ChiefsPlanet
Page 17 of 35 « First 713141516 17 1819202127 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Peyton “looked real good” throwing to new Broncos teammates (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257791)

Ugly Duck 06-12-2012 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8675343)
If Manning read CP, he would know that he's healthier than he's been in half a decade. What a dumbshit.
..................................ROFL:LOL:.............................................

Terrel Pryor camp report:

"Terrell Pryor continued to have issues. Same old dead horse, really. Floating long balls, low/behind on short passes, etc.. He also had a fumbled exchange on a handoff to Taiwan Jones. To his credit, he did pick it up in seven on seven drills and completed some nice passes. But once the linemen came in and the rush was coming, he was caught holding the ball too long and would have been sacked a couple times."

Quesadilla Joe 06-12-2012 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 8675304)
Peyton Manning says he still has work to do
Posted by Darin Gantt on June 12, 2012, 6:11 PM EDT
Peyton Manning AP

On the list of things Denver coach John Fox is worried about, Twitter pictures of playbooks are low on the list.

Maybe the notably conservative coach is relaxed because his quarterback continues to make good progress.

Peyton Manning told USA Today’s Jim Corbett he feels good after a Monday check-up with Broncos doctors, but stressed he was not yet 100 percent.

“I still have a lot of work to do,” Manning said. “I continue to rehab. I have work to do and progress that I still need to make.”

Corbett’s report said Manning showed good velocity, completing a 30-yard pass to Demaryius Thomas during practice. But Manning pumped the brakes, probably hesitant to get anyone’s hopes too high after a year off.

“I can’t emphasize enough that I still have rehab to do,” Manning said. “That’s still part of the process.”

The Broncos are doing everything they can to make Manning comfortable, even inviting his old offensive coordinator Tom Moore to practice (Moore and Fox worked together in Pittsburgh in 1989).

And if Manning can continue to make progress, Fox might be so happy he’ll start Tweeting himself.
LMAO

You just posted this because of the headline. The article was extremely positive and I bet you didn't even bother reading it.

Chiefshrink 06-13-2012 12:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WV (Post 8494722)
I know he's never really looked like an NFL player (ala Montana) but even still I thought he looked a bit frail.

http://director.denverpost.com/p.php...2&m=1332785482
Hell, Montana never looked the part either. Manning better be looking good since these are just shell workouts with no real D pressure:rolleyes:

One hit away from retirement OR he will have a Priest Holmes comeback epipheny thought of "Shit, this next play could paralyze me forever, I'm done !!:shake:

InChiefsHeaven 06-13-2012 05:59 AM
An 80% Payton Manning is better than anything we have. Dammit.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-13-2012 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by InChiefsHell (Post 8676423)
An 80% Payton Manning is better than anything we have. Dammit.
True. But, it's not good enough to even win the division, let alone a Super Bowl. Still one flawed as hell team, that would need a Manning close to his prime days to compete.

suds79 06-13-2012 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8676549)
True. But, it's not good enough to even win the division, let alone a Super Bowl. Still one flawed as hell team, that would need a Manning close to his prime days to compete.
??

They won the division last year with Tim Tebow. Now it wouldn't be good enough to win the division?

BigCatDaddy 06-13-2012 08:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8676554)
??

They won the division last year with Tim Tebow. Now it wouldn't be good enough to win the division?
It's possible they can win the division, but last year has little to do with this year. Teams improve, schedules change, bounces go or don't go your way and as we know key players get hurt.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-13-2012 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8676554)
??

They won the division last year with Tim Tebow. Now it wouldn't be good enough to win the division?
JFC. That was one of the biggest fluke seasons I've ever seen. They ran a Pop Warner offense and had some of the biggest breaks seen in a while for pete's sake. I doubt guys run out of bounds to stop the clock when all they need to do is fall over to win the game this year.

They were so confident they could repeat it, so they sent thier 1st round drafted QB packing and signed a guy with a broken neck.

vailpass 06-13-2012 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8676549)
True. But, it's not good enough to even win the division, let alone a Super Bowl. Still one flawed as hell team, that would need a Manning close to his prime days to compete.
LMAO precious

DaKCMan AP 06-13-2012 09:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8676554)
??

They won the division last year with Tim Tebow. Now it wouldn't be good enough to win the division?
Last place schedule vs. first place schedule may make a difference.

ToxSocks 06-13-2012 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8676695)
LMAO precious
Indeed.

8-8 Won the division last year. I hate the Donks and Manning as much as the next guy....but lets get real here....

Hammock Parties 06-13-2012 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Uncut Meat (Post 8495646)
"Oh yeah...you're looking GOOD Peyton."

http://i40.tinypic.com/34gaql1.jpg
Bumping this cus I can't stop thinking about it when i read the thread title.

Mile High Mania 06-13-2012 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8676703)
Last place schedule vs. first place schedule may make a difference.
We do this every year... last year, there wasn't a great deal of difference with the schedules of the AFCW teams, same for this year. Based on 2011, Denver has the 'first place' schedule while KC has the 'last place schedule'.

Take out the AFCW games...

Denver Home: Steelers, Texans, Saints, Bucs, Browns
KC Home: Falcons, Ravens, Bengals, Panthers, Colts

Denver Away: Falcons, Patriots, Bengals, Panthers, Ravens
KC Away: Bills, Saints, Bucs, Steelers, Browns

Texans at Denver vs Colts at KC
Denver at Patriots vs KC at Bills

Those are the main differences... KC gets the matchup edge there for sure, but there a lot of tough games for both teams.

tooge 06-13-2012 10:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 8676779)
We do this every year... last year, there wasn't a great deal of difference with the schedules of the AFCW teams, same for this year. Based on 2011, Denver has the 'first place' schedule while KC has the 'last place schedule'.

Take out the AFCW games...

Denver Home: Steelers, Texans, Saints, Bucs, Browns
KC Home: Falcons, Ravens, Bengals, Panthers, Colts

Denver Away: Falcons, Patriots, Bengals, Panthers, Ravens
KC Away: Bills, Saints, Bucs, Steelers, Browns

Texans at Denver vs Colts at KC
Denver at Patriots vs KC at Bills

Those are the main differences... KC gets the matchup edge there for sure, but there a lot of tough games for both teams.

You are missing the bigger difference, and that is the fact that all of most of KC's tough opponents (ATL, BAL, CIN) they get at home, while Denver gets 4 of its 5 toughest on the road. That could be a two game swing right there.

vailpass 06-13-2012 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooge (Post 8676846)
You are missing the bigger difference, and that is the fact that all of most of KC's tough opponents (ATL, BAL, CIN) they get at home, while Denver gets 4 of its 5 toughest on the road. That could be a two game swing right there.
Matt Cassell


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM.
Page 17 of 35 « First 713141516 17 1819202127 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.