the player. A screener is allowed to use arms to protect themselves, but cannot use arms to redirect the player being screened.

Anyway, SVP is full of shit and not even looking at the play. And ESPN-ABC knows that Sunday afternoon's game gets more viewers.

BWillie 04-05-2024 10:27 PM

So Car gonna beat that ass

Fishels 04-05-2024 10:28 PM

Girl roots for Mahomes.

I root for Girl

I am simple man

Hog Rider 04-05-2024 10:28 PM

So it's a foul by the book, but the ref is not supposed to make an obvious call because:
It's always the refs fault - because,,,don't make me clench my teeth you,you,you just don't know that it's, huff,huff,huff. Oh give me a minute. I gotta go to my safe space.

UChieffyBugger 04-05-2024 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag (Post 17473283)
Yeah, I’m not a woke piece of shit

Clearly!!..that's why they are better at life than YOU :D

KC_Connection 04-05-2024 10:47 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If that was a moving screen Draymond should be in prison for 10-15</p>&mdash; aaron. (@ayroned) <a href="https://twitter.com/ayroned/status/1776452506161426584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

smithandrew051 04-05-2024 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473297)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If that was a moving screen Draymond should be in prison for 10-15</p>&mdash; aaron. (@ayroned) <a href="https://twitter.com/ayroned/status/1776452506161426584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Regardless of the call, I would throw Green in prison

KC_Connection 04-05-2024 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17473301)
Regardless of the call, I would throw Green in prison

Tough but fair

Pitt Gorilla 04-05-2024 11:05 PM

Clark took a LOT of horrible shots tonight. Glad they won, though.

Taco John 04-05-2024 11:13 PM

I didn't like that call in the heat of the moment. But watching it after the fact, if you're not going to call that moving screen, then why call any of them. That was definitely a foul.

ptlyon 04-06-2024 12:20 AM

One of the most vocal gayhawk fans on CP bitching about officiating, and not even when it's not about the gayhawks. Color me shocked I tell ya.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 17473330)
One of the most vocal gayhawk fans on CP bitching about officiating, and not even when it's not about the gayhawks. Color me shocked I tell ya.

Soft, just like that call.

ptlyon 04-06-2024 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473338)
Soft, just like our 2023 season.

FYP

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 17473339)
FYP

Fair.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">With help from one of the worst calls in recent sports history! <a href="https://t.co/R8V5Ypcqcy">pic.twitter.com/R8V5Ypcqcy</a></p>&mdash; Bill Simmons (@BillSimmons) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillSimmons/status/1776453521480851826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Simmons may not be a KU guy but he is a guy who watches a lot of basketball and has almost certainly never seen anything like that call to end a game in his life.

louie aguiar 04-06-2024 03:17 AM

Reminds me of the defensive holding call against the eagles in the Super Bowl that everyone complained about- “yeah it was technically a hold but you can’t make the call in that situation”

If it’s the right call, it shouldn’t matter when it’s called. A foul is a foul.

ChiefsFanatic 04-06-2024 05:36 AM

This is funny AF.

She is one of my favorite basketball players ever, and this is brilliant. You may have to listen twice to catch them all.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5YO_...1hbW96YXNlNA==

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2024 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 17473309)
Clark took a LOT of horrible shots tonight. Glad they won, though.

That is more a credit to UConn’s defense. That girl who guarded her was relentless on defense. Off and on the ball. I don’t know how you can do that with zero rest.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 06:46 AM

KenPom boy ruined ANOTHER basketball thread?

bsp4444 04-06-2024 06:50 AM

Simmons may not be a KU guy but he is a guy who watches a lot of basketball and has almost certainly never seen anything like that call to end a game in his life.[/QUOTE]

But it didn’t end the game. Uconn could have rebounded the missed free throw and still had a chance. It changed the game, but it didn’t end it.

displacedinMN 04-06-2024 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15 (Post 17473267)
I was the big guy on the basketball court. I've set many picks, put guys on the deck clean many times. It's an art.

