ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Mojo Jojo 06-06-2010 12:56 PM

KU, KSU, ISU...Welcome to the Big West :)

kcpasco 06-06-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo (Post 6801939)
KU, KSU, ISU...Welcome to the Big West :)

ROFL

Al Bundy 06-06-2010 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo (Post 6801939)
KU, KSU, ISU...Welcome to the Big West :)

Well I hope they get used to the UC-Irvine rivalry...

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 01:32 PM

I'll skip the UC-Irvine game. But I'll be happy taking a trip to UCSD.

Titty Meat 06-06-2010 01:40 PM

**** yea

KChiefs1 06-06-2010 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo (Post 6801939)
KU, KSU, ISU...Welcome to the Big West :)

I still say Conference USA is a much better fit for them. :D

KChiefs1 06-06-2010 02:50 PM

TeddyGreenstein tweet:

Jim Delany: "The timeline could be affected." In other words, it will be affected.

KChiefs1 06-06-2010 04:05 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/2010/06/06...authority.html

Quote:

The Pac-10 board has given commissioner Larry Scott the authority to pursue any possible expansion for the conference.

Scott spoke following the conclusion of the conference meetings in San Francisco on Sunday. Earlier in the day, he addressed the chancellors and presidents about possible expansion and was given authority to move ahead without having to go back to the board for approval.

Scott says no final decision has been made whether to expand but many different scenarios were discussed this weekend. There have been reports that the conference could add as few as two teams or as many as six if it does expand.

The conference will decide its future plans by the end of the year before negotiating a new television contract for the 2012-13 academic year.

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6802005)
**** yea

What?

Mr. Laz 06-06-2010 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6801706)
Which would you choose if KU was in the same situation?

All depends on whether or not they have a concrete invite from the Big 10. If they do, then if the Big 12 gives an ultimatum they go ahead and bail to the Big 10. But if they don't then things get a little more dicey ... especially for Nebraska.

The only real reason Nebraska is getting an invite is because the Big 10 is a heavy football conference and Nebraska has a big football history. Also it looks like Nebraska might be improving their football back to being big time again. If Nebraska calls the Big 12 bluff and Notre Dame joins the Big 10 or something, Nebraska is screwed and screwed hard. Other conferences that aren't as heavy duty football as the Big 10 won't place as much value in Nebraska's main calling card.

Mizzou has a broader value than that so they can probably find a BCS conference on their own because they have St. Louis. Mizzou is all about having a 2-city market ... without St. Louis they have pretty much Jack and shit with Jack getting ready to leave town.

Still ... if they haven't received a concrete invite to the Big 10 they take a significant risk by calling the Big 12 bluff. This is what the Big 12 is shooting for imo ... play the bluff and hope 1 or both of the teams would rather stay in the Big 12 than risk getting caught out in the independent wind.

just sayin'

Sam Hall 06-06-2010 04:50 PM

You gotta see this Mizzou ultimatum countdown sig. Someone needs to make one for Nebraska so we can all put one in our sig.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/list.php?board=2

Bambi 06-06-2010 04:52 PM

Kind of upsetting to see so many taking joy in the potential of 100 years of local tradition evaporating.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2010 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6802349)
All depends on whether or not they have a concrete invite from the Big 10. If they do, then if the Big 12 gives an ultimatum they go ahead and bail to the Big 10. But if they don't then things get a little more dicey ... especially for Nebraska.

The only real reason Nebraska is getting an invite is because the Big 10 is a heavy football conference and Nebraska has a big football history. Also it looks like Nebraska might be improving their football back to being big time again. If Nebraska calls the Big 12 bluff and Notre Dame joins the Big 10 or something, Nebraska is screwed and screwed hard. Other conferences that aren't as heavy duty football as the Big 10 won't place as much value in Nebraska's main calling card.

Mizzou has a broader value than that so they can probably find a BCS conference on their own because they have St. Louis. Mizzou is all about having a 2-city market ... without St. Louis they have pretty much Jack and shit with Jack getting ready to leave town.

Still ... if they haven't received a concrete invite to the Big 10 they take a significant risk by calling the Big 12 bluff. This is what the Big 12 is shooting for imo ... play the bluff and hope 1 or both of the teams would rather stay in the Big 12 than risk getting caught out in the independent wind.

just sayin'

There's no danger in calling the bluff...

If the Pac-10 goes to 16, there is NO way the Big Ten doesn't. Missouri is fine in that case. Nebraska most likely is as well. (Missouri, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Syracuse, Rutgers to Big 16).

