ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Hall of Classics (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   101 random roasts by misc Roastmasters - Thread #2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274123)

rico 07-02-2013 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9788116)
I nearly made this same post





It was a short story because most of it was about his penis.

ROFL

rico 07-02-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788117)
Whatever man - a box turtle could snap that thing off

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3224/2...2d7_z.jpg?zz=1

If that worm is supposed to be my penis, then that turtle is God-freaking-zilla.

loochy 07-02-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 9788132)
If that worm is supposed to be my penis, then that turtle is God-freaking-zilla.

Wrong. It's a micro turtle.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mHTYN6UyNnc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

rico 07-02-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788141)
Wrong. It's a micro turtle.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/mHTYN6UyNnc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Well, then I must have encountered that shrinkage machine from "Honey I Shrunk the Kids."

tooge 07-02-2013 10:55 AM

honey you shrunk my penis

rico 07-02-2013 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9788173)
honey you shrunk my penis

Hahaha.

Man, talk about lines that could get you slapped in the face in a millisecond.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9787019)
If reported and mods agree that it's a racial slur, absolutely. I agree that one does not need to be a minority to be subjected to racial slurs and also agree that the knife should cut both ways.

We will disagree on this one.

Phobia 07-02-2013 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788189)
We will disagree on this one.

No problem. I'm also not sure "redneck" is a racial slur but we'd have fun talking it out.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788189)
We will disagree on this one.

So if it's reported and the mods agree that it's a racial slur, then not? So you have to be a minority to be subjected to a racial slur? You don't agree that the knife should cut both ways?

WTF?

patteeu 07-02-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788208)
So if it's reported and the mods agree that it's a racial slur, then not? So you have to be a minority to be subjected to a racial slur? You don't agree that the knife should cut both ways?

WTF?

It depends on who the poster is. They don't want anything to be too clear in order to keep their options open.

ptlyon 07-02-2013 11:11 AM

:popcorn:

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 9787325)
Ok, question:
If someone is "permabanned," why, if that person is found to be back, is the person not immediately nuked instead of what appears to be 'nuked at the discretion of the mod team?'

Just wondering.

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9787801)
I'm also for clear rules and for applying rules equally instead of having rules on the books that you can use on posters you don't like but waive for everyone else. Not to mention the fact that I think Hootie's previous bans (at least the one's I've been aware of) were bogus to begin with.

If someone can actually figure it out, come back here and be a decent member of the community, we are pretty forgiving.

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788208)
So if it's reported and the mods agree that it's a racial slur, then not? So you have to be a minority to be subjected to a racial slur? You don't agree that the knife should cut both ways?

WTF?


**** no. White people have held all the power, and all of the advantages since this country's inception. No one has ever said we are 2/5 human. Just because you were born in the last 50 years doesn't mean the past didn't happen. And while it may not be as widespread as it was back then, it still exists. And current generations have to deal with the pain of passed generations. It absolutely does not cut both ways. And the fact that people think it does, is one of the big reasons why it still exists today.

Phobia 07-02-2013 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788222)
**** no. White people have held all the power, and all of the advantages since this country's inception. No one has ever said we are 2/5 human. Just because you were born in the last 50 years doesn't mean the past didn't happen. And while it may not be as widespread as it was back then, it still exists. And current generations have to deal with the pain of passed generations. It absolutely does not cut both ways. And the fact that people think it does, is one of the big reasons why it still exists today.

I understand your perspective and I agree. But I also want to be consistent. I don't think I've ever banned anybody for slurs against whites but I'd like to think we would consistently apply those rules if required. I'd rather not go there but I do believe that there are minorities who hate white people simply due to the color of their skin and all of it is unfortunate.

ptlyon 07-02-2013 11:20 AM

Everybody just needs to go buy a copy of Blazing Saddles & chill the **** out

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9788231)
I understand your perspective and I agree. But I also want to be consistent. I don't think I've ever banned anybody for slurs against whites but I'd like to think we would consistently apply those rules if required. I'd rather not go there but I do believe that there are minorities who hate white people simply due to the color of their skin and all of it is unfortunate.