That was absolutely the right call. She wasn't set and stuck the leg out. That's a trash pick.

100% the right call.

she was not set and one foot was off the floor


it was a foul
it was not a fair catch

I hope Iowa has a chance vs SC. They are very very good.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 07:17 AM

Intentional to get you all talking about women's hoops ROFL

Bearcat 04-06-2024 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17473388)
KenPom boy ruined ANOTHER <strike>basketball</strike> thread?

...

Why Not? 04-06-2024 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473280)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The ref that called that foul should not be able to work another final four for a min! That was horrible and didn&#39;t let the players determine the outcome! I&#39;m sick for those players... a hot mess!</p>&mdash; Swin Cash (@SwinCash) <a href="https://twitter.com/SwinCash/status/1776453234124550534?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Nah. That ref just ensured job security for a long time. Women's basketball is mainstream relevant for exactly one more game. That ref (not saying intentionally) made sure that they are gonna get every drop of juice out of that last squeeze.

Bearcat 04-06-2024 08:16 AM

This is a penalty in hockey... LMAO

https://i.imgur.com/NPr3NJ0.png

https://i.imgur.com/hN1z3fu.png

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 17473274)
The mistake Dawn Staley made last year was she didn't care about Clark because her team was just outscoring everyone. So they didn't pay any extra attention to Clark, she went off and her team missed wide open looks all night. An issue they had all year (three point shooting) caught up with them. But this year they are one of the best three point shooting teams in the country.

They'll have a huge advantage on the boards, they have a much better bench, they have four elite guards who can all take turns attacking Clark and potentially get her into foul trouble like LSU did in the last final.

The only thing I don't like about SC is they can get bored and sloppy which leads to them playing down to their opponents level. But when they start rolling they can end the game in ten minutes which they did to NC State tonight.

The key to SC winning is clear. Blitz Clark all night and attack her on defense. And punish them on the boards like LSU did with your height advantages. It's that simple to me.

Iowa's not deep inside as well, and if Stuelke gets in foul trouble they will have no chance. I give Iowa about a 15% chance to win. Clark can only do so much, but that's why they play the games.

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473447)

Yep obvious as it gets.

<blockquote class="tiktok-embed" cite="https://www.tiktok.com/@brooks451_nc/video/7354627375461682478" data-video-id="7354627375461682478" style="max-width: 605px;min-width: 325px;" > <section> <a target="_blank" title="@brooks451_nc" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@brooks451_nc?refer=embed">@brooks451_nc</a> Replying to @user6052355619610 <a target="_blank" title="♬ original sound - Brooks451" href="https://www.tiktok.com/music/original-sound-7354627561382480686?refer=embed">♬ original sound - Brooks451</a> </section> </blockquote> <script async src="https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js"></script>

Bearcat 04-06-2024 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17473453)
Yep obvious as it gets.

I saw a comment on reddit that mentioned the replays that ESPN showed actually made it look more controversial than it was because you don't see her stepping out like you do on that angle... and one angle is zoomed in almost waist-up.

If anything, blame the replay angles (of course, the tinfoil caps will say that was intentional and within a matter of seconds ESPN chose those angles to make it more controversial than it was).

https://www.reddit.com/r/CollegeBask...alled_for_the/

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473460)
I saw a comment on reddit that mentioned the replays that ESPN showed actually made it look more controversial than it was because you don't see her stepping out like you do on that angle... and one angle is zoomed in almost waist-up.

If anything, blame the replay angles (of course, the tinfoil caps will say that was intentional and within a matter of seconds ESPN chose those angles to make it more controversial than it was).

https://www.reddit.com/r/CollegeBask...alled_for_the/

My post on here from last night said the same thing. The wide angle showed the moving pick was obvious but people were robbed of an ending... Please.

