ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Dorsey gone? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308394)

ptlyon 06-23-2017 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12928605)
NFL live speculating that Dorsey was fired because of some bad deals he's made and also beating Reid wouldn't sign a extension without knowing who the gm is going to be. They keep bringing up Brett Veach

Way less plausible than poontang

BlackHelicopters 06-23-2017 11:41 AM

According to my source, this has not registered a bit on Packers Planet.

RunKC 06-23-2017 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12928511)
As some know, I used to work for a company that had a sponship with the Chiefs. Owner has been a STH for decades and has been at events with Clark many times, including the one where I briefly met Scooter Poole.

I don't work there anymore but I know people that do and just text them to ask what the owner of the company is hearing through the grapevine.

Just got a text back. Here is what is going through the grapevine from people in the know.

Quote:

(Owners name) told us today that he's heard that the Dorsey/Hunt relationship has really sizzled. First off, anyone like Kietzman saying anything about Mahomes is a lie. Everybody loved him and Andy knew full well that he had work to do with him, so don't believe anything about Mahomes being a factor in this decision.
The GB issue was part of this factor. Clark knows that Dorsey has friends in GB and still talks to them all the time. When this rumor came out, Clark confronted Dorsey about this in his weekly meeting with him. Dorsey reiterated that this was his dream job, but that that was something he used to want when he was in GB. Clark wasn't too happy about that but was okay with offering a deal that would show loyalty here.

Contracts were a big problem in Clark's mind, and he didn't like how we kept having these bad deals with bad cap moves. Clark was not happy at all about how the Eric Berry situation unfolded. That situation got so bad last year that Eric Berry would not speak to Dorsey. He avoided him throughout the season and didn't want to have anything to do with him for a long time. This was due to the insurance fiasco. If it wasn't for Clark, Berry wouldn't have signed. Andy and Clark had to step in and help get that signing done bc of the animosity from Berry, his family and agent to Dorsey.
This led Clark to do a complete root cause analysis of the entire management in personnel. Normally this wouldn't happen because of the great success we've had.

It was no secret that Clark didn't like some of the contracts that were given out and the way they were formulated. Dorsey acknowledged this and fired Trip McCracken while hiring his new guy.

In regards to your question about Andy being on edge-
This was because of players missing OTA's. It's usually normal, but Eric Berry apparently told Andy he needed more time away because he was still upset about the contract drama.
This led to Andy snapping at the media.
Andy and Clark were furious at Dorsey for how he handled Maclin's release. Maclin was enraged about what happened. Andy initially wanted to have a man-to-man talk about this. What happened happened and Andy called Maclin right after to talk to him.
Mark Donovan was pissed off about the bad publicity that came from Maclin's release.

Finally, Clark was okay with giving Dorsey another chance with a new cap strategist, but Dorsey wasn't pleased with the dollars he was getting. Clark was not happy about this because he had just stepped in to do Dorsey's job and sign Berry. Adding in the contract missteps and GB drama to this situation made this easy for Clark.

Brett Veach is the obvious favorite for GM. We'll have some external candidates come in but it would have to be a slam dunk candidate to make them pass on Veach.

DJ's left nut 06-23-2017 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928583)
Dorsey had plenty of opportunities to leave Green Bay (including the Colts) but only left when offered the Chiefs gig.

I don't think he'll take just any job and his options will be few next year.

I'd be absolutely shocked to see him take the Los Angeles Chargers or Rams gigs (if they're open, which is possible) because he doesn't seem like a guy that wants to be the center of attention in a city with 10 million people (especially when no one cares about the Chargers). Same for the Jets gig.

So, he's not going to the AFC East, North, South or West. He's not going to the NFC East or NFC West. I suppose it's remotely possible that he goes to the Saints and possible that he goes to the Vikings (if they clean house) or the Bears (which is a team that's very likely to clean house).

So, Saints, Vikings and Bears, two teams which compete directly against Green Bay, the same franchise in which he was drafted, served as a scout and Director.