Missouri and Nebraska hold all the cards in this. Texas has none, and hates it. If Texas takes its little friends and leaves for the Pac-10, Missouri and Nebraska have their tickets cemented to the Big Ten.

The only real danger to Missouri's ride to the Big Ten was Texas and aTm going, or Notre Dame going (and them stopping at 12). Neither of those things is an option now.

There's no way Delany sits around while the expansion chips fall and lets the Big Ten get caught reacting.

KChiefs1 06-06-2010 04:55 PM

http://www.freep.com/article/2010060...on-at-meetings

Quote:

PARK RIDGE, Ill. -- The Big <NOBR id=itxt_nobr_0_0 style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 100%; COLOR: darkgreen; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">Tenhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif</NOBR> chancellors and presidents met here at the Big Ten meetings today but did not take a vote on expansion.

Michigan <NOBR id=itxt_nobr_1_0 style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 100%; COLOR: darkgreen; FONT-FAMILY: inherit">Statehttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif</NOBR> president Lou Anna Simon, the chair of the council of presidents and chancellors, said the outside swirl of expansion talk may affect the timeline but that is not a certainty.


"What's obvious in following all of the news you write is that our announcement in December has caused institutions as individual institutions to consider their future and conferences to consider their future," Simon said. "As a result of that that has an impact on our deliberations. That has not had an an impact on the criteria or the deliberatness of the process."


She and Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany pointed out that it could handled in phases, with one or a group added, then one or a group added later, or only one group or still not at all.


They said there have been no applications to this point.


A substantial part of the four-plus hours of meetings were about expansion discussion.


Simon suggested that the academic fit is still very important, maybe moreso than has been portrayed in publicly.


They would not address specific schools despite reports of the <NOBR id=itxt_nobr_7_0 style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 100%; COLOR: darkgreen; FONT-FAMILY: Georgia">Pac-10http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif</NOBR> offering teams, the supposed deadline to two Big 12 schools to stay or leave or even the report about Delany's emails with the Ohio State president regarding Texas.


"Obviously we are moving through a process, we had targeted a timeline as long as 18 months, it's possible that the timeline may be altered, but not the process," Simon said.

Crush 06-06-2010 04:57 PM

Big Ten meets, will likely speed up timetable
 
http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com...timetable.html

Quote:

Big Ten officials all but acknowledged Sunday that they intend to follow a turbo-charged timetable for expansion.

With possible expansion candidates Nebraska and Missouri facing an ultimatum from the Big 12, the Big Ten clearly is ready to stop dawdling and get down to business.

A longer way of saying that came from Michigan State President Lou Anna K. Simon: "Our announcement in December has caused institutions and conferences to consider their futures, and that has had an impact on our deliberations."

Big Ten presidents and chancellors met Sunday in Park Ridge for more than four hours, and at least half that time was spent discussing expansion.

Simon, who chairs the Big Ten Council of Presidents/Chancellors, said that no expansion votes were taken Sunday but that the league's 11 CEOs will not have to be present for a super majority (8 of 11) to approve inviting schools to apply for membership.

"My understanding of Big Ten bylaws," she said, "is that action can be done electronically, telephonically or in person."

Then she turned to commissioner Jim Delany, seated to her left, and added: "My lawyer has concurred."

It would surprise no one if Big Ten expansion is resolved in a matter of weeks, though Delany and Simon declined to discuss the specifics of the timing and which schools could be involved.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802407)
Kind of upsetting to see so many taking joy in the potential of 100 years of local tradition evaporating.

That local tradition began getting nailed as soon as Texas and co. joined our conference (and we promptly dropped all records and etc from our previous conference.

I'd be OK with ku getting a ride to the Big Ten. Too bad kSU is chained around your neck.

As it is, I'm sure you all will do OK in the MWC...

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802407)
Kind of upsetting to see so many taking joy in the potential of 100 years of local tradition evaporating.

The Big XII is a very new conference, and I could give a rat **** about leaving. What I care greatly about is the academic benefit of moving to the Big 10. This trumps everything.

|Zach| 06-06-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802407)
Kind of upsetting to see so many taking joy in the potential of 100 years of local tradition evaporating.

Bawwww

|Zach| 06-06-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6802400)
You gotta see this Mizzou ultimatum countdown sig. Someone needs to make one for Nebraska so we can all put one in our sig.

http://www.tigerboard.com/boards/list.php?board=2

Saw that this morning. Hilarity.