Hoover 04-06-2024 08:47 AM

Its in ESPNs financial interest for it to be a controversial call

BigCatDaddy 04-06-2024 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473258)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;I don&#39;t even know if I can say this on TV, but that call sucked, SVP.&quot; - Andraya Carter <br><br>&quot;Yeah, you can say it, and I agree.&quot; - Scott Van Pelt <a href="https://t.co/5GqUUsB8Fj">https://t.co/5GqUUsB8Fj</a> <a href="https://t.co/qtJNwdc4pG">pic.twitter.com/qtJNwdc4pG</a></p>&mdash; Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) <a href="https://twitter.com/awfulannouncing/status/1776458582470672529?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

You can’t end a game like that. Never seen anything like it.

From that angle the foul looks even worse than what I saw last night. She obviously was still sliding up the court to set the pick when the contact occurred.

Buehler445 04-06-2024 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17473467)
Its in ESPNs financial interest for it to be a controversial call

Yep.

Buehler445 04-06-2024 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473447)

Yeah, she got clocked in the ****ing throat.

It's a foul. And people are shocked that the TMZ of sports media is making a big deal about it. Nevermind all the ****hole calls (Bills Offensive offsides comes to mind) that they sit quiet about.

TMZ-SPN crafting a narrative? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.

BigRedChief 04-06-2024 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 17473310)
I didn't like that call in the heat of the moment. But watching it after the fact, if you're not going to call that moving screen, then why call any of them. That was definitely a foul.

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 17473341)
Reminds me of the defensive holding call against the eagles in the Super Bowl that everyone complained about- “yeah it was technically a hold but you can’t make the call in that situation”

If it’s the right call, it shouldn’t matter when it’s called. A foul is a foul.

agreed. It was obvious. If you don't call that foul and they make the shot, people would be up in arms the no-call decided the game.

Buehler445 04-06-2024 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag (Post 17473165)
Gabbie Marshall is a pretty decent looking teammate

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...I4_400x400.jpg

Give me Stulke. I think she looks great.

<blockquote class="reddit-embed-bq" style="height:500px" data-embed-height="740"><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/WNBA_Thots/comments/1bwpirh/hannah_stuelke/">Hannah Stuelke</a><br> by<a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Extension_Weight_260/">u/Extension_Weight_260</a> in<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/WNBA_Thots/">WNBA_Thots</a></blockquote><script async="" src="https://embed.reddit.com/widgets.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

ChiTown 04-06-2024 09:17 AM

It sucks that it happened when it did, but that’s a moving screen, and a blatantly obvious one at that. If the Ref swallows his whistle and allows Bueckers to shoot and make a clean shot due to the screen, then people would have a legit gripe. This? Meh.

RaidersOftheCellar 04-06-2024 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 17473330)
One of the most vocal gayhawk fans on CP bitching about officiating, and not even when it's not about the gayhawks. Color me shocked I tell ya.

Getting bent out of shape over a woman’s b-ball game. LMAO

MarkDavis'Haircut 04-06-2024 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473198)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NAAAAAHHHHHH!!! I ain’t rolling with that call.</p>&mdash; LeBron James (@KingJames) <a href="https://twitter.com/KingJames/status/1776451983047856248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 6, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The GOAT of reading book jacket covers.

Bearcat 04-06-2024 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 17473477)
Yeah, she got clocked in the ****ing throat.

It's a foul. And people are shocked that the TMZ of sports media is making a big deal about it. Nevermind all the ****hole calls (Bills Offensive offsides comes to mind) that they sit quiet about.

TMZ-SPN crafting a narrative? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.

Yeah, and it seems crazy shortsighted to bask in the fake outrage as opposed to talking about the quality of basketball (even if it wasn't actually amazing)... if it was actually a terrible call that decided it, I'd be less likely to watch tomorrow, but who cares because we can run 12 hours of rage bait today! :facepalm:

BWillie 04-06-2024 09:41 AM

I can tell you that in the NBA that has a 20% chance to be called, if that. In mens college bball it would be more like 50%

jettio 04-06-2024 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17473514)
I can tell you that in the NBA that has a 20% chance to be called, if that. In mens college bball it would be more like 50%

That's bullshit. In the NBA, the screener would know that they already had the defender screened and would not moved both feet and used arms to redirect to completely reroute the player.