Does anyone truly think that Green Bay wouldn't hire him to succeed Thompson, when they'd face Dorsey year in and year out for a decade or more?

It ISN'T a logical conclusion. It isn't logical.

You do not pass on a lifetime of financial security and stability for a young family because of a CHANCE to get a job that you're probably 3rd in line for.

That's not logical at all.

Bewbies 06-23-2017 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928607)
I'm not going to speculate about anything other than his performance as a GM, which was exemplary, so the only conclusion that makes any sense is the escape clause.

It surprises me how many other theories there are that aren't this.

Makes all the sense in the world to me that Clark would rather fill the role now and not as soon as the season is over next year.

Firing him now cost him millions of dollars...

Chiefnj2 06-23-2017 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefAshhole1056 (Post 12928556)
I think this comes down to this team wont be manageable going forward unless we bring in a guy capable of managing cap space appropriately. .

Every NFL team has someone in addition to the GM who is a cap guru. That's their job. KC replaced their cap guy last month. Shea is the new guy.

ToxSocks 06-23-2017 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12928616)
Just got a text back. Here is what is going through the grapevine from people in the know.

Even if any of that is true, it's still an idiotic reason to fire Dorsey.

None of that shit matters as long as Dorsey in bringing in talent that yields a championship level football team.

staylor26 06-23-2017 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12928628)
Even if any of that is true, it's still an idiotic reason to fire Dorsey.

None of that shit matters as long as Dorsey in bringing in talent that yields a championship level football team.

Exactly

RunKC 06-23-2017 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12928628)
Even if any of that is true, it's still an idiotic reason to fire Dorsey.

None of that shit matters as long as Dorsey in bringing in talent that yields a championship level football team.

I agree with you 100%. I don't like This move at all.

SAUTO 06-23-2017 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12928620)
It ISN'T a logical conclusion. It isn't logical.

You do not pass on a lifetime of financial security and stability for a young family because of a CHANCE to get a job that you're probably 3rd in line for.

That's not logical at all.

I think he asked for an out if gb came calling.

After that Clark looked at the cap situation, the berry situation (if true) and things like that svc just decided fyi let him go

staylor26 06-23-2017 11:54 AM

This could've been something really special with Dorsey/Reid/Mahomes

Our only hope is that Veach can be 75% of the personnel guy Dorsey was and Mahomes turns into an elite QB

O.city 06-23-2017 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12928628)
Even if any of that is true, it's still an idiotic reason to fire Dorsey.

None of that shit matters as long as Dorsey in bringing in talent that yields a championship level football team.

I don't know. Some of that by itself, yes.
Adding it up there could become a problem. Seems Clark wanted to get out ahead of it before it got to be a big issue. Better hope it works out

DaneMcCloud 06-23-2017 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12928620)
It ISN'T a logical conclusion. It isn't logical.

You do not pass on a lifetime of financial security and stability for a young family because of a CHANCE to get a job that you're probably 3rd in line for.

That's not logical at all.

Bob McGinn, one of the most respected sportswriters in America, wrote a long and detailed piece about Dorsey being the successor in Green Bay.

I don't think that was an accident.

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12928616)
Just got a text back. Here is what is going through the grapevine from people in the know.

Very logically situation that makes perfect sense.

DJ's left nut 06-23-2017 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928653)
Very logically situation that makes perfect sense.

Yeah.

I still don't agree with it, but that's a genuinely 'logical' sequence of events.

BigRichard 06-23-2017 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12928616)
Just got a text back. Here is what is going through the grapevine from people in the know.

All of that would make complete sense to me. Not sure how I feel about it but yeah... it makes sense.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 12928566)
I communicate regularly with Dorsey's dentist in GB. We went to dental school together.

OK gang, so Dorsey recently filed an appointment for a root canal in Green Bay...