You're right, they do. My perspective is, they actually have a valid reason too. We've ****ed them over for centuries. We're trying to change, but we're not there yet. They've never had the ability to **** us over in the world, so why do we hate them again? That's where I'm coming from, but it's worth talking about IMO. I'm open to see things from the other side. That's why we're such super awesome moderators. :)

BigCatDaddy 07-02-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788222)


**** no. White people have held all the power, and all of the advantages since this country's inception. No one has ever said we are 2/5 human. Just because you were born in the last 50 years doesn't mean the past didn't happen. And while it may not be as widespread as it was back then, it still exists. And current generations have to deal with the pain of passed generations. It absolutely does not cut both ways. And the fact that people think it does, is one of the big reasons why it still exists today.

Wow :facepalm:

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9788238)
Wow :facepalm:

Sorry the blacks have held you down, bro.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:24 AM

One time a black guy robbed my grandfather. I can say the N word whenever I want now, right?

I don't think anyone contests what was in the past was horrible and wrong, but allowing an extreme swing in the opposite direction does nothing but further ill will between the two sides.

Donger 07-02-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788235)
You're right, they do. My perspective is, they actually have a valid reason too. We've ****ed them over for centuries. We're trying to change, but we're not there yet. They've never had the ability to **** us over in the world, so why do we hate them again? That's where I'm coming from, but it's worth talking about IMO. I'm open to see things from the other side. That's why we're such super awesome moderators. :)

One day we might even have a Black POTUS.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788256)
One day we might even have a Black POTUS.

nah.

we mean bad white folks made sure that could never happen

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:29 AM

ROFL It's not like I'm bagging on white people here. I'm one of them, you know. I'm talking about racism. Drop the strawmen. White people rob people as well, but I guess they don't count.

Donger 07-02-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788259)
ROFL It's not like I'm bagging on white people here. I'm one of them, you know. I'm talking about racism. Drop the strawmen. White people rob people as well, but I guess they don't count.

No, you aren't bagging on White people at all. You are just saying that racism thrown in their direction is perfectly acceptable because of the past.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788262)
No, you aren't bagging on White people at all. You are just saying that racism thrown in their direction is perfectly acceptable because of the past.

this.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788262)
No, you aren't bagging on White people at all. You are just saying that racism thrown in their direction is perfectly acceptable because of the past.

This is actually a very good point. And one that I will have to gnaw on, because I don't think people should be abused because of the acts of their ancestors. Food for thought. Thanks, Donger.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788271)
This is actually a very good point. And one that I will have to gnaw on, because I don't think people should be abused because of the acts of their ancestors. Food for thought. Thanks, Donger.

Thank you for keeping an open mind about stuff (if this isn't a sarcastic statement; I can't tell anymore).

Donger 07-02-2013 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788271)
This is actually a very good point. And one that I will have to gnaw on, because I don't think people should be abused because of the acts of their ancestors. Food for thought. Thanks, Donger.

Sarcasm, I presume?

BigCatDaddy 07-02-2013 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788262)
No, you aren't bagging on White people at all. You are just saying that racism thrown in their direction is perfectly acceptable because of the past.

Exactly. I mean how far back to we want to go to hold someone accountable for something they didn't do? 50 years? 100 years? 500? 2000? Is there a cut off?

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788272)
Thank you for keeping an open mind about stuff (if this isn't a sarcastic statement; I can't tell anymore).

Without an open mind, we will never grow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788275)
Sarcasm, I presume?

Absolutely not. You presented your perspective in a way I could relate too, understand, and appreciate. Sincerely. That's what I hate about text. There is no tone, and you never really know the intent behind the words.

Donger 07-02-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788278)
Absolutely not. You presented your perspective in a way I could relate too, understand, and appreciate. Sincerely. That's what I hate about text. There is no tone, and you never really know the intent behind the words.

Okay, but I didn't really say anything different than what you wrote above. You're weird.

Frazod 07-02-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788235)
You're right, they do. My perspective is, they actually have a valid reason too. We've ****ed them over for centuries. We're trying to change, but we're not there yet. They've never had the ability to **** us over in the world, so why do we hate them again? That's where I'm coming from, but it's worth talking about IMO. I'm open to see things from the other side. That's why we're such super awesome moderators. :)

Yeah, I remember the day the Yankees came to my plantation and freed my slaves. I was heartbroken.

:spock:

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:40 AM

So what qualifies? Redneck? I don't think so, that doesn't even apply to all white people. That's one thing, no one has ever come up with any kind of horrible slang word for white people.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788287)
Okay, but I didn't really say anything different than what you wrote above. You're weird.