Paige Bueckers had nothing to worry about from Gabby Marshall if Edwards had realized that she had already done her screen.

Did you watch the play?

Marshall knew the microsecond that she heard the whistle that the foul was on Edwards. I do not think I have ever seen a defender know that fast that the call was not on her.

jettio 04-06-2024 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473447)

The thing you will notice about all the pissers and moaners about the call is that none of them will use a video breakdown of the play to support their claim.

The top picture shows Edwards has her left foot off the ground, and the next picture has her right foot off the ground.

George Liquor 04-06-2024 10:09 AM

I'm sure LeFlop has never gotten a favorable call in the NBA

displacedinMN 04-06-2024 10:13 AM

https://x.com/CoachJimMoraFB/status/...jp6b0e3LQ&s=09

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

dlphg9 04-06-2024 10:16 AM

That was absolutely an offensive foul. Wtf are people even bitching about. "Let the players play", well let the defender defend. She can't ****ing play defense if she's getting clocked by a moving screen and a hand to the throat. I hate that let the players play shit, because the person commiting the foul isn't allowing the player to play.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17473514)
I can tell you that in the NBA that has a 20% chance to be called, if that. In mens college bball it would be more like 50%

At that stage of the game? I’d say the percentages are even lower than that. Draymond could effectively get away with murder with 3 seconds left in a close NBA game.

dlphg9 04-06-2024 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473539)
At that stage of the game? I’d say the percentages are even lower than that. Draymond could effectively get away with murder with 3 seconds left in a close NBA game.

You're an idiot if you don't think that should have been called. I don't care when it's called. Why the **** should the offense get an unfair advantage just because there isn't much time? Don't slam into defenders and there wouldn't be a reason to call a penalty.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473447)
This is a penalty in hockey... LMAO

In hockey, you say? You know as well as I do that the refs effectively swallow their whistles late in the 3rd of close playoff games. The players certainly all know it.

Why Not? 04-06-2024 10:23 AM

Paige Bueckers handling it much better than anyone else. Totally owning that it should never come down to one call and that she should've done a better job. Big props to her.

dlphg9 04-06-2024 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473543)
In hockey, you say? You know as well as I do that the refs effectively swallow their whistles late in the 3rd of close playoff games. The players certainly all know it.

You're just an incredibly stupid person, huh?

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2024 10:26 AM

Honestly the call wouldn’t be so controversial except that the refs called a pretty shit game. I’m glad Iowa won. But I’m tired of officials who can’t stop themselves from influencing games. I don’t love the final call but I get it. But what was way worse and way more impactful was putting every damn UConn player in foul trouble. It let Iowa have so many uncontested plays inside. But anyway… im glad to see Caitlin play one last time in the finals everyone wants to see her play. I like bueckers too but she’ll have another run of it next year with probably a way better roster.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 17473548)
You're just an incredibly stupid person, huh?

Have you ever even been to a NHL game in your life? It’s a pretty common phenomenon.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17473550)
Honestly the call wouldn’t be so controversial except that the refs called a pretty shit game. I’m glad Iowa won. But I’m tired of officials who can’t stop themselves from influencing games. I don’t love the final call but I get it. But what was way worse and way more impactful was putting every damn UConn player in foul trouble. It let Iowa have so many uncontested plays inside. But anyway… im glad to see Caitlin play one last time in the finals everyone wants to see her play. I like bueckers too but she’ll have another run of it next year with probably a way better roster.

Well that certainly doesn’t help either. I was rooting against UConn (just like I’ll be rooting against them today) but they got screwed hard last night and it all culminated with that soft call in that moment.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 10:29 AM

Chiefs fans crying about a late, (correct) controversial call in a huge postseason that "shouldn't be called" is pathetic as ****. You're the same ones saying the grab on JuJu was legit lulz

It was an obvious foul, so correct call. Anyone on this board that says otherwise is hypocrical as ****.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473556)
Well that certainly doesn’t help either. I was rooting against UConn (just like I’ll be rooting against them today) but they got screwed hard last night and it all culminated with that soft call in that moment.