DJ's left nut 06-06-2010 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802423)
The Big XII is a very new conference, and I could give a rat **** about leaving. What I care greatly about is the academic benefit of moving to the Big 10. This trumps everything.

Ignore him.

He wouldn't give a flying **** about '100 years of tradition' if KU wasn't about to get left out in the cold.

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6802420)
That local tradition began getting nailed as soon as Texas and co. joined our conference (and we promptly dropped all records and etc from our previous conference.

I'd be OK with ku getting a ride to the Big Ten. Too bad kSU is chained around your neck.

As it is, I'm sure you all will do OK in the MWC...

I've actually stated in another thread that I'd be fine with KU joining the MWC.

Boise St, TCU, Utah, BYU are all good to great football programs. You'd think that if Boise and KU/KSU join they will surely be elevated to BCS status...

It will just be weird to not play Neb, MU, and OK year in and year out. And for what? Money that none of the fans will ever see? I don't get it.

I still find it hard to believe that Tex would join the Pac-10 btw.

VonneMarie 06-06-2010 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6802428)
Ignore him.

He wouldn't give a flying **** about '100 years of tradition' if KU wasn't about to get left out in the cold.

LOL! That is a good point. How come know one is talking about GayU in all of this. Of course I'd could give two shits about them...

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802423)
The Big XII is a very new conference, and I could give a rat **** about leaving. What I care greatly about is the academic benefit of moving to the Big 10. This trumps everything.

I agree with your thoughts on the "Big 12". I'm referring more to the Big 8. I've grown up having pride in the area schools and MU/Neb attempting to leave feels more like defeat for them than an achievement.

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6802420)
That local tradition began getting nailed as soon as Texas and co. joined our conference (and we promptly dropped all records and etc from our previous conference.

I'd be OK with ku getting a ride to the Big Ten. Too bad kSU is chained around your neck.

As it is, I'm sure you all will do OK in the MWC...

Heh heh. I love the built in KSU excuse. That is hilarious.

"We didn't make it because of you"!

Reaper16 06-06-2010 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802433)
MU/Neb attempting to leave feels more like defeat for them than an achievement.

Because you are stupid.

-King- 06-06-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802433)
I agree with your thoughts on the "Big 12". I'm referring more to the Big 8. I've grown up having pride in the area schools and MU/Neb attempting to leave feels more like defeat for them than an achievement.

ROFL ROFL Mad that no one wants KU?
Posted via Mobile Device

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6802428)
Ignore him.

He wouldn't give a flying **** about '100 years of tradition' if KU wasn't about to get left out in the cold.

What's with you dude? Why the venom?

I have no interest in KU going to the Big 10 and butting heads every week with big time established football programs.

Missouri is going to get their ass kicked in football for the next 20 years. Sorry to break that too you.

You thought the Navy loss was bad?

ROFL

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802433)
I agree with your thoughts on the "Big 12". I'm referring more to the Big 8. I've grown up having pride in the area schools and MU/Neb attempting to leave feels more like defeat for them than an achievement.

Well, then I can promise you that we'll be the happiest "losers" in the country. Mizzou fans and alumni should loath the greatly increased academic affiliation and additional revenue streams going into the university to further improve overall quality.

|Zach| 06-06-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802438)
What's with you dude? Why the venom?

I have no interest in KU going to the Big 10 and butting heads every week with big time established football programs.

Missouri is going to get their ass kicked in football for the next 20 years. Sorry to break that too you.

You thought the Navy loss was bad?

ROFL

Yes. Because Mizzou has really been getting its ass handed to it by Big 10 teams these past few years.

Pablo 06-06-2010 05:10 PM

Goddamn KSU albatross!!!!!!!!

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802438)
What's with you dude? Why the venom?

I have no interest in KU going to the Big 10 and butting heads every week with big time established football programs.

Missouri is going to get their ass kicked in football for the next 20 years. Sorry to break that too you.

You thought the Navy loss was bad?

ROFL

And after the call...he's holding nothing but an eight high.

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:13 PM

The Rime of the Ancient Wildcat.

Sam Hall 06-06-2010 05:13 PM

I love tradition. Imagine how jacked up I will be to see Nebraska play Ohio State and Michigan.

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6802442)
Yes. Because Mizzou has really been getting its ass handed to it by Big 10 teams these past few years.

yes you've been beating Illinois. Congrats. They are the creme de la creme of the Big 10.