Fair enough. You led the horse to water, and I was willing to drink. I guess I am just thinking it over in my mind and your post led me to the thought of it. So **** you, I'm awesome all by myself. And weird.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788290)
So what qualifies? Redneck? I don't think so, that doesn't even apply to all white people. That's one thing, no one has ever come up with any kind of horrible slang word for white people.

First of all, it doesn't bother us so much because we don't have a history of being kept down. Therefore, it's hard to find a superword to zing us. However, we don't appreciate double standards.

Second of all, Houstonwhodat kept saying "ninjas" and he got banned.

Ninjas doesn't apply to all black people.

Donger 07-02-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788290)
So what qualifies? Redneck? I don't think so, that doesn't even apply to all white people. That's one thing, no one has ever come up with any kind of horrible slang word for white people.

I kind of view redneck the same way as I do the "N" word. No, they don't apply to every person of the respective race, just the trashy kind. And, what Phobia said earlier certainly applies: context is key. If a Black person uses Cracker/Cracka in a derogatory way, that's inherently racist.

Donger 07-02-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788291)
Fair enough. You led the horse to water, and I was willing to drink. I guess I am just thinking it over in my mind and your post led me to the thought of it. So **** you, I'm awesome all by myself. And weird.

**** you too, Honky. Or is it Honkey?

Shit.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788300)
**** you too, Honky.

Honky Tonk Man

loochy 07-02-2013 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788300)
**** you too, Honky. Or is it Honkey?

Shit.

reported and bant

Phobia 07-02-2013 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788259)
ROFL It's not like I'm bagging on white people here. I'm one of them, you know. I'm talking about racism. Drop the strawmen. White people rob people as well, but I guess they don't count.

You have a lot more white skin that most white people too.

Frazod 07-02-2013 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788290)
So what qualifies? Redneck? I don't think so, that doesn't even apply to all white people. That's one thing, no one has ever come up with any kind of horrible slang word for white people.

Some Asian guy in Chicago who was pissed at me called me a "Redneck Hick Farmer from Kansas" once (I was wearing a Chiefs shirt at the time). I had no doubt whatsoever that it was intended as a racial slur. Absolutely none. And neither did the people who restrained me from beating the shit out of him. Holy crap I never snapped so fast in my life. Racial insult coupled with acusing me of being from Kansas? That ****er's seriously lucky to be alive.

I love it when people who live in small towns or cities that maybe see four of five minorities in an average week try to tell me that there's no reverse racism, or that it doesn't matter. Come to Chicago and tell me that shit.

loochy 07-02-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9788308)
You have a lot more white skin that most white people too.

I thought fat people had the same amount of skin but it's just thinner and all stretched out.

patteeu 07-02-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788278)
Absolutely not. You presented your perspective in a way I could relate too, understand, and appreciate.

You needed Donger to point that out to you? An open mind is great, but not if it's so open everything fall out. :p

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788293)
First of all, it doesn't bother us so much because we don't have a history of being kept down. Therefore, it's hard to find a superword to zing us. However, we don't appreciate double standards.

Second of all, Houstonwhodat kept saying "ninjas" and he got banned.

Ninjas doesn't apply to all black people.

Dude, he was making it a racial slur, and errone knows it. That's ****ing horseshit.

Saul Good 07-02-2013 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788222)
If someone can actually figure it out, come back here and be a decent member of the community, we are pretty forgiving.




**** no. White people have held all the power, and all of the advantages since this country's inception. No one has ever said we are 2/5 human. Just because you were born in the last 50 years doesn't mean the past didn't happen. And while it may not be as widespread as it was back then, it still exists. And current generations have to deal with the pain of passed generations. It absolutely does not cut both ways. And the fact that people think it does, is one of the big reasons why it still exists today.

There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

"White people" have most certainly not held most/all of the power since the country's inception. In fact, the very term "white people"as used today wouldn't have made sense centuries ago given the fact that we view whites in a much more homogenous manner today that in times past. Italians, Irish, etc. held virtually no power until relatively recently...that is to say nothing of the political makeup of the country prior to the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote.

As for the 2/5 part, I assume you're referring to the three fifths compromise. This compromise is completely misunderstood by most people...yourself included.

Treating slaves as only 3/5 of a person was the compromise. Slave owners wanted them treated as a full person. Abolitionists didn't want them counted at all.

