DJ's left nut |
03-17-2022 04:19 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
(Post 16197324)
The biggest problem with Clark was his contract length. Give Za’Darius Smith the 3 year contracts you gave Sammy, Matheiu and Reid then you are protected.
|
The contract length was necessary to spread the guaranteed money out to the point that he'd sign it and still leave you with sufficient cap space to go after the other guys Veach wanted.
Who were, unfortunately, Hitchens and Watkins.
Length doesn't do anything but let you spread the pain. The length of Clark's contract was immaterial especially once he restructured it.
The biggest problem with Clark was the guarantees.
And you're not getting Smith on the kind of cheap deal you got for Reid - that's why he walked away from Baltimore. And even on a 3 year deal, Mathieu and Watkins numbers were tough by the end of year 2.
Term on NFL contracts is nothing more than an accounting measure - it doesn't matter and in fact in most ways it helps teams (larger pro-rated period and more opportunity for restructures).
A 3 year deal doesn't get around any of those problems if Smith is insisting on significant guarantees. It certainly doesn't make things EASIER than a 5 year deal with the same guarantees would.
EDIT: I see you were talking about Hunter - it's an even BIGGER problem for Hunter because he's absolutely going to insist on those guarantees due to the leverage he has with his roster bonus imploding your cap and the fact that he is clearly indicating he wishes to be paid a great deal sooner rather than later.
If merely signing for $25 million in guarantees was sufficient, he'd be happy to take that $18 million roster bonus and turn it into a signing bonus to pro-rate it out. He clearly ain't content doing that. He's looking for $40+ million in guarantees and you aren't doing that over a 3 year deal without butt-****ing your cap.
|