Pablo 06-06-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6802442)
Yes. Because Mizzou has really been getting its ass handed to it by Big 10 teams these past few years.

mu should fare pretty decently; but you're essentially swapping UT and OU for OSU and Michigan. The results should be similar.

DJ's left nut 06-06-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802438)
What's with you dude? Why the venom?

I have no interest in KU going to the Big 10 and butting heads every week with big time established football programs.

Missouri is going to get their ass kicked in football for the next 20 years. Sorry to break that too you.

You thought the Navy loss was bad?

ROFL

Somebody explain this to me.

Look at Kansas City and St. Louis. These areas are loaded with athletes. MU hasn't been a national power because they've simply never tried. For years MU has been content with cruising along and getting wins where they can.

Now with the additional money that the Big 10 would bring them, MU is poised to take a major step forward in terms of prestige and, more importantly, commitment.

Tell me how the hell MU, the only major school in a fairly large state, is going to be a doormat for Purdue. Or Michigan State. Hell, we thump Illinois every year already. Why can't MU take a major step forward and run with the big dogs in the Big 10?

The logistics are there, the potential is there.

There's a shitload to be excited about in Tiger nation right now. You ask why the venom? Because I've got a bunch of damn Beakers right now trying to piss in my cornflakes instead of facing reality. Alden and Deaton outmaneuvered the shit out of Perkins, etc... and now is a great time to be a Tiger on account of it.

This would be huge, HUGE for not only a school that I attended, but for the community in which I reside.

You'll have to excuse me if I have little patience for all the deluded Beakers that want to come in here and obfuscate in order to make themselves feel better about being a red-headed stepchild.

kcpasco 06-06-2010 05:15 PM

KU is gonna get what they deserve

|Zach| 06-06-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802452)
yes you've been beating Illinois. Congrats. They are the creme de la creme of the Big 10.

Whoa. Strawman.

What teams would prevent MU from being at least middle of the pack.

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802440)
Well, then I can promise you that we'll be the happiest "losers" in the country. Mizzou fans and alumni should loath the greatly increased academic affiliation and additional revenue streams going into the university to further improve overall quality.

Great, maybe it will help you add to that one track national title you have.

Good luck!

Pants 06-06-2010 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6802420)
That local tradition began getting nailed as soon as Texas and co. joined our conference (and we promptly dropped all records and etc from our previous conference.

I'd be OK with ku getting a ride to the Big Ten. Too bad kSU is chained around your neck.

As it is, I'm sure you all will do OK in the MWC...

I don't think KSU has anything to do with KU not being invited to the B10. It's just that we don't have anything to offer in terms of big markets for the BTN. I mean, I don't have any facts, that's just what I understand from reading all the articles.

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 6802456)
KU is gonna get what they deserve

More Championships?

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802449)
The Rime of the Ancient Wildcat.


LMAO

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802459)
Great, maybe it will help you add to that one track national title you have.

Good luck!

http://www.thewambulance.com/

KcMizzou 06-06-2010 05:18 PM

Somebody's bitter.

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6802454)
Somebody explain this to me.

Look at Kansas City and St. Louis. These areas are loaded with athletes. MU hasn't been a national power because they've simply never tried. For years MU has been content with cruising along and getting wins where they can.

Now with the additional money that the Big 10 would bring them, MU is poised to take a major step forward in terms of prestige and, more importantly, commitment.

Tell me how the hell MU, the only major school in a fairly large state, is going to be a doormat for Purdue. Or Michigan State. Hell, we thump Illinois every year already. Why can't MU take a major step forward and run with the big dogs in the Big 10?

The logistics are there, the potential is there.

There's a shitload to be excited about in Tiger nation right now. You ask why the venom? Because I've got a bunch of damn Beakers right now trying to piss in my cornflakes instead of facing reality. Alden and Deaton outmaneuvered the shit out of Perkins, etc... and now is a great time to be a Tiger on account of it.

This would be huge, HUGE for not only a school that I attended, but for the community in which I reside.

You'll have to excuse me if I have little patience for all the deluded Beakers that want to come in here and obfuscate in order to make themselves feel better about being a red-headed stepchild.


I just don't get why you're angry. Enjoy it.

I hope you do well, believe me. I have a ton of MU friends and having never won anything they are sick and tired of it.

Remember you're getting Notre Dame in there too. It's gonna be big time schools bashing heads every weekend.