Treating slaves as a full person wouldn't have given them new rights. It would have inflated the population of the south giving it more political representation in congress. The slave owners would, in essence, get an extra vote for every slave they owned. That's not really a plus for the slaves.

This doesn't really take away from your larger point, I guess. You should probably understand the history you're citing before basing your arguments on it, though.

Raiderhater 07-02-2013 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788235)
You're right, they do. My perspective is, they actually have a valid reason too. We've ****ed them over for centuries. We're trying to change, but we're not there yet. They've never had the ability to **** us over in the world, so why do we hate them again? That's where I'm coming from, but it's worth talking about IMO. I'm open to see things from the other side. That's why we're such super awesome moderators. :)


Two wrongs do not a right make.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9788308)
You have a lot more white skin that most white people too.

Ain't that the truth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9788312)
Some Asian guy in Chicago who was pissed at me called me a "Redneck Hick Farmer from Kansas" once (I was wearing a Chiefs shirt at the time). I had no doubt whatsoever that it was intended as a racial slur. Absolutely none. And neither did the people who restrained me from beating the shit out of him. Holy crap I never snapped so fast in my life. Racial insult coupled with acusing me of being from Kansas? That ****er's seriously lucky to be alive.

I love it when people who live in small towns or cities that maybe see four of five minorities in an average week try to tell me that there's no reverse racism, or that it doesn't matter. Come to Chicago and tell me that shit.

I grew up in Seattle, and hang out in casinos. So I know. Racism is racism is racism. I changed my mind. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We should ban anyone talking that shit out of their assholes. Just forgive me if I don't get as worked up over the word redneck, as I do ****er, person of Hispanic heritage, chink, gook, or whatnot. It's a work in progress I guess.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:56 AM

And honestly, this hasn't just happened in the last 30 minutes. I've had this argument time and time again with people, and it's just taken a lot of talking and perspectives to get me to this point.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-02-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9788322)
There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

"White people" have most certainly not held most/all of the power since the country's inception. In fact, the very term "white people"as used today wouldn't have made sense centuries ago given the fact that we view whites in a much more homogenous manner today that in times past. Italians, Irish, etc. held virtually no power until relatively recently...that is to say nothing of the political makeup of the country prior to the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote.

As for the 2/5 part, I assume you're referring to the three fifths compromise. This compromise is completely misunderstood by most people...yourself included.

Treating slaves as only 3/5 of a person was the compromise. Slave owners wanted them treated as a full person. Abolitionists didn't want them counted at all.

Treating slaves as a full person wouldn't have given them new rights. It would have inflated the population of the south giving it more political representation in congress. The slave owners would, in essence, get an extra vote for every slave they owned. That's not really a plus for the slaves.

This doesn't really take away from your larger point, I guess. You should probably understand the history you're citing before basing your arguments on it, though.

Douche. I mean, touche!

BigCatDaddy 07-02-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788293)
First of all, it doesn't bother us so much because we don't have a history of being kept down. Therefore, it's hard to find a superword to zing us. However, we don't appreciate double standards.

Second of all, Houstonwhodat kept saying "ninjas" and he got banned.

Ninjas doesn't apply to all black people.

I'm stunned.... I always thought you were a Mexican luchador.

rico 07-02-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788296)
I kind of view redneck the same way as I do the "N" word. No, they don't apply to every person of the respective race, just the trashy kind. And, what Phobia said earlier certainly applies: context is key. If a Black person uses Cracker/Cracka in a derogatory way, that's inherently racist.

"Cracker" is the one "derogatory towards Caucasians" word that I have a problem with. And it all has to do with the origin of the word. To my knowledge, that word is derived from the "crack" of the whip on a slave's back. That is most definitely something I don't want to be associated with, let alone referred to as, for I have enough faith in my soul and my ability to be empathetic, that regardless of how I was raised, I wouldn't have been able to force myself to crack a whip on another human being's back.

Saul Good 07-02-2013 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788326)
Ain't that the truth.



I grew up in Seattle, and hang out in casinos. So I know. Racism is racism is racism. I changed my mind. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We should ban anyone talking that shit out of their assholes. Just forgive me if I don't get as worked up over the word redneck, as I do ****er, person of Hispanic heritage, chink, gook, or whatnot. It's a work in progress I guess.

The simplest way I can explain why "reverse racism" slurs aren't as bad is that people who are in the majority don't wrap themselves in their majority trait.