Juju

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2024 10:31 AM

I mean, UConn had only 6 players play and they had 18 personal fouls? That kind of shit is unconscionable. And the ncaa needs to move to 6 fouls asap for both men’s and women’s. Because nobody wants to see one and done tournament games played with a heavy whistle.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17473557)
Chiefs fans crying about a late, (correct) controversial call in a huge postseason that "shouldn't be called" is pathetic as ****. You're the same ones saying the grab on JuJu was legit lulz

It was an obvious foul, so correct call. Anyone on this board that says otherwise is hypocrical as ****.

About the Chiefs I fairly admit to being hypocritical as ****, sure. And if I was an Iowa fan, I certainly wouldn’t be apologizing for shit either.

That was still an incredibly soft call to end a game no matter what you say.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 10:32 AM

No one can argue what i just said ROFL

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17473561)
I mean, UConn had only 6 players play and they had 18 personal fouls? That kind of shit is unconscionable. And the ncaa needs to move to 6 fouls asap for both men’s and women’s. Because nobody wants to see one and done tournament games played with a heavy whistle.

Anybody who watched the game knows the officiating was heavily leaning one way.

BWillie 04-06-2024 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473539)
At that stage of the game? I’d say the percentages are even lower than that. Draymond could effectively get away with murder with 3 seconds left in a close NBA game.

Agreed. Those numbers Im guesstimating are just in general. As has been known for decades in basketball, refs swallow their whistle more on those types of plays at the end of games.

Jewish Rabbi 04-06-2024 11:03 AM

If the bitch from UConn would have taken the screen instead of being three feet from it she wouldn’t have had to move. If you want to blame anyone there blame Bueckers, not the refs or the screener.

Bearcat 04-06-2024 11:10 AM

Don't be afraid to do stupid shit and dare the officials to blow the whistle, they probably won't! -- coach Auriemma, probably

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2024 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 17473593)
If the bitch from UConn would have taken the screen instead of being three feet from it she wouldn’t have had to move. If you want to blame anyone there blame Bueckers, not the refs or the screener.

That’s a very fair statement. She took it way too wide and it’s probably a very clean screen if she comes off of it tighter. Uncharacteristic for a really smart player.

Jewish Rabbi 04-06-2024 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 17473600)
Don't be afraid to do stupid shit and dare the officials to blow the whistle, they probably won't! -- coach Auriemma, probably

Meh, he handled it with class I thought. Didn’t see any postgame comments but he wasn’t really railing on the refs at all for that call.

BWillie 04-06-2024 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 17473605)
Meh, he handled it with class I thought. Didn’t see any postgame comments but he wasn’t really railing on the refs at all for that call.

50/50 that Geno is a Jerry Sandusky. What kind of a creep would coach women & young girls for 35 years? A predator thats who.

I grew up with a guy who ended up being a golf instructor. He specialized in girls instruction. He recently became known as a Diddler. Him and P Diddler gonna share a cell.

threebag 04-06-2024 11:21 AM

Damn, Bwillie’s world is a gamble

ChiefaRoo 04-06-2024 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473562)
About the Chiefs I fairly admit to being hypocritical as ****, sure. And if I was an Iowa fan, I certainly wouldn’t be apologizing for shit either.

That was still an incredibly soft call to end a game no matter what you say.

It was a blatant moving screen that directly affected the play. It was an easy and correct call.

Bearcat 04-06-2024 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 17473605)
Meh, he handled it with class I thought. Didn’t see any postgame comments but he wasn’t really railing on the refs at all for that call.

I was making fun of the idiots in here, not coach Auriemma... coaches obviously want players to be even more aware of not doing stupid shit at the end of games, while others crying about the officials after such a blatant call is basically the opposite and saying what the player did was fine because it was the end of the game so who cares.