I think a reason for some of these delays is that some of these big schools might not be too thrilled about having to play super bowl level games every week. Sometimes you need to cruise with some smaller outfits.

beer bacon 06-06-2010 05:21 PM

Notre Dame has averaged seven wins a season over the last 15 years. Scary.

Mr. Laz 06-06-2010 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6802415)
There's no danger in calling the bluff...

of course you see no risk, you're a MU homer who thinks the whole world revolves around Columbia

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6802460)
I don't think KSU has anything to do with KU not being invited to the B10. It's just that we don't have anything to offer in terms of big markets for the BTN. I mean, I don't have any facts, that's just what I understand from reading all the articles.

I don't think KU would fair well AT ALL in football in the Big 10. The chance for success lies here in the Big 12 or MWC.

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:23 PM

Don't forget the national football powers of Syracuse, Rutgers, Indiana, ****ing Northwestern111, Purdue...

The list goes on and on and on. Clearly, Mizzou would be in deep shit.

Mr. Laz 06-06-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6802454)
MU hasn't been a national power because they've simply never tried.

ya, that's it.


ROFL


i think DJ's right nut also contained the brain.

Sam Hall 06-06-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802474)
Don't forget the national football powers of Syracuse, Rutgers, Indiana, ****ing Northwestern111, Purdue...

The list goes on and on and on. Clearly, Mizzou would be in deep shit.

Hey, Len Dawson and Drew Brees went to Purdue:D

Bearcat 06-06-2010 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6802465)
Somebody's bitter.

I think it's a pretty natural reaction in this case... it's not like Mizzou would get an invite based on anything they control. They would get an invite because of the potential value of St. Louis and maybe Kansas City to the Big Ten Network. I think they would do fine in football and pretty well in basketball, and it would be good for the school as well. So yeah, being the one left out of that talk sucks. As far as the sports are concerned, I wouldn't want to watch the Big 10, but I sure as hell don't want KU winding up in the MVC, and the MWC would suck for basketball.

Eh, until something actually happens, it's all pointless speculation... I'm glad it's finally picking up steam though.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-06-2010 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6802477)
Hey, Len Dawson and Drew Brees went to Purdue:D

Don't forget Pollard! :)

Pants 06-06-2010 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802473)
I don't think KU would fair well AT ALL in football in the Big 10. The chance for success lies here in the Big 12 or MWC.

Meh, B10 is weaker at the top than the B12. OSU isn't as good as Texas or OU and the rest of the teams are pretty much on par with what we face in B12 every year.

It's kind of a shame to see B12 disintegrate right as we were becoming pretty much one of the two best conferences in the country if you take all the 3 major sports into account. SEC being the the other one, of course. I don't blame MU and NU for leaving one bit. Not to go to the B10 would be sheer ****ing lunacy.

Anyway, our BB seasons are going to get pretty boring once we start dominating the MWC should we join them. They better start scheduling some big time non-con games.

KcMizzou 06-06-2010 05:44 PM

This move by the Pac 10 to go to 16 helps the MU/Nebraska to the Big 10 thing, I think. It pretty much rules out the idea of the Big 10 only adding ND, because if there are going to be four sixteen team "super conferences"... The Big 10 will damn sure want to be one of them.

Things are moving along quickly now, and nobody wants to be left in the lurch. Hence the Big 10 "fast tracking".

So in a way, Texas' little ultimatum makes things easier, I guess.

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802452)
yes you've been beating Illinois. Congrats. They are the creme de la creme of the Big 10.

Interesting that you would denigrate Illinois. They played in a BCS bowl the same year as KU.

vailpass 06-06-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrebMaxx (Post 6801869)
I just saw it on ESPNEWS. Said the Big 10 has invited NU and MU. Although I don't think it would happen, I wouldn't mind seeing the Big 10 ask KU, KSU and ISU to join the Big 10 too. That would give them a 16 team conference.

Those 3 schools bring absolutely NOTHING to the table for the Big 10.Nothing.

Saul Good 06-06-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6802518)
Interesting that you would denigrate Illinois. They played in a BCS bowl the same year as KU.

Missouri played 4 games against teams that played in BCS games that year.

Saul Good 06-06-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802525)
Those 3 schools bring absolutely NOTHING to the table for the Big 10.Nothing.

Yes they do. Pilgrim shoes. Big, yellow pilgrim shoes with red buckles.

DeezNutz 06-06-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6802518)
Interesting that you would denigrate Illinois. They played in a BCS bowl the same year as KU.