Really tall people or really short people tend to be more conscious of their height than a guy who is 5'11.

A white person in the US doesn't really think about his own whiteness as much as he would if he moved to Asia.

A guy without a goatee might feel perfectly normal at a cocktail party in 2013, but that same guy might feel like an outsider at a Chiefs Planet get-together or if he went back in time to 1998.

Phobia 07-02-2013 12:05 PM

I don't care for the attitude that "we did something to them". "We" didn't include me. I deal with each person as an individual regardless of the color of their skin. Afford me the same courtesy. I love black people and I love black people who like jokes because I have jokes. I spend my saturdays playing ball where I'm a minority and it's some of the most fun I have all week. Good folks come in all different colors.

loochy 07-02-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788319)
Dude, he was making it a racial slur, and errone knows it. That's ****ing horseshit.

I know it, and that's the point. Just because "redneck" isn't a bad slur, it could be used and intended as one.

Raiderhater 07-02-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9788322)
There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

"White people" have most certainly not held most/all of the power since the country's inception. In fact, the very term "white people"as used today wouldn't have made sense centuries ago given the fact that we view whites in a much more homogenous manner today that in times past. Italians, Irish, etc. held virtually no power until relatively recently...that is to say nothing of the political makeup of the country prior to the 19th amendment giving women the right to vote.

As for the 2/5 part, I assume you're referring to the three fifths compromise. This compromise is completely misunderstood by most people...yourself included.

Treating slaves as only 3/5 of a person was the compromise. Slave owners wanted them treated as a full person. Abolitionists didn't want them counted at all.

Treating slaves as a full person wouldn't have given them new rights. It would have inflated the population of the south giving it more political representation in congress. The slave owners would, in essence, get an extra vote for every slave they owned. That's not really a plus for the slaves.

This doesn't really take away from your larger point, I guess. You should probably understand the history you're citing before basing your arguments on it, though.


Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.

Saul Good 07-02-2013 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9788347)
Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.

There are more slaves in the world today than at any time in human history.

loochy 07-02-2013 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9788347)
Something else to add, in terms of the slavery aspect: blacks were rounded up and sold as slaves by fellow blacks. Blacks are as guilty of the slave trade as anyone. But it is only whitey that takes the blame.

It's like the guy that buys a stolen car and doesn't want to give it back.

loochy 07-02-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9788351)
There are more slaves in the world today than at any time in human history.

We're all slaves to the man.

BigCatDaddy 07-02-2013 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788356)
We're all slaves to the man.

****ing Donger.

Donger 07-02-2013 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9788360)
****ing Donger.

That's right. Just make your mark.

Marcellus 07-02-2013 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 9788126)
Haha.

But dude, the shit was crazy.

Then when I got inside, I googled some shit about snapping turtles biting people and read this story about this dude in Australia who got his penis bit by one. The snapping turtle didn't end up biting this guy's penis off (props to this guy's penis, I guess), but it did end up clamping and locking it's jaws and wouldn't release itself from the shaft of this Australian man's penis. They ended up having to pry the snapper's jaws off this guy's penis with a crow-bar. I can't imagine ANYTHING that would be more horrifying than that. I've been scared shitless of snapping turtles ever since.

You may only have 3150 posts but if there was a "words posted counter" I imagine you would be second behind Claynus.

rico 07-02-2013 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9788374)
You may only have 3150 posts but if there was a "words posted counter" I imagine you would be second behind Claynus.

oic

Phobia 07-02-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9788322)
There are an incredible amount of historical inaccuracies within this post.

Hahahaha - since when does historical accuracy mean anything to you? You still don't want to accept anything I post about Hootie even when I pluck cuts and pastes straight out of the mod forum. Pure irony. Historical accuracy is important to you when it fits with your agenda. Otherwise, screw it.

blaise 07-02-2013 12:26 PM

These roast threads are like Million Dollar Baby. Seemed so good at first, but then just turned in a depressing grind.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-02-2013 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9788374)
You may only have 3150 posts but if there was a "words posted counter" I imagine you would be second behind Claynus.

Heh, I joked something to the tune of...they should put a 0 behind his post count the other day. I like his posts, so it's all good.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-02-2013 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 9788385)
These roast threads are like Million Dollar Baby. Seemed so good at first, but then just turned in a depressing grind.