Chiefnj2 06-23-2017 12:08 PM

"Clark was not happy at all about how the Eric Berry situation ...This was due to the insurance fiasco"

Absolute no win situation for any GM.

BlackHelicopters 06-23-2017 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928669)
OK gang, so Dorsey recently filed an appointment for a root canal in Green Bay...

Untrue.

pugsnotdrugs19 06-23-2017 12:09 PM

RunKC's post is the most logistical thing I've read. I won't accept the move as good until proven so, but I can understand it a bit more.

ptlyon 06-23-2017 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 12928671)
"Clark was not happy at all about how the Eric Berry situation ...This was due to the insurance fiasco"

He should've learned from the Percy Snow incident

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 12:12 PM

Shows Dorsey was over his head as a GM. Which was kind of obvious when it came to free agency, trades, and contract extensions. Contracts and PR are huge parts of the job. His best position would be as a Personal Director.

pugsnotdrugs19 06-23-2017 12:14 PM

I could be wrong--but to me it seems like Clark is big on having the right image, treating players well and being 'professional'...

Dorsey, on the other hand, had become a bit ruthless and purely focused on what's best for the team.

That's a tough line to walk, but as a fan, the Dorsey approach was nice.

penbrook 06-23-2017 12:16 PM

So Clark is the one who saved Berry. Clark is the real MVP here! No one here should be mad at Clark

prhom 06-23-2017 12:17 PM

If that is true, then I think Clark is overvaluing the business side of being a GM and undervaluing the talent recognition side. So what if Dorsey offends the players a little when negotiating contracts. If Clark had to intervene to get the sides talking then fine. Maybe that's what he needs to be prepared to do going forward for negotiating major star contracts? Clark can help Dorsey out in that department, but he's not going to be of much use finding the next Kelce, Peters, Hill or Jones. Now, none of us know who is truly responsible for advocating for those players. Maybe those people are still with the team and we will be fine?

It just makes seems like a juvenile reason to let someone go over personality and mgmt style when they are producing a high quality product on the field. Do people love the Pats because Belichik is a nice guy and people think highly of the franchise? No, it's because they win championships. They win championships because they have Brady and can find talent in the draft and in strategic cheap free agents. I thought we were well on our way to replicating that model if Mahomes pans out, but now I have no idea. We will find out is Dorsey or Ballard were the keys to our draft and fa hits or if that person/people are still around.

penbrook 06-23-2017 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12928685)
I could be wrong--but to me it seems like Clark is big on having the right image, treating players well and being 'professional'...

Dorsey, on the other hand, had become a bit ruthless and purely focused on what's best for the team.

That's a tough line to walk, but as a fan, the Dorsey approach was nice.

I want players to play for us because they like the management not because of the money. Clark has basically saved this franchise.

FloridaMan88 06-23-2017 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12928685)
I could be wrong--but to me it seems like Clark is big on having the right image, treating players well and being 'professional'...

Dorsey, on the other hand, had become a bit ruthless and purely focused on what's best for the team.

That's a tough line to walk, but as a fan, the Dorsey approach was nice.

Looks like Clark might have learned his lesson with the Pioli fiasco in terms of the importance of how you treat players in contract negotiations and other types of transactions.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 12:18 PM

It sounds like it WAS about money if RunKC is correct, and Maclin, plus Dorsey asking for the moon, was the last straw.

So, **** Clark, basically.

BlackHelicopters 06-23-2017 12:19 PM

I have reached out to my fellow graduates to find out who Dorsey sees in KC. No solid answer yet. This is crucial.

mcaj22 06-23-2017 12:20 PM

Reid and Clark siding with the players how sad

penbrook 06-23-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928695)
It sounds like it WAS about money if RunKC is correct, and Maclin, plus Dorsey asking for the moon, was the last straw.

So, **** Clark, basically.