Yet more evidence of Wildcat oppression.

KcMizzou 06-06-2010 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6802527)
Yes they do. Pilgrim shoes. Big, yellow pilgrim shoes with red buckles.

LMAO

kstater 06-06-2010 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6802526)
Missouri played 4 games against teams that played in BCS games that year.

I didn't attend no fancy academic school, but, who was the 4th team?

|Zach| 06-06-2010 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6802527)
Yes they do. Pilgrim shoes. Big, yellow pilgrim shoes with red buckles.

:clap:

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6802526)
Missouri played 4 games against teams that played in BCS games that year.

Felt kinda bad to feel unwanted huh?

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6802531)
Yet more evidence of Wildcat oppression.

I admit, it was venom.

kstater 06-06-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6802536)
I didn't attend no fancy academic school, but, who was the 4th team?

Hey, got my years mixed up. That was the year they lost to OU twice

Bambi 06-06-2010 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6802518)
Interesting that you would denigrate Illinois. They played in a BCS bowl the same year as KU.

Yeah, they got destroyed.

Unlike the KU team which won their BCS Bowl.

too easy sometimes...

Crush 06-06-2010 06:00 PM

Texas is already whining that Baylor should be invited, instead of Colorado.

vailpass 06-06-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 6802527)
Yes they do. Pilgrim shoes. Big, yellow pilgrim shoes with red buckles.

:D

kstater 06-06-2010 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crush (Post 6802549)
Texas is already whining that Baylor should be invited, instead of Colorado.

Posturing. All of this is.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2010 06:01 PM

How is Missouri going to get its ass kicked in the Big Ten in football?

Who has been consistently better over the past 10 years, Texas and Oklahoma or oSu and Michigan? That's an easy call. I'll take the trio at the top over the duo that runs the Big 12 any day.

Missouri would have played for a national title in 2007 if it was in the Big Ten.

Missouri will slide right into the second tier of programs in the Big Ten, right along with Iowa and Wisconsin (and likely Nebraska for at least a few more years).

The Tigers will have more success in St. Louis. And I like their chances recruiting against MWC programs in KC...

Missouri football is going to be on TV more (especially in state). It is going to earn much more money from the conference. And it will have better footprint in other areas (Ohio, Michigan, even Florida, which has a strong Big Ten presence).

That adds up to a potential improvement.

Frazod 06-06-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802546)
Yeah, they got destroyed.

Unlike the KU team which won their BCS Bowl.

too easy sometimes...

They played a real team you ****ing dumbass. LMAO

kcpasco 06-06-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802546)
Yeah, they got destroyed.

Unlike the KU team which won their BCS Bowl.

too easy sometimes...

And this is why I said KU is gonna get screwed and left with a crappy conference.

Everyone knows you Orange bowl invite was the shady college football deal of the decade.

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802546)
Yeah, they got destroyed.

Unlike the KU team which won their BCS Bowl.

too easy sometimes...

Yea, it's a shame KU wasn't picked to play USC.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2010 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802546)
Yeah, they got destroyed.

Unlike the KU team which won their BCS Bowl.

too easy sometimes...

Unlike ku, Illinois played a team that deserved BCS status (USC), and yes, the Illini got destroyed.

Illinois also didn't have 17 points handed to it on a platter...

BUt yes, they were the same thing.

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6802557)
They played a real team you ****ing dumbass. LMAO

More venom. And what's with the name calling? They don't do that in New York from what I hear.

Kansas/Missouri - "You ****ing douche"!

New York - "Hey, youse fine gentleman"!!

Frazod 06-06-2010 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6802563)
Unlike ku, Illinois played a team that deserved BCS status (USC), and yes, the Illini got destroyed.

Illinois also didn't have 17 points handed to it on a platter...

BUt yes, they were the same thing.

Also unlike the KUnts, Illinois actually beat a good team during the regular season, too (Ohio State).

WilliamTheIrish 06-06-2010 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6802559)
Yea, it's a shame KU wasn't picked to play USC.

EDIT:

It's a shame Lew didn't lobby to play USC.

Frazod 06-06-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6802566)
More venom. And what's with the name calling? They don't do that in New York from what I hear.

Kansas/Missouri - "You ****ing douche"!

New York - "Hey, youse fine gentleman"!!

Mother Theresa would cuss this fool out. :D

Bambi 06-06-2010 06:07 PM

lol, night guys

Been fun!

http://johngibbonscomedy.com/images/KUncaa2008.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.