ChiefsPlanet
Page 169 of 177 « First 69119159165166167168 169 170171172173 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Rashee Rice Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348549)

ToxSocks 08-09-2024 10:09 AM
LMAO that trade scenario is so dumb.

So the productive difference between Rice and Lamb is suppose to be worth 2 1sts? LOL WUT?

Again, LOL WUT.

DRM08 08-09-2024 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToxSocks (Post 17622882)
LMAO that trade scenario is so dumb.

So the productive difference between Rice and Lamb is suppose to be worth 2 1sts? LOL WUT?

Again, LOL WUT.
Not to mention having to pay Lamb over $30M per year when Rice is still on a cheap rookie deal for 3 more seasons. Two years ago the Chiefs dumped the #1 ranked player in the league because they didn't want to pay him $30M per year. And they won 2 Super Bowls in a row without him. Receivers are overrated and overpaid.

Bl00dyBizkitz 08-09-2024 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToxSocks (Post 17622882)
LMAO that trade scenario is so dumb.

So the productive difference between Rice and Lamb is suppose to be worth 2 1sts? LOL WUT?

Again, LOL WUT.
I look at something like that and just assume some people look at football as if it were Madden. Or worse, like the NBA. Like pairing 2 or 3 guys together automatically gets you a ring.

It's also Twitter, so it's curated to get as much engagement as possible.

Balto 08-09-2024 11:43 AM
Lamb NO.....Maybe Rice+FAU for Parsons HAHA

Marcellus 08-09-2024 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 17622561)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">IMAGINE ��<br><br>Would the Chiefs make this move for CeeDee Lamb? ��<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DallasCowboys?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DallasCowboys</a> <a href="https://t.co/681wqQr5rx">pic.twitter.com/681wqQr5rx</a></p>&mdash; FanDuel (@FanDuel) <a href="https://twitter.com/FanDuel/status/1821706519185961432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hmmm, losing Rice, two #1 picks, and having to reset the WR market for maybe the 5th best receiver in the NFL? Pass.
Not just no but hell **** no. Thats reeruned.

Marcellus 08-09-2024 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToxSocks (Post 17622882)
LMAO that trade scenario is so dumb.

So the productive difference between Rice and Lamb is suppose to be worth 2 1sts? LOL WUT?

Again, LOL WUT.
And a probably $30MM AAV contract for CeeDee.

chiefzilla1501 08-09-2024 12:21 PM
Yeah ceedee is a hell of a player but rice is immensely more valuable than draft picks right now because he's cheap and we know he's good. I beat the drum for WRs last year but right now I'm very pleased with where we're at. If anything we could always use an extra role player but it's not necessary. I'd love to see a checkdown option who runs great routes and catches every damn thing even if they're not a burner. Maybe Ross fits that bill

PHOG 08-09-2024 12:32 PM
:shake: Wait, not no, HELL NO!!

Otter 08-09-2024 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17622630)
We traded Hill for the equivalent of a first but we’re gonna give up 2 firsts and Rice for Lamb? Huh?

This

New World Order 08-09-2024 12:48 PM
FAU for Parsons

Otter 08-09-2024 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToxSocks (Post 17622882)
LMAO that trade scenario is so dumb.

So the productive difference between Rice and Lamb is suppose to be worth 2 1sts? LOL WUT?

Again, LOL WUT.

And this

Dante84 08-09-2024 02:12 PM
I wouldn't trade Rice for Lamb straight up, because of the money alone.

As mentioned by others, the difference in production doesn't warrant giving up the extra picks, let alone the cap space impact.

carcosa 08-09-2024 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 17623126)
FAU for Parsons
Email this to bruntgeech@aol.com immediately!!!

Otter 08-09-2024 02:32 PM
Also, I know I'm picking a scab but it's definitely something to factor in if we're talking trades:

Be it suspension or worse Rice's future isn't exactly solid. The Chiefs aren't exactly dealing with a even deck. Not negotiation time IMHO. He's still on rookie contract and we're not dealing with pocket aces. Hang on till we know.

Pitt Gorilla 08-09-2024 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 17622561)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">IMAGINE ��<br><br>Would the Chiefs make this move for CeeDee Lamb? ��<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChiefsKingdom?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ChiefsKingdom</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DallasCowboys?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DallasCowboys</a> <a href="https://t.co/681wqQr5rx">pic.twitter.com/681wqQr5rx</a></p>&mdash; FanDuel (@FanDuel) <a href="https://twitter.com/FanDuel/status/1821706519185961432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hmmm, losing Rice, two #1 picks, and having to reset the WR market for maybe the 5th best receiver in the NFL? Pass.
Chiefs aren't even picking up the phone for that one.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.
Page 169 of 177 « First 69119159165166167168 169 170171172173 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.