This isn't about ****ing money!! Clark has hired Pioli to a large contract and now just gave Reid a 5 year extension. This is never about money. It's about Dorsey's inability to mange the cap and contracts.

kgrund 06-23-2017 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928681)
Shows Dorsey was over his head as a GM. Which was kind of obvious when it came to free agency, trades, and contract extensions. Contracts and PR are huge parts of the job. His best position would be as a Personal Director.

I know you are not a Dorsey fan given all that you have posted and I agree that aspects of his job were not good. However, the #1 job of a GM is to get the groceries. Dorsey's player acquisitions, as evidenced by our roster, is proof that we was very good at the most important thing. The other aspects of the job (contract negotiations (remember Denny Thum), and PR) could have been handled by reassignment or other means. Bottom line is if you are acquiring talent fairly regularly, you have to keep a guy like that around.

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgrund (Post 12928706)
I know you are not a Dorsey fan given all that you have posted and I agree that aspects of his job were not good. However, the #1 job of a GM is to get the groceries. Dorsey's player acquisitions, as evidenced by our roster, is proof that we was very good at the most important thing. The other aspects of the job (contract negotiations (remember Denny Thum), and PR) could have been handled by reassignment or other means. Bottom line is if you are acquiring talent fairly regularly, you have to keep a guy like that around.

His drafts aren't exactly the greatest either. The talent on this roster is overrated. Mostly it's an outstanding job by Andy Reid coaching them up.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12928685)
I could be wrong--but to me it seems like Clark is big on having the right image, treating players well and being 'professional'...

Dorsey, on the other hand, had become a bit ruthless and purely focused on what's best for the team.

That's a tough line to walk, but as a fan, the Dorsey approach was nice.

Dorsey is a bulldog.

Clark wants an luxury automobile dealer.

staylor26 06-23-2017 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928727)
His drafts aren't exactly the greatest either.The talent on this roster is overrated. Mostly it's an outstanding job by Andy Reid coaching them up.

:facepalm:

****ing reeruned. You want to bitch about the other shit, fine. But this is absurd and moronic.

penbrook 06-23-2017 12:36 PM

A director of player personnel and scouts are the ones who identify talent. Dorsey's job is to sign them to contracts and look for free agents. Yes he makes the decisions but his scouts are the ones that identify the talent

Marcellus 06-23-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928471)
The most plausible theory seems to be that Reid forced him out. He made Clark choose.

Well at least we can rule this completely out now.

KCrockaholic 06-23-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928734)
Dorsey is a bulldog.

Clark wants an luxury automobile dealer.

Clark wants another Carl.

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12928736)
:facepalm:

****ing reeruned. You want to bitch about the other shit, fine. But this is absurd and moronic.

They aren't that great you ****ing homer.

kgrund 06-23-2017 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928727)
His drafts aren't exactly the greatest either. The talent on this roster is overrated. Mostly it's an outstanding job by Andy Reid coaching them up.

So NFL insiders who have quoted NFL personnel saying this are either providing fake news or the NFL personnel guys do not know what they are talking about? If you have a keener eye for talent than NFL personnel guys may I suggest you send in your application.

DaneMcCloud 06-23-2017 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928695)
It sounds like it WAS about money if RunKC is correct, and Maclin, plus Dorsey asking for the moon, was the last straw.

So, **** Clark, basically.

:facepalm:

BlackHelicopters 06-23-2017 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgrund (Post 12928749)
So NFL insiders who have quoted NFL personnel saying this are either providing fake news or the NFL personnel guys do not know what they are talking about? If you have a keener eye for talent than NFL personnel guys may I suggest you send in your application.

You are in over your head ,dude.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 12928747)
Clark wants another Carl.

He wants Pioli without the backroom bullshit and general ****ery.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12928746)
Well at least we can rule this completely out now.

Yep. That's at least making this situation somewhat palatable.

staylor26 06-23-2017 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928748)
They aren't that great you ****ing homer.