Auriemma seemed pissed at his player and rightfully so, she made a boneheaded play that cost them the game.

jettio 04-06-2024 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17473561)
I mean, UConn had only 6 players play and they had 18 personal fouls? That kind of shit is unconscionable. And the ncaa needs to move to 6 fouls asap for both men’s and women’s. Because nobody wants to see one and done tournament games played with a heavy whistle.

UConn had a lot of key players out with injury. Their game strategy was to play with a lot of defensive effort on a 7 player rotation that was not UConn's 7 best players going into the season.

The foul trouble had more to do with UConn being a shorthanded team that needed everything to go right to have a chance.

The problem was UConn kept winning and made the final four to play a team they could only beat if they hustled and fouled the shit out of them the whole game.

staylor26 04-06-2024 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473278)
If you replaced LeBron with MJ in this sentence, I wonder who on the board it would apply to?

This is a blatant false equivalence. I don't bring up MJ any more than you do. Like you just did.

This idea that I'm bringing up MJ in every basketball thread and constantly posting tweets from weird Twitter accounts dedicated to defending his honor is objectively false.

99.9% of my posts on CP are Chiefs/draft related.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17473630)
This is a blatant false equivalence. I don't bring up MJ any more than you do. Like you just did.

Feels like something a MJ propagandist would say, yes.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 11:59 AM

So, we are all in an agreement. It was a foul.

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17473632)
So, we are all in an agreement. It was a foul.

If they called every moving screen a foul in a basketball game, how many fouls do you think there would be?

Pasta Little Brioni 04-06-2024 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473634)
If they called every moving screen a foul in a basketball game, how many fouls do you think there would be?

You can say the same for defensive holding. No one complained when we got it against Philly. Thread...

KC_Connection 04-06-2024 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni (Post 17473636)
You can say the same for defensive holding. No one complained when we got it against Philly. Thread...

If I wasn't a Chiefs fan, I sure as hell would have.

chiefzilla1501 04-06-2024 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 17473626)
UConn had a lot of key players out with injury. Their game strategy was to play with a lot of defensive effort on a 7 player rotation that was not UConn's 7 best players going into the season.

The foul trouble had more to do with UConn being a shorthanded team that needed everything to go right to have a chance.

The problem was UConn kept winning and made the final four to play a team they could only beat if they hustled and fouled the shit out of them the whole game.

I mean yeah they played more aggressively but that’s a tight whistle. It’s not like they were playing hack a clark. Both centers with 4 fouls? The guard who wasn’t even guarding Caitlin clark with 4 fouls?

I just hate to see it. When late in games defenders are backing off offensive players for easy scores that’s not great basketball. Refs have to swallow the whistle more in tournament basketball. Or more appropriately, they need to realize younger kids are more prone to mistakes and just raise the ejection limit to 6 fouls. Way too easy for refs to have massive influence on games on this level.

jettio 04-06-2024 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473634)
If they called every moving screen a foul in a basketball game, how many fouls do you think there would be?

If Jonathon Ogden was the screener and executed the screen as if was HOF left Tackle in one one on pass pro, almost all of them would be called.

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473562)
About the Chiefs I fairly admit to being hypocritical as ****, sure. And if I was an Iowa fan, I certainly wouldn’t be apologizing for shit either.

That was still an incredibly soft call to end a game no matter what you say.

you are ****ing reeruned... it was a hard foul, actually got her in the face a little and could have been reviewed as a flagrant, though it wasn't. It was definitely a text book moving screen common foul. If you watch the continued play, they didn't have much going for their offense anyway. Would have had to launch a prayer.

IowaHawkeyeChief 04-06-2024 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 17473634)
If they called every moving screen a foul in a basketball game, how many fouls do you think there would be?

LMAO... Just stop already. You've seen the angle they didn't show last night. Just like the hold on JuJu that wasn't shown. Once the actual foul was shown, it negates the dumb ****ers bitching about the call, except for reeruns like you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.