We never even reached 50 ROFL

Marcellus 07-02-2013 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9788387)
Heh, I joked something to the tune of...they should put a 0 behind his post count the other day. I like his posts, so it's all good.

Yea, I am not bitching, man that dude can type out some paragraphs.

Saul Good 07-02-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9788381)
Hahahaha - since when does historical accuracy mean anything to you? You still don't want to accept anything I post about Hootie even when I pluck cuts and pastes straight out of the mod forum. Pure irony. Historical accuracy is important to you when it fits with your agenda. Otherwise, screw it.

Historical inaccuracies matter when you're talking about seminal events in history, yes.

I've never argued that the "mod" conversations you have didn't occur. That's never been the point.

You're pointing to a trial or two and claiming that it means the justice system works. I've simply pointed to the multitude of times that more egregious offenses were overlooked as evidence of your hypocrisy.

If I moderate a board that prohibits facial hair and ban you for having a goatee, I'm perfectly in keeping with the rules. That said, if I let the guys from ZZ Top and Duck Dynasty run around and call other members racial slurs, I'm a hypocrite.

BigCatDaddy 07-02-2013 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9788392)
Yea, I am not bitching, man that dude can type out some paragraphs.

I'm thinking Adderall, maybe even Meth.

Frazod 07-02-2013 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 9788385)
These roast threads are like Million Dollar Baby. Seemed so good at first, but then just turned in a depressing grind.

Except that I was sad when the boxer chick got greased; Hootie, not so much.

Bowser 07-02-2013 01:32 PM

Hootie got nuked again, huh? Who did he piss off/what rule did he break this time?

TexansPlanet traffic will surge by at least six posts this week.

Donger 07-02-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9788504)
Hootie got nuked again, huh? Who did he piss off/what rule did he break this time?

TexansPlanet traffic will surge by at least six posts this week.

DaFace. No reason.

loochy 07-02-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9788504)
Hootie got nuked again, huh? Who did he piss off/what rule did he break this time?

what abandoned desert island do you live on?

He called Frazod a ninja so Bearcat axed him

Bowser 07-02-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788509)
what abandoned desert island do you live on?

Listen, I'm as pissed as you are that I have a life/responsibilities, believe me.

That, and I'm just waaaay too lazy to go look for it.

Frazod 07-02-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788509)
what abandoned desert island do you live on?

He called Frazod a ninja so Bearcat axed him

Reported.

loochy 07-02-2013 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9788516)
Reported.

Whatever. You know that you are in the Foot Clan.

http://www.ninjastars.org/wp-content.../07/Ninja1.jpg

crazycoffey 07-02-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9788325)
Two wrongs do not a right make.

But in algebra, two negatives make a positive.....

Bowser 07-02-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9788505)
DaFace. No reason.

Man, ****ing DaFace.

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788509)
what abandoned desert island do you live on?

He called Frazod a ninja so Bearcat axed him

Man, ****ing Bearcat.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 07-02-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9788293)
However, we don't appreciate double standards.

Deal with it. One type of racism can be explicitly worse than another. One may permeate institutional racism, while the other does not. We aren't just talking hurt feelings here.

cosmo20002 07-02-2013 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9788290)
So what qualifies? Redneck? I don't think so, that doesn't even apply to all white people. That's one thing, no one has ever come up with any kind of horrible slang word for white people.

No, but they make fun of the way we dance and stuff. That kind of hurts.

Saul Good 07-02-2013 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9788524)
Man, ****ing Bearcat.

man****ingbearcat > manbearpig

Pasta Little Brioni 07-02-2013 01:59 PM

I'm bored, so I did another one.

65. Dirk Diggler

The thing that stands out the most about Dirk is that he actually believes he ran a sub 4.2 40 when he was younger. Think about that a second. A grown man thinking that as a pasty faced youth he was faster than Jamaal Charles, Chris Johnson, and Usain Bolt. (frazod did run a 42.0 BTW). Hand timed runs by fat P.E. coaches FTW.

He also moonlights as an amateur porn star starring with corn fed beauties from all over the Mid-West. Unfortunately, the fast times spill over to this venue as well, so he needs a stunt cock to fill in.

Pros: Some people are naive enough to believe him. Got props from Dane.

Cons: Also believes the mailman was "fixing the TV reception" when he caught him leaving the house the other day.

Outlook: His wife convinces him he's 1/8th African American after she gets knocked up.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.