You're unbelievably ****ing ignorant if you believe that

One of the most stupid takes I've seen on CP. Honestly, who's drafted better the past couple years?

mcaj22 06-23-2017 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12928755)
He wants Pioli without the backroom bullshit and general ****ery.

yep Clark loved him some Fat Scott, the cap managment, not cutting guys and admitting mistakes, sticking with him way too long, and even asking Andy to see if he could make it work with Fat Scott

DaWolf 06-23-2017 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prhom (Post 12928692)
If that is true, then I think Clark is overvaluing the business side of being a GM and undervaluing the talent recognition side. So what if Dorsey offends the players a little when negotiating contracts. If Clark had to intervene to get the sides talking then fine. Maybe that's what he needs to be prepared to do going forward for negotiating major star contracts? Clark can help Dorsey out in that department, but he's not going to be of much use finding the next Kelce, Peters, Hill or Jones. Now, none of us know who is truly responsible for advocating for those players. Maybe those people are still with the team and we will be fine?

It just makes seems like a juvenile reason to let someone go over personality and mgmt style when they are producing a high quality product on the field. Do people love the Pats because Belichik is a nice guy and people think highly of the franchise? No, it's because they win championships. They win championships because they have Brady and can find talent in the draft and in strategic cheap free agents. I thought we were well on our way to replicating that model if Mahomes pans out, but now I have no idea. We will find out is Dorsey or Ballard were the keys to our draft and fa hits or if that person/people are still around.

It is a fine line. If you start earning a reputation that you are not a franchise that does right by your players, it is only a matter of time before things start going downwards. Players talk in the locker room. They talk to other players around the league. Your stars start staying away from OTA's. Players will be unwilling to talk about renegotiating contracts. An us against management mentality takes over. Agents are going to try and screw you. Guys like Marcus Peters are going to be harder to negotiate with because they know you're just going to ignore them and toss the franchise tag on them. Free agents will be unwilling to talk to you. Remember, Clark talked to Peyton Manning after he signed with Denver at one of the 101 Awards and asked him why he didn't consider the Chiefs, and the response he alluded to was that this place didn't have the best rep under Pioli at the time. I think that stuck with Clark. I doubt he wants to be there again...

kgrund 06-23-2017 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 12928754)
You are in over your head ,dude.

What makes you think I am in over my head?! This makes no sense.

O.city 06-23-2017 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 12928763)
It is a fine line. If you start earning a reputation that you are not a franchise that does right by your players, it is only a matter of time before things start going downwards. Players talk in the locker room. They talk to other players around the league. Your stars start staying away from OTA's. Players will be unwilling to talk about renegotiating contracts. An us against management mentality takes over. Agents are going to try and screw you. Guys like Marcus Peters are going to be harder to negotiate with because they know you're just going to ignore them and toss the franchise tag on them. Free agents will be unwilling to talk to you. Remember, Clark talked to Peyton Manning after he signed with Denver at one of the 101 Awards and asked him why he didn't consider the Chiefs, and the response he alluded to was that this place didn't have the best rep under Pioli at the time. I think that stuck with Clark. I doubt he wants to be there again...


True

When your gm starts alienating players that is probably a problem. He doesn't have to be buddies with them though

KChiefs1 06-23-2017 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12928605)
NFL live saying that Dorsey was fired because of some bad deals he's made and also beating Reid wouldn't sign a extension without knowing who the gm is going to be. They keep bringing up Brett Veach


Can't wait to hear what Kietzmann will say about it today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12928758)
You're unbelievably ****ing ignorant if you believe that

One of the most stupid takes I've seen on CP. Honestly, who's drafted better the past couple years?

Raiders for one. They got some major high end talent - Carr, Mack, Cooper and Jackson > Kelse, Peters, and Hill.

siberian khatru 06-23-2017 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12928774)
Can't wait to hear what Kietzmann will say about it today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yesterday it was because Dorsey drafted the worst QB in the history of the NFL, as evidenced by Mahomes' minicamp. In fact, Reid was so pissed about it he had Mahomes do footwork drills in front of the media so everybody could see how awful Mahomes was so it would make Dorsey look bad.

