I don’t think they’ll have to.

It sounds like the Vikings are actively seeking out a trade, and combined with his injuries the last couple of years, I think they can get it done with day 2 picks.

They’re supposedly trying to trade him before Sunday when his bonus kicks in, so I would imagine we should find out soon.

Yeah....yesterday.

Twitter said 11 mins ago LMAO

I think this as well. It was suggested over on ChiefsWire that we trade our 30th for Hunter and their 46th pick. Would you do that? I think I would.

I've seen conflicting reports on how his bonus works with the trade. I've seen reports that we don't take it, that we take a portion of it and some that say we take all of it.

Fits the Veach profile for Defensive End which is mediocre

Probably became official 11 minutes ago.

Yes, I would be fine with that.

It’s essentially a trade back, so you aren’t giving 1st round value away.

A healthy Danielle Hunter is mediocre?

First you said the Chiefs didn’t have a good offseason last year, now this?

Are you going full reerun today for maximum attention?

Essentially OBJ 2.0.

Yea, exactly.

Sort of.

OBJ was 25 and healthy.
Hunter is 27-28 and coming off of two injuries.

To me...I'm not taking that trade back unless we're getting another pick back from them and he isn't going to demand a new contract day one like Clark did.

I didn't say the Chiefs didn't have a good off season last year I said the roster construction is poor because it's too top heavy. Danielle Hunter has not been good since his neck surgery. First you wanted the guy with the bad back now the guy with the bad neck.

We’d have to give him one.

We can’t absorb that $18 million bonus.

I think he’s getting cut before the 8p deadline.

If 46 gets them somebody like Williams, Ebiketie, or Mafe, I’d consider that a huge win.

Hunter and one of those guys would be fantastic.

Then get your starting corner, RT, DT, or a WR at 62.