I am not making this up.

staylor26 06-23-2017 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928775)
Raiders for one. They got some major high end talent - Carr, Mack, Cooper and Jackson > Kelse, Peters, and Hill.

Considering where we were drafting, Kelce, Peters, Hill, Morse, and Jones is pretty ****ig close.

Let's completely ignore draft position though :rolleyes:

Carr is clearly the difference, and if Mahomes turns out to be what he can be I'd definitely argue our drafts have been better.

siberian khatru 06-23-2017 12:56 PM

KK also said that Dorsey was damaged goods because Hunt and Reid have disavowed him, and that other NFL teams might be reluctant to hire him.

Trent Green was on and basically said, in his nice way, that Kietzman was FOS.

DaWolf 06-23-2017 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12928761)
yep Clark loved him some Fat Scott, the cap managment, not cutting guys and admitting mistakes, sticking with him way too long, and even asking Andy to see if he could make it work with Fat Scott

It's the Peter Principle. Pioli would have probably been fine if he came along with a veteran head coach who was the boss and they just stuck him in a room and told him to focus on scouting. Same with Dorsey, he's really good at the draft and roster building and putting together a scouting team, but he probably works better if there is a President of Football Operations above him.

It'll be interesting to see if Clark/Reid go with another first time GM or try to get a veteran in there...

Dayze 06-23-2017 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 12928776)
Yesterday it was because Dorsey drafted the worst QB in the history of the NFL, as evidenced by Mahomes' minicamp. In fact, Reid was so pissed about it he had Mahomes do footwork drills in front of the media so everybody could see how awful Mahomes was so it would make Dorsey look bad.

I am not making this up.

LMAO

seriously?
KK needs to be punched in the throat.

ptlyon 06-23-2017 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 12928776)
Yesterday it was because Dorsey drafted the worst QB in the history of the NFL, as evidenced by Mahomes' minicamp. In fact, Reid was so pissed about it he had Mahomes do footwork drills in front of the media so everybody could see how awful Mahomes was so it would make Dorsey look bad.

I am not making this up.

If this is true Joe should give him a complimentary Roman candle to be firmly placed in his ass

DaneMcCloud 06-23-2017 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928775)
Raiders for one. They got some major high end talent - Carr, Mack, Cooper and Jackson > Kelse, Peters, and Hill.

Pretty easy to do if you're consistently drafting top 4

Dayze 06-23-2017 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon (Post 12928782)
If this is true Joe should give him a complimentary Roman candle to be firmly placed in his ass

LMAO

The Franchise 06-23-2017 12:58 PM

It's going to be Veach.

raybec 4 06-23-2017 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928727)
His drafts aren't exactly the greatest either. The talent on this roster is overrated. Mostly it's an outstanding job by Andy Reid coaching them up.

This tops it. How many All Pros would he have to draft to get your approval?

JakeF 06-23-2017 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928727)
His drafts aren't exactly the greatest either. The talent on this roster is overrated. Mostly it's an outstanding job by Andy Reid coaching them up.

:eek:

Ming the Merciless 06-23-2017 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928783)
Pretty easy to do if you're consistently drafting top 4

this is very true

lets see if they run into cap problems etc down the road

thats why I love the NFL cap rules....getting the top 4 sure things might actually be worse in the long run that medium round over-performers / value picks...

Red Dawg 06-23-2017 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 12928776)
Yesterday it was because Dorsey drafted the worst QB in the history of the NFL, as evidenced by Mahomes' minicamp. In fact, Reid was so pissed about it he had Mahomes do footwork drills in front of the media so everybody could see how awful Mahomes was so it would make Dorsey look bad.

I am not making this up.

What an idiot. KK is such an effing joke.

ChiefsCountry 06-23-2017 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928783)
Pretty easy to do if you're consistently drafting top 4

Tyson Jackson and Eric Fisher say otherwise.

penbrook 06-23-2017 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928821)
Tyson Jackson and Eric Fisher say otherwise.

Fisher is a top 10 LT

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12928824)
Fisher is a top 10 LT

Maybe in the CFL

staylor26 06-23-2017 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928821)
Tyson Jackson and Eric Fisher say otherwise.

What the **** does Tyson Jackson have to do with anything?

And if it weren't for Dorsey, we probably would have taken the consensus #1 in Luke Joeckel

kgrund 06-23-2017 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12928821)
Tyson Jackson and Eric Fisher say otherwise.

Bad examples. Jackson was Pioli and Fisher was in a draft that many in the NFL believe was one of the worst overall drafts ever. Look at the top 15 players drafted in the 2013. It was a dumpster fire.

L.A. Chieffan 06-23-2017 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928607)
As I mentioned earlier, Hunt and Dorsey's agent reached a fatal impasse.

There's absolutely no reason to believe that it was money, unless Dorsey asked for something so astronomically high that he actually forced his way out (which is unlikely, as all of the reports said that Dorsey was shocked to hear of his firing).

I'm not going to speculate about anything other than his performance as a GM, which was exemplary, so the only conclusion that makes any sense is the escape clause.

While we might disagree on why he was fired, it could be a combination of everything. Ultimately I think we both agree that it was ****ing stupid either way

Red Dawg 06-23-2017 01:19 PM

Let's also remember Mahomes is yet to sign. Dorsey was a bad contract guy.

Reerun_KC 06-23-2017 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12928824)
Fisher is a top 10 LT

Who holds in the playoffs.

Fisher is average.

dirk digler 06-23-2017 01:20 PM

KK is on and according to his "sources" it was culmination of things and for the last year or so Clark wasn't sure Dorsey was a good GM. He thought he was a great personnel guy but not an executive\GM type.

Also Reid and Donovan didn't object when they were told\asked.

Hammock Parties 06-23-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12928838)
Also Reid and Donovan didn't object when they were told\asked.

Donovan is a snake.

BlackHelicopters 06-23-2017 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 12928824)
Fisher is a top 10 LT

By God, Fisher should be a top ten player in the NFL . Not a top ten LT.

kgrund 06-23-2017 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 12928852)
By God, Fisher should be a top ten player in the NFL . Not a top ten LT.

That is absurd. Even if good drafts, the #1 pick in the draft is often not a top ten player in the NFL. Go back and look at them. Should he be better? Yes. Could they have picked a better player? Hindsight 20/20, yes. Did the miss really badly given the quality of the 2013 draft? No.

cmdrzman 06-23-2017 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12928783)
Pretty easy to do if you're consistently drafting top 4

Fake News-

Since 2010 the last 7 drafts, Oakland's only had five 1st rd picks and six 2nd rd picks

The Chiefs have had seven 1st rd picks and seven 2nd rd picks

Since 2010 the Raiders had 2 picks in the top 5

And the Chiefs did as well

Chiefs have had more 1st rd and 2nd rd picks than Oakland since 2010

Wut?, Wut? Whatcha got?

FringeNC 06-23-2017 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 12928838)

Also Reid and Donovan didn't object when they were told\asked.

Mellinger wrote the same thing. So maybe, Reid actually didn't force Dorsey out. He certainly didn't go to bat for him though.

Chiefnj2 06-23-2017 01:35 PM

Fisher is basically as good as you were going to get in that draft class.

Dorsey was far from perfect, but he certainly turned the team around quickly and did a good job finding talent.

Injuries/health seem to be the biggest thing that plagued him - Berry, Houston, Maclin.

RunKC 06-23-2017 01:37 PM

Brett Veach was a scout in Philly for the Southeast region. He banged on the table for Fletcher Cox.
Andy assigned him to look WR's in 2008. Eagles drafted DeSean Jackson that year.

I wouldn't sleep on Veach. He seems to be pretty good at player evaluation.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.